Knowledge

IUCN Mozambique designed and started implementing the Knowledge Hubs with the MTA. The Knowledge Hibs, transversal to all IUCN´s projects in Mozambique, and installed in partnership with MTA and local Governments, in Government premisses, are a knowledge center to share IUCN´s website in portuguese as well as a deposit of manuals, knowledge tools and courses (e.g. ACADEMY) to scale-up the number of beneficiaries that may access conservation tools, while also to expand IUCN outreach, with a focus on those in rural areas and on women and youth.

Having a set of manuals and tools (e.g. NBS, OECMs, mangrove restoration, etc) from IUCN, complimented with tailored manuals for projects and communities in Mozambique, uploaded to a web platform, allows the youth and the communities in general, from conservation and buffer areas, as well as from coastal areas where IUCN operates, to have a systematic and open access to knowledge, resulting in a sustainable empowerment and transforming them in full fledge conservation and adaptation actors.

The knowledge hubs are a cost-efficient training tool as they are based on existing facilities and only dependant on a web and internet capacity. As possible, the knowledge program includes physical community exchange as well as in-person training of trainers.

Applicable knowledge solutions deployed to teams were the Blue Training in Practise, that trained over 20 professors and MTA staff, in mainstreaming coastal and marine management into local development plans and projects, as a  long-term cross-sectoral process on integration across biodiversity, climate and development plans; the training on the application of nature based solutions into local activities, which included the translation of IUCN course and manual into portuguese, allowing all to access the online official training and certified course.

The Knowledge Hubs, installed as open public spaces, have motivated other development and conservation actors to join and support with a diversity of in-kind and financial support, hence the knowledge hubs also play the partnerships and awareness raising role.

 

IUCN Mozambique / Government of Mozambique partnership, IUCN´ funding partners and members (e.g. WWF), local partners vision and leadership.

Clear investment plan and priorities, agreed internet supplier and content development and uploading competencies/actors.

Partnerships

Playing the role of a membership union, of which the Government of Mozambique is a partner, was the guiding principle for IUCN´s intervention. Mozambique hosts key IUCN members, such as Peace Parks Foundation, WCS, WWF as well as it is a beneficiary of the EU funded PANORAMA program. This was the basis for IUCN to assess interest and possible engagement and support to a knowledge and information sharing platform such as the Dialogue Platform.

Together with the Ministry of Land and Environment, via ANAC, Cooperation and Climate Change Directorates, IUCN initiated the approach to members as well as to local organisation and local governments, as a means to identify key thematic areas and key policy guidelines that were important to be discussed and obtain streamlined approaches and manuals and that required conservation and environment actors' engagement and agreement. 

The first edition of the Dialogue Platform was a success as it provide the floor to an open dialogue with Government on key biodiversity and conservation aspects as well as it was the forum where nationwide actors were able to meet and jointly appreciate best ways to work and to apply development funds. The first event also accommodated SOMN´s mangroves champion awards, which were jointly delivered by IUCN representative, the German Embassy representative and the MTA Permanent Secretary.

Important therefore to add that as partnerships play a key role to build joint voices and influence improved policy decisions, including those related to mainstreaming biodiversity and ecosystems based adaptation into ALL development projects, this activity further contributed to ensure that the key principles and priorities were shared and the voice is kept alive as the Dialogue maintains its activities, unfolded into thematic and specific sub themes such as land uses and concorrencial land uses. 

IUCN´s membership, IUCN´s outreach and positive image with donors and conservation actors, visibility and public image and, as before said, Government´s trust.

Early engagement and clearance of all steps and contents with Government, joint engagement to partners and members, one by one, as a manner to build a joint voice and identify common interest. Once achieved design and approve with the wider group a calendar of events and respective contents and speakers.

Processes

The process was based on (a) IUCN´s membership network and other conservation partners and (b) IUCN as a Government reliable partner. This basis allowed IUCN to mobilise and engage the network of conservation and environment actors around the government counterparts and openly discuss challenges and opportunities to scale-up interventions via a coordinated and complimentary approach. The Paris Declaration on aid efficiency was a tool to discuss how development aid is organised, and its use contribute also to inform participants on the flow of aid fluxes and how impact needs to be officially reported as a manner to show the good work of conservation and environment actors.

The process further designed a calendar of thematic events under the Environment umbrella, such us use of PNDT and MSP/POEM as a basis to design ecosystems based local development plans, derived from another IUCN´s support, and the evaluation and response to concorrencial uses of conservation and buffer areas. by doing it, IUCN supports Government in continuing its open dialogue with partners and actors, contributing to participation and good governance.

Underlying these activities is IUCN´s systematic dialogue with Government, providing the floor for trust and reliability to enhance IUCN´s role and impact on policy design and public participation.

IUCN´s membership role, MTA via ANAC as an IUCN member, Government´s trust in IUCN´s competencies and transparent engagement, IUCN´s results orientation vis-a-vis national goals and commitments and contribution for its achievement. 

Lessons learned start by understanding and committing to the continuity of the dialogue, above project dates and budgets - one cannot initiate and engage Government and partners in one activity and then drop it, it brakes confidence and use; it relates to linking the activities to a national to global purpose - we need to show how the action provides a results towards the 30x30 commitment, and efficient use of available knowledge, data and research as the basis to design efficient and sustainable interventions, in a very practical and cost efficient manner, particularly when addressing communities.

Furthermore, on coordination aspects, it is important to recall and share which policies and instruments guide development cooperation as Mozambique and development part are signatories of the Paris Declaration. It is further useful as a mechanism to address in particular conservation and environment, as it allows to put pressure on development funding and national planning to also include these as priorities in both flows.

Partnerships

Cross-cutting partnerships were the basis for the glocal achievement. Initially, in partnership with the World Bank, partner that supported the development of the documents and agreed with IUCN that as the WB was phasing out IUCN could/should continue with the process as a reliable partner - this included co-funding one staff member for 6 months so the staff member could represent both entities until document development closure. Then by partnering with WWF and WCS, for their direct contribution with biodiversity data for the PNDT and the MSP - with a focus on WCS and the National Biodiversity database that was fully integrated in the above referred documents. Partnerships extended to all planning and conservation partners by maintaining a continuous information sharing system to ensure streamlined knowledge, support, understanding and engagement.

The principal partnership to be refer reports again to the Government. Good governance and policy making in a country is the Government's role and mandate. For policies to be improved or adopt it requires Government decision. And it requires also a transparent, reliable and efficient dialogue and capacities from the contributing partner. And this is where IUCN delivered at its best and expanded this engagement to its members.

 

IUCN´s membership role, IUCN´s dialogue and skills competencies, trusted partner to the Government.

Understanding of the subject and availability of skilled staff, membership and partners regularly informed and the capacity to build a common voice, a common force, capacity and openness for joint and complimentary planning with the network. Avoid single voice and multiple positioning.

Processes

The process was the key pilar for all the development to materialise. The process includes first to ensure the existence of qualitative data and the capacity to demonstrate its importance for the local to national context - which was the case for mangroves in the spatial and development planning, PNDT, given its impact on coastal livelihoods, climate adaptation and possible avenues for blue carbon credits. Once the data is available, it is required to present it to IUCN´s partners and members, as a means to create a supportive alliance and to obtain a streamlined public voice towards the decision makers. The process then continues by establishing and maintain an open, trustable and technically sound dialogue with policy makers and their technical teams. As a transversal basis, it is equally necessary to understand how governance and policy and legal frameworks are developed and implemented, to ensure that the contribution to the policies, even if not as one would expect it to be, it is appliable and adopted. Joint monitoring and continued IUCN´s support ensures qualitative implementation and adjustments as and where needed, having in mind that often its application and implementation may require budgets that are not available - but is to be remarked that conservation and adaptation, although globally defended and supported need to be at the forefront of Governance planning in order for the budgets to be available and co-financed by development partners.

The global campaign and awareness for mangroves contribution to sustainable livelihoods, Mozambique´s focus on the mangrove strategy and the development of both the National Territorial Development Plan and the Marine Spatial Plan, IUCN´s commitment and opportunity identification for the mainstreaming of mangroves in these referred national strategies/documents and IUCN´s reliability and nertwork.

Availability of technical assistance similar to the one available by Government, capacity and availability to step-up açligned with the Government process, be able to avail uograded technical assistance as needed, involve academia and civil society organizations, maintain an information sharing and awareness campaign and consultations.

Knowledge

Mangrove Knowledge and related scientific data were the entry point to inform planners and decision makers of the socio-economic importance of mangroves, from community income to coastal adaptation. Via SOMN studies on the country´s mangrove uses and the Global Mangrove Alliance data, IUCN established first a common voice with members and key conservation actors (WWF, WCS, Centro Terra Viva, BIOFUND, ABIODES and Government institutions) on mangrove advocacy. IUCN and SOMN further contributed to the elaboration and approval of the National Mangrove Strategy, where goals, approaches and restoration principles were approved by Government and partners.

With this as a basis, it was upscaled to the national strategies, namely the National Territorial Development Plan, which leads development with a sustainability and biodiversity vision and where a full Mozambique biodiversity wealth is mapped. Mangroves being a part of it, it allows local governments and local top community to conservation areas to be able to identify hotspots for conservation and key priority areas for restoration. It further provides geographic and quantitative information to let conservation actors and NGOs to easily identify and monitor progress, for their conservation interventions.

Existing data and studies, IUCN´s network of members and partnerships, IUCN´s trust and reliability vis-a-vis policy makers.

While this building block was important per se, it could one be materialised with the next two: processes and partnerships. IUCN´s acceptance by the Government and by partners was quintessential, ensure engagement and ownership at each step before moving to other, data quality and, at last but not at least full availability to work with Government as required to adapt and mainstream recommendations and data as required by the legal framework.

Alignment capacity building and policy influencing to get best practice mangrove restoration embedded

Based on the success of CBEMR training in Lamu, area KFS officers identified the need to spread this knowledge to the KFS managerial team and senior policy-level managers from KFS headquarters, county forest conservators from the 5 coastal counties of Kwale, Kilifi, Mombasa, Tana River, and Lamu and their forest managers, and lecturers from Kenya school of forestry. 

We organised a CBEMR managerial training, drawing in KFS managers, all coastal county department of Environment directors, and representatives from universities, the Western Indian Ocean Mangrove Network and local media. 

As a result, the team agreed to incorporate the CBEMR approach in the proposed Kenya mangrove restoration technical order. Furthermore, it was agreed to develop a national mangrove restoration platform to standardise mangrove management and conservation, especially for restoration projects. 

Kenya is also developing national mangrove restoration guidelines, supported by Wetlands International and WWF Kenya. It builds on the Global Best Practice Guidelines on Mangrove Restoration developed by the Global Mangrove Alliance amongst others, led by WI and CI in collaboration with dozens of scientists. 

Policy Formulation: National-level forest managers should be engaged in local/county based restoration initiatives to aid in the development of mangrove forest policies. For instance, based on the success of the first CBEMR training in Lamu, area KFS officers identified the need to spread this knowledge to the KFS managerial team and senior policy-level managers from KFS headquarters, county forest conservators from the 5 coastal counties of Kwale, Kilifi, Mombasa, Tana River, and Lamu and their forest managers, and lecturers from Kenya school of forestry. 

A CBEMR managerial training was therefore undertaken in September 2023, drawing in KFS managers, all coastal county department of Environment directors, and representatives from universities, the Western Indian Ocean Mangrove Network and local media. The team agreed to incorporate the CBEMR approach in the proposed Kenya mangrove restoration technical order and develop a national mangrove restoration platform to standardise mangrove management and conservation, especially for restoration projects. 

Marine Management

Much support was given to improve fisher capacity to manage their access to and use of Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs). The programme recognised that the establishment of marine managed and protected areas as a method of marine management has resulted in increased reliance on Fish Aggregating Devices installed outside the marine managed and protected areas, for sustenance of the fishery sector.  Fishers within the Carriacou Fisher Folks Inc also recognised this and the need for attention to be paid to the monitoring and management of this resource.  This beckoned the implementation of FAD Data Management training for fishers of Carriacou and Petit Martinique.  The training was facilitated through the Fisheries Department of the Government of Grenada, and included information sharing on, but not limited to data on marine conservation, history of FADs in the region, the importance of data collection, legislation, its challenges, development of informal protocols and rules, identifying fish species as well as data collection methodology and post data collection analysis.  The workshop also realised the commitment of fishers to establish GrenFAD, which will take the leading role in the management of the FADs.  The fishers agreed and signed off on the soft rules for FAD Fishing, membership and FAD fees, data collection, data collection templates and protocols for data collection and management.  Actors in the fishery sector and marine management/protection were also trained in the use of underwater drones for remote sensing. The Programme provided support for construction of at least 6 FADS for the St. Marks fishers in Dominica. In the case of Saint Lucia, the provision of navigational tools to assist in accessing the FAD locations, which are often many miles offshore, and generally speaking to assist with safety at sea.

With increased application of marine management strategies, there has been increased use of FADS to supplement the loss of access to fishing grounds which have been redesignated as protected areas, managed areas or reserves.  Thus, the CATS interventions to improve capacity to manage these FADS were quite opportune in timing, and the fishers were keen on participating in the interventions related to them.  In the case of the ROV’s this improved capacity enabled the beneficiaries to be ready to improve their monitoring efficiency and quality. 

The Programme recognised the need for practical, user-guided solutions and implementations as critical elements for success and long term and far reaching benefits from the same.  With regard to the FAD management and trainings, this process was smoothly executed with fishers taking ownership of this and taking the lead to put arrangements in place to better manage their FADs.

Integración de humedales urbanos costeros en procesos de políticas publicas

Del análisis de políticas e instrumentos relevantes para la integración de humedales urbanos, se identificó como la principal herramienta de planificación de la gestión urbana los Planes o Programas Municipales de Desarrollo Urbano (PMDU). 

Aunque las autoridades municipales no regulan las actividades que se realizan en los humedales, sí pueden darles el artículo 115 constitucional, formular los instrumentos de planeación territorial y autorizar y controlar los usos de suelo de los territorios adyacentes o lejanos a los humedales, que pueden generar impactos, directos o indirectos, sobre los humedales. En este sentido, los municipios pueden: i) formular instrumentos de planeación territorial, ii) autorizar y controlar los usos de suelo de los territorios adyacentes o lejanos a los humedales (por ejemplo, construcciones), iii) controlar las descargas de aguas residuales a los sistemas de drenaje o alcantarillado de los centros de población, iv) inspeccionar, vigilar y fiscalizar las descargas de agua residuales por uso doméstico y público urbano que carezcan o que no formen parte de un sistema de alcantarillado y saneamiento, v) implementar plantas de tratamiento de agua, vi) prevenir y controlar los efectos sobre el medio ambiente ocasionados por la generación, transporte, almacenamiento, manejo, tratamiento y disposición final de residuos sólidos e industriales no considerados como peligrosos, entre otros, que de manera directa o indirecta pueden tener impacto en la calidad y cantidad de los servicios ecosistémicos de los humedales, vii) establecer zonas de conservación ecológica municipal, entre otros. Por lo tanto, las autoridades municipales están directamente vinculadas al control y prevención de los impactos que afectan a los humedales (expansión de ciudades, contaminación, dragado, relleno, sedimentación, disminución del caudal de agua, entre otros). 

La integración de los humedales en los PMDU es fundamental para controlar y prevenir los impactos a distancia o cercanía (bordes) que afectan los humedales y aprovechar de manera sostenible los servicios ecosistémicos que los humedales brinden.

Se realizó un análisis de los PMDU de los municipios de las tres regiones del proyecto BIOCITIS, y se evidenció que en el diagnostico reconocen en distinta medida, la importancia de los humedales urbanos y que los humedales urbanos son vulnerables a los elementos específicos de los metabolismos de las ciudades, como los cambios de uso de suelo, la gestión de aguas servidas y residuos sólidos, construcción de infraestructura y desarrollo inmobiliario y hotelero, salvo por contadas excepciones, la información entre los campos ambientales y de desarrollo está relacionada con un análisis de enfoque causa – efecto. Las estrategias de desarrollo planteados en los PDMU carecen de medidas concretas de control y prevención de las acciones de desarrollo que afectan la calidad de los humedales urbanos. 

Luego del diagnóstico de la integración de humedales urbanos en PMDU se analizaron las metodologías y guías sobre el diseño de PMDU que ayudan a los responsables de formular instrumentos de planificación urbana del municipio, elaborando estos documentos. Al igual que en los PMDU, se evidenció que, en las guías los humedales son considerados como elementos en el diagnóstico, pero no en la fase prospectiva de las estrategias, proyectos y líneas de acción. 

Como resultado del análisis, se generó una guía metodología para integrar humedales urbanos en los PMDU, para establecer orientaciones y pautas que faciliten la integración de estos humedales urbanos costeros, buscando potenciar la gestión urbana de estos ecosistemas.  La guía se diseñó para tomadores de decisión municipal, personas que formulan PMDU (técnicos municipales y consultores), y para personas interesadas en integrar el valor y la importancia de los humedales urbanos costeros en este esfuerzo de planificación urbana.

Se divulgo el manual en webinar a un total de 25 personas, y se aprovecho el contenido del material para la incorporación de criterios para la conservación de humedales urbanos costeros dentro del reglamento de la ley de asentamientos humanos de Quintana Roo. 

  • Los humedales urbanos generan servicios ecosistémicos a la población, como la recreación y esparcimiento; sin embargo, la degradación de los humedales puede también afectar a la población, como por ejemplo ser fuente de enfermedades (mosquitos), malos olores, etc. Los municipios deben considerar tanto los servicios ecosistémicos como las afectaciones a la población de vivir cercana a humedales degradadas en sus PMDU. 
  • Los municipios no consideran a la gestión de humedales como parte de su accionar por diferentes razones como desconocimiento, confuso de la legislación, bajo voluntad política etc., lo cual dificultó su involucramiento en los procesos del proyecto. Se vio esta falta de interés desde los PMDU que carecen de estrategias y proyectos orientados a la conservación de los humedales. Los municipios, aunque sin competencias directas en la administración de los humedales, deben integrar los humedales en sus PMDU y los proyectos, especialmente los que se relacionan a la zonificación urbana, control de cambios de uso de suelo, gestión de aguas servidas, recolección de residuos sólidos, y manejo de asentamientos irregulares ubicados cerca de los humedales urbanos, por los impactos que estos generan sobre la salud de los humedales urbanos. 
Business and Technical Capacity Development

Building resilience of the agricultural sector against the effects of meteorological variations includes building the resilience of small businesses along the value chains which use the produce from agricultural production.  Through the Business Capacity Development measure, two women-only local agro-processing groups which process local produce for the local and national market, benefitted from theoretical lectures and hands-on exercises on crucial business aspects (costs, revenues, new product ideas, design, marketing and the management of their business) so they could apply the knowledge gained to improve the quality of their decision making.  The core topics addressed during the training were:  Entrepreneurship Essentials, Introduction to Marketing; Basic Book-Keeping Principles; Essential Costing Practices; Office Administration, financial education, business management and investment-driven market expansion and borrowing.

Both groups acknowledged that they did need to improve their operations to achieve business success as their ability to improve sales relies on their being able to overcome hindrances in their daily operations. The capacity building exercise was therefore an opportunity for them to gain skills to help overcome these challenges.   

While these activities assisted the partners in facing, in a practical manner, technical and implementation challenges they would face in their operations there is also need for training in interpersonal engagement eg. Effective communication, conflict resolution, management and other soft skills critical for effectively managing the interpersonal components of business management.