Environmental Assessment of Dive Centres
This is a practical and effective tool for assisting dive centres in implementing the environmental standards. The Green Environmental Assessment Rating System (GEARS) is used to assess the day-to-day practices of dive/snorkel centres against set criteria to measure their adherence to each Code of Conduct. Scores identify nature and urgency for improvements. Certification and free promotion on the Green Fins webpage act as incentives for eco-friendly dive tourism.
• Dive and/or snorkel centres willing to participate in the rating system • Qualified Green Fins Assessors (competent divers) and/or Coordinators who have access to the location and resources to support annual assessments and training for the dive/snorkel centres as required. Training and qualifications are overseen by Reef-World. These individuals cannot be involved directly with a specific dive centre, but may be freelance dive professionals, public employees, NGO staff or community members.
Certified membership of participating dive centres is granted after the first assessment, a joint decision on three realistic actions to implement, and the possibility to become one of the 10 top members are good incentives to improve environmental awareness and eco-friendly dive operations. If no improvement is recorded after two yearly assessments, free membership can be suspended or withdrawn from a dive centre – a valuable quality control tool. The annual Green Fins training and associated environmental consultation on how to implement the three feedback goals over the next year is a success factor. This assessment can balance lack of legal frameworks governing tourism industry practices and deficiencies in monitoring and enforcement capacities of local governments. The Green Fins systems encourage local dive and snorkel centres to unite and work together on local environmental issues and develop strategic outreach campaigns to address these issues.
Strengthening the Alliance and Capacity Building Activities
In order to strengthen the alliance, IBAMO has established five major committees facilitating its sustainable implementation: • Information, Education and Communication Committee (IEC) • Law Enforcement Committee • Habitat Enhancement Committee • Institutional/Capacity Building Committee • Monitoring and Evaluation Committee As part of the collaborative implementation of the EAF (i.e., pilot implementation of tailored strategies in focal sites with the explicit aim of capacity development of stakeholders for EAF), IBAMO was involved as key stakeholder. Capacity building focused on the institutional strengthening of IBAMO and included topics such as Coastal Resources Management, Fisheries Data Collection and other activities that were conducted in collaboration with other partners.
• External institutions (including civil society groups) take a role in catalyzing the process fisheries improvement • Mobilizing support from national government agencies (e.g., BFAR, DENR, DOST) to link up with the LGUs and provides technical as well as financial support.
XXX YET MISSING XXX
Partnerships and Networking
Partnerships with research, government and civil society institutions help FARMCs in the planning, implementation of their activities and achievement of their objectives.
Conditions for adoption elsewhere: • Accessible partners in public, research and private sectors, including foundations, NGOs, private persons, research agencies and universities, who are convinced that the FARMC can make a difference, and who are willing to contribute and to support FARMC in terms of funding and technical expertise.
Assistance from partners can help to balance shortcomings from government authorities and institutions. Cooperation with civil society organisations has demonstrated significant contributions, particularly in the field of capacity development. It is important to liaise with cooperation partners for technical support in providing orientation about the nature of FARMCs and to adjust their input and contributions appropriately to meet needs and capacities of beneficiaries.
Rewards and Incentives
The national incentive system for FARMC, a regular programme in BFAR, serves to recognize outstanding FARMCs and FARMC coordinators that may act as role models. It includes cash prizes, trophies and appreciation by the President of the Philippines that are regularly awarded in accordance to a nationwide evaluation process.
Conditions for adoption elsewhere: • Governmental recognition of the importance of fisheries and aquaculture • Governmental acknowledgement of efforts and achievements due to cooperation amongst stakeholders, particularly the contributions by local fisherfolk.
The recognition of good work and leadership is appreciated and helps to sustain if not boosting participation, commitment and engagement of FARMC stakeholders and coordinators. It enhances partnership and cooperation amongst group members and creates healthy competition amongst FARMCs. Champions act as models for emulation and inspiration of other and new FARMCs. It is, however, important to establish a transparent and equitable evaluation and awarding process.
Capacity Building for FARMC Members
Continuous training equips stakeholders with the necessary know-how and skills to set up and run a FARMC. It includes assistance on habitat assessment and monitoring, the establishment and management of marine protected areas (MPAs), mangrove rehabilitation, fisheries law enforcement, integrated coastal zone management (ICZM) and impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems.
Conditions for adoption elsewhere: • Adequate support mechanisms and resources are needed to provide the required and necessary technical expertise.
Capacity building increases the council’s knowledge and expertise. Confidence thus acquired boosts commitment and participation of beneficiaries thus contributing to increase achievement of objectives set. Site-specific training for core group building proved useful to enhance leadership capabilities of FARMC leaders. The design of all interventions at community level making understanding easy, particularly for participating fisherfolk created awareness among stakeholders of the important role that they play in resource management in their localities. Stakeholders turned from distant beneficiaries of a governmental programme into active participants in its implementation.
Inclusion of Fisherfolk Leaders
Regular participation and consultation of fisherfolk leaders is sought from the beginning. These leaders are appropriate advocates for responsive and effective co-management planning and implementation since they are directly affected and speak the language of coastal dwellers.
Conditions for adoption elsewhere: • Community leaders who are willing to sacrifice their time and share their talents for the common good. • Government workers who genuinely believe in the principle of people empowerment, social equity, partnerships.
Regular consultation and consideration of input from stakeholders at community level, including fisherfolk and their leaders from formulation of implementing guidelines up to policy implementation is a key factor for ownership and empowerment. Involving resource users in the management process makes them aware of resource status and need for proper management to sustain the basis for their livelihood. Awareness favours active participation, cooperation and compliance with rules and regulations. Contributions of fisherfolk and other resource users based on their local knowledge and long experience in the target area are complementary to scientific and technical expert input. Financial valuation of ecosystem services makes aware resource users of the economic importance of ecosystems that they rely on. It is effective in helping decision makers and managers to prioritise fisheries and aquaculture.
Regional FARMC Program Management Centres
Regional FARMC Programme Management Centres established in every region of the Philippines facilitate all programme activities. Their designated programme coordinators work directly under the supervision of the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA-BFAR) regional directors. DA-BFAR supports the implementation at all levels both logistically and technically and in cooperation with partner agencies including local government units.
Conditions for adoption elsewhere: • Legal framework (the 1998 Philippine Fisheries Code, Republic Act No. 8550 mandates the creation of FARMCs, defines responsibilities and authority of stakeholders and decisive engagement of fisherfolk in coastal resource and fisheries management. The Fisheries Administrative Order No. 196 defined FARMCs implementation process). • Will and commitment of government and community leaders; • Funding and human resources.
Resource users, when given the right opportunities in a proper context can be partners of the government for the management of fisheries and aquatic resources. They can be responsible resource users and be active participants in efforts targeting sustainable use of marine resources. Adequate support mechanisms in terms of a legal framework and definition of responsibilities and authorities, technical expertise, funding and logistics are needed to make co-management successful. Co-management poses many challenges requiring perseverance, commitment and strong conviction of all partners and stakeholders to overcome the many constraints and difficulties for planning and implementing co-management.
National FARMC Program Management Centre
The Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA-BFAR) established this national centre that implements and coordinates the national Fisheries and Aquatic Resource Management Council (FARMC) program of the Philippine government. It is charged with the facilitation, coordination and spearheading program implementation nationwide. Strategies and policies to enhance program execution are formulated and based on regular program evaluation.
Conditions for adoption elsewhere: • Legal framework (the 1998 Philippine Fisheries Code, Republic Act No. 8550 mandates the creation of FARMCs, defines responsibilities and authority of stakeholders and decisive engagement of fisherfolk in coastal resources and fisheries management. The Fisheries Administrative Order No. 196 defined FARMC implementation process). • Will and commitment of government and community leaders; • Funding and human resources.
The support provided by governmental agencies and fisherfolk from local communities, including their leaders is a paramount factor of successfully establishing the FARMC and implementation of the programme. Due to the legal framework and the strong cooperation and participation of all stakeholders concerned, government agencies and entities that were first unwilling to share power could be convinced to cooperate. However, this is a challenging process. Solutions for inadequate financial and logistical support due to the lack of programme funding, and lack of technical personnel to provide assistance are common problems that need to be taken into account during the planning, inception and implementation phases. National and international partner organisations may be alternative options to be assessed.
Conservation agreement

Networking and linking with other organisations has proven to be effective in ensuring sustainability and continuous support. All partners involved in conservation and rehabilitation activities jointly develop a conservation agreement that lays out the cooperation details.

tba

tba

Conservation framework

Communities and local governments receive support to draw up a conservation framework that prepares the ground for mangrove rehabilitation. This framework takes into account important aspects like climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction and integrates them into local plans, budgets and policies.

  • Strong engagement and good relationships with local government (district and municipal/city level)
  • Sufficient funds to support and implement the project

tba