Supporting the integration of legal and legitimate domestic lumber supply into VPA
Tropenbos Ghana
Supporting the integration of legal and legitimate domestic lumber supply through Voluntary Partnership Agreements
Full Solution
Supporting the integration of legal and legitimate domestic lumber supply into VPA
Tropenbos Ghana
The project aimed at equipping people living in forest fringe communities with relevant skills to undertake successful alternative livelihoods so as to dissuade them from engaging in illegal chainsaw milling which promotes deforestation and forest degradation.
In search of lasting solutions to address this challenge, Tropenbos Ghana (TBG), then, Tropenbos International Ghana (TBI), with funding from the European Union (EU) implemented a project from 2009-2016 that sought to develop viable alternatives to illegal logging. The beneficiaries received training in agroforestry, nursery and plantation development, group dynamics and basic business management.
Centred on an innovative approach to create a multi-stakeholder dialogue, the project in Ghana brought diverse stakeholders within the forest sector together to negotiate viable options for dealing with chainsaw milling. They were then able to supply their lumber into the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) with the European Union.
Last update: 29 Mar 2019
3775 Views
Photo and video gallery
Context
Challenges addressed
From the 1960s, Ghana has faced massive deforestation problem. This is largely due to agricultural expansion – mainly for cocoa production – but also illegal logging, which has thrived for many years due to high rates of unemployment and weak forest governance.
Illegal loggers were perceived as enemies of progress, and relentlessly pursued. However, attempts to address the escalating deforestation problem, including a ban on logging, proved futile due to corruption within the Forestry Commission and because of the number of livelihoods affected (an estimated 98,000 people). At the same time, there has also a high demand for domestic lumber, which contributed to the situation.
Location
Goaso Forest District, Ghana
West and Central Africa
Process
Summary of the process
The project believed from the on-set that stakeholder negotiations should be built on empirical information, felt need and a strong sense of trust. Raising awareness and efficacy through sharing information about the country’s forests was critical for effective stakeholder buy-in and ownership of the process.
Multiple stakeholder dialogues and meetings that followed were possible because they were based on identified “felt needs” and interests. The dialogues help build consensus and allowed participants to co-develop alternative solutions. In addition, government support also helped mainstream the outputs from these engagements, reinforcing the transition to an alternative livelihood.
By raising awareness about the problem of deforestation and finding out what stakeholders were keenly interested in, it made it easier for them to forge a bond and move away from illegal logging.
Building Blocks
Raising awareness and efficacy through information sharing
The project developed a strategy that entailed reaching out to illegal loggers as well as others, including the forest communities and those parties responsible for regulation and trade. They did this by presenting strong and relevant incentives for engagement, based on empirical information about the current situation and forecast for the country’s environmental resources in the future, and also by offering them the opportunity to help co-develop alternative solutions to these challenges.
Note: while the project was mainly focused on the illegal loggers, and the possibility of developing alternative livelihoods for them, its secondary target audience was the Forestry Commission, which is responsible for managing Ghana’s forestry resources. Over the years, the Commission has also
faced numerous challenges from murder of forest guards and accusations of corruption to poor communications with resource managers and forest communities.
A strategic approach was developed based on information generated, a felt need and a strong sense of trust. The discussions confirmed the need for alternatives livelihoods to illegal chainsaw milling and the concept of support for artisanal milling emerged.
Enabling factors
Engaging with the ultimate beneficiaries was essential for the project to be effective. Thus, dialogues were facilitated among stakeholders, including illegal loggers, at the district, regional and national levels. This allowed for input and consensus building at all levels.
Lesson learned
.
Creating a dynamic dialogue among stakeholders
Through a dynamic multi-stakeholder dialogue process, the project provided a platform to resolve conflict among stakeholders and to re-invest in institutions. It also helped stakeholders come together, build consensus and co-develop alternative solutions to the challenges they face.
Also, by organising the illegal loggers into groups, it was easier to work with them, including ensuring their support needs were being met.
Enabling factors
The project brought diverse stakeholders within the forest sector together to negotiate viable options for dealing with chainsaw milling, which had become synonymous with illegal logging.
By providing a pathway for the illegal loggers to engage in legitimate business operations, notably artisanal mining, it provided an alternative livelihood option and an incentive for them to participate, which had numerous positive impacts.
Lesson learned
.
Impacts
Providing a pathway for the illegal loggers to engage legitimate business operations, notably artisanal mining, has had numerous positive impacts. Some former illegal loggers have also invested in reforestation of degraded forests through legal arrangements facilitated by TBG with the Forestry Commission (FC).
A key negative impact is that the domestic demand for legal lumber has yet to develop adequately. If this trend continues, artisanal millers may be forced to revert to illegality.
The Timber Procurement Policy is a policy that makes it mandatory for all government projects to be undertaken with only legal lumber. This is an attempt to reduce the volume of illegal lumber on the domestic market and it is based on the fundamental principle that the illegal timber will continue to be laid on the markets as long as it is patronised. Although, the policy was mooted by the Forestry Commission more than five years ago, it has not yet been implemented.
While this EU-funded project ended in 2016, the work is continuing today under a project called, “Upscaling Artisanal Timber Milling to Improve the Supply of Legal Lumber to the Domestic Market.” This project, funded by the Food and Agricultural Organization, seeks to consolidate the artisanal timber milling concept in Ghana by piloting it in more communities and expanding its scale of implementation.
Beneficiaries
Illegal loggers (Direct)
Forestry Commission (Direct)
Local communities (indirect)
Traditional authority and land owners (indirect)
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG 1 – No poverty
SDG 9 – Industry, innovation and infrastructure
SDG 12 – Responsible consumption and production
SDG 13 – Climate action
SDG 15 – Life on land
SDG 17 – Partnerships for the goals
Story
Although chainsaw operators benefit immensely from trade in illegal lumber, there is always the risk of being apprehended by authorities or, in worse case scenarios, even killed, not to mention the impacts on their environment. Therefore, the operators saw an opportunity to reduce their risks, albeit with some implications for their profit margin. Others even realised the impacts of their activities on their environment and began advocating for change:
Until I participated in the MSD meetings in Juaso, I thought God would provide for trees forever. But now I have seen maps, pictures, figures and facts showing that forests disappear amongst other things because I log trees illegally and do not replant. We cannot go on like this. This illegal logging should stop[1].
– Chainsaw Operator, Obogu, 2013.
[1] See 2 (Parker et al. 2013).
Connect with contributors
Other contributors
Marieke Wit
Tropenbos International
James Parker McKeown
Tropenbos International Ghana
Emmanuel Marfo
Forestry Research Institute of Ghana
J.K.G Amonoo
Tropenbos International Ghana
Mercy Owusu Ansah
Forestry Commission, Ghana
Evans Mensah Sampene
Tropenbos International Ghana
Jane Aggrey
Tropenbos International Ghana
