The "Akha" Top-Lit Updraft (TLUD) Gasifier Cookstove

A TLUD is a simple gasifier that is composed of a vertical tube that is filled with small pieces of wood, or densified biomass like pellets, balls or small briquettes. This is called a 'fuel bed.' It is ignited at the top, and underfed with primary air from a grate at the bottom. The ignition front travels down through the fuel by radiating heat into the raw fuel, drying it, and initiating pyrolysis. Released volatiles are ignited by the flame. The reaction is sometimes called a “migratory flaming pyrolytic front” (MFPF). Residual char is left on top of the fuel bed as the MFPF moves down.   

 

The burning volatiles create an orange gas flame for cooking.  Once pyrolysis is completed, the orange flame goes out, and the left-over char is colleded and smothered, or quenched with water.

 

We needed the "Akha," a culturally-appropriate TLUD for Bangladesh.  It had to be made locally, study, and made with with as little (imported) metal as possible.  Because of its heavy construction, it has a hinged grate for removing the char.  To protect the Akha for free use, an there is an open-access patent.  The current version of the Akha is a prototype being evaluated for acceptance, and obvious improvements can be made.

For the Akha to be successful, it has to:

  1. have very low emissions of smoke
  2. be easy to operate and burn reliably without going out
  3. make char for use as biochar or as charcoal.
  4. burn less fuel than a traditional stove (even when the char is unburned)

Making char may be the critical enabling feature for Akha acceptance.

 

 

The main lesson learned was that the Akha was well accepted by the women who were well trained in its use.  We already knew the main limitations of a TLUD:

  1. It does not burn loose biomass, so traditional stoves will be saved for that purpose.
  2. It takes time to size woody fuel into small pieces, however, producing fuel for TLUDs may become some's livilhood.
  3. It does not burn wet fuel.
  4. It is batch-loaded with fuel rather than continuously stoked, to for long cooking times it will have to br reloaded.
  5. Women have to the trained on how to prepare fuel, and operate a TLUD.

 

Community development (Environmental awareness, volunteer opportunities, and skill trainings)

Environmental education: raised environmental awareness among community members and helped them better understand the balance between ecology and development through environmental education workshops.

 

Volunteer opportunities: the promotion of dry farming has led thousands of farmers in the surrounding communities to participate in the project, to be engaged throughout the process of trial planting, adaptation & adjustment as seen fit, and harvesting. They did not need to test out the effects in their own fields.

 

Skill trainings: improved the ability of the community to apply new technologies and new models to farming and herding methods. Assisted the community to set up new cooperatives.

  • The local village council provided strong support that enabled local farmers to attend the workshop and training sessions.
  • Workshops and trainings taking place in their villages and at times that were convenient for the whole family, made it possible for more farmers to attend, without having to travel far.
  • The poverty elimination campaign from the government helped raise the awareness of the community that skills training would lead to better income – and therefore more willing to learn.

Ecological restoration effort only can be maintained if the local communities understand the relationship between good ecology and their daily life, particularly when daily production includes land management through farming and herding. Improving the community’s environmental awareness and building skills around sustainable farming, while respecting their culture and valuing their knowledge in the field, made it possible for people and nature to prosper together

Sustainable land management (Accessible, technology-driven decision-making tools; Sustainable grazing management in degraded grasslands; sustainable “dry farming” agriculture management suitable for arid and semi-arid areas)

Cooperating with Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, the project implemented "smart grassland management” on 200 hectares (3000 mu) of grassland in Helinge’er county, in combination with vegetation growth monitoring and use of meteorological data to determine the right time to start spring grazing. Herder were able to dynamically determine grazing time and intensity, as well as tailor the grazing plan with balanced grass and livestock. After 3 years of pilot work, the project has spearheaded the model of "grazing in warm seasons and feeding in cold seasons", suitable for the local area and other sites with similar conditions in the grassland of northern China.

 

The project helped the local farmers cope better with the accelerating water shortage, exacerbated by a changing climate. The farmers were embracing, the integrated technologies and practices of high-yield dry-farming, ecological dry-farming and soil testing formula fertilization, selected drought-resistant crop varieties, enhanced film mulching, and innovative irrigation to make full use natural precipitation. The approach—combining accessible data tools and new land management practices—has led to multiple benefits of water and fertilizer efficiency, and increased production and income.

  • Collaboration with Inner Mongolia Agricultural University and local communities enabled our approaches grounded to the local needs and conditions.
  • Wide use of smartphones in the rural area make the Smart Grasslands app easily accessible.
  • Active engagement with the supportive farmers who then play the role of ambassadors to champion the method.

We were able to develop a close collaboration with the local communities by taking time to understand what challenges they were experiencing with existing techniques for farming and herding. We targeted community members who expressed dissatisfaction with the status quo and who hoped to change the production methods. Through this collaboration, and by explicitly valuing the local community’s traditional knowledge, our new scientific sustainable management methods were more suitable to the area and more likely to be adopted at scale. For example: detecting the feeding time (cold seasons) which suits their traditional practice, selecting drought-resistant crop varieties by learning what crops were no longer planted because of water shortage. 

Ecological Restoration (Nature-based solutions that both restore ecosystems and also sequester carbon, e.g. "trees, shrubs and grass" approach)

In order to restore the degraded land, to increase the vegetation coverage and biodiversity, and to recover the ecosystem functions of windbreak and sand-fixation, the project employs the tertiary structure of "trees, shrubs and grass." Native species of trees, shrubs, and grass were selected for maximum ecological service function, including carbon sequestration and habitat potential. Since 2010, we have restored a priority area of 2,585 hectares of degraded land, as identified by the Helinge’er County Ecological Restoration Plan. Restoration activities included planting nearly 3 million trees that is estimated to capture more than 160,000 tons of CO2 over the next 30 years.

 

Aiming at gully areas with serious water and soil erosion, the project incorporated engineering and biological approaches, introduced new technologies such as a "biological blanket"(It is a high strength ecological slope protection tool made of a variety of naturally degradable materials. Biological blanket helps reduce soil erosion on the slope) and successfully restored nearly 600 hectare (9,000 mu) of soil and water loss areas in 14 gullies.

  • Buy-in and agreement from all parties – the Inner Mongolia Forestry Bureau, the local community, TNC scientists, and funders – enabled effective collaboration over a decade to implement restoration activities
  • Partnerships with the implementing company to make sure the restoration process took in place  as planned.
  • Through philanthropic support, TNC had funds to hire temporary and seasonal workers to implement restoration work and provide much needed additional income for the population which was living at or near the poverty line.

Through simulation and calculation, the most important areas that could guarantee restored ecological service function were selected under the principle of as small an area as possible and as low maintenance costs as possible.  Cost is one of the major barriers to ecological restoration and can prevent local communities from participating. During implementing, the method is constantly adjusted according to the actual situation and in order to reduce the cost (labor, transportation, etc.) and improve efficiency. When the economic cost is smaller, the method became more scalable/adoptable by others. 

Transboundary biodiversity conservation and its governance

The environment is a continuum that is not bound by political-administrative boundaries. Unilateral measures that a country can take to protect a shared resource are generally ineffective and the unregulated use of the resource usually ends in its overexploitation and destruction.

Based on this, biodiversity conservation in areas of high ecological value in border areas should be done on the basis of cooperation and understanding between countries. However, these areas, far from the centers of decision making, are often not a priority for foreign ministries.

In these cases, civil society organizations play an important role, since they can move and articulate with a freedom that governments at different levels do not have.

To be effective, the governance of transboundary protected areas, such as the Tri-national Biological Corridor, requires the involvement of all stakeholders: local, regional and national authorities, entrepreneurs and organized civil society.

As is the case at the local level, civil society organizations have a continuity over time that political actors do not have.

Moreover, they are not bound by protocol and hierarchy and can communicate directly among themselves and with whomever.

Also, as at the local level, NGOs can focus on environmental issues, unlike the political power, which must deal with a wide range of issues.

Coordination between NGOs in neighboring countries can be easily accomplished. However, sometimes internal issues in one of the countries, such as an organization's relationship with the authorities in office, slow down or paralyze a cross-border project, or even the opposite.

The addition of NGOs from neighboring countries makes governments pay more attention to the projects in question.

Providing Emergency Aid to Health Centres

The second wave of COVID-19 in April, 2021 left India in deep distress, with rural and remote communities affected severely. These areas have a huge shortage of essential supplies and medicines, with primary health centre (PHC) workers being short staffed and overworked. Due to CWS’ strong on-ground presence and the implementation of Wild Surakshe workshops in rural Karnataka and Goa, we were able to directly observe the devastating impacts of COVID-19 on people in rural India.

 

The Wild Surakshe program has enabled us to build a network of several hundred people to act on the ground. Thus, our local field staff are well-equipped to provide support and help curtail the rapid spread of COVID-19 and similar zoonotic diseases in these areas.

 

We are currently using our resources to support over 500 PHCs across Karnataka and Goa by procuring COVID-19 essentials like face shields, PPE kits, oximeters, thermal scanners, gloves, masks, and medicines. Our field staff are also closely monitoring the state of these PHCs to offer any additional immediate assistance they need. By providing such immediate assistance during emergencies in our project areas, we want to ensure people are getting help when they really need it, and strengthen our ties to local communities and stakeholders.  

 

1. We speak to medical staff and community workers to identify rural PHCs in remote areas without access to COVID-19 relief materials and take note of their patient loads and requirements.

2. We raise funding, source materials and provide medical resources requested by them such as oxygen concentrators, pulse oximeters, BP Monitors, IR thermometers, etc.

3. Our pre-existing relationships with PHCs through Wild Surakshe and other CWS programs help us understand local challenges and effectively meet their requirements.

 

 

1. Communities in these remote areas were hit hard by the second wave of COVID-19 in India, and need urgent ongoing support and relief to manage this and future outbreaks.

2. Doctors from primary health centres in these areas have a very strong network. By tapping into this network and forging a long-term relationship with doctors, we can understand local conditions and health requirements better for future interventions and continued support.

Stakeholder Engagement

Key stakeholders such as Department of Wildlife Conservation, Divisional Secretariat & District Secretariats, Ministry of Environment, UNDP, Ocean Resources Conservation Association, University of Wayamba, IUCN, Sri Lanka Navy, Coastal Conservation Department, National Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency were involved in this project. Together the technical knowledge and experience of experts in the field, demarcation of the Bar Reef, designing of buoys, buoy deployment and allied activities were implemented.

 

While above named institutions provided the neccessary technical expertise, training and awareness and input for monitoring and evaluation, key local community members, such as members of the 'Tour Boat Society' (a society which was established for tour guides in the area), were also given the opportunity to participate in the demarcation activities to identify the GPS locations of the areas to be protected at Bar reef with the participation of specialists and other stakeholders. An identified team of locals, such as tour boat operators/guides were also involved as local volunteers to assist in monitoring and maintenance of the buoys and the protected zone.

  • Since the community involved were heavily dependent on promoting tourism in Bar Reef, and in order to encourage flow of tourists to the Bar Reef, they were motivated to participate in conservation activities. 
  • District/Divisional Secretariats and DWC were capacitated on the true gound level situation and importance of Bar Reef conservation and its biological value for the both the community and environment.
  • Participatory approach to project design & implementation and mobilization of national, regional & local level champions.

During the course of implementation of conservation activities, it was identified that inclusive community engagement, mobilization and transparancy is much needed. Since this was a transitional community who, depending on the season, engaged in both tourism and fishing activities simultaneously. it was difficult to find a fully focused and committed community to actively participate for conservation activities throughout the year. Further, it was noticed that with changing economic conditions, Easter Sunday attack, COVID-19 sitution and fall of tourism, community was rather less driven to participate in Bar Reef conservation.

 

In conclusion, with capacity building and awareness raising, active, voluntary engagement in buoy redeployment after off-season, periodic progress monitoring and recording of the changes of the reef and increased community awareness on natural heatwaves, anthropogenic activities that adversely affect the ecosystem, led to motivation and dedication of community to conserve the Bar Reef and ensure sustainability.

Conducting Workshops in Villages Near Protected Areas

Workshops are conducted in vulnerable villages focusing on public health and safety by trained CWS staff. Participants usually consist of families, frontline workers, government staff, and members of other non-profit and self-help groups. The workshops are conducted using illustrations, videos, and demonstrations. Each workshop has five sessions. The first session titled “ Our Wildlife'' introduces the participants to various wildlife species found in their landscape and their significance. The second session, “Preventing Injuries due to wildlife” teaches the participants how to coexist with wildlife and the do’s and don’ts of wildlife encounters. The third session titled “Responding to Wildlife Encounters” takes participants through the steps one can follow if a conflict incident such as livestock loss or injury takes place. The fourth session “Zoonotic Diseases'' shares important information on seven relevant zoonotic diseases - COVID-19, Nipah, Scrub Typhus, Kyasanur Forest Disease, etc. The fifth and final session “Basic First Aid'' teaches participants various basic first aid techniques through demonstrations. After each workshop, we also distribute safety guidelines and emergency contact information. To obtain feedback and evaluate effectiveness, we conduct pre and post surveys before and after each workshop.

 

1. We ensure workshops are interactive with questions/ discussions/ local examples. 

2. We encourage participation of representatives from all relevant sectors (health/forest/administration/self-help groups/panchayats etc.)  

3. We use videos and demonstrations for better visualization of concepts.

4. While concluding workshops, we ask for feedback and try to apply it in following workshops.

5. We provide handouts with summarized information.

 

After conducting several workshops we have learned the following:

1.  Most of the participants are busy and travel from far locations. We ensure we know about time constraints at the start of each workshop so that participants can be present for the entire duration.

2. Breaks between sessions are important for participants to discuss and absorb information. 

3. We encourage local leaders to help us identify the people we can invite, which enables better discussions during the workshop. 

 

The participation of civil society in co-management

Civil society acts as the driving force and articulator of the biodiversity conservation and nature tourism development proposal.

On the other hand, participation and co-management ensure a broad base of society to implement the proposal.

Local NGOs know the reality and problems of the area and are in horizontal contact with the inhabitants. In addition to identifying the problems, they can and should contribute to their solution.

In general, civil society maintains continuity of proposals over time, while political actors alternate due to electoral changes.

On the other hand, civil society maintains its focus and centers its interest on the project, while the authorities must attend to a number of issues that dilute their attention.

Notwithstanding the above, CSOs can make contributions in cultural, artistic and sports issues.

At the beginning, the loss of power implicit in co-management generated some discomfort among political actors. It is difficult to accept the interference of third parties who are not elected by popular vote.

It was also difficult for the representatives of civil society to determine exactly the limits of their powers and not to exceed them.

Pluralism and non-partisan group action, even if each individual maintains his or her own preferences and political activities, has served to reduce the fears of political actors and to gain their respect and that of the community.

Planetary Health

Planetary health examines the ways in which human health is impacted by human-caused disruptions to the Earth’s natural systems. Within that definition is a feedback loop. Anthropogenic environmental changes affect the health of people. At the same time, the way people interact with the natural environment is influenced by their physical, social, and mental well-being and their economic security. This loop reiterates the interconnectedness of human health and environmental systems. It introduces the possibility of designing win-win planetary health solutions that recognize that a change in one system can trigger positive shifts within another. Ecological levers for public health are interventions in the ecosystem or conservation space that have positive outcomes for human health.

ASRI’s planetary health intervention was done by creating a dual conservation-health program that is able to improve human health and reduce deforestation of rainforests.

Intensifying community-designed planetary health interventions during the Covid-19 pandemic has enhanced community resilience and prepared people for the future shocks of climate change. We have not just focused on an emergency infectious disease response for communities, but have also invested in a stimulus package for the rainforests to ensure tandem wellbeing and resilience. Increasing food security will have both environmental and human health impacts. Reforestation will decrease zoonotic transfer of diseases and improve ecosystem integrity, which will support human health.