India Biochar and Bioresources Network (IBBN)

The India Biochar and Bioresources Network (IBBN) is a collaborative platform that promotes and educates on the use of biochar and circular agriculture for a collective usage of bioresources. This network facilitates the sharing of information between farmers, policy makers, and researchers, to bridge the knowledge-policy-application gap and promote biochar application on a large scale. IBBN is in the process of establishing bioresource and biochar supply chains to ensure that the produce is marketed and sold at a fair price. Furthermore, the network is working towards establishing credible partnerships with carbon market platforms to facilitate generation and trading of carbon credits that will help farmers and village panchayats involved in agroecological and natural farming practices. A network like the IBBN can be replicated in other regions to support the use of biochar, as its integrative and knowledge-sharing methods are highly adaptive. 

  • Collaborations between scientists, farmers, industry, government, and non-governmental organisations to promote sustainable biochar management and ensure a vivid and relevant network. 
  • Further research, including policy briefs and white papers including technological, environmental, and economic aspects of climate mitigation via biochar and other bioresources, is needed to ensure evidence-based application of the technologies.  
  • Accessible knowledge systems are needed to spread relevant information on the application and promotion of biochar as technology and a sales product amongst relevant stakeholders.luding 
  • Membership, consultancy, and strategic collaborations with funding agencies to sustain the network. 
  • The success of IBBN depends on active participation from farmers, policymakers, researchers, and private sector actors. Clear roles and responsibilities for each stakeholder ensure effective collaboration and knowledge exchange. 
  • Many farmers and policymakers are unaware of the full potential of biochar. Tailored capacity-building programs and demonstration projects help translate research findings into practical applications at the farm level 
  • While IBBN provides a national framework, localized solutions tailored to regional bioresource availability, farming practices, and policy landscapes have proven most effective in scaling up biochar adoption. 
  • For long-term viability, diverse funding sources—including membership fees, consultancy services, and strategic partnerships with funding agencies—are necessary to support research, capacity-building, and market facilitation activities 
Knowledge Management and Gender-Inclusive Awareness for Sustainable Biosphere Re-serve Governance

This building block strengthens knowledge management and promotes gender-inclusive awareness to support sustainable governance of Viet Nam’s Biosphere Reserves. It began with identifying the low levels of understanding among communities, tourism operators, and sector agencies about threats to biodiversity and the impacts of unplanned development. The project then designed a coordinated training and knowledge-sharing approach to build local skills and create systems for transferring lessons across sites.

A total of 92 training courses were delivered at central and provincial levels on Biosphere Reserve management, biodiversity integration in planning, monitoring tools, and sustainable livelihood models. More than 3,100 participants—around 40% of whom were women—were trained on biodiversity monitoring, METT application, and natural resource management. By September 2024, awareness levels among community members and tourism operators reached 75%.

To sustain learning beyond individual trainings,  knowledge management systems were strengthened. Open-access websites for the national Biosphere Reserve target sites were created or upgraded to host guidelines, resources, and training materials. In addition, 19 potential best-practice models were identified and documented, including those related to set-aside zones and eco-tourism,  for potential replication, helping ensure that successful models can be adapted and scaled across other Biosphere Reserves in Viet Nam.

Systematic Documentation: Documentation of good practices and establishment of a national coordination hub for sharing lessons. 

Consistent Awareness Efforts: Regular communication and awareness-raising to promote Biosphere Reserve approaches nationwide.

Tailored Capacity Building: Training and capacity-building programs tailored to community and institutional needs.

Formal Knowledge Strategy: A formalized knowledge management strategy between MAE and MAB for sustained learning.

Awareness Must Be Continuous: Trainings and communication activities were effective—raising awareness to 75% and engaging more than 3,100 participants—but lasting impact requires ongoing reinforcement rather than one-off events.

Knowledge Needs Structure, Not Just Volume: While many best practices were generated, they were not always systematically curated or linked to a national knowledge hub, limiting replication across sites.

Institutionalizing Knowledge Management Is Essential: Embedding knowledge management within MAE/NBCA and the National MAB Committee is crucial to ensure that tools, guidelines, and models are standardized, updated, and openly accessible.

Gender-Responsive Learning Strengthens Outcomes: Women’s participation was strong, but ensuring women influence decisions—not only attend activities—requires deliberate integration of gender perspectives into training content and knowledge products.

Co-Management Lessons Need Clear Pathways: Insights from participatory planning and community co-management must be documented and fed back into national policy and future Biosphere Reserve planning to avoid repeating the same challenges.

Strengthening Regulatory and Institutional Framework for Biosphere Reserve Management

Biosphere Reserves were not formally recognized in Vietnam’s national law, resulting in fragmented governance and unstable financing. To address this, the project supported the integration of Biosphere Reserve management into the Law on Environmental Protection (2020) (No. 072/2020/QH) and contributed to the issuance of Decree No. 08/2022/ND-CP and Circular No. 02/2022/TT-BTNMT, which together provide clear legal mandates for Biosphere Reserves under Article 153.

These policies were then translated into actionable guidance includingthe development of the National Strategy for Biosphere Reserve Management, the Plan for Expanding and Strengthening the Biosphere Reserve System, and technical guidelines on Key Biodiversity Areas, High Conservation Value Forests, sustainable forest management, and biodiversity mainstreaming in provincial planning. To ensure effective implementation, 92 capacity-building courses were delivered for national and provincial officials, resulting in a 35% increase in institutional capacity.

Biodiversity Impact Assessment requirements were also integrated into the national environmental assessment system, ensuring that new development projects within Biosphere Reserves apply biodiversity safeguards. Together, these efforts created a coherent governance framework, strengthened cross-level coordination, increased Biosphere Reserve financing by 305% between 2017–2024, and enhanced the long-term sustainability of Biosphere Reserve management in Viet Nam.

Government commitment: Strong national commitment under MONRE (now MAE) to integrate Biosphere Reserve management into environmental policies (LEP 2020, MONRE Circular 2022).

Cross-sector collaboration: Active collaboration among MAE, MAB, and UNDP, fostering cross-sector coherence.

National–provincial coordination: Effective coordination mechanisms between national and provincial levels.

Openness to co-management: Government openness to institutionalizing co-management and adaptive governance frameworks.

Legal recognition transforms practice: Anchoring Biosphere Reserves in national law proved essential. Once integrated into the Law on Environmental Protection and supported by Decree No. 08/2022/ND-CP and Circular No. 02/2022/TT-BTNMT, Biosphere Reserves gained clear mandates, legitimacy, and access to more stable financing.

Tools and mandates must be practical: Legal reforms only became operational when paired with usable guidelines on Key Biodiversity Areas, High Conservation Value Forests, sustainable forest management, and Biodiversity Impact Assessment. These tools helped provinces translate policy into daily decision-making.

Co-design accelerates adoption: Policies developed with provincial authorities and Biosphere Reserves Management Boards were more realistic and gained faster acceptance, showing that bottom-up inputs are critical.

Capacity building is not optional: The 92 training courses created a shared understanding across sectors and increased institutional capacity by 34.8%, demonstrating that reforms need continuous investment in people, not just policies.

Better coordination unlocks financing: Clear mandates and stronger governance structures contributed to a 305% increase in Biosphere Reserve funding, illustrating that institutional clarity directly supports resource mobilization.

Sustaining progress requires political will: Without long-term commitment and adequate resourcing, regulatory gains risk stalling. Durable change depends on consistent leadership and follow-through.

Protected area designation & planning

Jabal Shada was declared a Special Nature Reserve (IUCN Category Ia) in 2002, following a reconnaissance survey conducted in 2001 by the former National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development (NCWCD). After establishment of the National Center for Wildlife (NCW), a new management plan was developed (meant to be updated after every 5 years) which integrates biodiversity protection with local livelihoods supporting Shadawi coffee cultivation, community-based development, ecotourism, and regular biodiversity monitoring to ensure long-term conservation of this unique mountain ecosystem. Jabal Shada was also registered on the world database of protected areas (WDPA).

Sustainable NWFP Marketing to Support Community Livelihoods

This building block focuses on strengthening 19 NWFP Community Groups through well-developed management plans and bylaws that ensure sustainable harvesting, monitoring, and equitable benefit-sharing. JWS is known for the sustainable collection of Rubia spp., Swertia chirayita, star anise, soft broom grass, mushrooms, and other high-value NWFPs.
Management activities include resource assessment, setting harvest quotas, training communities on proper harvesting techniques, enforcing bylaws, and supporting community-led monitoring. JWS also supports market linkages, pricing transparency, and annual reviews of the management plans.
Community participation is central: members help monitor resource conditions, report illegal extraction, follow sustainable harvest practices, and collectively manage income distribution.
In 2024, these groups collectively earned around Nu. 3.5 million from the sale of Rubia spp., Swertia chirayita, and star anise alone, excluding income from other NWFPs, demonstrating the livelihood potential of sustainably managed forest resources.

  1. Strong community institutions with approved bylaws
  2. Training on sustainable harvesting and monitoring
  3. Market access for high-value NWFPs
  4. Active patrolling support to reduce illegal extraction
  1. Clear rules and bylaws improve compliance and sustainability
  2. Community ownership increases protection and reduces overharvesting
  3. Regular resource assessments help adjust quotas and prevent depletion
  4. Strong market linkages boost community income
  5. Transparent benefit-sharing builds trust and long-term participation
tripulante a bordo liberando tiburón sedoso
Cooperation with tuna stock assessment models
Development of biodegradable and non-meshing Fish aggregating devices (FADs)
Strengthen on-board monitoring in 100% of the fleet and Data Collection throughout the fleet
Participatory Management, Training and Awareness
Multisectoral Collaboration
Implementation of Codes of Good Practice
Cooperation for the conservation of marine protected areas.
Nationwide capacity-building and awareness-raising for environmental budgets’ planning, implementation, monitoring, and reporting

Lastly, this solution has included capacity-building activities and awareness-raising meetings across all 21 provinces and the capital since 2022. For capacity-building, trainings have been provided online and in-person, while forums and workshops were also organized for broader discussions. Awareness-raising meetings have targeted specific local decision-makers and have been conducted in-person.  

The objective of these activities is to equip local actors with the knowledge and skills needed for environmental management and budgeting aligned with the NRUF, through exercises on planning, execution reporting, and monitoring and evaluation of local environmental budgets. Trainings have also focused on the Environmental Budget and Expenditure Database, helping local governments to disclose their information and improving data-driven planning and decision-making.  

 Moreover, UNDP BIOFIN is working with the government of Mongolia in the development of an expenditure taxonomy, which will provide a standardized categorization of environmental expenditures, adding clarity and consistency to budget reporting.  

Key enabling factors include sufficient time, personnel, and funding to conduct a variety of trainings, workshops, and meetings at the local level. The development of easy-to-understand materials, knowledge products, and supporting activities is also an essential factor. 

Trainings and workshops should focus on translating complex information into clear and actionable messages. This is crucial to ensure their effectiveness and address the main challenge of legal complexity and ambiguity in the context of the NRUF. Practical components, such as hands-on activities, further support the achievement of learning outcomes by reflecting what local actors will have to do, in practice, when defining and reporting their budgets. Finally, trainings and workshops should be tailored to specific audiences. Since local governments are responsible for implementing the NRUF, and each province has unique opportunities and constraints, it is effective to provide separate trainings for individual local governments rather than solely aggregating all personal at a higher level.  

Developing a public database to track biodiversity finance, improve accountability, and ensure that governments’ expenditure responsibilities are met

A public Environmental Budget and Expenditure database was developed to disclose environmental budgets and expenditures (since 2023). Its intuitive and visual layout allows users to track how much each province has spent on biodiversity each year. This has two main implications.  

 First, by having to thoroughly fill the database, local governments can use it as a tool to better understand how to develop their own environmental budgets and clarifying which categories should be included.  

 Second, the public database promotes accountability and transparency in environmental planning and budgeting, encouraging governments to fulfill their biodiversity finance responsibilities under the NRUF and, ultimately, functioning as an effective monitoring tool.  

 

Technical capacity and funding for the development, implementation, and maintenance of the database; local governments’ understanding of the database and commitment to disclose their environmental budgets and expenditures.  

Beyond legal responsibilities, monitoring and accountability tools (such as publicly available databases) can create additional incentives for enforcing biodiversity expenditure laws. These tools offer a practical way to translate disaggregated information into an easily accessible format for tracking biodiversity finance. It is important, however, that the development of these tools is accompanied by efforts to raise awareness of their existence, ensuring they are effectively used to monitor progress and support law enforcement.  

Enhancing regulation and strengthening cooperation across government levels for effective law enforcement

BIOFIN and the National Audit Office of Mongolia jointly assessed the implementation level of the NRUF and examined institutional and regulatory gaps affecting law enforcement. The review found that weak enforcement resulted from legal ambiguities, inconsistent regulations, and ineffective coordination among government agencies. Following this process, BIOFIN provided technical assistance to develop revised regulations that address these legal ambiguities.  

 

Beyond regulatory enhancements, a fundamental component was strengthening cooperation and communication between government agencies — ensuring that the NRUF and its revised regulations are understood and effectively implemented. This is particularly important since local governments are responsible for incorporating the NRUF, a national law, into their budget processes. To support this, the Ministry of Finance (MoF) began to issue bi-annual budget call circulars: official instructions that explain the procedures to prepare next fiscal year’s budget, helping local governments to incorporate biodiversity expenditures. The MoF also increased efforts to review and approve dedicated budgets for environmental protection and natural resource rehabilitation.  

Enabling factors include mutual understanding among government agencies of the interconnectedness of biodiversity finance procedures and a willingness to cooperate. Support from biodiversity finance specialists, particularly the BIOFIN team, was also critical in identifying gaps in regulations and coordination, and in effectively supporting the development of solutions to address them.    

A key lesson learned from this building block is that cooperation and communication can bridge the gap between biodiversity finance law and practice, in combination with clear regulations that support enforcement. Although the NRUF was approved in 2012, these inconsistencies have prevented the law from achieving its intended outcomes.  

 While the NRUF is specific to Mongolia, the replicability of this building block goes beyond that. It consists of the fact that biodiversity finance is an inherently interconnected matter, and government solutions typically involve multiple agencies at different levels, from finance departments to environmental sectors. This building block shows that other governments-national, regional, or local — seeking to strengthen biodiversity finance through laws and regulations must give equal attention to governance structures, cooperation mechanisms, and regular communication and guideline tools, such as the bi-annual call circulars.  

 

Improved implementation Mongolian law NRUF
Enhancing regulation and strengthening cooperation across government levels for effective law enforcement
Developing a public database to track biodiversity finance, improve accountability, and ensure that governments’ expenditure responsibilities are met
Nationwide capacity-building and awareness-raising for environmental budgets’ planning, implementation, monitoring, and reporting