Community based action plans

Relevant stakeholders are engaged to identify challenges within their respective communities and solutions that are ecosystem friendly but contribute to the enhancement of local livelihoods. This process follows a prior participatory community-wide assessment and validation of results from the assessment or survey process. The assessment identifies livelihood and climatic trends and impacts on various sectors. Following this, a stakeholder meeting is initiated through which potential adaptation and sustainable livelihood stategies are proposed and adopted against each challenge and included in the overal community-based adaptation plan. A community-based action plan matrix is then generated through the stakeholder participatory process that includes the following sections: livelihood and adaptation options, duration of implementation, actors, required resources, key expected results and estimated amount to implement each adopted strategy or action.

  • Availability of adequate data or information collected through a participatory process using participatory instruments involving various stakeholders.
  • Participatory involvement of both local and County-level stakeholders

 

  • Adequate involvement of stakeholders including community members can help collect data on baseline information.
  • Community involvement from the beginning contributes to them accepting management planning results and their positive contribution towards implementation.
  • Sharing the community based plan with local stakeholders and community members contribute to their ownership of the local-elevl generated action plans.
Community exchange visits

Exchange visits were organized to places where the initiative has been active for some time and the implementation is on-going. For example, in order to acquire drought tolerant crops for local production, Ecofinder Kenya visited the Tangokona community in Busia County, Kenya where improved cassava and sweet potato varieties have been promoted and grown by local communities. The model was studied by Yala wetland communities, seeds purchased and farmers are now growing drought tolerant cassava and sweet potatoes.

  • Pay actual visit to model sites or farmers.
  • Availability of resources including transportation, learning facilitation at the place of visit.
  • Willingness to learn and practice the new skills among the interested stakeholders.
  • Local production of recommended drought resilient crop varieties can be achieved by learning and sharing of skills and ideas.
  • Farmers can embrace and practice what they see and can confirm to have worked in similar places.
  • The success of implementation of improved crop production and testing of new crop varieties may be dependent on prevaining weather conditions mainly rainfall amounts especially for rain-fed agriculture.

 

Stakeholders involvement and participation

This involves participation of all stakeholders at the local level in order to come up with locally viable solutions that all participants are comfortable with and that contribute to sustainable livelihoods and long term conservation of local biodiversity. We achieved this building block by involving stakeholders at different levels, i.e. at the meso or County level and micro or local community level. First, we engaged representatives of the Siaya County government departments  (such as Agriculture, Lands, Tourism, Environment and Natural Resources) and Civil society representatives working at the local and regional levels. A workshop was organised upon which the government and non-government actors discussed the challenges facing agriculture and biodiversity in relation to climate chage in the County and amicable and potential solutions sought from the participants. Secondly, local level meetings were held with community members and local leaders and resource persons including elders, retired government staff, health workers and conservation enthusiasts. The challenges facing agriculture and local biodiversity were sought and potential solutions reached. These were then analysed to come up with overal challenges and solutions from the stakeholders perspective.

  • Analysis and involvement of critical stakeholders to make sure that all people with interest are involved. This should include (1) government departments at the County or District levels, (2) Non-state actors including Non-governmental Organisations (NGOs), Community-based Organisations (CBOs) and Faith-based Organisations (FBOs) among others, and local communities
  • Recognition of the roles played by various stakeholders.
  • Recognition of potential benefits and benefit sharing from the proceeds of conservation.

 

  • Stakeholder involvement at both meso or County/District level and micro/community level ensures potential for inclusion and use of results in local policy change
  • Forums bringing government and non-state actors contribute to harmonisation of conflicting views and ideas and ensure potential for harmony in implementation of various strategies. However, we experienced many opposing views during strategy discussions pitting the government officers and the civil society.
  • Potential for benefit sharing and incentives are critical for conservation of biodiversity at the local scale.
  • Local communities are willing to participate in biodiversity conservation initiatives when alternative livelihoods can be provided.

 

Public Sector Guidance Coupled with Private Sector Initiatives

To address a social need for transportation facilities equitably accessible, understandable and usable to people of all ages and abilities, the national government enacted a law to promote smooth transportation to the elderly, disabled and others in 2006. It set a target to adopt the concept of Universal Design by 2020 for all public transportation facilities, including airports that serve more than 3,000 daily passengers. Under this law, the government developed “Universal Design Guideline”, which is also applicable to improvement of Haneda International Airport. Not only did TIAT follow this guideline, it as a private company made extensive efforts to offer a comfortable space and enhanced accessibility to all types of airport visitors.

  • Strong drive from the national government to consider universal accessibility in infrastructure design

  • Detailed guidelines to develop universally accessible infrastructure

A key tenet of the philosophy of Universal Design is that the facility improvements needed to support people with disabilities can benefit everyone. Increased physical accessibility and hospitality satisfy customers with the high-quality of services and contribute to increasing the number of airport users to some extent. While the national government plays a pivotal role in adopting the Universal Design concept in public transportation facilities, private terminal operators should be motivated to proactively install innovative technologies and unconventional services for long-term cost saving and customer (passenger) satisfaction.

LONG TERM FINANCIAL MECHANISM TO GUARANTEE THE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION F THE PROTECTED AREAS’ MANAGEMENT PLANS

With the revenues from the endowment and the investment in the sinking fund, La Minga provides the financial resources to implement the prioritized actions from the management plans. To that end, the members of the Technical Committee decide together what strategies are the most vital to implement, the cost of the activities and the terms of refence for hiring a community-based organization to execute the components.

The donation of the Walton Family Foundation to la Minga will be in the fund for at least 30 years, and therefore this mechanism can guarantee that the protected areas will have financial resources for every year over a long time.

It is necessary to get to the 5 Million USD Goal in the endowment and 1 million USD in the sinking found. Otherwise we won’t have enough revenuers to support the implementation of the management plans of the three protected areas.

These endowment funds are subject to an investment policy focused on generating annual income while simultaneously preserving and enhancing the value of endowment capital through adequate diversification of high quality instruments, balanced by an acceptable degree of risk.

The process of building an endowment and a sinking fund is long and difficult. Most of the potential donors’ can´t give money for a long period (La Minga is conceived at least for 30 years). Also, it is very important to set strict and clear rules regarding the investment of the money, because of different expectations that can emerge in the country.

 

DEVELOPMENT OF A GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE TO GUARANTEE THE STAKEHOLDER´S PARTICIPATION IN THE RESOURCES INVESTING PROCESS

All of the protected areas that are covered by La Minga are managed by Community Councils and the regional environmental authorities. Net interests of La Minga will be transferred to community-based organizations (Community Councils) and other nonprofit organizations to support the implementation of management plans for the protected areas, under the
supervision of an Endowment Fund oversight structure.

A Technical Committee for La Minga directs  and oversees the use of La Minga Endowment revenues that are channeled annually to the account
opened and held by Fondo Acción. The Technical Committee is  composed of representatives from Conservation International Colombia, Fondo Acción, local environmental authorities, Community Councils with participation in the protected area management, and an academic advisor. The Technical Committee reviews and approves annual investment plans
presented by both Regional Environmental Authorities and Community Councils.

The Executive Committee  makes the funding decision in accordance with the recommendations that it receives from the Technical Committee.

A big enabling factor is the transparency required in the governance mechanism and also the need to guarantee the effective participation of the community council´s representatives and of the environmental authorities. Also, the thorough following of the proposals and projects are a key factor for the mechanism to work. And -lastly- is it of high importance to continue with the building capacities process with local stakeholders to ensure that the proposals will be in line with the management plans and the prioritized needs.

We learned that the involvement of the community’s actors is required from the very beginning to obtain an acceptance of the rules and an empowerment of the local stakeholders regarding the management of the areas that they use to satisfy their needs. We also learned, that building this kind of mechanisms requires a lot of time and it´s very important to make that clear with all the allies so they don’t expect the financial support in an early stage.

The consolidation of a co-management mechanism requires that the public entities understand the value of the inputs of the community, and that they are willing to prioritize the investment needs in accordance with the needs of the local stakeholders.

Lastly, it´s important to mention that an endowment can create a lot of false expectations in different actors, and that´s way is necessary to consolidate a communications strategy that can reach national, regional, and local levels.

Using tourism economic data for analysis, reporting and influencing decision-making

The main objective of tourism and recreation economic analysis have been used for public relations objectives. Common objectives of tourism economic analyses have been to increase support for raising PA budgets, for building partnerships, and for influencing local policies and planning decisions.

 

These types of uses require lower levels of detail or accuracy compared with other studies focused on evaluating management alternatives for specific PA issues, like decisions about new investments, facilities or services. For instance, park managers may wish to use this tool for the purpose of adaptive management and/or integrate economic impact evaluation with a livelihoods or social analysis of the PA that reveals non-monetary benefits and costs. In such cases, the study should be designed to allow for estimation of local level impacts.

 

At the same time, government administrators may wish to compare the national level value of a park with other land uses or parks in similar regions. What is important is that major stakeholders are consulted prior to the design phase so that chosen measures and their relationship to the park reflect what is desired to be known by the intended audience.

The presentation of the results should be focused on the purpose of the report and the audience. Figures and examples facilitate the public understanding. In order to support presentations,

PA managers should communicate the TEMPA results in order to raise awareness among policy-makers, conservation and commercial stakeholders, local communities, and the public at large of the value that PAs serve not just for conservation but also as engines for benefit-sharing.

 

Results should be communicated in terms that are understandable to the intended audience. Normally, a summary and glossary of economic terms is helpful for most audiences. The most common measures are sales, income, jobs, GDP and taxes; formal definitions of the measures are also needed to clarify these terms and the measurement units. 

Tourism Economic Model in Protected Areas (TEMPA) assessment tool

As part of a larger effort to assess the socio-economic impacts of GEF-funded Protected Areas, the Tourism Economic Model for Protected Areas (TEMPA) was developed to help guide project managers and others in the collection, analysis and display of tourism spending data using an easy to use spreadsheet-based tool, which is also provided. Despite the fact that economic impact analysis has been applied in many countries, such as, USA, Canada, Australia, Finland,  Namibia, and South Africa, this preliminary version of the tool and accompanying spreadsheet represents an initial step in a longer process of testing and refining TEMPA in a wide range of protected area categories globally. At present, TEMPA has been tested only in one selected park in Southern Africa, and nationally for Brazil. Results show significant direct and indirect economic gains from parks at the local and national level. It is hoped that the widespread use of tools such as TEMPA can continue to build from this effort to highlight the important multi-faceted role that protected areas play in supporting nature and livelihoods.

 

Estimating the economic effects of visitor expenditure

 

Economic Effects = Number of Visitors * Average spending per visitor * Economic multipliers 

 

To complete the analysis, the manager undertaking a park study needs to collect or estimate the following:

 

  1. the number of visitors who visit the parks and surrounding area;
  2. the average spending per visitor in the region, and;
  3. apply economic multipliers to measure the ripple effects of expenditure within the region (TEMPA).

The TEMPA model assists the manager with entering data and calculating the economic impact of a park. Setting up the calculations to estimate the economic effects of tourism expenditure may seem rather daunting, especially to people with little experience in economics and the analysis of economic data.  Therefore, the model that will do most of the work, and is likely to surprise with how easy it is to use.

Table banking and group with a difference

The table banking aspect of the project was responding to the needs of the community to access affordable loans for businessess and farming activities.

 

We supported the group in training on financial management and accountability.

 

The table banking aspects has attracted the younger people who are interested in doing farming as a business. This has helped in improving livelihod food security

Increased production has enabled the emergence of small businesses with table banking enabling access to affordable loans.

 

Farmers have also been able to take their children to schools thus increasing knowledge and skills within the community

 

Access to cheap and affordable loans to engage in business and farming activities is fundamental in improving community livelihoods.

 

It is vital to include capacity building in leadership and financial accountability skills to enhance governance on the resources.

 

Training was also done to increase the repayment period from one month to at least 6-12 months. This is what is referred to as group with a difference where the loans do not become a burden to the community members who have adequate tim to repay and get returns on investments.

Benefit Sharing for Ecosystems Conservation

Communities in two counties formed a Community Forest Association (CFA), which was empowered through training and the sustainable use of non-timber forest products.

 

They were also trained in surveilance and reporting, while ensuring government officers work in close collaboration with these groups with timely action on any reporting.

 

 

  • Mutual trust among community members
  • Government agencies partneships with local communities
  • Paradigm change in forest management that allowed nearby commnunities have user rights, and partcicpate in decision making process
  • Building mutual trust between communities and government agencies is key in sustainable ecosystems management (forests and riperaian zones included)
  • Community capacity building can better monitor natural resources just as well as other institutions due to sense of ownership