Following two funding calls, a total of 17 projects were selected. The projects represent a very wide range of different approaches and solution ideas for pursuing the Alliance's goals, depending on the respective context.
To increase the visibility of the projects and to foster knowledge exchange they are invited to present their ongoing work, intermediate goals and preliminary results to the Alliance community through posts on the website or at online events.
Sufficient funding is necessary to ensure long-term support and sustainable implementation of the project goals.
Continuous communication between those responsible for the project and the Alliance secretariat ensures the success of the project, the feedback of results to the community and thus added value for the community.
Adequate feedback from project partners can be challenging and requires good communication strategies.
International Alliance against Health Risks in Wildlife Trade
Project Map
Funded Projects
Country packages
Members Area
Working Groups
Governmental Consultation Facility
Feasibility Study
A study on how the carbon market could potentially finance climate adaptation/mitigation projects.
Collaboration with researchers in the climate financing field and relevant governmental stakeholders.
The Indonesian carbon market is yet to be fully developed, with many uncertainties in the policy side. Nonetheless, feasibility study became a guideline for other initiatives who are searching for sustainable financing for their mitigation projects.
Although the findings were not fully conclusive, connections with the Government were established along the way to receive the necessary information for future implementation.
Informal training in the field about climate information, biogas usage, and creating adaptation plans for the upcoming seasons.
Farmers were first identified through vulnerability assessments, where their areas are noted to be impacted by climate change (e.g. low crop production).
It is important to conduct CFS to close-knit communities, as such groups would motivate each individual to implement practices that are being taught.
Different farmer groups require different approaches and educational curricula. Depending on what problems are in the field, the CFS module must be adjusted to their needs.
The same way the biogas digesters are promoted in the field schools, some farmer groups would have different highlights about the digester. For instance, some groups struggle more with getting fertilizers than gas. Biogas as a tool for fertilizers need to be highlighted in this case.
Installing small-scale biogas digesters to farmers.
Important criteria to receive a digester include: owning pigs/cows, access to water, location with enough sunlight, and sufficient space nearby the kitchen.
Champion farmers must first be identified a important pilot cases for each village. Once a champion farmer has successfully utilized the digester, the other farmers in the village will follow. This way, biogas digesters are installed village-by-village and not farmer-by-farmer.
It takes time for farmers to fully understand how the biogas digester work. Farmers are hands-on learners, which makes the CFS the perfect platform to promote the digesters.
The Sustainable Blue Economy Training emphasizes an interactive and participative approach, fostering a dynamic learning environment. Unlike traditional training programs, the facilitators prioritize engagement and active participation, which allowed for a more contextualized and meaningful learning experience tailored to the participants’ specific needs and realities.
The training combined the presentation of concepts and ideas with a series of interactive exercises in which participants apply these concepts and learn about practical tools to use within their own organizations and wider actor networks. The materials were adapted to help practitioners and decision-makers discuss conceptual knowledge on SBE, and to create interactive work sessions that provide participants with opportunities to practice methodologies and tools that they can take away and use subsequently to address or strengthen their contribution to an SBE.
Engaging participants to reflect on their own challenges and actively discuss solutions proved vital for the training's success;
Logistics should be more related to training methodology;
It is advisable to conduct trainings preferably outside of the city to prevent participants from being called back by their superiors, as well as to create a more immersive training experience.
The facilitators maintained a neutral stance and should have provided more critical feedback on group work results.
The training assumed that participants had read the materials, which was not possible for many participants.
There was a decrease in the number of participants over the course, particularly in the case of the BE Council
There was a gap in participant selection, as representatives from the private sector and local community leaders should have been invited.
The use of Miro Boards was challenging for most participants.
Training evaluation can be understood as the systematic process of collecting information and using that information to improve the training. Without disregarding the pre-training evaluation, keeping track during and after the training is relevant for the ongoing and future trainings.
The evaluation process for the Sustainable Blue Economy Training was conducted on a daily basis, with a strong emphasis on the active involvement of the co-management group. This group, consisting of three participants, played a key role in assessing the effectiveness and impact of the training program. Through daily evaluations, the co-management group provided valuable insights and feedback on the training sessions, facilitation methods, and overall learning experience.
Daily evaluations are needed for continuous improvement of training efectiveness;
Post evaluation should be done at training location;
Evaluation platforms should be used after assessment of participants capacity to correspond.
