Integrated Multi-sector and Multi-stakeholder Planning and Management for Biosphere Reserves
This building block strengthens integrated, multi-sector planning across Viet Nam’s three Biosphere Reserves by using a participatory and adaptive approach to address fragmentation in land-use and resource management. The process began with understanding how local authorities, communities, tourism operators, and protected area managers interact with forest and landscape resources. Through this groundwork, the project identified gaps in cross-sector coordination and opportunities to align conservation with socio-economic priorities.
Next, multi-stakeholder planning platforms were established to connect provincial departments, Protected Area management boards, local communities, and private actors. These platforms enabled joint decision-making, supported the integration of biodiversity considerations into development planning, and strengthened protected area governance. As a result, Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) scores across six Protected Areas increased by an average of 38 points—well above the project target.
With these partnerships in place, the project facilitated evidence-based land-use planning. A total of 62,940 hectares of high-conservation-value forests and ecosystems were mapped and designated as set-aside, non-extractive use zones; 4,005 hectares of degraded forests were restored; flagship species monitoring systems were introduced; and biodiversity-friendly tourism certification was promoted, reaching 21% adoption by 2024.
Altogether, more than 1.79 million hectares of Biosphere Reserve buffer and transition zones were brought under sustainable management. This integrated planning framework now enables Viet Nam to embed biodiversity into broader development decisions, strengthening a functional biosphere network that supports both ecological integrity and community well-being.
Inclusive Engagement: Inclusive stakeholder engagement at both community and provincial levels.
Clear Communication: Tailored communication and participatory decision-making mechanisms for local actors.
Livelihood Integration: Integration of livelihood activities (eco-tourism, sustainable agriculture) with conservation goals.
Continuous Support: Continued collaboration with UNDP, NGOs, Women’s Union, Farmer Associations, research institutes, and local governments for capacity building and knowledge transfer.
Participatory Planning Improves Results: Engaging authorities, communities, NGOs, and private actors led to stronger management effectiveness and broader areas under sustainable management. Joint planning helped reduce fragmentation and improved alignment of conservation and development priorities.
Institutionalization Is Necessary for Sustainability: Without formal co-management structures, clear mandates, and regular knowledge-sharing systems, many gains depend on continued project support. Embedding collaboration into official agreements and governance processes is essential for long-term impact.
Leadership and Mandates Shape Progress: Sites with strong local leadership and clearly defined responsibilities advanced more quickly. Where provincial priorities were fragmented or mandates unclear, progress slowed, showing that governance context strongly influences outcomes.
Livelihood Pilots Need Market Links: Community-based livelihood activities showed that local people are willing to support conservation. However, sustaining these models requires stronger connections to markets, value chains, and long-term economic incentives.
Tourism Pilots Show Promise but Need Support: Biodiversity-friendly tourism in Cu Lao Cham–Hoi An demonstrated potential, but scaling it will require consistent monitoring, incentives, and closer engagement with local operators.
Approaches Must Stay Realistic and Context-Driven: Integrated Biosphere Reserve approaches work best when grounded in local conditions, early co-management, and gradual capacity-building. Overly ambitious models without strong local foundations are harder to maintain beyond the project period.