Stakeholder engagement and strategy development for Sustainable Agro-Sylvo-Pastoral Management

In the strategy development phase, landscape boundaries are clearly defined, and the interrelations between different landscape units are analyzed to understand their interactions and dependencies. This step is essential for identifying priority areas for intervention. Key actors, including community representatives, local government officials including the DIREDD, conventioneers (companies or associations with a lease management agreement with DIREDD), and NGOs, are identified and involved in the strategy development process to ensure that it is inclusive and collaborative. 

  • Strong collaboration among stakeholders, led by the committee, facilitated through workshops and meetings. 
  • Use of participatory planning techniques, including community mapping and focus group discussions, to gather diverse perspectives and insights. 
  • Formal agreements with private entities (the contractual parties) for forest restoration. 
  • Strong collaboration among stakeholders, led by the committee, facilitated through workshops and meetings. 
  • Use of participatory planning techniques, including community mapping and focus group discussions, to gather diverse perspectives and insights. 
  • Formal agreements with private entities (the contractual parties) for forest restoration. 
Action definition and implementation for Sustainable Agro-Sylvo-Pastoral development

The definition of action involves establishing clear and measurable objectives for the identified priority areas. Technical options are selected and prioritized based on the specific soil types, landscape characteristics, and socio-economic conditions of each area. Various options, such as agroforestry, soil conservation techniques, and integrated livestock management are considered to address the unique challenges of each site. In Marohogo, the establishment of firebreaks and the reforestation of degraded areas was selected. Three types of firebreaks were established: bare firebreaks, green firebreaks with fire-resistant plants, and agricultural firebreaks. The Taungya method was used to involve local farmers in reforestation efforts while allowing them to cultivate the land temporarily. As such, degraded forest plots are made available to local farmers to enable them to grow food crops for two to three years. In exchange, they must plant trees and maintain the plot in order to restore the forest cover. 

  • Access to technical expertise and support in sustainable land management from local and international experts for farmers as well as access to appropriate plant species.  
  • Availability of appropriate technologies and resources to implement the selected interventions. 
  • Tailoring interventions to specific local conditions enhances their effectiveness and acceptance by the community. 
  • Combining agricultural and forestry practices can yield both environmental and economic benefits. 
  • Strengthening local community empowerment ensures an inclusive process.  
Stakeholder engagement and strategy development for Sustainable Agro-Sylvo-Pastoral Management

In the strategy development phase, landscape boundaries are clearly defined, and the interrelations between different landscape units are analyzed to understand their interactions and dependencies. This step is essential for identifying priority areas for intervention. Key actors, including community representatives, local government officials including the DIREDD, conventioneers (companies or associations with a lease management agreement with DIREDD), and NGOs, are identified and involved in the strategy development process to ensure that it is inclusive and collaborative. 

  • Strong collaboration among stakeholders, led by the committee, facilitated through workshops and meetings. 
  • Use of participatory planning techniques, including community mapping and focus group discussions, to gather diverse perspectives and insights. 
  • Formal agreements with private entities (the contractual parties) for forest restoration. 
  • Transparent communication throughout the process builds trust and ensures that all stakeholders are on the same page. 
  • Clear, enforceable contracts and ongoing stakeholder engagement are extremely important. 
  • Flexibility to adapt strategies based on stakeholder input is crucial for developing a plan that is realistic and achievable. 
  • Trust and respect between local communities, the DIREDD and the contractual parties is key. 
Knowledge Management and Gender-Inclusive Awareness for Sustainable Biosphere Re-serve Governance

This building block strengthens knowledge management and promotes gender-inclusive awareness to support sustainable governance of Viet Nam’s Biosphere Reserves. It began with identifying the low levels of understanding among communities, tourism operators, and sector agencies about threats to biodiversity and the impacts of unplanned development. The project then designed a coordinated training and knowledge-sharing approach to build local skills and create systems for transferring lessons across sites.

A total of 92 training courses were delivered at central and provincial levels on Biosphere Reserve management, biodiversity integration in planning, monitoring tools, and sustainable livelihood models. More than 3,100 participants—around 40% of whom were women—were trained on biodiversity monitoring, METT application, and natural resource management. By September 2024, awareness levels among community members and tourism operators reached 75%.

To sustain learning beyond individual trainings,  knowledge management systems were strengthened. Open-access websites for the national Biosphere Reserve target sites were created or upgraded to host guidelines, resources, and training materials. In addition, 19 potential best-practice models were identified and documented, including those related to set-aside zones and eco-tourism,  for potential replication, helping ensure that successful models can be adapted and scaled across other Biosphere Reserves in Viet Nam.

Systematic Documentation: Documentation of good practices and establishment of a national coordination hub for sharing lessons. 

Consistent Awareness Efforts: Regular communication and awareness-raising to promote Biosphere Reserve approaches nationwide.

Tailored Capacity Building: Training and capacity-building programs tailored to community and institutional needs.

Formal Knowledge Strategy: A formalized knowledge management strategy between MAE and MAB for sustained learning.

Awareness Must Be Continuous: Trainings and communication activities were effective—raising awareness to 75% and engaging more than 3,100 participants—but lasting impact requires ongoing reinforcement rather than one-off events.

Knowledge Needs Structure, Not Just Volume: While many best practices were generated, they were not always systematically curated or linked to a national knowledge hub, limiting replication across sites.

Institutionalizing Knowledge Management Is Essential: Embedding knowledge management within MAE/NBCA and the National MAB Committee is crucial to ensure that tools, guidelines, and models are standardized, updated, and openly accessible.

Gender-Responsive Learning Strengthens Outcomes: Women’s participation was strong, but ensuring women influence decisions—not only attend activities—requires deliberate integration of gender perspectives into training content and knowledge products.

Co-Management Lessons Need Clear Pathways: Insights from participatory planning and community co-management must be documented and fed back into national policy and future Biosphere Reserve planning to avoid repeating the same challenges.

Integrated Multi-sector and Multi-stakeholder Planning and Management for Biosphere Reserves

This building block strengthens integrated, multi-sector planning across Viet Nam’s three Biosphere Reserves by using a participatory and adaptive approach to address fragmentation in land-use and resource management. The process began with understanding how local authorities, communities, tourism operators, and protected area managers interact with forest and landscape resources. Through this groundwork, the project identified gaps in cross-sector coordination and opportunities to align conservation with socio-economic priorities.

Next, multi-stakeholder planning platforms were established to connect provincial departments, Protected Area management boards, local communities, and private actors. These platforms enabled joint decision-making, supported the integration of biodiversity considerations into development planning, and strengthened protected area governance. As a result, Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) scores across six Protected Areas increased by an average of 38 points—well above the project target.

With these partnerships in place, the project facilitated evidence-based land-use planning. A total of 62,940 hectares of high-conservation-value forests and ecosystems were mapped and designated as set-aside, non-extractive use zones; 4,005 hectares of degraded forests were restored; flagship species monitoring systems were introduced; and biodiversity-friendly tourism certification was promoted, reaching 21% adoption by 2024.

Altogether, more than 1.79 million hectares of Biosphere Reserve buffer and transition zones were brought under sustainable management. This integrated planning framework now enables Viet Nam to embed biodiversity into broader development decisions, strengthening a functional biosphere network that supports both ecological integrity and community well-being.

Inclusive Engagement: Inclusive stakeholder engagement at both community and provincial levels.

Clear Communication: Tailored communication and participatory decision-making mechanisms for local actors.

Livelihood Integration: Integration of livelihood activities (eco-tourism, sustainable agriculture) with conservation goals.

Continuous Support: Continued collaboration with UNDP, NGOs, Women’s Union, Farmer Associations, research institutes, and local governments for capacity building and knowledge transfer.

Participatory Planning Improves Results: Engaging authorities, communities, NGOs, and private actors led to stronger management effectiveness and broader areas under sustainable management. Joint planning helped reduce fragmentation and improved alignment of conservation and development priorities.

Institutionalization Is Necessary for Sustainability: Without formal co-management structures, clear mandates, and regular knowledge-sharing systems, many gains depend on continued project support. Embedding collaboration into official agreements and governance processes is essential for long-term impact.

Leadership and Mandates Shape Progress: Sites with strong local leadership and clearly defined responsibilities advanced more quickly. Where provincial priorities were fragmented or mandates unclear, progress slowed, showing that governance context strongly influences outcomes.

Livelihood Pilots Need Market Links: Community-based livelihood activities showed that local people are willing to support conservation. However, sustaining these models requires stronger connections to markets, value chains, and long-term economic incentives.

Tourism Pilots Show Promise but Need Support: Biodiversity-friendly tourism in Cu Lao Cham–Hoi An demonstrated potential, but scaling it will require consistent monitoring, incentives, and closer engagement with local operators.

Approaches Must Stay Realistic and Context-Driven: Integrated Biosphere Reserve approaches work best when grounded in local conditions, early co-management, and gradual capacity-building. Overly ambitious models without strong local foundations are harder to maintain beyond the project period.

Strengthening Regulatory and Institutional Framework for Biosphere Reserve Management

Biosphere Reserves were not formally recognized in Vietnam’s national law, resulting in fragmented governance and unstable financing. To address this, the project supported the integration of Biosphere Reserve management into the Law on Environmental Protection (2020) (No. 072/2020/QH) and contributed to the issuance of Decree No. 08/2022/ND-CP and Circular No. 02/2022/TT-BTNMT, which together provide clear legal mandates for Biosphere Reserves under Article 153.

These policies were then translated into actionable guidance includingthe development of the National Strategy for Biosphere Reserve Management, the Plan for Expanding and Strengthening the Biosphere Reserve System, and technical guidelines on Key Biodiversity Areas, High Conservation Value Forests, sustainable forest management, and biodiversity mainstreaming in provincial planning. To ensure effective implementation, 92 capacity-building courses were delivered for national and provincial officials, resulting in a 35% increase in institutional capacity.

Biodiversity Impact Assessment requirements were also integrated into the national environmental assessment system, ensuring that new development projects within Biosphere Reserves apply biodiversity safeguards. Together, these efforts created a coherent governance framework, strengthened cross-level coordination, increased Biosphere Reserve financing by 305% between 2017–2024, and enhanced the long-term sustainability of Biosphere Reserve management in Viet Nam.

Government commitment: Strong national commitment under MONRE (now MAE) to integrate Biosphere Reserve management into environmental policies (LEP 2020, MONRE Circular 2022).

Cross-sector collaboration: Active collaboration among MAE, MAB, and UNDP, fostering cross-sector coherence.

National–provincial coordination: Effective coordination mechanisms between national and provincial levels.

Openness to co-management: Government openness to institutionalizing co-management and adaptive governance frameworks.

Legal recognition transforms practice: Anchoring Biosphere Reserves in national law proved essential. Once integrated into the Law on Environmental Protection and supported by Decree No. 08/2022/ND-CP and Circular No. 02/2022/TT-BTNMT, Biosphere Reserves gained clear mandates, legitimacy, and access to more stable financing.

Tools and mandates must be practical: Legal reforms only became operational when paired with usable guidelines on Key Biodiversity Areas, High Conservation Value Forests, sustainable forest management, and Biodiversity Impact Assessment. These tools helped provinces translate policy into daily decision-making.

Co-design accelerates adoption: Policies developed with provincial authorities and Biosphere Reserves Management Boards were more realistic and gained faster acceptance, showing that bottom-up inputs are critical.

Capacity building is not optional: The 92 training courses created a shared understanding across sectors and increased institutional capacity by 34.8%, demonstrating that reforms need continuous investment in people, not just policies.

Better coordination unlocks financing: Clear mandates and stronger governance structures contributed to a 305% increase in Biosphere Reserve funding, illustrating that institutional clarity directly supports resource mobilization.

Sustaining progress requires political will: Without long-term commitment and adequate resourcing, regulatory gains risk stalling. Durable change depends on consistent leadership and follow-through.

National Level II Protected Wild Endangered Plant—Green-flowered Cypripedium (Cypripedium henryi)
Système complet d'études et de surveillance scientifiques
Système de protection de l'habitat à plusieurs niveaux
Mesures de conservation ciblées pour les espèces rares
Participation communautaire et moyens de subsistance durables
Strengthened Patrolling and Quick Response Teams for Forest and Wildlife Protection

This building block enhances on-ground protection through dedicated patrolling teams and Quick Response Teams (QRTs) who respond to threats such as poaching, illegal harvesting, forest fires, and human–wildlife conflict. QRTs are trained to act quickly during emergencies, while regular foot and night patrols provide a strong deterrent against illegal activities, improving safety for wildlife and nearby communities.

Local people do not join patrols but play an important role by informing the forest office about suspicious activities, wildlife movements, or potential conflicts. This early reporting system helps the QRT mobilize quickly and strengthens community–agency collaboration.

Improved protection allows other conservation activities—such as mineral lick restoration, habitat improvement, riverbank protection, and sustainable NWFP management—to succeed. By lowering disturbance and resource extraction, ecosystems stabilize and provide a foundation for sustainable livelihoods, eco-tourism development, and long-term climate resilience. This system builds public trust, encourages responsible behavior, and promotes shared responsibility for conservation.

Reliable communication channels with local residents for timely reporting.
Well-trained patrolling teams and QRTs with knowledge of wildlife behavior and safety.
Availability of essential field equipment such as communication devices, GPS, torch, and rain gear.
Support from local leaders and gewog administration.
Clear SOPs for emergency response and patrol duties.

Timely information from local communities greatly improves the effectiveness of QRT response, even if community members do not join patrols. Building trust is essential—when people feel safe reporting, the detection of illegal activities increases.

Challenges include difficult terrain, limited staff, and weather constraints. Continuous training and proper equipment improve response time and safety. Regular engagement with communities helps maintain information flow and reduces conflict cases.

A major lesson is that protection must be integrated with education and habitat restoration efforts. Patrolling alone cannot reduce threats unless supported by awareness and community cooperation. Recognizing community informants and maintaining open communication improves long-term collaboration.

Andean Food Festivals and Market Valorization

UNORCAC and its Women’s Central Committee organize annual food festivals to reconnect communities with ancestral culinary traditions, promote the use of native crops, and enhance the market appeal of agrobiodiversity-based products. These events feature the preparation and sharing of traditional dishes made with local maize, tubers, herbs, and wild fruits, often linked to the agricultural calendar and Indigenous celebrations like Pawkar Raymi or Koya Raymi.

Farmers, women leaders, and youth co-develop menus, displays, and tasting booths that showcase underutilized crops and recipes. Exhibits often include Chicha de Jora, medicinal teas, and dishes made from mellocos, oca, or mortiño. These festivals are intergenerational, involving local schools, cultural groups, and tourism initiatives, helping to increase awareness, cultural pride, and consumer demand for native products.

By merging culture and commerce, the events position local crops as valuable and healthy, supporting both food sovereignty and livelihoods. They also complement other marketing strategies, such as the community fair La Pachamama Nos Alimenta (Mother Earth feeds us).

  • Strong cultural identity and Indigenous agricultural calendar
  • Partnerships with municipal institutions and community organizations
  • Youth participation through schools and community exchanges
  • Growth in food tourism and visitor interest in traditional cuisine
  • Support from UNORCAC and the Women’s Central Committee in coordinating logistics and training participants

Blending cultural heritage with commercial opportunities has proven effective in building community pride and food sovereignty. Farmers are more likely to cultivate native crops when they see them valued in public events and markets. Food festivals serve as platforms to educate consumers and youth on nutritional, cultural, and ecological benefits of agrobiodiversity.

However, long-term impact depends on consistent marketing support, media coverage, and logistics coordination. One challenge is ensuring diverse participation and maintaining product quality and hygiene at events. Replication requires early engagement of local cooks, producers, schools, and promotional partners, and investment in storytelling around ancestral recipes to enhance product appeal.

Indigenous Seed Banks and Farmer Exchange

Community-managed seed banks and seed exchange fairs are central to conserving agrobiodiversity and ensuring climate resilience in Cotacachi. With support from UNORCAC and its Women’s Central Committee, local farmers maintain and store diverse native varieties of maize, beans, tubers, and medicinal plants. Seeds are selected from each harvest based on quality and stored in traditional clay pots, tanks, and drying racks. The Bioknowledge Centre functions as a seed bank and educational site, hosting 12 varieties of maize and 39 of beans.

The Muyu Raymi Seed Fair, held annually for over 20 years, allows hundreds of producers to exchange seeds and knowledge, including traditional medicine and ancestral cuisine. These events strengthen local seed systems, promote culturally relevant crops, and reduce dependency on external inputs. Exchanges also take place at the La Pachamama Nos Alimenta community fair and through interregional bartering events between highland and subtropical zones.

Success is enabled by:

  • Long-standing cultural practices of seed saving and bartering
  • Women-led knowledge transmission and intergenerational learning
  • Strong organizational support from UNORCAC and its Women’s Central Committee
  • External funding for events like Muyu Raymi and infrastructure like the Bioknowledge Centre
  • Community interest in preserving agricultural heritage and food sovereignty

Key lessons include the critical role of community ownership and cultural pride in sustaining seed diversity. Farmers are more motivated to preserve seeds when they are linked to identity, ritual, and household nutrition. Women are essential knowledge holders; empowering them strengthens both seed systems and community cohesion

However, maintaining formal seed banks requires external funding and technical support, which may not always be consistent. Youth engagement is a challenge; many see agriculture as less attractive. To sustain seed systems long-term, it’s important to integrate cultural education, hands-on training, and opportunities for youth.

Replicating this building block elsewhere requires respecting local knowledge, involving women, and ensuring community leadership in seed selection, exchange, and storage processes.