Sustainable agriculture in watersheds and vulnerable coasts
- Institutional support to producers in organizing themselves, to better engage with the local and regional markets and implement a more uniform plan and approach; reduce market competition and provide more inclusive access to production activities. - Promotion of more sustainable agricultural potential products, such as Ylang-Ylang used for perfume production, using more efficient, sustainable and resource-efficient technologies. For example, using copper stills and providing better distillation techniques that allow growers to also enter the production chain and command a better price for a better quality product. Agro-forestry techniques reduce the amount of primary fuelwood needed for the stills, and reduce impacts on the watersheds for the island. - Developing market-gardens and vegetable production to supply tourist facilities, such as hotels, restaurants, yachts within Comoros.
As above, the revitalization of collaborative planning and action, shared governance and better trust between actors is an essential step.The Comoros supplies 80% of the world’s ylang-ylang, so an existing market and practice is in place, but such a global market is fragile. Engaging the interest of leading sourcers of ylang-ylang, and convincing them to support sustainability in their sourcing is an important factor that enables more environmentally and socially responsible production. Proven transferable techniques and methods are available for ylang-ylang
The key lesson is that existing markets and resource opportunities should be the first to be developed, adapted and made more sustainable than looking at the very high transaction costs of introducing new alternatives. The link to sustainable production in watersheds and the quality of water, and reduced impact on coral reefs is not an obvious one, and can be forgotten once programmes are up and running. Maintaining a connection through awareness-raising, collaboration between sectors, and regular engagement is essential for long periods of time. An initial campaign may start the right track, but messages may soon be relegated if they are not maintained. Products such as ylang-ylang are part of a global market. As such, the commitment from sources and buyers, along the chain of production, is essential to avoid catastrophic market failures in the future. Using consumer groups and networks to encourage company buy-in to sustainability at source is an important contributing factor.
Creation of awareness raising and policy influencing tools
Multi-stakeholder Dialogue (MSD) platforms are created, comprised of government representatives, NGOs, civil society involved in the project. The platforms consist of management committees set up in each village and at provincial level, to monitor the project’s activities and inform its management. The committees provide support for the daily implementation of the activities as well as for strategic engagement with other institutions. Advocacy material for policy makers is also produced. The engagement at national, regional and global levels is crucial, to ensure that knowledge is transferred, and that policy makers become advocates/implementers of the key lessons learned from the project. Strategic engagements at national, regional and global levels included so far: - A national inception workshop of the project - A national forum with the Directorate of Civil protection on ecosystems-based risk management - Presentation of the project at regional forums and meetings (regional conservation forum, regional consultations for the WCDRR) - Showcasing the project in publications or case studies for global events (UNFCCC COP 21)
-Early involvement and awareness of governments: local governments should take part in the project from its start, and national government representatives should been invited to its inception workshop. - Establishment of MSD platforms at multiple levels of implementation allows monitoring of activities and provides guidance for strategic policy outreach - The international role and presence of an organization like IUCN, allows for opportunities to showcase activities and advocate for nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation at various levels.
- The creation of multi-stakeholders committees, in charge of monitoring and informing field activities, is key for actively involving partners and local governments in the implementation of the project. Their active engagement at every step of the project gives them ownership and encourages interactions between different sectors (research, civil society, environmental organizations, etc.) that usually don’t work together. - Working on policy influence at all levels (local to global) allows to effectively make the case for ecosystem-based solutions for climate change. -Showcasing local traditional knowledge for adaptation encourages government to implement similar actions at broader scales.
Engaging diverse partners to address climate change impacts
Creating a strong collaborative partnership was an important success factor for this project. A management planning workshop held in July 2011 and attended by KWS scientists, planners and managers and facilitated by Parks Canada identified climate change as the most important conservation challenge facing Kenya’s national parks. Six parks heavily impacted by climate change were identified for adaptation intervention and appropriate initiatives determined for each one of them. The implementation strategy required the project to engage diverse partners drawn from the public and private sectors. Local communities, researchers, NGOs, park visitors, school groups, the tourism industry, health workers, youth and women groups associated with each park were consulted by KWS, briefed on the project’s goal of enhancing adaptation to climate change, and requested to participate in its implementation. KWS and Parks Canada provided scientific and technical support while other participants contributed professional skills, local knowledge, labor and enthusiasm. The Government of Canada provided funding through the Fast Start Climate Change Initiative.
• existence of a national climate change framework for Kenya was helpful in engaging stakeholders on issues of climate change impacts and the need for a societal response • A strong and effective KWS community conservation programme facilitated outreach • A formal partnership between KWS and Parks Canada executed through a Memorandum of Understanding facilitated acquisition of funds and provided an opportunity for sharing professional expertise to develop and implement broad scale adaptation interventions.
• Dialoguing with people to create the awareness of climate change impacts on livelihoods and the role protected areas can play to address them can promote their willingness to participate in adaptation interventions. • Implementing intervention actions together with diverse groups helped to increase the awareness and understanding of climate change impacts, the benefits of protected areas and healthy ecosystems in addressing climate change threats, and the need for collective and individual action in mitigation and adaptation • A partnership such as the one between Parks Canada-KWS can be a model for interagency collaboration for addressing global challenges
Developing and promoting the tourism product
This building block involves everything related to producing your tourism product. It is recommended that a private sector partner possessing the appropriate market focus and experience in ecotourism be selected before embarking on tourism development in order to ensure long-term sustainability. Our model suffered as a result of not having a partner from the start, putting all responsibility for marketing and tour operation on the project. Selecting and training village tourism service group members is the next important step, and should be done with involvement of community leaders, the local government tourism agency and the private sector partner. Contracts with service group members can be used to create incentives for good service and protection of wildlife. Infrastructure should be built as a community project to instill maximum ownership. A cost effective, high impact marketing tool is a ‘familiarization trip(s)’ for tour companies and journalists, in contrast to printing brochures. Word of mouth is the most important factor and is ultimately determined by a unique and well thought out product.
It’s important for stakeholders to understand the importance to partner with the private sector. It is equally important that the private sector understand the product and the goals of the project. If these conditions are not met, an appropriate partnership may not be created, handicapping the project’s ability to create a sound business model. If a partnership cannot be created from the start, it is important to have the financial resources to incubate the product until the conditions are better for forming a partnership.
Private sector partnership is key to developing a sustainable business model, especially in remote areas that require heavy marketing to attract visitors. In the absence of a clear partnership, the project must be ready to operate the tour, possibly with subsidies from donor funds if tour numbers are low in the beginning. This is not recommended, as it takes resources from other project components and risks failure. Infrastructure built and maintained by the community should be designed in the sturdiest fashion to reduce maintenance costs. In selecting and training village tourism service group members, effort should be made to find responsibilities that allow for gender balance
Engaging citizens to control the spread of invasive species
Invasive species in Amboseli, Tsavo and Nakuru NPs had covered large areas of wildlife habitat, displaced native biodiversity, reduced favorable forage, affected wildlife distribution and lessened visitor enjoyment. In each park, KWS staff worked with local people and other scientists to identify invasive species, their impact on wildlife, strategies for early detection, and mechanisms for control and eradication. Special focus was given to species that were growing fast, breeding profusely, dispersing widely and outgrowing native species. Areas of heavy infestation were mapped and divided into blocks to enable systematic control. Mechanical removal was preferred over chemical-based eradication to minimize risks to non-target species. KWS organized volunteer groups from local institutions and communities to mechanically uproot invasive plants from designated areas. In some cases local people were hired to work in difficult areas. The uprooted trash was either burnt in abandoned quarries or buried to prevent re-invasion. Plots were revisited for three growing seasons and regrowth removed.
• Many citizen groups showed willingness to participate in the eradication of invasive species • There was plenty of local labor for mechanical control, a labor intensive method. • A good understanding of the impact of invasive species existed at individual and community levels • Traditional and expert knowledge was available for identifying invasive species and their impacts • Sufficient funding was available to purchase the required implements, pay casual workers when necessary and to support logistics
• Re-invasion was observed and complete eradication was only possible after three consecutive mechanical removal sessions spanning several growing seasons. • Herbivores were immediately able to utilize cleared areas, but large predators were disadvantaged as stalking prey was more difficult in more open areas. • Disposal of uprooted biomass can pose a significant challenge and should be planned for in advance • Understanding the cause and mechanism of invasion can help in the eradication or containment of invasive species • Providing free park entry to volunteers can be an initial incentive for volunteers to participate in invasive species control • Communicating the success and challenges of invasive species control can attract additional support from stakeholders and donors.
Strategy and plan – Contribution to the system of the region
The implementation process contributes to: the environmental regulation of the sub-region, reinforce the inter-institutional and community work, bringing together more than 35 participating stakeholders from various government agencies, NGOs and community organizations, in order to advocate for the well-management of hydro biological and fisheries resources, where ecosystem conservation and welfare of local communities would be beneficial.
Interagency and community coordination, environmental regulation, ethnic legislation and an ethnic vision of the territory. Recognition of the importance of ecosystems as a benefit for local and regional communities Recognition of traditional ancestral practices of black communities.
The articulation institutions and the community to achieve a common goal: governance
Enhancing water availability to reduce conflict
Wildlife in Amboseli and Tsavo national parks invade community lands during drought periods in search of water while people drive their livestock into the parks in search of pasture. These inverse wildlife-livestock movements usually result in intense human wildlife conflict. The project focused on creating water reservoirs in parks and community areas that could conserve rain water for 4-6 months into the dry season, allowing wildlife and livestock to utilize different parts of the landscape over longer periods and reducing the need for wildlife and livestock to cross park boundaries. Suitable areas for capturing rain water were identified and dams and water pans were excavated. These included rehabilitating some old dams that used to be fed from streams and rivers that had dried up. In addition, important swamps that provide water to wildlife and communities throughout the year were identified and fenced off to reduce degradation due to overuse. Water was pumped into water troughs constructed outside the fence to ensure sustained supply to people, livestock and wildlife. Trees were planted along the swamps to reduce soil erosion.
• Funding was available to undertake relatively expensive excavations • KWS and communities have good understanding of the hydrology of the land • Cost of creating dams significantly reduced as KWS has technical knowhow, appropriate equipment and experience for undertaking the tasks. • Good community and stakeholder support
• Under climate change, it may be necessary for communities and park agencies to agree on mechanisms of sharing water resources during times of scarcity in order to prevent human wildlife conflict • Localized environmental solutions such as swamp protection can yield enormous benefits to many people and prevent human wildlife conflicts at different geographical scales. • Rain water harvesting can be a low cost strategy that can minimize water-related conflicts. • Adaptation strategies that enhance the provision of ecosystem services while reducing resource use conflicts can attract support from diverse partners.
Transboundary exchange to define common activities
Due to the multiple threats to the integrity of the ecosystems that are shared between Guatemala and Mexico, directors and rangers of the institutions responsible for the administration, management and protection of the respective protected areas decide to carry out exchanges. These exchanges serve to define activities that contribute to reducing existing threats. As a result of the exchanges, the implementation of binational management and conservation strategies are continuously defined in a strategic plan for control and collaborative monitoring, aimed at, among others, minimizing the illegal trafficking of flora, fauna and archaeological remnants.
Both protected areas need to recognize shared threats and be willing to tackle them under a joint vision. Both sides also need to be able to mobilize park rangers and make them feel that they are working together as equals to reduce environmental threats.
Park rangers carry important knowledge about the environmental threats. If they receive motivation to work together and exchange their knowledge they can contribute to develop effective conservation strategies. The different capacity levels and skills of park rangers from either side aid collaborative learning. Political conditions (for instance lack of legal framework) can be an obstacle to initiate the exchange and be a challenge in implementation.
Formal and informal training for adaptation
As people cannot adapt to climate change without first having the capacity to do so, the project aimed at equipping a broad range of partners with knowledge and skills necessary for effective implementation of adaptation actions. The main target groups comprised KWS staff and local communities. Specific areas of training included methods and techniques of ecological restoration, management of modern tree nurseries, including seedling production and propagation. Others were reforestation techniques, invasive species identification, control and management, water quality and quantity monitoring, and fence maintenance. Training was provided at individual, institutional and community levels and was done either through formal institutions or on-the-job training. The Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI) provided specialized training to KWS and community groups in establishment and management of tree nurseries, reforestation, and invasive species management. Most volunteer groups received on-the-ground training from KWS staff and other relevant professionals and technicians
• Funding availability • Professional expertise in different areas available • Support from organized community groups such as community forest associations, tour groups and learning institutions.
• Capacity needs (in terms of skills) may vary between locations due to the differences in climate change impacts and differences in site-specific interventions • Responding to climate change impacts require a great diversity of skills and resources which reside outside conservation agencies and can be tapped through collaborations and partnerships. • Skills obtained through training were transferable to areas of human pursuit
Regular review of the Annual Operative Plan (AOP)
During the aforementioned exchanges, park rangers identify, review and analyze the major shared threats, the local communities involved in illegal activities and the need to strengthen local capacities. Based on this an Annual Operative Plan (AOP) is developed and a regular review process is carried out concerning the progress of the implementation of the AOP. This review is conducted jointly by the managers of the border area institutions in order to mitigate threats, identify shared tasks and promote synergies between the institutions. The review of the Annual Operative Plan serves the staff to keep on track regarding the implementation and allows for the plan’s adaptation to changing conditions if necessary.
A clear understanding of the environmental and geographic context is essential. It will be useful to identify leaders (park rangers) to push the process
Every year, each protected area develops their own AOP. The contents of the transboundary and national AOP should not be merged. Therefore the transboundary AOPs should cover only those aspects which are not covered by individual plans. It is helpful to avoid park ranger turnover in order to guarantee the continuity of the implementation process and obviate to return to the start of the process.