A holistic strategy for Protected Area management

Abraham González
Publié: 14 octobre 2015
Dernière modification: 12 février 2020
remove_red_eye 3487 Vues

Résumé

Protected Areas (PAs) are a powerful tool for biodiversity conservation. In Mexico, more than 175 federal PAs protect over 25.6 million hectares of habitats and landscapes. Due to the remote location of many PAs, however, administrative frameworks for their governance and enforcment of regulations is often lacking. Therefore, a conceptual model to support PA enforcement was developed. This model is designed to increase the compliance of regulations and to facilitate the recovery and conservation of fish stocks and biodiversity.

Classifications

Région
Amérique du Nord
Échelle de la mise en œuvre
Intranational
Local
Ecosystème
Estuaire
Lagune
Mangrove
Marais salant
Récif corallien
Zones humide (marécage, marais, tourbière)
Écosystèmes d'eau douce
Écosystèmes marins et côtiers
Thème
Gestion des espaces côtiers et marins
Gestion des espèces
Gouvernance des aires protégées
Pêche et aquaculture
Services écosystèmiques
Sécurité alimentaire
Tourisme
Challenges
Récolte non durable, y compris la surpêche
Braconnage
Gestion inefficace des ressources financières
Manque de capacités techniques
Mauvaise surveillance et application de la loi
Manque d'infrastructures
Objectifs de Développement Durable
ODD 14 - Vie aquatique
Obectifs d'Aichi
Objectif 4: Production et consommation durables
Objectif 5: Perte d'habitat réduite de moitié ou diminuée
Objectif 6: Gestion durable des ressources vivantes aquatiques
Objectif 11: Aires protégées
Objectif 12: Réduction du risque d'extinction
Objectif 14: Services des écosystèmes
Objectif 20: Mobiliser toutes les ressources disponibles

Emplacement

Gulf of California, Mexico

Défis

Illegal resource use, overfishing and lack of enforcement:

  • Illegal extraction of natural resources
  • Fisheries overexploitation
  • Ignorance and non-compliance to regulations
  • Lacking inter-institutional coordination and political will
  • Scattered surveillance and enforcement system
  • Excessive workload of public servants
  • Lacking human and economic resources as well as presence of authorities
  • Absence of impact indicators´for evaluation
  • Gaps in the legal system

Bénéficiaires

Direct benficiaries:

  • Fishermen
  • Tourists

Indirect benficiaries:

  • Government authorities
  • Seafood companies
  • Seafood consumers
  • Tourism industry

Comment les blocs constitutifs interagissent-ils entre eux dans la solution?

NA

Les impacts positifs

  • Increase in the number of acts set by the PROFEPA (Federal Administration of Environmental Protection) in the protected areas of Bahía de Los Ángeles (233% between 2012 and 2013) and of the Biosphere reserve El Vizcaíno (evaluation in progress).
  • The dissemination of information to promote the compliance of users increased as measured by the proportion of users that know the regulations, the consequences of non-compliance and the advantages of complying to them: 85% Guaymas industrials, 90% ribereños of Bahía de los Ángeles, 60% ribereños of El Barril.

The governance indicators of the IUCN manual (2006): How is your MPA doing? (http://marineprotectedareas.noaa.gov/pdf/national-system/mpadoing.pdf) were used for the evaluation.

Histoire

It was the time of the year when the whales are giving birth to their calves and play with them in the lagoon.

One morning, Juan (from PROFEPA) and Gringo, a colleague from the Mexican Comission for Protected Areas (CONANP) got into their boots and life jackets, and hopped onto their small boat. They left with the purpose to monitor those whales. Suddenly, Gringo saw something strange in the water. "There is something far away, I see a flutter, is it a fish caught in a net?", he asked Juan. Surprise and irritatated, Juan and Gringo found that it was a small turtle trying to escape a fishing net. The small turtle was completely entangled in the net and could not get out off it withput help. Juan and Gringo tried to hold the turtle gently while cutting the net, but the turtle moved with great force and despair. When they finally managed to cut the nets and free the turtle, they took it to shore and had a veterinarian examine the turtle. After it received a clean bill of health, the turtle was released into the lagoon. Like a Hollywood star, this departure included cameras, applause and the smiles of visitors, who came to see the turtle off. 

 

Adapted from “The History of Conservation“ by Claudia Cecilia González Olimón, 2013

Contribué par

Alejandro Castillo López Pronatura Noroeste

Soumise par

Pronatura Noroeste