Leo Baquedano
Installation of the technological infrastructure
Experimental monitoring system
Capacity building and informed decision-making for the monitoring of species
Building cross-sectoral partnerships
Leo Baquedano
Installation of the technological infrastructure
Experimental monitoring system
Capacity building and informed decision-making for the monitoring of species
Building cross-sectoral partnerships
Integrated Approaches to Peacebuilding Through Joint Livelihoods

The PEACECORE project uses sustainable, climate conscious livelihood support as a tool to restore traditional, and create new, trade and exchange opportunities for farmers and herders in 6 Local Government Areas of Plateau State, Nigeria. The aim is to replace negative conflict behaviors with mutually beneficial economic relations, while mediation and dialogue also supported through the first building block. Participants from communities affected by conflict have been brought together and trained across various organic agricultural and dairy value chain opportunities, cooperative formation and operation, and conflict resolution. Through such efforts we have been able to bring together conflicting livelihood groups of farmers and herders to establish trade agreements and form cooperatives around value chains including organic fertilizer supply, supply of cow dung and crop waste for briquette production, fodder and forage production, dairy and tofu production etc.

  1. The selection of value chains that are beneficial to both parties such as fodder production, organic fertilizer.
  2. Strong reputation of GIZ in implementation of agricultural and development programmes meant participants were willing to trust the process.
  3. Willingness of conflicting partners to find solutions to the conflict.
  4. Availability of resources for the project and initiatives such as technical skills and equipment, financing etc meant that participants could create tangible structures and operations.
  1. Trust building is essential as well as involving participants across all stages of project interventions.
  2. Adding value to existing business and products is a useful first step to engagement.
  3. New ideas and processes are welcome as long as the benefits can be perceived.
  4. Using connectors (things that both parties need in common) is essential.
Decentralized Community Dialogue Platforms

The project has brought conflicting parties using platforms such as the Community Peace Architecture Forum CPAF and the People First Impact Method P-FIM. This approach has succeeded in bringing people at the community level together to discuss and resolve their issues at the local level using community driven solutions. Communities have been able to resolve disputes arising through mediation of the CPAF and articulate their needs, and goals through P-FIM. All of which have helped the project to design and deliver on its objectives with the buy in of local communities.

1. Involvement of local actors, stakeholders and capacities for peacebuilding.

2. Creating a safe space for dialogue and discussions.

3. Strengthening the capacities of local civil society organizations familiar with the communities and trusted by them to better implement.

4. Decentralised strategy.

5. Empowering structures to mediate directly in conflict, with links to relevant authorities.

1. Mediation is easier at local levels where the conflicts occur, than through centralized strctures which might be more cumbersome and present generalized solutions which might not be adequate to local challenges.

2. Communities have capacities for resolving conflicts and addressing their developmental issues by themselves. These should be identified and supported over external solutions as they are often more sustainable.

3. Bottom to top approaches are more effective than top to bottom approaches.

4. Decentraization of dialogue structures at community level, reduces the logistics of conducting such dialogues and encourages their continuation after projects exit.

Use of data for decision-making and planning.

SAGE Findings:

  1. Little involvement of fisherwomen in LMMA decision-making, discriminated against because of mosquito net fishing.
  2. Lack of recognition of community rights to participate in LMMA decision-making.
  3. Major deficiencies in the process of complaints and follow-up of cases related to invasion of the reserves by the entire community due to the lack of inspection instruments.
  4. Deficit of collaboration and coordination, it does not share reports and plan of activities between different actors.

Recommendations:

  1. Involve mosquito net fisherwomen at all stages of LMMA establishment and prioritize opportunity costs for them.
  2. Disseminate information on rights to participate in LMMA decision-making to all community.
  3. Encourage community to report offenders and follow up on cases related to the invasion of the reserves. 
  4. Promote regular meetings to share reports and activity plans between actors.

Based on these recommendations, the project is implementing bivalve aquaculture, prioritising women’s involvement to address opportunity costs. We are supporting annual district, provincial and national stakeholder meetings. We are supporting CCPs with equipment for improved LMMA enforcement. We are strengthening CCP skills for communication and equitable governance through training by AMA.

The purpose of this exercise needs to be well understood by the focus group members. It must exist a will to improve existing conditions by the focus groups members and they must recognise change is possible.

SAGE and IMET methodologies are the simplest, fastest, easiest and cheapest way to evaluate and monitor the progress of a project. Before adopting these tools, the project used only EXCEL to analyse the data, and this was time consuming and expensive as we needed to hire consultants to conduct the surveys. Data analysis and interpretation was also done manually, which too was time consuming.

Participatory Assessment

Data Collection, Data Analysis and Data Synthesis:

Organised groups of actors from different social backgrounds gathered for this process, which was facilitated using the local language and a translator was engaged to assist with the translation. To take into account the level of education of participants, we defined the appropriate means of communication. People participated according to the same interest group or social status (Community Fishery Council, fishermen, fisherwomen, government, influential members and income generation alternatives, among them). In the first phase, discussions were done separately and later discussed in plenary; after the discussion participants reached consensus, it is this consensus that was considered as the final response. To ensure that the selection of members taking part in each target group was inclusive, it did not take into consideration party affiliation, religion, social level, gender. During the meetings we also explained the importance of the SAGE process.

FPIC standards (Former Prior Informed Consent) must be applied to maximise genuine participation. The data collection/facilitator team should be well known by the community members and recognised as trustful. There should be a sense of long-term engagement in support of the community.

One of the lessons learned was to present the results of the issues discussed separately in a plenary, where members of different groups discuss the same ideas and reach consensus.

A sign that we are valuing local knowledge.

And that is good for the success of a community-managed conservation area.

Training participants in the SAGE and IMET tools.

The first part of this project was training participants on SAGE. To make the SAGE more applicable to our situation, we chose six of the most important principles that are relevant to the LMMA:

1: Respect for resource rights and human rights of community members

3: Effective participation of all relevant actors in decision making

4: Transparency, information sharing and accountability for actions and inactions

8: Equitable sharing of benefits among relevant actors

9: Achievement of conservation and other objectives

10: Effective coordination and collaboration between actors, sectors and levels

 

The SAGE methodology is a participatory process, conducted with: Community Fisheries Council, fishermen, livelihoods group, community and religious leaders, district and provincial government.

 

The IMET was supported by two consultants from the National Administration of Conservation Areas. Various actors were invited: a) National Fisheries Administration, Provincial Service of Economic Activities, Provincial Directorate of Environment, Provincial Directorate of Tourism; b) District Service of Economic Activities, Maritime and Lake Police, Administrator of Quirimbas National Park and Justice Authority; c) Community Fisheries Councils, fishermen, community and religious Leaders).

The two tools, IMET and SAGE, value local knowledge, so the contribution for all actors involved in the process was very positive. It was also a positive process because through this tool, the community understood that management power can be transferred to the community from the government, increasing their sense of ownership and empowerment. Prior to this, the majority of the community thought that the management of the reserves was only for the Conselho Comunitario de Pescass and not for the whole community.

The good communication and the results of the opening of the temporary reserves (octopus) helped the communities to understand that the reserves belong to the community and are for the benefit of the community, hence neighbouring communities have started to request the project to create new conservation areas.

Maida Lobo
Training participants in the SAGE and IMET tools.
Stakeholder identification and analysis/site profile analysis.
Participatory Assessment
Use of data for decision-making and planning.
Maida Lobo
Training participants in the SAGE and IMET tools.
Stakeholder identification and analysis/site profile analysis.
Participatory Assessment
Use of data for decision-making and planning.
GIZ PEACECORE
Decentralized Community Dialogue Platforms
Integrated Approaches to Peacebuilding Through Joint Livelihoods