. Reframing Relationships between Humans and the Earth: The "Anthropocene", a New Ideology to Justify the Status Quo?

Communication, advocacy, public policies, research and teaching programs take in account the general phenomenon in view of the transformation of the dominant paradigms of development, growth, wealth, power and freedom embedded at political, economic, educational and cultural levels. Earth’s regeneration and mankind’s regeneration, as faces of the same coin, are addressed simultaneously, for their mutual support, in view of all dimensions of being in the world, as they combine, as donors and recipients, to induce the events (deficits/assets), cope with consequences (desired/undesired) and contribute for change (potential outputs): intimate, interactive, social and biophysical. In the socio-cultural learning niches, heuristic-hermeneutic experiences could generate awareness, interpretation and understanding beyond established stereotypes, from a thematic (“what” is at stake), an epistemic (“how” to understand and define the events) and a strategic (who, when, where) point of view. 

According the recommendations of the Earth System Governance Project, it is necessary to explore the following questions: How to assess the institutional, political and social context in view of comparative research and meta-analyses to reveal general patterns and trends that vary by context? What are the research topics and questions where the accumulation of knowledge would be particularly fruitful in terms of scientific progress and/or impact on policy and governance? What comparative research, systematic reviews and meta-analyses exist? Which research results are in fact (not) taken up by policy makers, and why (not)? How to develop and use a basic terminology that is widely shared, but nevertheless open to reinterpretations and new concepts? How to coordinate collaborations such as common dictionaries or shared databases? How might the Science-Policy Interface community influence the policies of journals and funding agencies ? How to deal with communication, advocacy, public policies, research and teaching programs in view of research integrity?

Relevant questions regarding knowledge collaborations:

   Beyond Traditional Boundaries: Participatory science projects that cross disciplinary boundaries, leading to more holistic and innovative research. 

   Braiding Indigenous Knowledge and Western Science: Projects that build and reflect different knowledge traditions for deeper understandings and respectful planning.

 

Addressing Global Challenges:

  Developing sustainable technologies, understanding climate patterns, and proposing mitigation strategies; improving disease diagnosis, treatment, and prevention; or exploring alternative energy sources, efficient resource management, and sustainable agriculture.

   Expanding Basic Discoveries: Contributing to fundamental scientific advancement, in fields like health, physics, chemistry, biology, ecology, etc., or developing technological advancements that support scientific discovery.

 

Diversity and inclusion:

   Bridging the Gap: Efforts ensuring that projects are accessible to people from diverse backgrounds, including those with disabilities and from marginalized communities.

   Community-Based and Boundary Organization Partnerships:Leveraging partnerships to bring project opportunities to new audiences.

 

 

Evaluating and Disseminating Outcomes for Continuous Improvement and Sustainability

Another key component of the Agroecology Leadership Academy was the regular evaluation of its outcomes. Participants were frequently surveyed about their experiences with the Academy, its content, and their personal progress. This feedback was utilized not only to adapt the Academy's programme flexibly to meet the demands of the participants - an aspect previously identified as a success factor in other building blocks – but also to evaluate the entire programme more effectively and derive lessons learned for potential future academies. After the Academy concluded, these findings were compiled and discussed in an internal workshop involving the implementing organisations. The lessons learned, along with other relevant materials, are shared on various platforms, particularly Agroecology TPP, to assist organisations in planning and implementing similar projects. Additionally, the project was presented in a public webinar upon completion. During this webinar, Academy participants had the opportunity to showcase their transformation initiatives, providing a valuable chance to expand their networks and enhance the sustainability of the Academy.

  • The regular collection of feedback from participants not only allowed for real-time adaptations of the Academy programme but also served as the foundation for the internal evaluation workshop held after the Academy’s conclusion. The feedback addressed a wide range of aspects related to the Academy, including content, formats, logistics, learning experiences, and more, in order to achieve a more comprehensive evaluation at the end.
  • It is important to note that the webinar following the Academy provided a platform not only for the implementing organisations to present the Academy itself, but also, and importantly, for the Academy participants to present the initiatives they had developed. This fostered engagement beyond the Academy’s boundaries and enabled participants to forge new connections that could be beneficial for furthering their initiatives.
  • While some surveys yielded helpful insights, others unfortunately had low response rates. It is therefore advisable to use brief surveys with no more than 10 questions at the beginning of the Academy and after each international learning event.
  • The planning of follow-up activities should include considerations for how this Academy could be adopted by other institutions, follow-ups on the country transformation initiatives, and strategies for further embedding the Academy in the countries involved. It is recommended to develop a clear action plan aimed at maximising the sustainability of the Academy approximately nine months before its conclusion.
International Learning Events and Online Sessions

Two international four-day learning events framed the Academy, occurring at its beginning and end. The first event took place in February 2024 in Kisumu, Kenya, as part of the Sowing phase of the Academy. The objective of this event was to bring all participants together for the first time in a spirit of collaborative learning and support. It aimed to introduce the participants to the key concepts of leadership and agroecology while laying the foundation for successful work and group cooperation. During this event, participants began developing stakeholder systems maps to advance agroecology in their countries and collaborated to create a vision for change. Additionally, a field visit took participants to a local demonstration farm (BIOGI) and a farm practicing agroforestry, supported by the NGO Trees for the Future. 
After several months of learning in country groups and meeting the global cohort online four times, the second event was held in November 2024 in Hawassa, Ethiopia. This marked the final official activity of the Academy and served as the core event of its Harvesting phase, transitioning participants into the Transforming phase. The key objectives of this event were to support country groups and individuals in taking and scaling up action, to deepen the learning from previous months, to discuss the potential for upscaling the initiatives developed during the Academy, and  to celebrate and strengthen the networks that had formed.
During this event,  participants reflected on and shared learnings with other country teams, exploring key topics such as personal ecology, individual leadership, habit formation, and communication. A field visit included a tour to a local coffee co-operative processing facility and a diversified small-scale farm. Participants also planned their next steps as transformation makers for agroecological change.
The two international learning events were complemented by a total of four online session, each lasting 2,5 hours, which took place in March, May, July and September 2024. These sessions provided participants with additional insights on models and tools for leading transformation initiatives and advancing agroecology, including effective communication, overcoming obstacles, and influencing political narratives. Thus, these online sessions constituted an important component of the Academy’s Growing phase. 

  • Both events featured a highly interactive blend of training and workshops, guided by a pre-set agenda while allowing ample opportunity for participants to influence the programme.
  • The translation services provided during both live and online events were seamless. Thanks to the excellent interpreters, particularly at the two learning events, language barriers were effectively addressed.
  • Participants appreciated the field trips, which were made possible by hosting the international learning events in cities that offer access to rural areas, rather than in capital cities.
  • While the focus between the two in-presence International Learning Events was on country-specific transformation initiatives, the international online meetings provided an opportunity for the entire group to reconvene, maintain collective momentum, and to share insights with one another.
  • Regarding the field trips, it is preferred for future events to concentrate on a single field visit per learning event, dedicating more time, ideally an entire day – to the farm. Effective and timely coordination with country partners is essential to ensure that suitable locations, logistics, and adequate facilities are available on-site.
  • The bilingual nature of the events necessitated translation services for all sessions. While this was highly effective during in-person international learning events, the quality of interpretation and the technical setup for translation during online events fell short, creating additional work for facilitators, such as repeating sessions. Therefore, it is recommended to utilise software with easy-friendly translation features (such as Zoom, if permitted by the organising entity of the Academy) and to provide participants with more thorough briefings on overcoming technical challenges.
  • Thorough logistical preparation is crucial for international learning events. Participants from various countries need to converge at an appropriate location. Important processes, such as obtaining necessary visas and exploring travel options, should be initiated well in advance.
Building Bridges: The Academy’s Multidimensional, Multistakeholder Approach

The purpose of the Academy was to support participants in developing the skills and experience necessary for leadership in navigating complex systems and fostering agroecological transformation.
A suitable concept to fulfill this purpose was developed over a span of three months (July – September 2023): 

Consequently, the purpose was distilled into three key objectives: Learning, Acting, and Networking. These objectives were reflected in the design of each session and supported at three levels:  individuals, country teams, and the global cohort.
The methodology of the Agroecology Leadership Academy was based on 7 principles:

  • A close connection between the topic of Agroecology (the “What”) and Transformation and Leadership (the “How”)
  • A clear focus on transformation skills and mindset
  • Transformation initiatives as core learning projects
  • In-Country facilitators to support the country teams
  • Linking Learning, Acting and Networking
  • Systemic, experiential and relational learning
  • The strong role of communication

The general structure of the Academy was organised into four phases: Sowing, Growing, Harvesting and Transforming. Various learning formats were implemented throughout these phases, including an online kick-off event, two international in-presence learning events, four international online sessions, and individual workshops for the different country teams. These formats concentrated on the aforementioned levels. While the meetings within the country teams emphasised teamwork at the national level, the international sessions facilitated mutual learning among the global cohort. 

After the concept development phase, the participant selection process commenced. The goal was to assemble a heterogenous group representing diverse stakeholder groups, skills, ages and genders. 
A call for applications was sent out to a pre-defined group of potential participants from agroecology-networks in the respective countries. Following the evaluation of initial applications based on predefined selection criteria, individual selection conversations were conducted to finalise the group composition, with five participants chosen from each country. 
In selecting participants, not only individual criteria were considered, but also the need for complementary skills within the group composition.  Each participant was expected to contribute something from their personal background that would benefit the group as a whole.
This selection process ensured that different levels of the agricultural and food system were represented - participants included, among others, farmers, founders of agricultural enterprises, university professors, and representatives of ministries of agriculture - as well as ensuring a balanced gender ratio within the group.

  • Utilising a core model developed during the concept development phase, which was introduced at the beginning of the programme and referenced throughout The core model for Agroecology Leadership was designed in a circular format with multiple rings. The centre of the model, Agroecological Transformation, was to be achieved by interweaving elements of the inner circle – leadership elements at various levels – with the outer circle – agroecological principles.
  • Implementing a communication action plan to ensure that all participants understood the planned communication tools and materials, alongside establishing frequent communication to share information and include modules on effective communication.
  • Involving country focal persons in the development and implementation of the Academy to provide context specific support for both the facilitation team and participants. 
  • Adapting the Academy’s curriculum based on participants’ needs to ensure those needs were adequately met. Regular feedback from participants was solicited for this purpose. 
  • The overall structure and duration of the Academy appeared appropriate. The 11-month duration, combined with a mix of live and online events and transformation initiatives, was beneficial for learning.
  • The participant selection process was effective, as invitations sent through agroecology networks attracted two to three times as many applicants as available spots. The application process utilised simple and streamlined forms, and requesting application videos proved helpful in assessing participants.
  • Country teams, with diverse representation from various sectors (public sector, start-ups, academia) were highly active and successful. It is essential to emphasise the critical need for farmer representation and participation in forums like this.
  • The facilitation team demonstrated adaptability in creating a programme that addressed participants’ learning needs.  Rather than establishing a fixed curriculum at the outset, topics were developed based on participant feedback, which proved to be effective.
  • Initially intended to focus solely on creating materials such as videos and factsheets, communication activities became integral to all aspects—from the application process and session preparation to facilitation, documentation, and participant management. Therefore, it is recommended to incorporate the strong role of communication consistently into future Academies from the onset.
The graphically designed landscape highlights the important steps of the approach: Initial evaluation and community entry to identify fisheries management systems; election of committees in new or existing community management organisations; support for demands-oriented capacity development; operational planning and implementation of fisheries management system; fostering cooperation between community and authorities for joint resource management
East and South Africa
Southeast Asia
Global Programme
Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture
Initial evaluation and community entry
Developing existing or new committees
Support for enhancing capacity
Operational planning and implementation
Cooperation of community and authorities
The graphically designed landscape highlights the important steps of the approach: Initial evaluation and community entry to identify fisheries management systems; election of committees in new or existing community management organisations; support for demands-oriented capacity development; operational planning and implementation of fisheries management system; fostering cooperation between community and authorities for joint resource management
East and South Africa
Southeast Asia
Global Programme
Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture
Initial evaluation and community entry
Developing existing or new committees
Support for enhancing capacity
Operational planning and implementation
Cooperation of community and authorities
Five women harvesting fish with a net in the shallow part fo a pond.
Global Programme
Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture
Analysis of gender roles and capacities in the value chain
Capacity building
Awareness raising
Management roles for women
Platforms for women in the fish value chain
Five women harvesting fish with a net in the shallow part fo a pond.
Global Programme
Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture
Analysis of gender roles and capacities in the value chain
Capacity building
Awareness raising
Management roles for women
Platforms for women in the fish value chain
Incorporating storytelling and visuals

Incorporating storytelling and visuals is essential for effective communication and engagement with the target audience. Combining storytelling and visuals in a media campaign on sustainable fisheries and aquaculture can help increase awareness, educate stakeholders, and inspire action towards sustainable practices. For instance, a visual representation of depletion of fish in a dam can help building a connection between the audience and the cause, fostering a sense of understanding for the importance of preserving aquatic resources and promoting responsible practices in the industry.

By presenting information in a compelling and relatable way, it can evoke emotions, capture attention, and make complex concepts easier to understand. Visuals, such as images, videos, and infographics, enhance the storytelling experience by providing a visual representation of the information being conveyed in a specific context. Visuals can help to reinforce key messages, increase retention of information, and appeal to different learning styles. 

Overall, clear objectives and target audience identification, strategic planning and message development, effective use of various media channels, consistent messaging and branding, monitoring and evaluation of campaign performance, and adaptability to feedback and changing circumstances are important for communication purposes. Additionally, collaboration with stakeholders, understanding of audience preferences and behaviours, and creativity in content creation are essential for the success of media campaigns.
 

Collaborating with key stakeholders

Collaborating with key stakeholders such as fishers, fish farmers, government agencies, project implementing partners, and local communities can enhance the credibility and outreach of the campaign. Involving these stakeholders in the planning and implementation process of a media campaign on fisheries and aquaculture is crucial for gathering support and ensuring the sustainability of the initiatives by spreading them more widely beyond the project duration. This can be done by identifying the necessary stakeholders for a media campaign on fisheries and aquaculture and requesting input on concepts, Terms of Reference, or script content for the campaign. This can help ensure that the messaging is accurate, relevant, and resonates with the target audience. Establishing feedback loops during the campaign development process allows for continuous input and adjustments based on stakeholder feedback, leading to a more refined and successful campaign. Involving stakeholders in the planning and implementation of the media campaign not only ensures quality control of the campaign material but can also increase buy-in and support for the initiative. This collaborative approach fosters a sense of ownership among stakeholders, enhances the credibility of the campaign, and ultimately contributes to the long-term sustainability and success of the fisheries and aquaculture initiatives being promoted. Furthermore, working with key stakeholders can help identify potential challenges or opportunities that may not have been apparent initially, leading to more informed decision-making and strategic planning. Engaging stakeholders also leverage their networks and resources to amplify the reach and impact of the media campaigns.