Farmer field schools

As there is no general recipe for SAFS (but principles), we use the experience and vision of local “lighthouse” families in field courses and farmer-to farmer exchanges. Concretely we accompany the restoration of degraded plots, and also the implementation of new ones, with a successional focus and without using fire.
During a 12 months modulized training with 8 modules of one week each, farmers a trained in dynamic agroforestry. 5 modules are centralized where the principles of dynamic agroforestry are taught in theory and practice. Between the centralized modules, the participants are implementing according to their specific farm conditions a dynamic agroforestry plantation on their own farm. ECOTOP trainers monitor and supervise them, visiting each participant on their farm. The implementation, costs, challenges, problems, development and success is recorded by each participant. During the last module as "final test" each participant presents his experiences with his garden and lessons learnt. One concept is to grant local innovative farmers a university title of agricultural technicians, which generates prestige in the communities and helps to interact with policy-makers. Many of such “peritos” have become local leaders and are now in various positions, promoting SAF locally.

 

Rewarded local leaders educated in SAF with a university degree has helped to establish and to develop the vision in various local public and private entities. Especially women have profited increasing their decision-making role in the families, as they were often the first to try SAF with a view to satisfy food security, involving their children in the activities. Often husbands joined later on when seeing benefits in yields and household economy. Crucial of the success is a thorough selection of participants who are committed and open minded.

Those farms that follow the logic of short-term (e.g. food, banana and hibiscus which has a stable market), medium (e.g. fruit trees, coffee, cacao, coca) and long-term (high-value timber) crops have been the most successful. Also, complementing a cash crop (e.g. cacao) with food crops that generates income throughout the year (e.g. banana) has shown to be a successful economic strategy. It is crucial to accompany the process closely from the beginning on. At least 3 on-farm field visits of each farmer with practical instructions is required during the first year. Follow up should be guaranteed during 3 to 5 years. A dynamic and participatory local institutional framework is essential.
-Obstacles are often institutional restrictions or lack of understanding of dynamics of nature, therefore, learning has to be considered as a process in the long term. Another main obstacle is an extractivist logic that has been promoted with the colonization of the Yungas and other tropical areas, an approach where nature and biodiversity are rather seen as threat than as virtue.

Stakeholder participation and partnership

Partnerships and collaboration between different public bodies is necessary for the development and implementation of activities.

Furthermore, public participation is required for the development of a Land Use Plan and is also part of the implementation of green strategies aimed at improving air quality and buffering heat stress. For example, a scheme has been in place since 1992 for Stuttgart residents to  adopt a tree, for which they are also responsible for.

Having a mayor who supports green activities, relevant legislation and strategies, and in-house research facilities can help ensure cross-sectional collaboration.

Partnerships between the City of Stuttgart and the Verband Region Stuttgart (the association of regional cities and municipalities) enabled the creation of the 2008 Climate Atlas.

Furthermore, thanks to close collaboration between the Office for Environmental Protection (analysis of information, provision of recommendations) and the City Planning and Renewal team, the recommended green infrastructure solutions are being implemented through spatial planning and development control.

KLIPPS - Evaluation method for the human-biometeorological quality of urban areas facing summer heat

In addition to improving overall conditions related to increasing temperatures, the city of Stuttgart has designed an innovative project “KlippS – Climate Planning Passport Stuttgart” based on quantitative findings in urban human-biometeorology, for improving human thermal comfort. The KlippS project calculates the human thermal sensation under “warm” category during the daytime in summer. KlippS is divided into two phases: the first phase is concerned with a rapid evaluation of human heat stress for the areas involving “sustainable building land management Stuttgart”, the second focuses on numerical simulations at high-risk urban areas related to heat.
 

KlippS provides the following remarkable issues on a planning-related potential to mitigate local human heat stress:

a) innovative program involving the human-biometeorological concept which represents a new interdisciplinary field

b) various spatial scales including the both regional and local ranges on the basis of the systematical two-phase method

c) quantitative approach to human heat stress by using dominant meteorological variables such as air temperature T, mean radiant temperature MRT and thermophysiologically equivalent temperature PET

As an ongoing project,  the outputs of the KlippS project have been discussed in the internal meetings with the Department of Administration as well as the local council in the city of Stuttgart. On the basis of the meetings, the practical measures are provided for the implementation as soon as possible.

People suffer heat stress through the combination of extreme hot weather on the regional scale and the inner urban complexity on the local scale. In principle, three options exist to mitigate the local impacts of severe heat on citizens:

a) heat warning systems of national weather service

b) adjustment of the individual behavior towards severe heat

c) application of heat-related planning measures

While both a) and b) work on the short term, option c) represents a long-term preventive way. In this perspective, KlippS was designed to develop, apply and validate measures, which contribute to a local reduction of severe heat.

 

The KlippS project was addressed at a lot of meetings and workshops, including at the public workshop “Climate change and Adaptation in Southwest Germany”, attended by 250 participants, on October 17, 2016 in Stuttgart. In addition to the workshops, KlippS was presented at many national and international scientific conferences.

Land Use Plan

A preparatory land use plan (PLUP) was undertaken, which organises land into its building and other types of uses and includes green areas and corridors. This PLUP is not legally binding, but serves as a basis for planning and information.

 

The land use plan developed in 2010 contains essential components for sustainable urban development, envisaging urban development under the slogan "urban─compact─green". Its guideline is for brownfield rather than greenfield development in a 4:1 ratio. It aims to protect green areas and develop a green network through brownfield areas.

Constructive use of existing regulations (e.g. the German Federal Building Law) provides a mandate for the implementation of planning recommendations relating to local climate.

Furthermore, the city has had a climate change mitigation strategy since 1997 and a climate change adaptation strategy was developed in 2012.

Finally having an urban climatology section within the Office for Environmental Protection enabled creation of the necessary data.

 

Having in-house climatic research capacity within a city municipality  is rare but a huge advantage so as to provide concrete knoweldge and solutions, rather than applying general principals when creating a Land Use Plan that can address objectives of climate protection and air quality. Having detailed and concrete data for the city has allowed the engineering through planning and landscaping of an entire system for urban air circulation.

Green spaces and corridors

Topographic structures such as stream and meadow valleys provide natural green belts which at the same time represent preferred pathways for ventilation, while green spaces benefit urban climate and its protection:

 

  • Vegetation exerts a significant stabilizing effect on the CO2 balance, cools the area and improves air quality.
  • Green spaces serve as place-keepers, eliminating other uses which could impact negatively on climate protection due to potential emissions of relevance for the climate, such as roads or buildings.
  • Where lower-level and less dense vegetation exists, green spaces promote ventilation within built-up areas through generation of cold air through thermally induced local wind systems such as ground wind and downslope winds and so act as fresh air corridors. This reduces exposure to pollutants and dissipates the build-up of heat and thermal stress, in particular during periods of extreme heat.
  • Where vegetation is higher and denser, high wind speeds during storms are buffered. Furthermore, woodland plays a major role in terms of protection against soil erosion as a result of heavy rainfall and storms.

 

These green areas are protected and/or created in Stuttgart through the Land Use Plan.

Climatic and air-hygiene maps represent an indispensable technical basis for green corridor planning.

 

Many legal aspects support the preservation and creation of green spaces and corridors, including nature protection regulations and the German Federal building law which was revised in 2004 and now require precautionary environmental protection in urban zoning and planning practices.

Keeping natural green corridors free of encroachment by buildings does not necessitate a great deal of persuasion, given that aspects of landscape and nature conservation also support the urban climatology arguments. This joint argumentation featured predominantly in the debate surrounding conservation of the Greutterwald orchard district (Stuttgart-Weilimdorf).

 

Green corridors and networks are more important for climate objectives than small isolated green spaces, which have only a minimal remote impact in respect of their environment due to the so-called "oasis effect". However, this consideration does not in any way detract from the temperature-sinking importance of all vegetation areas.

Climate Atlas

The climate Atlas for the Stuttgart region was published in 2008 and comprises of standardised climatic assessments for 179 towns and municipalities in the Stuttgart region. It provides relevant information and maps required for urban climatic optimisation, such as regional wind patterns, air pollution concentrations, temperature, etc.

 

A key element of the atlas in terms of EbA planning for airflow and cooling is an area classification based on the role that different locations play in air exchange and cool airflow in the Stuttgart region. This is based on topography, development density and character, and provision of green space. The Atlas distinguishes eight categories of areas in this manner, and for each of them different planning measures and recommendations are provided.

 

Planning recommendations were included in the “Climate Booklet for Urban Development Online – Städtebauliche Klimafibel Online".

The Atlas was based on the previous work in this area carried out by the City of Stuttgart since the 1980s and the in-house urban climatology department (in existence in the City of Stuttgart since 1938). Indeed a climate Atlas had been published in 1992, upon which the current Atlas was extended.

Maps are important tools for planning and for communicating information to relevant stakeholders. They are necessary for attaining climatic and air quality goals.

 

The study provides important insights that can be used for climate protection and the recommendations include a focus on the transformation of green space and vegetation into the built city and the preservation and restoration of natural vegetation, including ensuring green corridors.  

Capacity building for improved coastal management

Capacity building activities included:

  • Awareness raising
  • Trainings and workshops
  • Hands-on learning activities at the field sites
  • Supporting improved municipal coordination
  • field visits and study tours with government and other partners

 

 The project focused on re-enforcing the capacities of actors on the ground (local community-based organizations as well as capacities of the Municipal Government), to implement ecosystem-based interventions and therefore much was "learning-by-doing".

 

The project also aimed to strengthen coastal governance at the municipal level and capacity for sustainable coastal zone management through the creation of a Municipal Coordination Roundtable, trainings and support.

 

At the national level capacity building efforts were directed at raising national awareness of the importance of the ridge-to-reef approach to disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation and need for sustainable coastal zone management.

Working with community-based organizations cements on the ground training in these practical field interventions and their maintenance.

 

Furthermore, having field activities serve as an entry point to promote ecosystem-based activities within the framework coastal governance at the national level and raise national awareness of coastal and marine issues.

The limited technical capacities and resources at the municipal level was a challenge. Introducing participatory dialogue through the Municipal Coordination Roundtable, was helpful, especially for civil society organizations, which gained a more direct access and involvement in municipal planning and decision-making. It also enabled the Municipal Government to take on a more visible role in coastal zone management. However, absences and turnovers in Municipal Government also made it difficult to anchor training efforts and build long-lasting capacity within local government institutions. One lesson learned from the project was to work closely with the more permanent, technical Municipal Government staff and strengthen their capacities and ownership of the project. In addition, UNEP built partnerships and agreements with different Government entities to manage local political instability and lack of continuity.

Ridge to Reef Approach

The ridge to reef approach aims to provide a holistic intervention for protecting the coastal area by targeting environmental degradation in the uplands ("ridge") that impact coastal ecosystems through sedimentation, by restoring the shoreline and protecting marine ecosystems ("reef"), thereby mitigating storm surges, coastal and inland flooding and reduce people’s exposure and vulnerability to these hazards. At the same time, aiming to provide direct livelihood benefits to targeted households and stakeholders in the project.

 

  • Uplands: Reduce erosion in upland areas through
    • improved soil management of 6.5 ha of sustainable vetiver production, which also increases economic benefits.
    • establishment of tree nurseries with a capacity of 137,000 seedlings of coastal, forestry and fruit trees;
    • 25,380 trees planted on 137 ha near riverbanks to reduce upland erosion and sedimentation.
  • Shore: Create natural coastal buffers through re-vegetation of 3.82 ha of coastal areas (0.66 ha in rivermouths and 3.2 ha in shorelines)

Sea: Create resilient and sustainable fishing through strenghening the fishers association in Port Salut and responding to some of their needs to reduce nearshore fishing.

The project built on UNEP’s presence and ongoing activities in the South Department of Haiti, such as the Côte Sud Initiative.

 

The ecosystem-based interventions in Port Salut were designed to deliver multiple livelihood benefits in addition to disaster risk reduction/climate change adaptation. For instance, more sustainable vetiver cultivation can produce higher quality produce which increases income.

The re-vegetation and re-forestation along rivers and coastal areas was monitored. In the uplands, much of this occurred on private land and landowners were trained and given technical assistance. The monitoring indicated a 75% seedling survival in those areas. In the communal coastal areas, however, survival rate was 57%. A number of field visits took place to identify the reasons for this and necessary steps to establish adaptive management and improved practices in the future. These steps included awareness raising to catalyse more protection of the seedlings by the community and improving planting techniques.

 

The project invested in strengthening community-based organizations (vetiver farmers and fishers) as a key mechanism for implementing project activities. This was effective in Haiti because it addresses a key vulnerability of vetiver farmers and fishers. However, these community-based organizations still require sustained capacity development support.

Baseline Assessments

Field surveys were undertaken to map the extent of marine and terrestrial ecosystems, develop an ecological baseline and identify areas and measures for ecosystem-based interventions. Field surveys also identified locations of infrastructure exposed to river flooding. Remote sensing and GIS modelling provided complementary data and were used to assess exposure of the population to storm surges and flooding under current and future conditions. The InVest coastal vulnerability model was used to assess coastal exposure under different ecosystem management scenarios.

A planning and feasibility study for coastal restoration was also undertaken.

The Audubon Society of Haiti and Reef Check helped undertake field surveys and developed the planning and feasibility study.

 

The relatively low data requirements of the InVest model and the fact that it takes into account both the geophysical and ecological characteristics of the area in measuring coastal exposure make the InVest model highly suitable for EbA/Eco-DRR planning and for data-poor countries.

The results of the InVest model were in line with observed patterns of exposure. For instance, areas that are identified by the model as highly exposed to coastal hazards at present were in fact some of the areas that were most impacted by Hurricane Sandy in 2012. The results also point to the importance of protecting and rehabilitating ecosystems that mitigate hazards, so that they can in turn protect the community. However, depending on circumstances ecosystems may not provide the best nor full protection. The results cannot be used therefore to prescribe a best solution but only highlight the trade-offs and potential outcomes of different ecosystem management decisions especially as the model does not provide a comprehensive analysis.

Local and national capacity building

The project invested significantly in capacity building at the local and nation level through awareness raising on EbA/Eco-DRR, hands on field learning activities and training workshops. The project ensured that women were among those trained in all activities.

Local capacity building targeted mainly the five villages where the interventions took place but also involved representatives from villages who were involved in up-scaling the project interventions to a larger area of the wadi in the upstream section.  Awareness raising promote dialogue on dryland ecosystems and disaster risk management issues. 

 

Farm extension agents (2 in each village) were trained due to limited presence of the Government in the villages to provide agricultural extension support services. Moreover, eight community animal health workers also referred to as “paravets”, were trained on animal husbandry, treatment, animal drugs, feeding, and vaccination, through theoretical and practical sessions. The "paravets" also monitored the re-seeded pasture areas.

 

A national and a state-level training on Eco-DRR were also undertaken.

The major portion of capacity building took place in the field, as part of “learning by doing” through implementation of field interventions such as nursery establishment and management, rangeland re-seeding, and reforestation.

Local capacity-building trainings provided to communities improve the chances of continuity in the management of field interventions.

 

The State-level workshop initiated a series of dialogues in North Darfur on the importance of establishing a forum that serves as a platform for natural resource management that is both inclusive and conscious of water-related hazards.  Undertaking such trainings at the national and state-level, help mainstream ecosystem-based measures in national policies and programmes. Indeed IWRM was identified as a key measure to reducing disaster risks and adapting to climate change and weather extremes, which was reflected in the National Agenda for Action which was the main output of the national training.