Visit to conservation organizations and agencies

From each of the 6 PECC committees, 2 members were selected and brought to Dar Es Salaam, to visit several conservation organizations, as well as the Wildlife Division as the government institution directly dealing with protected area management (excluding national parks). This trip provided committee members with an overview on how protected areas are managed, and understand the regulations. It allowed them to discuss with key people about their concerns regarding Saadani NP, getting reactions on how these concerns are being addressed through national protected area policy. They also learned about commonalities with other parks, where adjacent communities struggle with similar challenges, and discuss some solutions that have been found elsewhere for addressing such challenges. The visit helped the committee members realize that many regulations are decided at a higher level than that of individual parks. This shifted their view about the ability of Saadani park staff to take action.

Since this activity was comparatively expensive, adequate available funding was an important enabling factor. An existing interest from the side of the hosting institutions to receive the community representatives and dedicate time and effort to meet with them was also crucial.

Committee members in Buyuni said that the visit led to a change in their mindsets – they understood that it is important to support conservation, and they came to believe that it is possible to align conservation and community development. Trip participants especially valued the visit to the Wildlife Division under the Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism (MNRT), over the visits to nature conservation organizations, because it is in this government department that decisions about protected area management (albeit not about national park management, which is the responsibility of a separate agency: TANAPA) are taken. Thus, more time should be spent on this institution during future similar trips. From the perspective of Kesho Trust, it would be good to try and engage more strongly with other organizations involved in community and conservation engagement in Tanzania, next time such a visit is conducted.

Cross-sectoral platform for marine conservation

To enable a real commitment to ocean responsibility, a marine strategic agreement between industries and conservation was set up, including a shared platform to facilitate discussion and build awareness about ocean issues while highlighting solutions achievable through collective effort. The establishment of this platform was made possible through multiple events during to facilitate dialogues between different stakeholders from conservation, industries and political institution. The main issue that was highlighted during these events was the fact that bold and transformative steps are urgently needed to shift the world onto a sustainable and resilient path and these steps are only achievable through meaningful collaboration to make informed and coordinated decisions for the future of the ocean and consequently for our own future. Moreover, the increased global awareness about climate change and environmental issues represents a great opportunity for the industry to be proactive in embracing sustainable practices, rather than be enforced to adopt them in the near future, while directly reinvesting in marine conservation.

  • Development of a specific cross-sectoral communication platform to allow for understanding of the model from parties with different backgrounds and interest
  • Adoption of a collaborative approach
  • Increased awareness of climate change and environmental issues, globally and on the part of the yachting industry

To actively engage and collectively act, towards societally, environmentally, political and economically sustainable approaches and solutions to tackle ocean challenges, Waterevolution has developed a specific cross-sectoral communication platform that laid the foundations of a strategic alliance. The key lesson learned in implementing this component is related to the difficulty to build partnerships and promote interaction between two completely different sectors. To overcome this challenge, a great investment of time and efforts was made to create interactions opportunities and a clear commitment from both parties to work together to achieve sustainable ocean management. To actively engage and collectively act, towards societally, environmentally, political and economically sustainable approaches and solutions to tackle ocean challenges, Waterevolution has also developed a specific cross-sectoral communication to target information according to the specific audience.

Long-term financing for MPA management

Mexican Protected Areas are usually financed through public funds. Adding private or developing a system with mixed funds can be particularly relevant when managing resources for projects of short and medium term. Opportunities for other sources to finance the management of the Protected Areas include funds that are financed by environmental fines and access fees to Protected Areas.

NA

  • Short- or medium-term private resources have been fundamental to construct, systemize and prove that the approach is practicable.
  • A long-term success depends on governmental investment or on the existence of specific funding through heritage assets. Both are also useful for the supply of equipment and necessary infrastructure.
Common trust fund monitoring

Two compatible monitoring systems being built track financial resources and conservation impact across regional and national trust funds. Combined, these systems establish a robust M&E framework to measure for impact, organizational learning and donor reporting, using applicable regional indicators.

  • Development of region wide applicable reporting and indicators: Many sources of information and elements for these indicators are already available within and outside the region and would not need to be created in a vacuum.
  • Learn from experiences of similar institutions to establish the appropriate monitoring and evaluation system parameters
Strategic plan and fundraising strategy

Developed and implemented jointly with donors, countries and partners, the strong strategic plan includes:

  1. Consolidating the establishment of the fund's architecture
  2. Opening new thematic windows and attracting new countries to be part of the architecture
  3. Establishing a fundraising strategy
  4. Establishing a marketing and communications plan
  5. Establishing a monitoring and evaluation system
  • Consultations: A thorough consultation process will allow to develop a strong strategic plan for the CBF.
  • Measurable objectives and indicators: The Plan needs to include measurable objectives and indicators in order to assess its effectiveness.
  • It is crucial for the strategic plan to be an inclusive document with ample participation from all stakeholders
Successful trust fund operationalization

Skilled personnel, effective governance and functioning technical systems are essential for successful operation. Key elements to support this include training for National Conservation Trust Funds, staff and board members, establishment of clear accounting systems, operations manuals, learning from best practices, mentoring, and peer exchange.

In this regard, the CBF has established training on its accounting system for its staff. It has also become a member of the Latin American and Caribbean Network of Conservation Trust Funds (RedLAC) to learn from similar institutions.

  • Staffing: Hiring of a highly capable executive director. Additional support staff may also be needed.
  • Office: Set up initial logistical office operations.
  • Board: Establishment and training of the board of directors and executive director.
  • Committees: Establishment of board sub-committees and other advisory committees.
  • Development of an operations manual.
  • Finance and accounting.
  • Mentoring and overall organizational development.
  • Developing all necessary systems (accounting, other operations systems) often takes longer than expected. It is important to establish realistic timelines for establishing a CTFs operation. Tasks for the appropriate set-up of operations multiply quickly.
  • Support from donors and partners; not only in cash, but also in-kind, is key during the initial 1-2 years of operations.
  • Mistakes along the way will occur and it is important to recognize and address these quickly and continue to move forward.
  • It is key essential to have formal and informal advisor and other kinds of technical support. Many other CTF are currently under operation and can provide important insights in this process. RedLAC is a key resource for example.
Independent National Conservation Trust Funds (NCTFs)

CBF endowment proceeds will be channeled through the NCTFs, which in turn will lead the grant-making process for on the ground and water activities. They are governed by majority non-government member boards reflecting a broad range of sectors and interests, and provide grants to both government and civil society.

 

Drawing on internationally recognized standards, the characteristics of NCTFs to be supported by the CBF are:

  • Purpose: Purpose aligned with the purpose of the CBF.
  • Board composition: Broad composition and representation, with majority civil society board membership and no single majority interest group dominating the board.
  • Civil society board members: Board members representing civil society not solely selected by the government.
  • Asset control: Well-designed and independent asset control.
  • Audit requirements: Well-defined annual external audit requirements.
  • Grants: Grant making to government and civil society.
  • Multiple-stakeholder dialogue to guarantee participation of all relevant sectors in governance structures.
  • Clear legal instruments that reflect independent structures and guarantee the rights and responsibilities of the different stakeholders.
  • It is challenging to find the right balance between government and civil society representation in governance structures at the national level. Government actors may feel that majority non-governmental governance structure will exclude them from decision making and civil society may feel that majority government boards will result in inefficient institutions controlled by government.
  • Donors have a strong preference for NCTFs governance that is independent from government control, although government may participate in it.
  • Finding a balance in NCTFs constitutive instruments and other agreements to different points of views, needs and requirements, and reassure all stakeholders that the governance structure and decision making process will be transparent and inclusive is essential.
Government commitment

Governments are key in the success of the regional collaboration. Their political commitment to the Caribbean Challenge Initiative (CCI) Goals has been essential to attract donors to help achieve these goals, including building the finance architecture. Governments participate as observers and/or focal points in regional trust fund board meetings and are also part of the National Conservation Trust Funds (NCTF) boards.

  • Open, transparent and direct dialogue with governments.
  • Identifiable benefits for advancing national and regional conservation priorities.
  • Donor’s and partners’ commitments to provide funds and other technical assistance.
  • Building political commitment is a lengthy process that requires technical and policy inputs at multiple levels in government from technical staff, to middle/senior management positions and the highest levels ministers/heads of governments.
  • Donor’s commitment provides countries with additional security and confidence with regards to their political commitment and knowing that partners are ready to assist.
Marine Spatial Planning

A guided marine spatial planning exercise leads to the development of a multi-use zoning design for the area. This increases the capacity to protect, manage and sustainably use the marine resources. Potential mismatches between the area’s existing jurisdictional (legal-institutional) and geographical (social-ecological) scales requires consideration.

  • Pre-existing cross-scale partnerships (i.e. multi-stakeholder working group) and stakeholder engagement mechanisms for communication and information exchange
  • Academic-NGO partnership to address the mismatch between the existing jurisdictional (legal-institutional) scale and the geographical (social-ecological) scale
  • Collaborative data collection & validation processes supported trust and ownership in MSP information

GIS analyses were useful to determine the spatial allocation of the sea in a way that maximizes societal benefits and mitigates possible conflicts. Although the system was used to support transboundary MSP, inadequate sub-regional governance mechanisms constrain the implementa¬tion of the marine zoning plan by either country. Although framework legislation and national environmental management strategies are in place, formal institutional systems for national and transboundary marine management need to be clearly established. The realisation of effective transboundary cooperation and regional governance is needed to determine the appropriate and feasible institutional arrangements. Likewise, the fostering of environmental political will is essential for the development and implementation of new environmental management policies, plans and institutions.

Participatory GIS applications

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications provided a framework for effective data management and integration of information from a variety of scales and sources, thereby increasing spatial understanding of marine resources and corresponding spatial uses. The system was used to demonstrate practical GIS applications valuable for ecosystem-based decision-support and marine spatial planning. Using a participatory GIS approach supported the development of ecosystem-level GIS spatial analyses of the region to be conducted and presented in ways that increased stakeholder understanding.

  • GIS capacity and access to funding for GIS software, which is generally costly.
  • Well identified actual problems that were of concern to stakeholders and could be addressed with the information acquired.
  • Continued public access to the transboundary information produced via the research website maintained by the NGO-academic partnership

The usefulness of integrating interdisciplinary information and multiple sources of knowledge for marine spatial planning is well documented, yet the actual framework and practical methodologies for acquiring holistic ecosystem-based information is lacking. We found a participatory GIS approach useful for identifying, collecting, integrating and understanding interdisciplinary information. Practical GIS analyses were applied to produce relevant ecosystem-based information. Additionally, the application of a participatory GIS approach (in terms of both information integration and visualization) proved beneficial in the conduction and presentation of information generated in ways that increased stakeholder understanding, thus supporting marine governance. Despite the overall success of participatory GIS, the maintenance of the MarSIS will require additional capacity building, particularly in terms of GIS skills.