Access to financial resources

Small scale fishing communities were heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Reduced demand for seafood due to the disruption in distribution and decline in tourism led to reduced seafood prices, resulting in a significant drop in household income. Having access to alternative livelihoods and/or access to savings helped to mitigate this loss in income. 


Alternative livelihood programmes can increase local resilience to economic shocks. Alternatives accessed during the COVID-19 crisis included seaweed and sea cucumber farming, drying or smoking fish to preserve and store it until markets recover and collectors return.


Community-led savings and loans groups have provided a critical buffer against financial difficulties as they enable people to save money and access credit in remote areas where this would otherwise not be possible. These locally led community groups pool together their savings in order to address financial hardship and provide loans to those most in need within their group. 

 

  • Strong community relationships
  • Short term fisheries closures, delivering rapid economic returns to communities, periodically boosting fisher income
  • Private sector partnerships enabling the development of community based aquaculture
  • For fishing communities, focus on rebuilding fisheries as the primary livelihood
  • Seek out partnerships to support livelihood diversification and the establishment of savings and loans schemes
Addressing community needs

In order to enable communities to engage in the complex, long term work of the sustainable management of marine resources, their basic needs must be addressed. Working across sectors to enable communities to meet their basic needs creates an enabling environment within which they are able to work towards longer term goals.

 

The need for a livelihood is addressed through Blue Ventures’ work to rebuild fisheries, and through livelihood diversification initiatives where appropriate. The unmet need for health care is addressed through supporting and strengthening local health systems, and through partnerships with health care providers.

 

Working in a multisectoral way creates efficiencies through the sharing of resources and opportunities across programmes. It provides opportunities to broaden community engagement and build trust, and experience has shown that it enables communities to better respond to shocks and stressors.

  • Multidisciplinary teams
  • Taking a whole system approach to problem solving and developing a theory of change
  • Strong partnerships with actors from different sectors

 

  • Build a unifying vision and integrated program of work with partners, based on shared values and respect for each other’s contribution to the overall goal and with buy-in from the whole team
  • Capture and share evidence of the added value of working in a multisectoral way
  • Ensure effective communication with all stakeholders, anchoring messaging in the purpose of collaboration
Strong local presence, empowering communities and building local capacity

Our strong local presence, and emphasis on working in partnership with communities and local stakeholders to rebuild fisheries, has meant that much of the work has been able to continue in spite of travel restrictions and other disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Empowering communities to sustainably manage their own resources and health services has proven to be a more resilient approach to conservation in the context of this major shock. 


Communities have the most to gain from the effective management of natural resources (and good community health services), and the pandemic has served as a powerful reminder of the value of locally led approaches to marine conservation. 

 

  • Long term local presence
  • Staff recruited from the local community
  • A willingness to listen

 

  • Invest the time to build relationships with communities, keep putting communities first
  • Focus on building local capacity for the long term, harness local wisdom, draw upon and help to build social capital  
Garth Cripps and Blue Ventures
East and South Africa
Southeast Asia
South Asia
Vik
Mohan
Strong local presence, empowering communities and building local capacity
Addressing community needs
Access to financial resources
Garth Cripps and Blue Ventures
East and South Africa
Southeast Asia
South Asia
Vik
Mohan
Strong local presence, empowering communities and building local capacity
Addressing community needs
Access to financial resources
MSPglobal, IOC-UNESCO
Planning, reporting and monitoring stakeholder participation and communication
Strengthening stakeholders’ capacities
Analyzing current conditions of the marine environment and maritime uses
Building scenarios for MSP and sustainable blue economy
Showcasing key results through a simplified and interactive storytelling tool
Supporting the formulation of institutional recommendations at regional scale
Showcasing key results through a simplified and interactive storytelling tool

This Building Block aimed to develop a multilingual storytelling tool to showcase both existing conditions and scenarios for the pilot in the Gulf of Guayaquil. The objective was to present the data and information in a simplified and interactive way, and as such to turn complex concepts into notions easily understood by all stakeholders.

  • Professionals with previous experience in developing an online storytelling tool with spatial data visualization
  • Technical reports with the necessary data and information published in advance
  • Spatial data organized in a geodatabase with metadata
  • Teamwork: Those involved in the development of the reports need to work in close collaboration with those responsible for developing the tool to ensure that the key results are properly selected and displayed
  • Structure: Organize the story through different themes, titles, taglines and sections
  • Be concise: Limit the size of the texts to the key messages. If the user is interested in learning more, reports with the full information should be available
  • Technical terms: Whenever possible, avoid using difficult and/or technical language (including acronyms) that might be incomprehensible for a wider audience. If it cannot be avoided, better to add the meaning
  • Responsive web tool: Depending on the type and format of the content, it might be difficult to ensure that the tool is sufficiently responsive across different internet browsers, resolutions and electronic devices
  • Beta version: It is recommended to develop a beta version (pre-release) and then ask some users to play with it before the launch
Building scenarios for MSP and sustainable blue economy

This Building Block aimed to analyze potential future conditions of the Gulf of Guayaquil in order to build three scenarios by 2030: trend scenario; conservationist scenario; and integrated scenario. The developed scenarios DO NOT represent official proposals for the area; instead, they are a starting point for a multi-sectoral and cross-border dialogue about the desired future. A technical report was developed and made publicly available.

  • Sectoral plans with objectives and potential areas of development already identified
  • National policies with at least some goals for the coastal and marine socio-ecological system already identified
  • Potential areas of development: Important to confirm with competent authorities if the areas identified in previous policies are still valid
  • Transparency: Justify the goals and assumptions of each scenario, as well as how they were developed. If they are not official proposals, make it clear whenever presenting the scenarios in order to avoid any issue, such as a governmental stakeholder upset because it was not involved in the process
  • How to use: Develop some guidelines with suggestions on how to use and adapt the scenarios during dialogue and negotiation with stakeholders at national and regional levels
Analyzing current conditions of the marine environment and maritime uses

This Building Block aimed to analyze the current conditions of the Gulf of Guayaquil (historical bay shared by Ecuador and Peru) as an example that could be replicated in other cross-border areas. Policies, data and information on the marine environmental and main maritime uses were analyzed to identify use-use and use-nature conflicts and compatibilities, resulting in the development of a technical report publicly available.

 

Spatial data was compiled with the support of the National Focal Point of each country, who contacted and requested the data to the competent governmental authorities. A geodatabase with metadata was built and maps developed. Consultation activities (local and binational) were organized with stakeholders in order to review the maps and provide further information about conservation and sectoral issues. 

  • Access to public national, regional and international data sources
  • Data from previous project developed in the region
  • Key governmental partners to support data compilation
  • Increasing willingness of data providers to share the data due to engagement activities
  • At least one member of the team with expertise in spatial data available during the whole initiative in case additional analysis is necessary
  • Policies: Analyze them as a package to understand their connections, overlaps and gaps, as well as the governance framework. Some policies provide relevant information about zones already established for different sectors, although this kind of spatial data is not always publicly available
  • Data providers: Map the potential data providers and then request data through a key governmental partner in order to increase the chance of a positive answer
  • Lack of data: Some institutions might not be willing to share data, so it is important to be transparent and acknowledge data gaps
  • Data quality: Validate with experts the reliability of data compiled from a source outside of national or international institutions; and if needed, remove it from the analysis
Planning, reporting and monitoring stakeholder participation and communication

This BB aimed to structure the tasks related to stakeholder engagement and communication through the development of:

I) A Strategy for Public Participation based on:

  • Three pillars: identification of stakeholders; engagement activities; and monitoring and evaluation of participation
  • A two-way participatory approach: balance between top-down and bottom-up

II) A Communication and Dissemination Plan to set a unified tone and direction so that all activities, tools and materials work in harmony to create a shared vision to raise awareness of the initiative and its results. It also included monitoring of a number of metrics – through various channels and means – to evaluate the overall impact and success of communication and dissemination actions.

 

Standalone communication and dissemination plans, as well as engagement plans and reports were developed to guide and evaluate each activity implemented. The key messages from these reports were used as web news in order to communicate and report back to the stakeholders.

 

In the Southeast Pacific pilot, the following engagement activities were implemented:

  • Stakeholder meetings, especially for the mapping exercise in the Gulf of Guayaquil
  • Institutional workshops at national and regional levels
  • Training courses for governmental authorities and sectoral stakeholders
  • Contacts from previous project developed in the region
  • Nomination of a governmental representative (National Focal Point) to support the identification of stakeholders, as well as to officially invite them to participate
  • Development of a Stakeholder Database to include all stakeholders who so wished, facilitating the contact and dissemination of information
  • Development of a visual identity
  • A member of the team fully dedicated to communication
  • Stakeholder Database: When dealing with hundreds of stakeholders, better to build a database with limited number of essential fields to maintain communication
  • Stakeholder mapping: Actively map stakeholders (e.g., snowball technique) in order to expand and diversify the actors engaged
  • Engagement activities: Start organizing and publicizing well in advance, as well as send reminders frequently (for both face-to-face and online events)
  • Local stakeholders: Field visits to identify and engage with local stakeholders, who might be less willing to use virtual channels
  • Communications and outreach: Adapt communication to the stakeholders involved; use different channels to reach larger audience; mix digital, audiovisual and print products