Commitments on the part of the farmer

Part of the solution was to encourage a shift from traditional or conventional production to environmentally friendly livestock production through seed capital provided to each farmer. The seed capital was related to the practices themselves, and was always provided in kind (e.g. barbed wire for paddock division, seeds for fodder banks, etc.). It also demanded a counterpart on the part of the farmer. For example: the expert committed himself to provide a certain predefined quantity of barbed wire to the farmer, and the farmer committed himself to plant a certain number of sprouts in the new fences. The ranchers' commitments were of an environmental nature: planting trees and freeing areas for natural recovery. In this way, a greater commitment and ownership was achieved on the part of the farmers, and the proper use of the inputs provided was also ensured.

  • The same types of commitments were required by all farmers.
  • Sensible monitoring of the implementation of commitments
  • To avoid misunderstandings and ensure good monitoring, it was essential to define jointly and transparently in the farm plan the expert's contributions and the farmer's commitments at the beginning of the collaboration. The document was then signed by both parties.
  • The inclusion in the expert's work of regular visits to the farms allowed him to ensure the proper use of the seed capital and compliance with the commitments, or otherwise to enter into a dialogue.
  • To ensure effective fulfillment of the commitment, each farmer's contribution had to be sized in proportion to his available resources.
Technical capacity building for farmers

The development of technical capabilities was based on the transfer of knowledge coupled with the direct application of the new practices transferred to the beneficiary farmers in pilot areas of their farms. On a rotating and regular basis, farmers from the same area met at the farm of a volunteer farmer to attend explanations and demonstrations of the practices by the expert. The participatory methodologies encouraged the exchange among the farmers, opening up space for their own experiences and knowledge. At the same time, the technician periodically visited each farmer's production unit to correct mistaken implementations, ensure compliance with the farmer's commitments, and open space for specific questions. The training plan included four basic silvopastoral practices (pasture division, improved pastures, fodder bank, live fences) and three complementary practices (silage, haymaking, nutritional blocks). The implementation of the practices was carried out throughout the year according to weather conditions. In addition, the expert taught the farmers hygiene practices in order to improve their ability to market their milk.

  • Motivated and qualified technician, with strong support from his manager, who establishes transparent and trusting relationships with farmers
  • Reasonable duration of the capacity building process, allowing to face together (expert-farmer) doubts and setbacks. In this case it was 7 years.
  • Seed capital for a pilot area, since the establishment of innovations requires significant investments.
  • Exchange tour to livestock farms, where the implementation of the practices already proved successful, had a motivating effect.
  • The implementation of the different environmentally friendly livestock practices in a small pilot area during the first year allowed the farmer to gain experience before progressively expanding the area of application.
  • A homogeneous group of members, with the same degree of adoption of silvopastoral practices, facilitated the transfer of knowledge compared to working with heterogeneous groups.
  • The number of follow-up visits made to the same production unit did not determine the quality of the implementation of the different practices. The key was the relationship of trust and transparency between the farmer and the expert, as well as the availability of the latter.
  • In the visits to the farms, it was key that the silvopastoral expert provided effective support, responding professionally and adequately to doubts. This also strengthened the bond of trust between the expert and the farmer.
Producing compost for crops

This planting started in 2017 August to:

i) maximize available resources, make use of agricultural by-products, volunteer agricultural labor to produce bio-organic fertilizer with high value,

ii) enhance soil micro-organisms, rapid decomposition of organic matters, eliminate and destroy harmful microorganisms that exist in manure, support plants to increase their resistance,

iii) contribute to environment protection, reducing the toxicity of chemicals in agricultural products due to the abuse of chemical fertilizers,

iv) raising awareness to villagers in clean environment.

 

Hence, farmers will have a number of benefits from compost they make, including, access to fertilizer resources with reasonable price for their conditions, less depending on markets, keeping the  environment clean and ensuring good quality of agricultural products.

18 households - selected from different community meetings – participated in this activity and received technical trainings on producing compost in a step-by-step process combining theory and on-hand practical implementation in their gardens.

The following factors made this activity effective:

  • Farmers paid special attention to applying scientific knowledge to their crop production activities for better products,
  • the necessary materials were locally available,
  • weather conditions were favorable for farmers during the implementation as there was little rain and low humidity.
  • Projects provided a small amount of inputs such as Trichoderma probiotics, molasses, and lime
  • Compost can be produced in the amount that farmers need for their crops and trees.
  • Even though only 18 households took part, technical material was shared with other farmers 
  • Growers should understand how to use compost in the Integrated Pest management process, in particular how to use compost for trees and crops in certain growing stages (for example, the fruit generating period is important).
  • Frequent checks should be made to ensure the compost is in good condition.
Contour planting with pineapples and pinto peanut in orange fields

This planting started in 2017 March for:

i) reducing runoff and erosion in the steep orange fields,

ii) keeping moisture content high for orange trees,

iii) protecting the top soil layer,

iv) increasing soil fertility, and

v) minimizing grass cover that competes with orange trees.

 

Thus, this mixed planting can provide a number of services to growers, such as fruits from orange trees and pineapples for income, fodder for animals and materials from pinto peanut for compost and improvement of soils.

 

12 households participated in this planting. They were selected from community meetings based on criteria (committment, site characteristics, labor force). Two members each household were invited for the in-class technical training on doing this planting. Trainers provided planting techniques in localized discussions and lessons learnt. Farmers were also offered on-hand practical part in their own orange fields for the detailed and real application.

 

Pineapples were planted as contours between orange rows, by serrated planting to ensure erosion control function. Pinto peanut - a nitrogen fixing plant - was planted between trees. The survival rate is almost 100%, pineapples already offered the first fruits. This activity is continuously taken care of and checked by farmers.

  • One of the success factors of this planting was communicating its values to farmers. Because pinto peanut was completely new to farmers and commune staff, many felt reluctant to apply it. Technicians and the project team implemented good practices to show locals.
  • A second factor was that technicians used traditional knowledge in training, which helped farmers understand this approach.
  • Frequent checks were offered to support farmers and motivate them for their hard work.
  • Planting pineapples and pinto peanut as contoursr in orange fields is more time-consuming than cultivating orange trees without anything in between.
  • Farmers had to do many different tasks to get pineapples planted in serrated rows and pinto peanut planted in beds. Thus, information on technical requirements should be clearly explained to farmers in the beginning.
  • First time application should not cover too many households.
  • This application is new to farmers, so frequent checks are very important to make sure they stay interested and commit to the work.
  • The third lesson is involving a local institute (the agroforestry unit in this case) to enable the introduction and replication among other farmers and areas where possible.
  • Participating households should be carefully selected because households with many livelihood opportunities might not participate because they will focus on activities for good income, rather than this approach which mainly provides environmental value rather than increased income.
Restoration of degraded natural forests with native trees in the top section of the hills

Planting started in 2016 December for:

i) protecting and enriching the existing natural forests in very low density and poor composition,

ii) introducing comparative advantages of natural forests against acacia plantation,

iii) raising awareness to local residents on utilizing ecosystems suitability.

 

Forests were protected and enriched to provide different services to other ecosystems and human, such as food and non-timber forest products for daily use and income, regulation of micro climate, underground water, and extreme weather conditions.

 

54 households whose forests are connected to each other joined the activities. They were then trained on enrichment, including on-hand practical exercises in their forests. Forests were enriched by strips and spots; depended on the current forest status that was checked by technicians. Three native species were planted, including Erythrophloeum fordii (Iron wood), Cinnamomum iner (Cinnamon tree species from SE Asia), and Manglietia glauca (Magnolia tree). These species were planted by single rows along contours. The survival rate was 95% and all trees had new growing points after 2 months. Plantings are taken care and checked by farmers.

 

 

  • Various aspects made this planting possible. Farmers understood the importance of keeping natural forests for their own lives. This lead to their commitment and hard work in their forests. 
  • Also, the planting is compliant with the district and commune development plans on the enrichment of natural forests by native species.
  • Lastly, their work was closely monitored and supported by technicians to ensure the planting was done correctly and to motivate them for the hard work.
  • A large group of farmers is interested in clearing their forests to plant fast-growing species for short rotations.
  • In addition, governments lure investment in industrial work including construction and processing factories that need raw materials from fast-growing species. These trends support farmers who easily decide to convert natural forests to short-rotation plantations for their daily lives and income.
  • Besides raising awareness among farmers about the benefits that natural forests bring about, the project team worked closely with local authorities to ensure that the protection and restoration of natural forests was implemented effectively.
  • Another important point was involving farmers who are passionate about natural forests and act as 'role models' to other families.
  • Lastly, the process was transparent and farmers had their voiced in the entire process.
Supporting livelihood development to enhance resilient coastal communities towards climate change impacts

Livelihood models were developed and piloted to support participating households, helping them to generate additional income and strengthening the ownership of the local community. 30 participating households were identified trough baseline surveys and three models were selected which had been identified as having the potential to reduce the pressure on coastal forests, while also providing additional benefits to communities. Vegetable gardening, fodder production & cattle raising as well as fish farming were identified to support selected farmers. As such, the livelihood activities are directly linked to the coastal protection forest plantation, not only by reducing pressures but also by enhancing the adaptive capacity of local communities through diversifying agricultural products. Ownership for the coastal protection forest plantation was also increased as locals partaking in the livelihood models have protection and maintenance responsibilities for the pilot plantations. A series of technical trainings on identified livelihoods, including guidances on farming were delivered to farmers to improve their technical knowledge and production skills.

- Involvement of local authorities and communities from the start of first discussions about project planning
- The needs of local people are respected and taken into account
- Technical knowledge and regular advice play important roles in improving production skills for farmers
- Good collaboration and support from local authorities and project partners are key factors

- It takes time for farmers to really understand and apply techncial knowledge and change their production habits to adapt to climate change impacts
- EbA measures usually take longer until its results and impacts can be seen. Short-time implementation of the solutions has not yet brought practical evidence of the biophysical effectiveness of measures which could be communicated to local authorities with facts and figures, making it hard to persuade them to take over responsibility on M&E and maintaining the solutions

- The restoration of ecosystems (medium-term benefits) in combination with livelihood development of local people (short-term benefits) is an integrated and sustainable approach in response to climate change impacts
- Ownership and responsibility of local communities for upscaling and maintaining pilot measures in the long run is a key factor to ensure their sustainability

Reforestation and rehabilitation of coastal protection forest to restore biodiversities and ecosystem services in coastal areas.

The coastal protection forest plays an important protective function in safeguarding communities and land uses from extreme storms, rising sea levels, shoreline erosion, sand moving and salt water intrusion. Evidence has shown that by restoring coastal ecosystems, the protective functions of these ecosystems can be restored which in turn increases the resilience of coastal communities and ecosystems, while providing diverse additional benefits such as biodiversity conservation. In Hoa Binh village, the degraded proection forest causes the loss of the protective function of the forest and increases the vulnerability of local communities and adjacent land (villages, agricultural land, underground water sources…). Since 2016, the project has supported a pilot model of reforesting coastal sand-dune forests using a mix of species of acacia (wattle), casuarina (whistle pine) and native species (Melaleuca cajuputi, Myrsine linearis, Lithocarpus concentricus, Syzygium corticosum) on 10 ha of degraded land, classified as protection forest. The aim was to restore the costal forest and increase the resilience of coastal ecosystems and communities. The restoration activity has so far planted 5ha of acacia forest, another 5ha of casuarina and inter-planted 100 clusters of native species.

- Existing local people’s basic awareness on the importance of protection forests to their lives in the context of increasing extreme events

- High commitment and ownership of local people and local authorities towards forest protection and rehabilitation

- Enhancing technical knowledge and skills of local people in forest plantation

- Close technical monitoring and and guidance of community forest protection groups

- It takes time to discuss, persuade and raise awareness of local authorities and local communities on rehabilitating native species and mix-planting native species with the standard species (acacia and casuarina) that had been regulated in the forest plantation agenda of the government for coastal forests

- Room needs to be created for local people to raise their voice on how they would like to approach implementation

- High commitment and support from local authorities is needed at all levels for community forest protection groups to operate and carry out their work properly and sustainably

- Selection of good quality seedlings with support of technical experts is one of the key factors

- A maintenance plan as well as monitoring and evaluation is a crucial factor to decide the success of the pilot measures by local communities and authorities

Awareness raising on Climate change and Ecosystem-based Adaptation for local coastal communities

Being located along the coastal line seriously exposes local people to natural hazards such as storms, floods, whirlwinds, sand-moving, river and sea bank erosion and salinity intrusion. The majority of populations in coastal areas is poor and has limited knowledge about climate change impacts. In 2016-2017, over 20 training courses were conducted for more than 1200 people from 10 coastal villages and local staff to provide practical knowledge and information on (ecosystem-based) adaptation to climate change, aiming to strengthen their understanding and their adaptive capacity towards impacts of climate change. During the training, local people had the chance to learn about climate change and project impacts in their region and globally, to discuss their challenges and worked out potential adaptation measures together. In addition, awareness raising on climate change was also conducted for about 300 pupils and teachers in primary and secondary schools in Ngu Thuy Nam commune. Participating in a picture drawing contest run under the title “Climate change in your home-village’’ increased their understanding on climate change issues and adaptation measures that they could contribute.

- Training materials were prepared in a simple manner which made it easy for local people to understand: photos, leaflets, videos…

- Creating opportunities for local people to identify their challenges and to discuss potential adaptation measures that their community could carry out

- Active involvement of local authorities in the activities

- Mobilising participation of young generations, such as youth unions and students is a key success factor due to the important role they play in the action plan for responding to CC impacts in the area

- Tangible examples/good practices on climate change impacts and EbA measures help local people and staff to get a better understanding about adaptation measures and their benefits.

-  Taking challenges of local communities as entry points for the training's content

- Support and active involvement of the local authorities definitely increased the success of the activity

- Adaptation plans of communities need to be supported and followed up to ensure their sustainability

Assess the total net income from FAP and Control Fields

Income is the best incentive for farmers.

The methodology is in detail described in Christmann et al. 2017. On farm trials using the same inputs in all fields (inputs according to usual practice of farmers, so other farmers can gain the same net income).

Select marketable plants together with farmers. Which ones are useful for them? Do they flower during the flowering time of the main crop or before/after - to sustain pollinators in the field over a longer period. Check before seeding: not all useful crops recommended by farmers attract pollinators.

It is important that at least some plants in the habitat zone provide really good income. Farmers select those habitat enhancement plants, which they regard as most useful. Their criteria might differ from the researcher's criteria, so better seed a wide range of habitat enhancement plants. Include oil seeds and spices, they are very attractive. Check, if they don’t attract pests at this specific seeding time. Check, if they can grow (water demand) under the same conditions as the main crop.

Acuerdos institucionales para respaldar mecanismos de compensación

Los acuerdos de compensación por servicios ecosistémicos hídricos parten desde lo local, insertándose en un marco más amplio. La combinación entre participación comunitaria y la inserción en una red de actores gubernamentales y de apoyo le da un significativo respaldo a los acuerdos negociados entre usuarios del agua y propietarios del bosque. Además, las compensaciones aportadas por las comunidades de escasos recursos, no cubren las demandas de compensación requeridas. En este sentido, las redes conformadas alrededor de los mecanismos permitieron la movilización de recursos adicionales (monetarios y no monetarios) para la compensación, y abrieron la opción a extender las contribuciones al fondo de compensación a cascos urbanos adyacentes. En la práctica se involucraron municipalidades, mancomunidades e institutos especializados, ya desde el inicio del proceso. Ya en el proceso de negociación de los mecanismos de compensación, contribuyeron con aportes claves como la exención de impuestos a propiedades inmuebles para propietarios de bosque. Estas colaboraciones son respaldadas por llamados acuerdos institucionales, que les dan legalidad. De estos surgieron comités de monitoreo de los mecanismos, conformados por las organizaciones comunitarias así como las entidades asociadas.

  • Interés por parte de entidades presentes en el territorio de vincularse a un iniciativa de protección del bosque
  • Confianza en las capacidades de las comunidades para tomar un papel clave en el manejo de un fondo de compensación y el monitoreo de otros mecanismos de compensación
  • Asistencia técnica continua, sobre todo a las organizaciones comunitarias
  • En las comunidades de escasos recursos en las cuales se trabajó, los aportes adicionales realizados por los usuarios del agua no fueron suficientes para responder a las demandas de compensación por los servicios ecosistémicos hídricos – por ej. de los propietarios de bosque. Las aportaciones, aunque pequeñas, a un fondo de compensación, fueron no obstante la prueba de compromiso real para los otros actores involucrados (municipalidades, mancomunidades, institutos forestales, etc.).
  • Gracias a la duración de la asistencia técnica, se proporcionó un seguimiento continuo a la ejecución de nuevas actividades, solventando dudas y acompañando la resolución de trabas.
  • Colaboraciones con entidades de apoyo (por ej. ONG, proyectos de cooperación internacional) fueron muy beneficiosas para gestionar compensaciones puntuales: por ej. capacitaciones para prevención y control de incendios forestales, plantones, material para cercar. Los mecanismos y su comité de monitoreo se mantuvieron no obstante independientes de éstas, en vista de no caer en dependencia.