Coordination: Capacity development and governance

This building block´s approach is reflected in various activities ranging from training measures, spaces for exchange and dialogue between stakeholders and between institutions as well as support in the development of agreements. One example is the agreement between the Ministry of Environment, the protected area management unit and the university with regard to participatory monitoring and evaluation of nurseries and restoration trials. Strengthening of the protected area management committee is another key measure that aims to improve the area's governance.

In addition, the appropriation and integration of the national climate change policy in meso-level actions, such as the development of climate change plans, the implementation of adaptation measures in productive sectors and in the management of ecosystems, are reflected.

  • Will and trust among stakeholders to cooperate and share responsibilities.

  • Articulation and implementation of public climate policy at the local level.

  • Broad and participatory dialogue spaces are key to achieving lasting agreements with local populations and actors, when there is a real participation in decision-making (MAE and GIZ 2016).
  • The establishment of local governance spaces (e.g. protected area management committee) facilitates the design, implementation and ownership of ecosystem-based adaptation actions.
  • Improved coordination between the different state institutions that have jurisdiction over the area from the areas of their competence will allow a sustainable and integral management of the mangrove protected area located in the urban perimeter (MAE and GIZ 2016).
Research: Theoretical and technical foundations

The activities that form part of this building block aim to improve knowledge about the mangrove ecosystem, the impacts of climate change and the theoretical and technical basis of mangrove restoration. It aims to articulate the compilation of scientific information with local knowledge, transferring the findings into a practical approach.

  • As a preliminary step to the implementation of the measure, the preparation of the climate change plan of the Municipal Government of Esmeraldas was supported.
  • In 2016 a dialogue event was held between experts and technicians from Ecuador and other countries to better understand the impacts of climate change on the mangrove ecosystem and to share experiences and lessons learned on mangrove restoration. This knowledge is used to plan the reproduction of the red mangrove (Rhizophora harrisonii), reforestation in situ and monitoring (see also building block III).
  • An agreement has been established with the Pontificia Universidad Católica (Esmeraldas office) to monitor the efficiency of the trials and generate research on mangrove ecosystems linked to climate change.
  • Political and technical interest of the Municipal Government of Esmeraldas in generating the climate change plan.
  • Predisposition by the academy to collaborate in the implementation of practical research.
  • Interest of different actors in exchanging experiences and lessons learned in mangrove management.
  • Research on climate change, in order to be relevant and applicable to solving problems and challenges of conservation and sustainable management of mangroves, must be planned among all the actors in society (MAE and GIZ 2016).
  • Vulnerability studies should include perceptions of local communities.
  • The dissemination of information should address all political and decision-making levels, communities, public servants and others, using all possible means (not only digital) in a broad and creative way.
  • The development of training processes on climate change should be a line of action for the following years (MAE and GIZ 2016).
Organize Traditional Food Fair

In the project's lifetime, two traditional food fairs were organised at Busia's Agricultural Training Centre. The food fairs increased community participation in managing biodiversity by changing people’s mind-set and attitude towards local foods. During the fairs farmers collected and competed for the most comprehensive display of plant parts, seeds, fruit samples and traditional food items. It was also an occasion for farmers to share biodiversity-related information and associated traditional knowledge as well as planting material and seeds, while it enabled the research team to locating new custodians of biodiversity. It is felt that the fairs have contributed in encouraging consumers, schools, youth, policy-makers and farming communities to make continued use of local crops and varieties, thereby contributing to their conservation.

There is need to identify champions within the community and at the policy level to ensure that the message is adequately transmitted and supported. Organizing a traditional food fair also requires significant organizational skills, and therefore some thought should be given to assignining roles and responsibilities for different parts of the organization.

  • Sufficient funds should be sought, either through direct funding or in-kind (help in organizing the fair), as the events can be a costly affair
  • Advertising - sufficient time should be allocated to widespread advertising prior to the event. Use every mean you can think of to ensure the message is spread. I.e. church groups, radio, sms broadcast, Whattsapp, social media, email
  • Allow some space for competition. In the Busia event, seven farmer groups competed against each other for the best presentation and variety of traditional foods, but were also judged based on hygiene, value addition. Cooking competitions are also a hit and could be a good way of engaging the public
Resiliency

An urban food forest symbolizes the city's ability to be resilient regarding climate change and food security issues. Thus, this system must manifest resiliency in itself, with a minimal vulnerability (to diseases, environmental or governance issues) and a maximal autonomy (energy, nutrients, water resources).

 

The urban food forest relies little on external resources for water and nutrients. Rainwater is collected through a rainwater collection system and then reused to refill the pond, clean the tools, and water the plants. Deadwood, leaves, fruit peelings, or weeds are composted in several compost bins. They will be transformed into very good quality compost and be reused in the forest garden to provide the plants with all the nutrients they need.

 

The food forest is made up of "tree guilds" which includes several layers of vegetation who mutually collaborate and help each other to grow faster and healthier. For example, there will be nectar plants to attract pollinators, associated with nitrogen-fixing plants, ground-cover plants to protect from weeds. Therefore, the urban food forest is resilient to environmental fluctuations and needs minimal human energy to be maintained.

1. Water autonomy thanks to a rainwater collection system.

2. Nutrient autonomy and no waste generated thanks to the compost bins.

3. Make the plants collaborate and help each other through companion planting and tree guilds.

At first, the communities had no idea about how the compost is working or what is companion-planting. That's why we organized "work parties" : to teach them how it works, how to do it and what are the basic principles of natural farming. Now, they are all able to maintain the compost by themselves, choose a good combination of plants, and last but not least, they can, in turn, teach these good practices to visitors or media.

 

A food forest takes time to mature before it can become fully resilient. At the moment, we still rely partially on the municipal water system in both Seattle and Hsinchu because of the insufficiency of rainwater collector volume or precipitation. Volunteers are not yet fully equipped with knowledge to solve technical problems. Once, a break down of the system happened in Hsinchu and water was leaking. None of the volunteers were able to manage this technical problem and we had to call an expert. So we learned that the key to quickly face these kinds of technical problems is to write clearly on site how to react and who to call in a particular situation.

Educational opportunities

Community engagement is very important in order to gather leverage support, grant funding, and general involvement. To ensure continuous involvement of the community/volunteer, providing educational opportunities for personal development is crucial. In our solution, these opportunities include attending educational workshops or work parties at the food forests, taking leadership at a work party, joining the core team to learn and participate in food forest development, planning educational or fundraising events...etc. 

 

Technical knowledge and skills are offered through monthly work parties. People may learn new skills by doing hands-on work, and exchange problems/challenges that they face when implementing skills at home. Some topics we've held include making compost, bee hotels, turning garbage into enzymes, make-your-own toothpaste, and much more.

 

Providing educational opportunities can also help getting involvement from schools and universities. We receive many inquiries from schools for site visits. Teachers and students would come and learn about trends and social activities in the real world and can benefit from the holistic way of learning by balancing the use of head, hand, and heart when working in the food forests. 

1. Create fun and knowledgeable workshops/events that incorporate hands-on activities and reflection.

2. Patience and respect for individual differences: there is no definite answer in a food forest and every person learns and does work differently. Patience and respect are crucial to facilitate a successful educational event.

3. Pro-active outreach can help get the event word out and attract many more participants and even potential educators.

It should be a high priority to establish larger groups that are committed to the project, in order to prevent the project from falling into disarray if the core people are no longer able to participate. Our primary participants are the elderly living next to the site. While they are devoted to taking care of the site, they may not be able to take the lead in organizing educational events or outreach. So we decided to reach out to local schools and organized tree-planting activities in order to attract new volunteers of new ages. The teachers were very happy about these educational opportunities, and the children and their parents continued to visit their trees after the event.

 

Educational events should be fun and applicable in the participants' daily life. At the same time, creating a fun and enjoyable learning group can be as important as coming up with an attractive topic.

 

 

An Open and Participatory Process

Hsinchu Food Forest is a result of an open and participatory process between the municipality and several stakeholders of the city, like local residents, community groups, city agencies, schools, and even those that might not initially like the idea of an urban food forest. In order to assure public participation and support, it is essential to make every step of building the food forest an open and participatory process. We held over 30 hours of talks to educate local and surrounding communities the idea of a food forest, we even invited the co-founders of the Beacon Food Forest to share their experience with the municipal government and communities, which was a big help in getting the official to say yes. We also held a competition to collect people’s idea on the design of the site, and later asked a landscape designer to combine the ideas of the winning groups. We kept a close relationship with the managing official and local communities (and media) to make sure that the stakeholders would be informed of the latest progress of the food forest, and to modify the design in a timely manner when someone came up with concerns that had been neglected, such as people might trip and fall into the pond at night. We added a short hedgerow and lighting to prevent such possibilities.

1. A group with strong incentives to carry out the project that can negotiate with different stakeholders and take the responsibility.

2. An open and positive attitude when facing obstacles and different opinions.

3. Full and clear understanding of the project, potential obstacles and other information by every stakeholder.

4. Support from every stakeholder/community member. This is critical when the project is on public land.

5. Participatory design: the community must be also consulted and engaged in the design of the site.

The support of the landowner, especially when it is the municipal government, is very important in making this project is sustainable, as it helps face many challenges and bring legitimacy to the project. During the process, one will definitely face different opinions or stumble upon behavioral problems, sometimes reasonable and sometimes not. For example, many of the suggestions brought out by the local elders were against the “care for the earth” or “fair share” concept, such as wanting to use pesticides to alleviate pest problems, or keeping people they don’t like from participating in the food forest. While keeping an open and positive attitude and trying to make everyone equal and happy, we found it hard to enforce the code of conduct as we are not officials nor local residents. This is when the municipal government could play their part in coordinating conflicts and making the final judgment. Note that this might not be the case if the project is happening in other cultural settings.

Wellbeing

FPP considers fundamental for the implementation of projects: achieving the basic needs and the improvement of the living conditions of the community, it has the endorsement of it. So it is essential to build bonds of trust with its participants, local authorities and community leaders.

 

The satisfaction of basic is necessary to improve life conditions of families and communities; which creates accurate conditions to self-sufficiency as well the design of local projects that contribute to their development beyond wellbeing.

 

Having these situations will generate projects oriented to the generation of income with local resources that will establish the bases to achieve self-sufficiency and their empowerment. Also, from this process the community will carry out actions for the management of high impact projects with and other instances. After having finalized the knowledge and skills for the design, execution and monitoring of local and regional development plans.

  • Participants with a communitarian vision on long term which permits identify the goals to achieve development.
  • Commitment from participants with the project, the process and the work.
  • Trainings and farming models design according with the region to achieve best yields.
  • Know the ES that each region offers in order to insert it in a value chain which permits better incomes for farmers.
  • People could receive benefits to reach wellbeing, but they have to participate actively and share the compromise to work inside this scheme.
  • We have to identify the options to insert the products in the best market, and that market has to have the same values as farmers.
  • We have to determine with community how far we can go in a period of time with the project, to identify the goals, indicators and impacts of the project.
  • We have to identify secondary products and identify the diversification of the work for non-farmers families.
  • We must include young people and children in the process of identify goals for the community.
Community organization

FPP intervention scheme considers the Community Organization as a fundamental catalyst because through it an active, conscious, inclusive and participative community is created that is committed to solving its problems. FPP focuses on the integration of networks and working groups, linked to the community and participants participation in their locality, in such a way that a dynamic community is achieved that learns to make joint decisions.


We seek to work with self-managed community actors that promote collective interests and raise awareness of the importance of social integration for the resolution of common problems. This allows the appropriation of projects that integrate environmental services conservation and based on social organization.

 

We are working for the consolidation of the community organization with a solid structure, well-defined roles and full participation of women and young people; which have high levels of trust and solidarity as well as promoters of change.

Of that it is possible a resilient community with the capacity of answer to problems or external shocks that, likewise, remain in the search of continuous improvements.

  • Identifying cultural knowledge, values and idiosyncrasy of participants to enhance the impact of the project to achieve common goals.
  • Identifying geographical area, landscape and ecosystem services offered by the region to understand people life and dynamic.
  • Work team from the region whom speak language and share idiosyncrasy to achieve people confidence and participation.
  • Participatory planning to identify their own community, their needs according their environment, social perspective and economic opportunities.
  • Effective communication.
  • People need feel part of the project and to achieve that we have to integrate as much as possible the entire community, even if they are not farmers, but receive benefits of ecosystem and social services offered by farmlands.
  • We need to identify the base line considering environmental and social perception of the entire community, even if they are not active farmers.
  • We need to develop a plan beyond only farming or wellbeing, in which include leadership, entrepreneurship, financial education and business.
  • We need to include young people in order to reach a generational joint.
Sharing knowledge

Identifying and value local knowledge and generating an exchange of it, as well as the transfer of technology appropriate with environment and community needs, which allow people strengthen its skills and abilities in order to carry out local and regional development projects.

This block is based on the recognition of local capacities, abilities, livelihoods and resources, as well as social and cultural resources specific to the community and its environment. As well as through the identification of strengths and weaknesses, it becomes possible to have the necessary information to identify and prioritize common problems.

We have a central catalyst for FPP betting: generate an exchange of knowledge and technology transfer for the environment and the problems detected, which allows the improvement of local production systems and facilitate the development and implementation of community projects. This catalyst make the bases to design projects of wellbeing, conservation agriculture, among others; that this exchange of knowledge and technologies is carried out and can be replicated and implemented in other community projects.

 

  • Local promoters which lead the process of community participation in the project.
  • Participation of families in participatory planning to identify needs and solutions for them community and commitment to work on it.
  • Farmers identifying environmental services offered by their lands.
  • Farmers taking trainings to improves the cultural management of their land, applying knowledge and working seeking to conserve environmental services
  • Networks with different stakeholders to improve farming and market the products.
  • We need to prioritize the ecosystem as the main base of development, in which one is inserted the social organization that strengthen the sustainable use of the environmental services that offer the region and that have a profitable economic activity as consequence.
  • Participants of the projects having the main role in the process, we have to impulse them to participate seeking the way to give them confidence and security to participate, asking and sharing about the topics they want to know.
  • Farmers have local knowledge as important as trainers and other stakeholders; they could strengthen their skills to identify the best practices for them.
  • We have to give them the responsibility of their community, developing skills that permit farmers change the paradigm about farming as pick up harvest, to farming as way of life to drive development.
Co-management of Soariake MPA

Soariake is an IUCN category VI MPA, that aims at protecting natural ecosystems while allowing the sustainable use of natural resources. It is currently co-managed by WCS and local community gathered in Soariake Association.

Local communities are at the same time actors and victims of overfishing.  As MPA co-manager, WCS  is in charge of scientific research and monitoring to assess the value of the site, communicate, raise awareness and support local communities to identify and implement suitable conservation measures, identifying alternatives to better manage natural resources, and identifying key partners if needed. WCS also provides capacity building in terms of project management, social organization and fishing regulation; thus ensuring the integrity of the MPA and the livelihoods of the communities.

WCS also supports the local community to define different zoning of the MPA, local conventions on resource management, ensure patrolling through Community Control and Surveillance, collect  fish catch data, and promote alternatives that are environmental friendly.

Community involvement in the management of the MPA is key to build a local ownership, one pillar to warrant sustainability of on ground activities.

  • Building a long term partnership between WCS and the local community to seek for sustainability: a project approach will raise an opportunistic feelings among local community which does not help achieving conservation and development objectives;

 

  • Maintaining support while ensuring the local community would not become dependent on WCS: capacity building, technical support during the implementation of the activities aim ensuring that in the future local community will be able to implement the activities by themselves;
  • Once the industry is developed in a village and the farmers increase, organizational support is also crucial to help farmers organize production, maintain quality standards, negotiate with the private sector, managing the community equipment, ensuring socio-economic monitoring among farmers, and supporting households in managing their income so as to make sure that the benefit from the aquaculture brings advantages to the family;

 

  • Fighting illiteracy should be part of the activity to consider while promoting co-management so as to facilitate the implementation of regulation, the negotiation with partners, to better involved in rural entrepreneurship