Understanding different scales of interactions between natural and cultural systems using the System thinking approach

System thinking is a scientific approach that starts with the whole. It is used for the design of individual biosphere reserves but also for connecting it to the whole international network. It takes into account complex relationships as well as “soft” variables that underpin human emotions, motivation and behavior thus providing a holistic approach to complex policy and social issues. From this perspective, biosphere reserves consist of various components which reflect complex relationships between natural and socio-economic factors, between physical structures and human values, between cultural space and natural landscape, political ecology and creative ecology. The application of system thinking is carried out from the preparation stage of nomination of a biosphere reserve to design, management planning and implementation. Applying system thinking to the design of a biosphere reserve allows to identify all elements of the larger ecosystem. In the case of CBR, this approach enables the connection between the ancient town, influential to the development of the whole ecosystem as a historic port and its cultural heritage in relation to the marine protected area.

In CBR, the ecological interconnection between the heritage city and the protected area were clear and the design had to consider the interface of the estuary between the cultural systems (settlements) along Thu Bon River, the mangroves and the sea.

(1) System thinking is a tool for managers and policy makers to outline appropriate solutions to practical problems.

(2) System thinking differentiates fundamental problems from their symptoms and facilitates both short-term interventions and long-term sustainable strategies.

Coordinating body for multiple international and national designations

The CBR Management Board coordinates all activities that are related to the cultural and natural values of the Biosphere Reserve. In the development procedure, the CBR tries to create a safe place for stakeholders to work together and find out integrated solutions. One of the main tasks of the CBR Management Board is to coordinate the different international and national designations which include the Biosphere Reserve, the World Heritage site, the intangible cultural heritage, and the marine protected area. The master plan and implementation program of the CBR is always in the making, being updated and coordinated with stakeholders including the four main entities: government, scientists, private sector and local people. The majority of the leaders in the city were invited to be members of the management board of the CBR. This is an important characteristic of the system that serves to facilitate the collection of information and data, to discuss and to reflect at workshops and meetings, to analyze problems, and to find out solutions thereon. All of the CBR coordinators are responding to the balance between conservation and development, focusing on sustainable development and resilience to climate change.

  • The CBR has created a good relationship with local communities and stakeholders working together on conservation, livelihood development, eco-tourism and education becoming a space for system thinking, reflections on linkages with nature, and harmonization between humans and the biosphere.
  • The existence of multiple designations such as the World Heritage designation, the Marine Protected Area (MPA) designation, and the Intangible Cultural Heritage designation call the attention of locals, authorities and tourists.

With so many different designations at different levels, there are several approaches that are required to be integrated and coordinated in the action plans such as the ecosystem approach, watershed approach, integrated coastal management and the ridge to reef (2R) approach in order to develop management models. For example, the Quang Nam province has assigned 19 of 235 hectares of Cù Lao Chàm MPA area for the local fishermen in Bai Huong village to manage the marine resources and develop eco-tourism based on the conservation results since 2013. This is a shared decision-making process that includes the government, the local communities and other stakeholders. The local fishermen created the resources management plans by themselves. Using this system thinking, the local partners will be real owners of the natural and cultural resources. They are decision-makers in the maintenance of the values of the Biosphere Reserve for the future generations.

Dang Ke Duc
Coordinating body for multiple international and national designations
Understanding different scales of interactions between natural and cultural systems using the System thinking approach
Zoning based on patch-corridor-matrix model (Landscape Planning)
Partnering between state, market and civil society (Intersectoral coordination)
Using Biosphere Reserve Branding (Quality Economy)
Dang Ke Duc
Coordinating body for multiple international and national designations
Understanding different scales of interactions between natural and cultural systems using the System thinking approach
Zoning based on patch-corridor-matrix model (Landscape Planning)
Partnering between state, market and civil society (Intersectoral coordination)
Using Biosphere Reserve Branding (Quality Economy)
Dang Ke Duc
Coordinating body for multiple international and national designations
Understanding different scales of interactions between natural and cultural systems using the System thinking approach
Zoning based on patch-corridor-matrix model (Landscape Planning)
Partnering between state, market and civil society (Intersectoral coordination)
Using Biosphere Reserve Branding (Quality Economy)
Building a participatory monitoring and reporting system on the state of conservation in the World Heritage Site

Pimachiowin Aki First Nations and the Pimachiowin Aki Corporation developed a Guardians Program in 2016 to implement the strategic direction set out in approved management plans of ensuring community well-being, raising funds, supporting local economic development, creating opportunities for Elders and youth to work together, maintaining/enhancing our cultural tradition, and ensuring compliance with customary laws and policies. Capacity and skills have been built among community members in communication, record-keeping, survival, good health, use of GPS to collect and record geographic information. Guardians are community members that observe, record and report on the health of ecosystems and cultural sites, educate the public about how to be good stewards of the cultural landscape, work with provincial government land and resource managers, and conserve pictographs, petroforms, archaeological sites, cultural sites, and intangible values shaping Anishinaabe connections with the Site including oral traditions central to the expression and intergenerational transmission of Akiiwi-gikendamowining (land-based knowledge), customary laws, and geographical names.

  • Funding (Guardians’ wages and operating costs, Elders’ honoraria, workshops and training).
  • Strong leadership at community-level.
  • Knowledge of the indicators of social, economic, cultural and environmental values of the site.
  • Good relationships with leaders, community members, Western modern scientists and government land managers (mutual respect, trust, honesty, parity in decision-making).
  • Opportunities to share experiences with other Guardian and stewardship programs. 
  • Success of the Guardians Program depends on keeping Guardians employed on a full-time basis, and on maintaining connections between Guardians and Elders and youth. 
  • Guardians initiatives risk failing completely or produce disappointing outcomes if careful planning is not completed before monitoring activities start.  For monitoring to be successful, data and information needs to be stored, organized and distributed in ways that ensure it is useful, maintains its quality and credibility, and protects confidential information.  
  • Compiled GIS (Geographical Information System) based inventories and databases are the best way to identify data gaps, which can then be used to update monitoring priorities and plans. A monitoring framework and information management system provide critical information for governance and decision making.
  • Elders and other knowledge-keepers are engaged in developing a broader set of indicators and metrics to provide a reliable statement on the condition of - and trends in - ecosystem health and the cultural landscape.
Intergenerational and inclusive approaches to participation in communities’ dialogue

The voices and perspectives of youth must be acknowledged as well as those of adults and Elders to ensure the whole community is part of the dialogue. Youth participated in the development of community-based land management plans and the Pimachiowin Aki nomination dossier. We will need the youth to understand and carry on this work after the Elders are gone. For this, presentations and dialogue sessions with Elders took place at community schools and youth forums. The communities carry out ongoing Elders and Youth Anishinaabe Language, Knowledge and Lands Teaching camps to ensure children and youth understand the importance of the land and continue to support this work in the future. These camps are held outside the communities, throughout the summer.

In parallel, Pimachiowin Aki Corporation held two regional women’s forums:  the Pimachiowin Aki Women’s Forum on January 18, 2017, and the Ikwewak Gikendasowinan on January 23, 2018 where Elders and young women participated in making recommendations to the Pimachiowin Aki partners which were included in the nomination dossier. Ongoing participation and leadership of women in governance is an important feature of the site management framework.

  • Recognizing the importance of facilitating interactions between Elders and youth in preserving the Anishinaabe way of life and language, the boreal shield landscape, and the interdependence of culture and nature.   
  • Funds to facilitate meetings of community-based land working groups and land-based learning opportunities. 
  • Facilitating the participation of youth and women from the beginning is crucial for success. Elders and Youth dialogue is essential for the ongoing success of the communities’ efforts to protect Ancestral Lands, and Pimachiowin Aki, now and in the future. However, at times during the land management and planning and nomination processes when we had time or budget constraints we left our youth engagement out. That was our mistake, and we are now busy making sure that we focus on youth engagement. 
  • The Corporation continuously supports experiential opportunities for youth in purposeful, land-based activities, emphasizing that respectful behaviour is required for survival, and ensures that local and regional schools are provided with information and resources to incorporate the cultural, natural, and educational values represented by Pimachiowin Aki into their curricula.
  • Pimachiowin Aki First Nations Guardians Program ensures that the intergenerational dialogue continues.
Establishing knowledge systems dialogue between Indigenous peoples and Western scientists in land management and planning

The Anishinaabe knowledge system carried and shared by the Elders has always led community life and land decisions. Through the First Nations Accord, land management and planning and the World Heritage nomination processes, the Pimachiowin Aki First Nations’ knowledge keepers began to work with scientists who were adding their system of knowledge to traditional area plans and the nomination. The only process for success was to set up a regular dialogue between both knowledge systems, and the engagement at the community level of Elders and other knowledge keepers, to ensure the community voice was heard and documented in the plans, the nomination dossier and in all communications, through community-based land working group meetings, meetings of the Pimachiowin Aki Corporation, and meetings of First Nations and government representatives on land management planning and plan implementation teams. The community knowledge keepers and scientists learned to understand each other. This was a long process and with mutual respect and patience, we were able to agree on the information provided in the documents. This process is still in place today, with the engagement of communities when Provincial Governments, Universities and organizations carry out research projects in Pimachiowin Aki.

  • Recognition of the validity of Anishinaabe knowledge and belief systems, and of the rights of First Nations to speak for Ancestral Lands.
  • Respectful dialogue and willingness of participants from both systems to understand each other.
  • Funding for regular community meetings provided by the 2 provincial governments, with some funds contributed by the First Nation governments.
  • Engaging the people who live in protected areas in meaningful dialogue and decision-making processes about the values, history and future of these areas, and educating people about co-generation of knowledge, as opposed to integrating cultural wisdom and traditions into existing policies, sustainability practices and management plans.
  • Ensuring that Anishinaabe and scientific knowledge systems work hand in hand; it takes time and hard work to establish a good working relationship.
  • Openness and learning from each other in a cross-cultural environment.
  • Land management planning to define and recognize First Nation communities' visions, goals and priorities is a foundation of the World Heritage site nomination. 
  • Full involvement of Anishinaabe knowledge keepers is a requirement for all potential research in the Pimachiowin Aki World Heritage Site.
Honouring the wisdom, vision, and ki ki no mah gay win (teachings) of the Elders to guide use of the land and respectful relations between each other and with the land

Elders and others with land-based knowledge (ki ki no mah gay win) are important for their role in guiding decision-making in personal, family and community matters related to use of the land. Knowledgeable Elders are respected for their role in ensuring continuity of Ji-ganawendamang Gidakiiminaan (keeping the land). Elders advocated for the community voice to be heard in defining strategic direction for Ancestral Lands, and in the nomination dossier and all communications and decisions about Pimachiowin Aki. Elders are part of Annual General Meetings, regular and special meetings of the Corporation, planning team meetings, and community-based lands working group meetings, to guide protection and management of Pimachiowin Aki in accordance with the principles of Ji-ganawendamang Gidakiiminaan. Adherence to these principles requires local community authority in protection and management and a continued presence on the land. Those with the greatest experience on the land (e.g. Elders, head trappers, trapline helpers and others with personal and family ties to specific family harvesting areas) are leaders in sharing Akiiwi-gikendamowining and ensuring compliance with the principles of Ji-ganawendamang Gidakiiminaan

  • First Nations Accord.
  • Drafting the Nomination dossier.
  • Elders and Youth Forum.
  • Elders’ willingness to share their knowledge with the rest of the world 
  • Community-driven, Elders-led process.
  • Elders’ willingness to devote their time and energy in taking part in meetings outside the communities to ensure their voices are heard and understood.
  • Meetings of community-based land working groups.
  • Patience in land management planning and nomination processes to ensure Elders are engaged early and often.  
  • Giving attention to political imperatives but not allowing them to dictate schedule / deadlines.
  • Indigenous-led nominations or any other initiative must include Elders’ knowledge and voices at the forefront at all stages.
Creation of Pimachiowin Aki Corporation: a multi-level and multi-stakeholder partnership

First Nations started a process to define Ancestral Lands by completing land use and occupancy studies, archaeological research, moose habitat studies, historical documentation, and community-based land management plans. From 1999, they started the dialogue on the importance of Ancestral Lands, way of life, industrial threats and how they could work together and help each other. In 2002, the First Nations Accord was signed, a historical document describing the commitment to work together to protect Ancestral Lands. The impetus for creating a not-for-profit charitable corporation with a Board of Directors was to have a forum for continued and regular dialogue, consensus-based, non-hierarchical decision-making and a legal entity that could make contracts, raise funds, and develop a World Heritage nomination dossier. The Corporation was established in 2006 with a Board consisting of one representative from each First Nation and Provincial Government. An Executive Director oversees operations and provides support and advice. The mission is to acknowledge and support Anishinaabe culture and safeguard the boreal forest, preserving a living cultural landscape to ensure the well-being of Anishinaabeg and for the benefit and enjoyment of all people.

  • First Nations’ Accord signed in 2002 to work together to protect Ancestral Lands.
  • Interprovincial Wilderness Area (Manitoba & Ontario) MoU signed in 1998 to work together on planning and management of adjacent provincial parks.
  • IUCN call for WH nominations on boreal shield ecosystems in 2003.
  • Willingness of Manitoba & Ontario Governments and the four Pimachiowin Aki First Nations to work together on a nomination.
  • Provision of funds by the provinces to establish the Pimachiowin Aki Corporation.
  • Need for predictable levels of support -not only annual government grants- to contribute to financial sustainability and greater staff retention.
  • Importance of strategic planning and leadership development.
  • Need to enhance the organization’s ability to leverage financial and human capital, improve grant management, allow for longer-term evaluations, strengthen programs and reach out to donors who want to help build a program.
  • Ensure wide and frequent engagement/participation of all partners in defining vision, mission, charitable purposes, and duties of Directors.  
  • The Corporation is successful not only because certain procedures are in place to channel information and communication, but because it fosters a culture that values people learning from one another, and recommends ways of building capacity and creating opportunities in areas where challenges currently exist.