PA Effectively manned - "The last band on the titanic"

The effective management of the Reserve depended on the willingness of core staff - 8 wardens and 1 science officer - to remain on the nature reserve despite the countrywide lockdown and restrictions. This staff chose to stay on the island to carry out MPA activities instead of being at home with their families. For context, Cousin Island is relatively remote. Staff live on the island without partners or families, and have the opportunity to get off the island over the weekend. However, during the Covid-19 lockdowns, their limited movement was further curtailed by restrictions.

  • Available donor funding to retain core staff
  • Committed staff
  • A committed team that goes beyond the call of duty is required to run an MPA. However, they must also be remunerated for their work
  • Management effectiveness can plummet depending on capacities to cope with extended periods of financial difficulties
  • We need to continue to safeguard strategic natural assets and the essential services they provide so that resilience is maintained to help us bounce back from crises
Data collection (IMET and SAGE)

The purpose was to  enhance knowledge on the assessment tools and to collect data for informed decisions. For the Intergrated Management Effectiveness Tool (IMET), this involves collecting comprehensive data on the ecological and management attributes of the park and for the Site Assessment on Governance and Equity (SAGE), it involves collecting data on the views and needs of all the stakeholders to facilitate a joint understanding of the governance and the key issues faced in governance of the site. This data is then collectively analysed and provides transparency for all stakeholders present as they have contributed to the data and the analysis. 

  • Description of the assessment tools at the start of the workshop, simplifying terminology into the local language 

  • Ensuring that participants understand the type of information required

  • Ensuring active participation from everybody

  • Duration of the workshop - long days discourage people to attend

  • Participants knowledge and active participation 

  • Participants availability for all sessions

  • Lack of data as a result of participants who did not show  up can hamper prorgess

  • IMET tool has some challenges when working offline and there is a need to cater for this in remote areas

  • Most participants were not familiar with biodiversity conservation terminologies and some time needs to be added to allow for some explanations first. 

  • Close integration with community members is vital - they feel important and provide all the information

  • There is need to probe some participants to get information

  • The tools need coaches knowledgeable about conducting the assessment

  • The assessment tools are giving insight information for improvement of the park management and identifies capacity building needs

Nature Seychelles/Liz Mwambui
East and South Africa
Liz
Mwambui
PA Effectively manned - "The last band on the titanic"
Availability of donor funding for salaries
Partnerships for conservation
Compliance with health and tourism safety requirements for reopening
Nature Seychelles/Liz Mwambui
East and South Africa
Liz
Mwambui
PA Effectively manned - "The last band on the titanic"
Availability of donor funding for salaries
Partnerships for conservation
Compliance with health and tourism safety requirements for reopening
Nature Seychelles/Liz Mwambui
East and South Africa
Liz
Mwambui
PA Effectively manned - "The last band on the titanic"
Availability of donor funding for salaries
Partnerships for conservation
Compliance with health and tourism safety requirements for reopening
Identification of appropriate technology

Data collection is digitised using technological applications often selected to meet the needs of a particular project. In wildlife monitoring and protection, SMART for Conservation was identified as a suitable software for it provides a quick form to record incidents while tracking the distance covered by each team. Further, data collected in this manner needs to be used alongside other datasets for well informed decision making. To achieve this, an integration with Earthranger (an online visualization platform) was instituted to allow visual analysis of incidents and patrol coverage against other components such as tagged animals, live streaming images from security cameras, points of interest and environmental hazard reports.

  • Landscape-level collaboration - Learning from other players in the field to select technologies that have worked and can help in collaboration and sharing

  • Conservation Technology Laboratory - Existence of a technology development and trialing facility at the project site enhanced consultations with developers and other users. It was essential for conducting training, software configurations and system integration.

  • Knowledge of existing gaps - There was a clear understanding of gaps in data submission (time, geolocations and inconsistencies)

  • Team participation - Deliberate involvement of key staff members who have knowledge in the fieldwork designs, management needs and existing gaps is useful in pointing out technological needs.

  • Engagement of other organizations and people - It is important to learn from others who will indicate successful parts of the solution and associated shortfalls. These engagements would often help identify training needs, appropriate equipment and sustainability of the project

  • There is probably no fit-for-all solution - Application of identified technology/solution for data collection and/or analysis may need to be implemented together with other applications to enhance information management and sharing

  • Piloting before implementation - At the point of identification, it is useful to undertake a pilot rollout with a trial group if resources allow to gauge applicability and highlight potential pitfalls

Awareness and community outreach

The purpose of this building block is to ensure that the broader communities are involved in the conservation efforts through activities that they are passionate about i.e youth through sports, school children through reading programmes. This helps to improve the connectedness that the local people have with the rhinos and they value the rhino more. 

  • Organized youth groups and structures

  • Willing and welcoming community

  • Strong partner co-operation

Feedback meetings attended by conservancy leadership have proven to be an important communication tool to discuss objectives, challenges and ways to improve the monitoring programme. We have also implemented various projects to engage local communities through sports, reading programmes and youth clubs. Through awareness campaigns local people feel and realize the important role they play towards the conservation of rhinos.

Key partnerships to share expertise and resources

In June 2019, RRFB started the first larval propagation project in Bonaire in collaboration with SECORE International. The goal of the partnership is to establish a technical cooperation in which RRFB provides local knowledge, manpower, field logistics, and a facility, and shares all field trial results, monitoring data, and qualitative feedback on methodologies and technologies provided by SECORE Int. In return, SECORE Int. provides techniques, methodologies, expertise and training sessions on larval propagation. This partnership's knowledge was crucial for successfully implementing larval propagation techniques in Bonaire. By consistently sharing results and lessons learned, the technique was improved, leading to greater success and scalability for future project replication.

  • The existence of a well developed and effective global network of scientists and practitioners willing to constructively share knowledge. 

  • A formalized partnership with well-defined roles and responsibilities.

  • The opportunity for and committment to scheduling regular virtual and in-person training sessions.

  • Having a shared vision and goals among partners.

  • Importance of scheduling regular meetings with partners before and after each major step of technique implementation to formalize results, feedback and lessons learnt.

Identifying facilitators and Assistant facilitators and identification of stakeholders for both trainings
  • Sensitization of the Ministry Management on the project for endorsement of the activities as the PA is managed by the government.
  • Identifying facilitators who are knowledgeable about the tools with assistance from IUCN as this was the first time the training were conducted and there was no expertise in the country. 
  • Identifying  assistant facilitators from the Ministry to assist with logistics and interpretation. Assistant facilitators, especially youth should also come from members of the community for them to feel free to provide information and feel the need to implement the findings together.
  • Stakeholders identification for each workshop training was based on the type of data to be collected. The target participants for SAGE training were mostly the local authorities (Chiefs, local council) and other structures  involved in decision making in biodiversity conservation related matters. The target participants for IMET were mostly technical people involved in conservation related issues. Line Ministries were engaged in the training workshop to provide technical expertise on conservation related activities outside PCAs in their respective departments and to agree on the working relations to link conservation inside and outside the PCA
  • Good stakeholder map available allowing informed selection of the relevant people for the assessments
  • Endorsement by the Ministry and Park management for support of the processes
  • Identify possible obstacles and solutions prior to the workshop

  • There is need to invite stakeholders on time to diarise and create time for their participation

  • Sometimes there is need to identify specific people who are involved in projects because they have information that is needed for the process. Ministries sometimes send participants who do not have that information.

  • Considering motivation for participants to keep them throughout the entire period of the workshop (some participants especially community members and the local authorities) 

  • Considering interviewing of the decision makers who are not able to attend the workshop at another time to ensure their input is part of the process.

Establishing information centers in Mangabe Reserve

The IMET evaluation of Mangabe Reserve in 2020 revealed weaknesses in infrastructure, capacity and communication that hamper effectiveness of the Reserve. Sustainability of the Reserve depends entirely on the capacity of the local communities to manage it. This is compounded by poor education levels of the population and difficult access to the villages. Over the past years, we have been bringing technicians from the towns to inform and train community members. It is now time to make this knowledge available locally so that youth who are better educated can access and use them as needed. Our challenge until 2030 is to establish an information center at each of the ten villages within Mangabe Reserve. In 2021, we started the initiative to build three information centers in three villages (Mangabe, Andranomandry, and Avolo) within the Mangabe Reserve. At the center, all community members will be able to obtain information about the Reserve and the existing regulations from one place. They will also be able to learn about improved farming techniques and read documents on financial management, personal development, etc. The center will represent the permanent presence of the Reserve that people will know and respect. As a result, we expect annual forest cover loss to decrease below 250ha from 2022.

  • Consult and collect the needs of local communities
  • Local communities give act of land endowment to build the information centers
  • Involve community members during the process of the building of information centers

 

To run information centers, we planned monthly events involving staffs from Ministry representatives and other guests to cover relevant topics for the local communities (importance of Protected Area, sustainable agriculture, health and hygiene…). Due to the delay in the building of information centers, acquisition and transport of equipment, and fieldwork missions, this objective was not achieved as planned. This led us to design an annual planning of the use of information centers. In 2022, the information center in Mangabe village was used for sewing and embroidery course for the women group, the information center in Andranomandry was dedicated for alphabetization course for adult people, and the information center in Avolo village was mainly used for community meetings.