Multi-Sectoral Stakeholder Approach to Addressing Gender Equality and Environmental Sustainability

This building block fosters collaboration among diverse stakeholders to address the structural and systemic issues intersecting gender equality and environmental sustainability. Through activities such as training sessions, conflict management meetings, and leadership support, stakeholders from the gender sector (led by the Division of Gender) and the environmental sector (led by the Ministry of Fisheries) engage in cross-sectoral discussions to align objectives and integrate solutions. For example, fisheries stakeholders provide insights into resource management and illegal practices, while gender sector members contribute expertise on GBV prevention and response mechanisms. The initiative also influences policy by advocating for and supporting the revision of legal instruments like the Fisheries Act and the Anti-GBV Act of 2011, ensuring they address the unique challenges at this intersection. Additionally, technical support is provided for mainstreaming gender considerations in other sectors and integrating cross-cutting issues into broader policy frameworks. By aligning community-level efforts with institutional policies, this approach ensures scalable, sustainable, and contextually relevant interventions.

  1. Policy and Legal Advocacy: Engaging stakeholders in revising key policies, such as the Fisheries Act and Anti-GBV Act, ensures the alignment of national frameworks with the realities of community-level challenges.
  2. Cross-Sector Collaboration: Inclusion of diverse stakeholders—district committees, line ministries, community leaders, and local institutions—promotes synergy in addressing interconnected challenges.
  3. Institutional Support for Integration: Providing technical assistance for mainstreaming gender across sectors ensures that interventions align with broader national development goals.
  4. Accountability Mechanisms: Regular reporting and feedback loops between community actors and state-level stakeholders strengthen coordination, transparency, and long-term support.
  5. Contextual Awareness: Recognizing the socio-political and cultural dynamics, such as cross-border issues in Sesheke, enables flexible and tailored solutions.
  1. Policy Influence Requires Persistence: Revising laws and policies to reflect grassroots realities, such as integrating "sex for fish" dynamics into the Fisheries Act, is a gradual but essential process.
  2. Integration Enhances Impact: Addressing GBV and environmental issues in isolation is less effective than integrating these efforts into other sectors, such as health and education, to reflect the interconnectedness of societal challenges.
  3. Collaboration Fosters Sustainability: Strong partnerships between gender and fisheries sectors help stakeholders appreciate mutual dependencies, resulting in better coordination and ownership of interventions.
  4. Respecting Local Dynamics Is Critical: Communities dependent on resources may resist government interventions due to historical or systemic inequalities. A participatory approach rooted in respect and understanding is essential.
  5. Adaptability in Complex Contexts: Addressing intersectional challenges which are deeply embeded in neoliberal systems and structures such as intersectional inequality, rural marginalization and cross-border security issues, requires flexibility and innovative resource use to sustain project momentum.
Awareness Raising and Gender Training on the Interlinkages Between GBV and Environmental Degradation in the Fisheries Sector

T his building block focuses on raising awareness and providing tailored gender training to highlight the interconnectedness of GBV, particularly exploitative practices like "sex for fish," and environmental degradation in the fisheries sector. With men dominating fish harvesting and women constituting 90% of post-harvest activities, the sector reveals stark gender dynamics. The initiative educates communities and stakeholders on how these transactional relationships exacerbate resource depletion, harm biodiversity, and perpetuate power imbalances between men and women. Using diverse forms of communication, such as roadshows, community dramas, and GBV Watch Committee activities, the project aims to transform perceptions, foster collaboration, and inspire action to address these interwoven challenges.

  1. Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration: State actors, resource custodians, and legal systems working together to tackle the dual challenges of GBV and resource depletion.
  2. Diverse Communication Strategies: Using roadshows, drama, community awareness sessions, and GBV Watch Committees to effectively convey complex issues to different audiences.
  3. Local and Cross-Border Contexts: Acknowledging the unique socioeconomic and cultural contexts of communities along the Zambezi River, which spans multiple countries.
  4. Understanding Power Dynamics: Addressing the control and access to resources as central to the exploitation, rather than blaming victims or perpetuating stereotypes.

Lessons Learned

  1. Sensitivity Is Critical: Miscommunication or misrepresentation, such as media captions, can harm awareness efforts; careful messaging is essential.
  2. Continuous Engagement: Awareness raising is an ongoing process that requires sustained efforts and integration into existing platforms.
  3. Community Dynamics Matter: Resource-dependent communities can resist government-led resource management; respect and understanding of their perspectives are crucial.
  4. Challenging Stereotypes: Awareness efforts must emphasize that "sex for fish" is rooted in power imbalances rather than reducing women to instigators or sex workers.
  5. Resource Management Challenges: Disputes over ownership and responsibility for natural resources highlight the need for clear roles and strengthened governance.
Engagement of Men and Boys in addressing GBV in the Fisheries Sector.

This building block emphasizes the critical role of engaging men and boys in addressing GBV within the fisheries sector. Recognizing that gender equality requires collaboration between men and women, this initiative targets the predominantly male-dominated fisheries sector to foster a more inclusive and supportive environment. By involving men ie: fishermen, law enforcer, male stakeholders, landowners, transportation providers, and traditional leaders—in awareness raising, training, and GBV Watch Committees, the intervention seeks to transform negative attitudes and behaviours that perpetuate GBV, including exploitative sex-for-fish practices. It also leverages the influence of traditional leaders to drive societal change, ensuring that men play an active role in avoiding backlach and safeguarding women and addressing the interconnected challenges of resource depletion, illegal fishing, and GBV. 

  1. Inclusive Approach - Ensuring that men and boys are actively included in interventions, such as training and GBV Watch Committees, to foster collaboration and shared responsibility.
  2. Engagement with Influential Men - Involving traditional and religious leaders, teachers, and fisheries officers, fishermen and law enforcers as agents of change to drive community-wide transformation.
  3. Respecting Cultural Dynamics - Gaining the buy-in of traditional leaders by respecting their roles and aligning interventions with local governance systems.
  4. Awareness and Capacity Building - Raising awareness among men about the impact of GBV and providing them with tools to address it within their roles as resource and tradition custodians and community leaders.
  1. Collaboration Is Essential: Addressing GBV effectively requires working with both men and women, as men are often key decision-makers and actors in the fisheries sector.
  2. Cultural Sensitivity Matters: Engaging traditional leaders takes time and patience but is critical for securing their support and using their influence to enact change.
  3. Systematic Inclusion Yields Results: Including men in GBV Watch Committees and training sessions has fostered shared responsibility and reduced resistance to interventions.
  4. Sustained Engagement Is Needed: Changing perceptions and behaviors among men requires continuous awareness and reinforcement to ensure long-term impact.
  5. Sector Integration Is Key: Fisheries officers, while primarily tasked with technical duties, can play a significant role in addressing GBV once sensitized and empowered.
Strengthening GBV Case Management and Access to Justice in the Fisheries Sector by working with the Judicial system

This building block focuses on improving the management of GBV cases and facilitating access to justice for survivors within the environmental (fisheries) sector. Given the unique challenges, such as the remote locations of fishing camps and the limited reach of formal judicial systems, this intervention aims to bridge the gap between GBV referral pathways and the Fast Track Court system. Through community-driven mechanisms like GBV Watch Committees and engagement sessions with key stakeholders, survivors are supported in navigating complex legal processes. This initiative also works to raise awareness of the specific dynamics of "sex-for-fish" practices and ensure that judicial actors and environmental agencies collaborate effectively to address these intersecting challenges. 

  • Stakeholder Engagement- Involvement of judicial actors, GBV referral systems, and fisheries departments to create a shared understanding of GBV in the fisheries sector.
  • Community-Led Mechanisms- GBV Watch Committees act as a bridge between survivors and formal legal systems, providing local support and referrals.
  • Technical and Financial Support- Provision of resources to overcome logistical challenges, such as facilitating survivors’ access to the Fast Track Court.
  • Political and Social Awareness - Recognition of the negative impacts of sex-for-fish practices and growing political will to address GBV in environmental sectors.
  1. Time and Resources Are Critical -Addressing GBV requires long-term commitment and investment in training stakeholders to fully understand and respond to the issue.
  2. Integrated Approaches Are Key - Environmental goals cannot be achieved in isolation; addressing interconnected issues like GBV is essential.
  3. Adapting the Legal System Is Challenging - Social issues like GBV do not easily fit into rigid legal frameworks, and alternatives to punitive measures should be explored to balance justice with social needs.
  4. Systemic Change Is Needed - Decolonizing legal systems and tailoring them to local contexts is vital for improving accessibility and comprehension for communities.
  5. Nuanced Case Management - Both sectors (judicial and environmental) must clearly define and differentiate between GBV and business disputes to ensure proper case handling.
Establishment of community level GBV Response Mechanism

The GBV Response mechanism at community level was establish to prevent and respond to the GBV cases and fishing illegalities which occours in the fisheries sector due to the lack of reporting structures and long distances from the fishing communities to the formal GBV response structures through the establishment of GBV Watch Committees. The GBV Watch Commitees provide awareness in the fishing camp and fishing communities about the exploitative sex for fish practices. They also respond to GBV disclosures at community level, the committees also link survivors to proffessional services and operate as safe space in the community among other functions. 

  1. Engaging communities in establishing and managing GBV Watch Committees ensures community ownership and fosters trust, and sustainability.
  2. Capacity building and training of the committees and raising community awareness strengthen GBV prevention and response in the fisheries sector.
  3. Connecting committees with formal services ensures survivors receive holistic support.
  4. Integrating GBV committees into policies for further institutional support enhances their effectiveness and legitimacy.
  1. Local mechanisms to bridge structural gaps are essential where formal GBV structures are lacking.
  2. Leveraging local and traditional knowledge and adapting to their ways ensures community resilience and sustainable outcomes.
  3. Addressing cross-sectoral approaches such as GBV and environmental/climate issues together achieves a broader impact.
  4. Collaboration matters when resource-owning communities and partners work together and the results delivered are more impactful.
  5. Financing partners do not need to impose what they wish from the resource-owning communities, results may only last as much as the intervention lasts.
Building Effective Partnerships for Mangrove Conservation and Policy Integration

Cross-sector partnerships were the basis for achieving success in mangrove conservation efforts. The journey began in partnership with the World Bank, which supported the development of the initial documents. As the World Bank phased out its involvement, IUCN stepped in as a reliable partner to continue the work. This transition included co-funding a staff member for six months, allowing them to represent both IUCN and the World Bank until the document development was completed.

IUCN then formed strategic partnerships with WWF and WCS, who contributed valuable biodiversity data for the National Territorial Development Plan (PNDT) and Marine Spatial Plan (MSP). Notably, WCS and the National Biodiversity Database was fully integrated into the developed documents. These partnerships were extended to all other planning and conservation stakeholders, by maintaining a continuous information sharing system to ensure streamlined knowledge, support, understanding and engagement.

Ultimately, the most crucial partnership was with the Government, to which the partners need to refer to in order to pass on the data to be uploaded to the national GIS system. Effective governance and policy-making are the Government’s mandate and responsibility, and for policies to evolve or be adopted, they must be accepted and integrated by Government leaders. IUCN’s role was to facilitate transparent, reliable, and efficient dialogue, leveraging its expertise and broad network to drive these discussions forward and ensure alignment with the Government’s objectives.

Key to this success was IUCN’s role as a trusted partner, its strong dialogue skills, and its reputation as a reliable and skilled partner for the Government. IUCN’s extensive membership network further supported this collaborative effort.

Several lessons emerged from these partnership activities. First, understanding the subject matter and having access to skilled staff was essential. Regular updates and information sharing with members and partners helped maintain momentum and encouraging a unified approach. The ability to build a common voice and common force within the network was key to ensuring success. It was important to avoid fragmented efforts and instead focus on joint, complementary planning that aligned everyone toward a shared goal.

The Key Processes in Integrating Mangrove Conservation into National Policy

The process was the cornerstone for transforming ideas into tangible results. The first step was ensuring the availability of high-quality data and demonstrating its importance within both local and national contexts. In the case of mangroves, this included their role in spatial and development planning, included in the National Territorial Development Plan, which highlights their impact on coastal livelihoods, climate adaptation, and potential blue carbon credits.

Once the data was gathered, the next step was presenting it to IUCN’s partners and members, fostering a supportive alliance to create a unified voice for advocating with decision-makers. This process continued by establishing and maintaining an open, trustworthy, and technically robust dialogue with policymakers and their technical teams. A key component of this was understanding how governance, policy and legal frameworks are developed and implemented, ensuring that even if contributions weren’t fully aligned with initial expectations, they remained practical and applicable and are adopted.

Ongoing monitoring, along with continued support from IUCN, ensured that the strategies were effectively implemented and adjusted when necessary. It’s important to acknowledge that while conservation and adaptation efforts are globally supported, they often require significant budgets, that are not available locally. To secure funding, these issues must be at the forefront of governance planning, allowing for the budgets and co-financing by development partners to be available.

Critical factors that facilitated the process included the global campaign of raising awareness about the benefits of mangroves for sustainable livelihoods, Mozambique’s focus on the mangrove strategy, and the development of key national policies like the PNDT and Marine Spatial Plan. IUCN’s commitment and its ability to identify opportunities to mainstream mangroves within these national strategies, coupled with its extensive network and reliability, were equally essential.

Several lessons emerged throughout this process. First, technical assistance, similar to that provided to the government proved invaluable, as did the capacity to step up in alignment with government processes. The ability to access upgraded technical support when required, and the involvement of academia and civil society organisations, are critical for a successful approach. Maintaining ongoing information-sharing and an awareness campaign, combined with consultations, helped sustain engagement throughout the process.

The Power of Knowledge about Mangroves in Shaping Conservation and Policy

The vital role of mangroves in coastal ecosystems has been emphasised through a wealth of scientific data and research. This knowledge has become the entry point for educating planners and decision-makers on the socio-economic significance of mangroves, from providing community income to supporting coastal adaptation. Through studies conducted by SOMN on Mozambique’s mangrove use and data from the Global Mangrove Alliance, IUCN has united key conservation actors such as WWF, WCS, Centro Terra Viva, BIOFUND, ABIODES, and government institutions to establish a common voice in advocating for mangrove protection.

IUCN and SOMN played a pivotal role in the elaboration and approval of the National Mangrove Strategy, which outlined clear goals, approaches, and restoration principles and were endorsed by the Government and conservation partners. Building on this foundation, the strategy was integrated into national policies, particularly the National Territorial Development Plan. This plan not only drives sustainable development but also maps out Mozambique's rich biodiversity, including its mangrove ecosystems. This allows local governments and community leaders to identify key conservation hotspots and priority restoration areas. The strategy also provides geographical and quantitative data, enabling conservationists and NGOs to monitor and track progress in their interventions.

Key for these activities were the existing data and studies, IUCN's broad network of members and partners, and the trust and credibility IUCN has built with policymakers.

While the knowledge was foundational, its true potential was realized through effective processes and strong partnerships. IUCN's acceptance by the government and its partners was quintessential to ensure engagement and ownership at every stage of the process. It was also vital to ensure the quality and availability of data, and to collaborate closely with the government to adapt and incorporate recommendations into the legal framework, ensuring that mangrove conservation became a long-term priority.

AGROFORESTRY PROJECT FARMERS WITH SEEDLINGS
Community-Based Nursery Beds
Tree Planting at community Level
Cash Crop Integration for Sustainable Incomes
AGROFORESTRY PROJECT FARMERS WITH SEEDLINGS
Community-Based Nursery Beds
Tree Planting at community Level
Cash Crop Integration for Sustainable Incomes