Operational planning and implementation

Once the committee is officially recognized and its members’ capabilities are clear, it needs to start the creation of a development plan. This development plan includes a clear vision for the future, outlines the course of action and envised outcomes. All committee members should be involved in the creation of this joint picture of the future of their waterbodies and the planned management practices to reach this joint picture.

Such a target could be combating illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing (IUU) in the waterbody the committee is managing. Therefore, the management committee assesses the initial status of the waterbody and fishing activities, develops patrol plans, and organises awareness-raising events to inform the community of new regulations. 

When necessary, the management can request assistance from relevant authorities, like commune chiefs, fisheries administrations or provincial departments of agriculture and fisheries. In addition, the supported committee can collect fishing data, document all their patrolling and record or report any IUU fishing incidents that occur within its area. They achieve this by either using paper forms or digitally with tablets or cellphones when trained accordingly.

Next, the committee must learn how to turn its development plan into a monthly action plan. This can be done following the same process as was used to establish their development plan, just for the course of one month at a time. With the help of external assistance, they can determine what they can do over the next thirty days. 

Finally, a simple monitoring and evaluation system needs to be set up. Generally, this involves monitoring the progress of the tasks listed in their action plan. This includes recording any deviations from the plan, documenting any modifications made, and keeping track of the expenses associated with each activity. The committee should meet at the end of each month to review the previous month’s work and schedule the next one. A regular review process helps ensure that the committee stays on track and can adjust its strategies as necessary.

The project approach

The implementation of these CSA practices has led to significant changes in beneficiary behavior. Minority groups have started adopting appropriate CSA technologies, engaging with local technical advisors, diversifying income sources, and exploring market opportunities. Additionally, knowledge and skills related to CSA techniques have been disseminated to the local community through project partners, including unions and institutions.

Presentation of results

Following from the six monitoring methods, six databases were also created to collect and analyse the data from these activities. The results have been written up into formal reports in English and Portuguese and shared with the national government. 

Each of the three fieldwork coordinators responsible for the data collection, processing and analysis of the data presented the results to other NGOs, the ministry of environment, Câmara Municipal Boa Vista (CMBV) (town council), Society of Tourism Development in Boa Vista and Maio (STDIBVM), Varandinha Association, Port Maritime Institute (IMP) and National Police including Maritime Police 

We are also hoping to submit the data collected during this project to be published in national scientific journals. 

Cooperation of the stakeholders.

Detailed and through databases produced by Dr Dario Cesarini with formulars for automatic calculation of indicators. 

Division of workload.

Sharing data allows for constructive feedback to be given to improve methods in the future. It also brings more meaning to the work and data colelction that was implemented over many months.

Community-Based Forest Management

This involves engaging local communities in forest management can be effective in any region where local populations depend on forest resources. These initiatives have granted communities secure land tenure and motivated them to manage forest resources effectively. By involving locals in forest stewardship, conditions have improved, and alternative income sources such as agroforestry and eco-tourism have been developed. The programs have increased community control and accountability in forest management, resulting in healthier forests and greater community engagement. Their success is largely due to robust local institutions, favorable policies, and ongoing capacity-building. Community participation in decision-making and resource-sharing has further enhanced forest conservation and improved livelihoods.

Successful Community-Based Forest Management relies on several key enabling factors. Establishing a clear legal and policy framework is crucial to support community management of forests. Empowering local communities through training and education builds their capacity to manage forest resources effectively. Providing economic incentives and ensuring that communities benefit from sustainable forest management encourages active participation. Partnerships with NGOs, government agencies, and the private sector can bolster community initiatives. Finally, implementing robust monitoring and evaluation systems helps track progress and adapt strategies as needed. By integrating these elements, Community-Based Forest Management can promote sustainable forest management and community development in various contexts.

Empowering local communities and ensuring their active participation in forest management is crucial. When communities have a vested interest in the management and benefits of forest resources, they are more likely to adopt sustainable practices and protect the forest. Secondly, the establishment of clear and supportive policies and legal frameworks is essential. These frameworks provide the necessary rights and incentives for communities to manage forests sustainably, ensuring their efforts are recognized and supported. Without legal recognition and support, community initiatives can be undermined. Additionally, continuous capacity building and support are vital for the long-term success of Community-Based Forest Management. Providing training, education, and ongoing technical assistance helps communities develop the skills and knowledge needed to manage forests effectively and adapt to changing conditions. These lessons underscore the importance of community involvement, supportive governance, and ongoing capacity development in achieving sustainable forest management.

Information dissemination, communication with customers

The final product's value is created through sustainable development goals. It is essential this message is passed on to the customer through the acquisition of the product, whether it be furniture, a bracelet or ball pen. 

Spending time at the facility, participating in a class or tour gives exposure to the processes in an innovative and creative manner. The facilitators are expert at providing 

Recycling Abandoned nets

The focal point of recycling is a step by step process that transforms waste product into a reusable, valueable substance. The composition of the net is cleaned, crushed and restructured

Abandoned nets are broken down as raw material, the raw material transitions to a Recycler. The rPET is returned in pellet form

a lot of experimentation as to timing, size, application

5. Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation

Regular engagement allowed for the assessment of impacts and adjustments based on feedback, ensuring the project remained aligned with community needs and goals. Monitoring strengthened relationships between implementers and beneficiaries, building trust and accountability.

 

Continuous evaluation closed the loop by integrating lessons learned back into decision-making, capacity building, and implementation, ensuring the project stayed adaptive and relevant.

Multi-Sectoral Stakeholder Approach to Addressing Gender Equality and Environmental Sustainability

This building block fosters collaboration among diverse stakeholders to address the structural and systemic issues intersecting gender equality and environmental sustainability. Through activities such as training sessions, conflict management meetings, and leadership support, stakeholders from the gender sector (led by the Division of Gender) and the environmental sector (led by the Ministry of Fisheries) engage in cross-sectoral discussions to align objectives and integrate solutions. For example, fisheries stakeholders provide insights into resource management and illegal practices, while gender sector members contribute expertise on GBV prevention and response mechanisms. The initiative also influences policy by advocating for and supporting the revision of legal instruments like the Fisheries Act and the Anti-GBV Act of 2011, ensuring they address the unique challenges at this intersection. Additionally, technical support is provided for mainstreaming gender considerations in other sectors and integrating cross-cutting issues into broader policy frameworks. By aligning community-level efforts with institutional policies, this approach ensures scalable, sustainable, and contextually relevant interventions.

  1. Policy and Legal Advocacy: Engaging stakeholders in revising key policies, such as the Fisheries Act and Anti-GBV Act, ensures the alignment of national frameworks with the realities of community-level challenges.
  2. Cross-Sector Collaboration: Inclusion of diverse stakeholders—district committees, line ministries, community leaders, and local institutions—promotes synergy in addressing interconnected challenges.
  3. Institutional Support for Integration: Providing technical assistance for mainstreaming gender across sectors ensures that interventions align with broader national development goals.
  4. Accountability Mechanisms: Regular reporting and feedback loops between community actors and state-level stakeholders strengthen coordination, transparency, and long-term support.
  5. Contextual Awareness: Recognizing the socio-political and cultural dynamics, such as cross-border issues in Sesheke, enables flexible and tailored solutions.
  1. Policy Influence Requires Persistence: Revising laws and policies to reflect grassroots realities, such as integrating "sex for fish" dynamics into the Fisheries Act, is a gradual but essential process.
  2. Integration Enhances Impact: Addressing GBV and environmental issues in isolation is less effective than integrating these efforts into other sectors, such as health and education, to reflect the interconnectedness of societal challenges.
  3. Collaboration Fosters Sustainability: Strong partnerships between gender and fisheries sectors help stakeholders appreciate mutual dependencies, resulting in better coordination and ownership of interventions.
  4. Respecting Local Dynamics Is Critical: Communities dependent on resources may resist government interventions due to historical or systemic inequalities. A participatory approach rooted in respect and understanding is essential.
  5. Adaptability in Complex Contexts: Addressing intersectional challenges which are deeply embeded in neoliberal systems and structures such as intersectional inequality, rural marginalization and cross-border security issues, requires flexibility and innovative resource use to sustain project momentum.
Engagement of Men and Boys in addressing GBV in the Fisheries Sector.

This building block emphasizes the critical role of engaging men and boys in addressing GBV within the fisheries sector. Recognizing that gender equality requires collaboration between men and women, this initiative targets the predominantly male-dominated fisheries sector to foster a more inclusive and supportive environment. By involving men ie: fishermen, law enforcer, male stakeholders, landowners, transportation providers, and traditional leaders—in awareness raising, training, and GBV Watch Committees, the intervention seeks to transform negative attitudes and behaviours that perpetuate GBV, including exploitative sex-for-fish practices. It also leverages the influence of traditional leaders to drive societal change, ensuring that men play an active role in avoiding backlach and safeguarding women and addressing the interconnected challenges of resource depletion, illegal fishing, and GBV. 

  1. Inclusive Approach - Ensuring that men and boys are actively included in interventions, such as training and GBV Watch Committees, to foster collaboration and shared responsibility.
  2. Engagement with Influential Men - Involving traditional and religious leaders, teachers, and fisheries officers, fishermen and law enforcers as agents of change to drive community-wide transformation.
  3. Respecting Cultural Dynamics - Gaining the buy-in of traditional leaders by respecting their roles and aligning interventions with local governance systems.
  4. Awareness and Capacity Building - Raising awareness among men about the impact of GBV and providing them with tools to address it within their roles as resource and tradition custodians and community leaders.
  1. Collaboration Is Essential: Addressing GBV effectively requires working with both men and women, as men are often key decision-makers and actors in the fisheries sector.
  2. Cultural Sensitivity Matters: Engaging traditional leaders takes time and patience but is critical for securing their support and using their influence to enact change.
  3. Systematic Inclusion Yields Results: Including men in GBV Watch Committees and training sessions has fostered shared responsibility and reduced resistance to interventions.
  4. Sustained Engagement Is Needed: Changing perceptions and behaviors among men requires continuous awareness and reinforcement to ensure long-term impact.
  5. Sector Integration Is Key: Fisheries officers, while primarily tasked with technical duties, can play a significant role in addressing GBV once sensitized and empowered.
Establishment of community level GBV Response Mechanism

The GBV Response mechanism at community level was establish to prevent and respond to the GBV cases and fishing illegalities which occours in the fisheries sector due to the lack of reporting structures and long distances from the fishing communities to the formal GBV response structures through the establishment of GBV Watch Committees. The GBV Watch Commitees provide awareness in the fishing camp and fishing communities about the exploitative sex for fish practices. They also respond to GBV disclosures at community level, the committees also link survivors to proffessional services and operate as safe space in the community among other functions. 

  1. Engaging communities in establishing and managing GBV Watch Committees ensures community ownership and fosters trust, and sustainability.
  2. Capacity building and training of the committees and raising community awareness strengthen GBV prevention and response in the fisheries sector.
  3. Connecting committees with formal services ensures survivors receive holistic support.
  4. Integrating GBV committees into policies for further institutional support enhances their effectiveness and legitimacy.
  1. Local mechanisms to bridge structural gaps are essential where formal GBV structures are lacking.
  2. Leveraging local and traditional knowledge and adapting to their ways ensures community resilience and sustainable outcomes.
  3. Addressing cross-sectoral approaches such as GBV and environmental/climate issues together achieves a broader impact.
  4. Collaboration matters when resource-owning communities and partners work together and the results delivered are more impactful.
  5. Financing partners do not need to impose what they wish from the resource-owning communities, results may only last as much as the intervention lasts.