Methodology
  • Involvement of the local community
  • Responding to community needs 

The openes of the  community to learn and adopt the toolkit.

The financial support to the prooject 

The effective of the toolkit in detering the wildlife from farm 

Funding and professional development training

For many conservationists, including our participants, the knowledge to effectively use conservation technology is not enough without the funding to access the tools. Recognizing this barrier, we provide each participant with $500 USD in seed funding to help them implement their conservation solutions. Additionally, we offer training in grant writing, pitching, and engaging with funders to enhance their ability to secure future funding.

  • Support from donors who fund seed grants 
  • Students are required to submit two updates and a financial report for their grant. Ensuring follow-up on these submissions requires dedicated effort and engagement from the core team  
  • Students have reported that being able to list the seed funding received through our program on their CVs has helped them secure additional funding opportunities in the future.
Hands-on engagement

For our technical training, we prioritize activities that allow students to directly interact with conservation technology tools. By setting up and deploying tools in safe, low-pressure environments, students have the opportunity to make mistakes and learn from those experiences. For example, letting students decide where to place a camera trap based on a lesson, and then evaluating the effectiveness of their decision by reviewing the data collected, is highly valuable. 

  • Access to technology tools at host institution for practical use 
  • Opportunities for students to trial and test tools themselves
  • Experience instructors to provide guidance and support 
  • When paired with supporting background information, we have found these hands-on experiences to be more impactful than traditional lectures or merely observing technology in use 
  • Providing opportunities to engage with the entire lifecycle of a technology (e.g., from set up and deployment to data collection and analysis) better prepares students for using these technologies in their own projects
Focus on early career potential

We select participants who are at the beginning stages of their careers, such as those who have completed their bachelor’s degrees and are entering the NGO or conservation workforce or embarking on higher education.The goal is to identify participants whose careers would benefit the most from the type and amount of training, funding, mentorship, and support we provide. 

  • Strong networks with local academic institutions and regional NGOs help us attract a large pool of qualified applicants (~200 applications per year)
  • Tailored educational materials that align with the needs of early-career participants
  • Community of same-stage participants form strong and enduring connections 
  • Initially, we included participants at various career stages, but we found that older, more experienced individuals have different needs and require a distinct program tailored to their experience level
  • Our entry-level training materials were less useful for women with more experience in the field
  • Over the past two years, we’ve recruited at least one participant without formal education but with extensive on-the-ground experience. These individuals have thrived in the program, highlighting an opportunity to further cater to this audience in future iterations.
Core training materials

To support our upskilling objectives across different contexts, we have developed a core portfolio of training materials. These materials focus on teaching fundamental competencies and are organized into themed modules (e.g., wildlife protection, human-wildlife conflict). Depending on the local context, we select the most relevant modules and training topics. Our locally recruited mentors and trainers are then encouraged to adapt these materials based on their specific expertise and background.

  • Multiple years of programming have allowed us to refine and improve our training materials
  • Annual participant feedback helps guide the development of new topics 
  • Host institutions and local partners provide valuable input on the most relevant training needs
  • Asking local trainers develop their own materials often exceeds their time and capacity 
  • Using standardized materials ensures consistency and reduces variability in the type and depth of content delivered
Mentors, trainers, and allies

Our goal is that our core portfolio of standardized training materials are delivered by female experts recruited from the local region, who we further engage in mentoring and leadership activities. By centering these role models throughout our programming, we provide our participants with a vision of their future careers. We strive to foster an inclusive environment for honest dialogue and encourage ongoing mentorship even after the program concludes. However, the very gender gap we aim to address often presents a challenge when it comes to recruiting female educators and role models for our programs. This situation has helped us to differentiate three leadership roles: “mentors” (female role models, who participate in training and mentorship), “allies” (male trainers and facilitators), and “trainers” (support from international organizing team). Participation of each to these types of individuals is critical to develop and support our participants.

  • Keen interest from female leaders to foster the next generation of conservationists, including willingness to engage honestly in vulnerable conversations and provide career advice 
  • Growing interest from allies to support development of women in their field and organizations 
  • Funding to support attendance and honorarium for high-quality mentors and allies 
  • We have established a code of conduct and set clear expectations up-front on how mentors and allies should engage with students during and after the program 
  • Mentors and allies with a background in training as well as expertise in conservation tech are preferred 
  • Wherever possible, we seek a combination of mid-career and established mentors, who can speak to participants about different stages of the conservation career journey 
  • Male allies need to be carefully selected to create a supportive, safe environment 
  • We maintain and cultivate female-only spaces at the workshop where male allies and trainers are not allowed 
Local partners and host institutions

This program aims to equip women with practical skills that are actionable within their local context, enabling them to seize opportunities such as funding and career advancement within their specific regions. To achieve this, we collaborate closely with local partners and host institutions to adapt our core training materials, ensuring they align with local challenges, processes, and institutions. By tailoring our trainings to address the unique needs and contexts of the women we support, we maximize the relevance and impact of our programming. 

  • Local partners with aligned visions in education, upskilling, and empowerment 
  • On-the-ground support from women within the host and collaborating organizations 
  • Networks of experienced local educators and trainers in the conservation technology space  
  • Educational systems vary significantly, even across countries in the same region. For example, certain types of trainings or activities - such as active learning approaches - may be more difficult for students from countries where education is centered on rote memorization. Understanding local learning preferences and adapting teaching methods accordingly can support deeper engagement. 
  • Certain technologies or methodologies, such as drones or cloud-based data storage, may be prohibited or prohibitively expensive in some. Partnering with local conservation technology experts ensures that we focus on accessible, actionable technologies for our participants.
Open-Source Application for Species Monitoring

This building block democratizes access to cutting-edge technology, enabling scalable and cost-effective wildlife monitoring. Users can upload images or videos, and the application automatically detects and classifies species, providing actionable insights for decision-making.

  • A simple and intuitive user interface to ensure accessibility for non-technical users.
  • Documentation and training resources for users to understand and effectively utilize the application.
  • Community feedback to continually enhance the tool’s usability and features.
  • Usability is key; overly complex interfaces deter users.
  • Offering technical support and clear documentation ensures broader adoption.
  • Integration challenges included aligning the AI model’s output with user-friendly visualization tools; iterative testing was essential to resolve this.
Field Data Collection and Validation Framework

The framework ensures that the AI model is robust and generalizable across different regions and habitats. Data collected is used to test the model’s ability to recognize vulture species in diverse conditions, providing feedback for further optimization.

  • Deployment of drones and camera traps in strategic locations within reserves for optimal coverage.
  • Collaboration with local conservation teams for field logistics and data collection.
  • Consistent testing and refinement of the model based on field results to address discrepancies.
  • Having local partnerships ensures smoother field operations and enhances data collection efficiency.
  • A major challenge was dealing with low-quality or insufficient data; addressing this required setting up more camera traps in diverse locations.
AI-Powered Vulture Species Recognition Model

The purpose of this building block is to automate the traditionally manual process of wildlife monitoring. The model works by analyzing visual data, detecting the presence of vultures, and classifying them into species with high accuracy. This reduces human effort, accelerates data analysis, and ensures consistency in monitoring.

  • A high-quality, annotated dataset with diverse images representing the target species in different environments and conditions.
  • Access to computational resources ( Google Colab Pro+)for training and validating the AI model.
  • Collaboration with conservationists to validate the model’s results in field conditions.
  • Ensure the dataset is representative of real-world conditions to avoid bias in detection (e.g., lighting, angles, habitats).
  • Regular updates to the model with new data improve accuracy and adaptability.
  • Challenges include misclassifications due to overlapping species traits; having experts validate initial results is essential.