Sustainable Ecotourism

Cultural tourism provides an additional source of income for the local community. Guided tours promote community traditions, art of fishing and wealth of natural resources. However, if not well controlled and based upon with strong values and rules, recreational fishing can be unsustainable and a source of local conflict.

 

The Consorcio Por la Mar R.L developed guided visits to learn about the culture of being a small scale fisher in Costa Rica.

Cultural identity

Natural resource base recuperation

Traditional knowledge

Recreational fishing can be a new threat for the sustainable management of the marine area if it is not well controlled.

Cultural identity and traditional knowledge are very important for sustainable livelihoods

Norms and regulations need to be established before new activities start to function.

Recognition of women work in fisheries is important and very important for this process.

No training investment is really needed since fishers know by heart exactly what small scale fisheries is all about.

Responsible Fishing Code of Conduct

The fishers adopt voluntary standards for responsible fishing based on FAO recommendations. The Local Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries helps to ensure the conservation and sustainable use of coastal and marine resources and was applied once the Marine Responsible fishing area was recognized.

• A given tradition of environmental awareness with the locals

• Need to conserve natural heritage recognized.

• Collaborative governance model in place and participatory management plan developed.

Voluntary actions can be very effective if agreed and understood by all.

The ecosystem approach to fisheries works.

Fishery Database

Each fisher records their daily fish catches, methods and site locations and feeds the information into a database. This information aids in monitoring the abundance and diversity of key species and serves as an important management tool. Data are analyzed by technicians/scientists, and the results are discussed with fishermen

Long term view of the process.

Data are gathered by fisher’s organization and are maintained as a collective asset.

Research questions adressed with the data base respond to the needs of fishers.

Information is power.

Participatory Information gathering is important for practical and immediate management of the fishery

Trustful relationship between technicians from institutions and fishers.

Basic knowledge/ training is important.

Participatory Local Governance

MRFA are defined as “areas where fishing activities are regulated to secure the sustainable use of resources in the long term and where the conservation, use and management action of INCOPESCA can count with the support of coastal communities and other institutions”. (Executive Decree No. 35502 of October 1st 2009).

This new legislation recognized the fishers effort for a collaborative governance model for the management of the marine territory.

The local community developed a Fisheries Management Plan based on their traditional knowledge. A commission, composed of members of the fishing cooperative and governmental authorities, is responsible for the further management of the area.

• A given tradition of environmental awareness with the locals

• Need to conserve natural heritage recognized.

• Respect for and inclusion of local and traditional knowledge for management.

Recognition of traditional knowledge is crucial for the management and conservation of a marine territory.

 

Fishers can do research as a process of learning new things.

 

It is better to do things than to say them with no practical implementation

 

Collaborative governance models recognition (as the Marine Responsible Fishing Areas) are crucial for the future conservation of the sea. Recognizing this other models of governance by the governments is a crucial issue for the future of marine conservation.

 

Identity, Participation and capacity strengthening of small scale fishers towards responsible fishing and a human rights approach to marine conservation is very important for conservation.

Negotiation and Legal Recognition

A participative process with artisanal fishers of Coope Tárcoles R.L., government authorities represented by INCOPESCA and CoopeSoliDar R.L. as a facilitator of the process, was initiated for the development of the MRFA fishing management plan.

Artisanal fishers and semi-industrial trawlers was agreed that semi-industrial trawlers would stay for 3 miles from the coast. During 2009 semi-industrial trawlers made the proposal to move out from water areas with a depth of 15 meters or less but requested that artisanal shrimp fishers had also to respect this no fishing zone so that the white shrimp population could recuperate faster.

There was also an agreement for a one-year ban on shrimp captures by artisanal and commercial fleets, which was transformed in year 2012 by the INCOPESCA Board of Directors into a national decree (AJDIP-193) as stipulated by the MRFA decree.

After the ban, Coope Tárcoles R.L. requested permits for shrimp fishing. This request was backed up by the INCOPESCA research department and approved and the shrimp semi-industrial trawlers were requested to permanently stay out of the agreed 15 meter zone. Later, shrimp trawlers agreed to move out of the area 5 nautical miles from the coast to support sustainable shrimp populations.

• Cooperation with and assistance by Coope Solidar

Government and shrimp fishing industry willing to dialogue

Prior informed consent is important

Capacity strengthening and respect of local views and cultural identity is crucial

Long-term relationship

Trust and understanding. between actors

Community-managed Marine Area

The policy that regulates the recognition of a Marine Responsible Fishing Areas (MRFA) is under the control of INCOPESCA, the National Fishing and Aquaculture Institute. In 2009, CoopeTárcoles R.L requested the Costa Rican government to recognize a MRFA in their fishing territory, which was approved in 2011.

 

The recognition of this area and fishers rights helps to conserve both the marine biodiversity and the cultural identity of the local community.

• A tradition of environmental awareness of the locals • Fishermen recognize the need to conserve natural heritage. •  Policy incidence and dialogue and negotiation between fleets. Collective action and organization.

1.- Dialogue and agreements for responsible fishing and sustainable use are much more productive and efficient in the long term than excluding fleets.

 

2.- Organization and collective action is crucial for the sustainable use of resources.

 

3.- Traditional knowledge is crucial for the management of small scale fisheries.

 

 

 

Communication about ecosystem service values

Different communication tools increase the audience and options to share information and deliver transparency on issues that related to natural resources in order to make more equitable decisions and in order to get support from the different stakeholders, such as the residents, the private sector and the local governments.

  • Understand who your target group is and compile the proper information out of all your results, specific to target your person(s)
  • Communication budget
  • Creative team to make results easy accessible and attractive
  • Have specific meeting to transfer information from your research
  • It takes a long time before the message gets across
  • Ecosystem values is a complex message that needs to be translated into concise day-to-day information
Value scenarios for cost of (in)action

The results of the ecosystem services valuation can be used in applications to raise awareness, support decision-making, develop sustainable financing mechanisms, for spatial planning and for damage assessments. With scenarios, the study can assess certain policy issues, such as the economic loss if natural assets are damaged by, for example, sewage run-off. The applications answer questions relating to current environmental management issues on the islands. Stakeholders and local experts provided input determining the most relevant management issues to be used in local relevant scenarios.

  • Interdisciplinary team of experts including statisticians, GIS specialists, ecologists and economists
  • Ability to relate the results to different scenarios
  • Work on existing policy and or decision making issues
  • Insights from scenarios gives you an indication not an absolute figure
  • It is about awareness raising and relative comparison
  • Visual applications are very strong
Ecosystem service valuation following the TEEB framework

Conducting surveys with tourists or residents creates understanding of local issues, such as waste management, coastal development as well as insight in usage of ecosystem service. Moreover, a willingness-to-pay (WTP) for nature conservation can be established through Choice Experiments. Valuation of priority ecosystem goods and services, also by other means then WTP, are combined to arrive at an estimate of the Total Economic Value (TEV) following the TEEB framework. Results are used in applications, such as scenarios, valuemaps and decision support systems.

  • Primary data collection through surveys (WTP)
  • Quality check of values, discount rates and sensitivity analysis with scientific experts
  • Existing and proven methodology (TEEB)
  • Involved stakeholders
  • Budget to realize surveys (around 400 to 800 questionnaires)
  • Depending on the available data certain methods can be used and others not
  • Primary data collection provides better and more usable results
  • Be very clear on the difference between financial value and socio-economic value
  • There is always uncertainty
  • Deal with lack of solid data by collecting data yourself, make assumptions or qualitatively describe, what you can not value
Understanding what ecosystem services are

Through a workshop stakeholders start to understand how powerful valuing ecosystem services can be as a tool to address relevant policy decisions. Exercises during the workshop based on local cases generate information about local ecosystems, ecosystem services, beneficiaries, stakeholders and issues. Participants start to understand how they can use this tool to create important insights for all-inclusive decision-making. Moreover, during the research, continue to communicate with all stakeholders through newspapers and radio.

  • Make sure the workshop contains a representation of all beneficiaries
  • Budget to hold the workshop (at least two days including lunch)
  • Stakeholders need to have some degree of interest and capacity to understand the material
  • High-level policy advisors do not have enough time to take part in workshop. They need to get involved through personal meetings
  • Environmentalists are not economists and vice versa
  • Be very interactive and keep repeating the message