Ressource use associations
To obtain a concession, »ancestral users« are required to organise into an association. The association then applies to the government for the special status by submitting names of association officers; a member list; an association agreement; maps of the area; and a management plan detailing the sustainable use of mangrove resources.
tba
tba
Design of participatory steps for village engagement
Through community-based activities the importance of traditional knowledge for increasing people resilience to climate change is demonstrated. 6 villages were involved from the start of the project, and the villagers given the opportunity to share their views throughout the project’s implementation. This includes: (1) Organizing a Climate Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment workshop for defining the main climate-related threats that the communities are facing (drought, floods, salt intrusion) as well as local techniques (anti-salt bund and Assisted Natural Regeneration - ANR) that can be implemented for responding to these challenges. (2) This forms the basis for defining the field activities in each village. (3) Village committees are created to coordinate the implementation and act as advisory boards. (4) Regular monitoring missions are undertaken to follow up on field work. (5) Annual meetings are organized in each village for assessing the results from activities and planning the next steps.
-Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment (VCA) workshop, for getting inputs from communities and defining adaptation strategies based on their knowledge -Attribution of concrete roles for getting the community involved in the implementation of field activities. -Creation of villages committees, to get ownership on the project while ensuring that field activities are implemented according to workplan -Regular meetings for sharing their feedback and advice about the project -Gender equity, with both men and women involved in the village committees and sharing tasks
Active involvement of communities from the early stage of the project was well appreciated and led to a high level of ownership and an effective implementation of activities - Using traditional knowledge and practices from the country helped to reach higher (regional or national) level for making the case for ecosystem-based solutions for climate change - Local knowledge is accessible/available if appropriate tools are used to gather, unlock and distil them, such as VCA workshop - Involving external local stakeholders (local NGOs etc.) is key for supporting communities and maintaining group cohesion - Participatory approaches for restoring the protected area enhance the knowledge and adaptive capacities of rural communities, while ensuring the sustained provision of ecosystem goods and services
Pride training program
Rare’s Pride Program training is a two-year process through which local conservation leaders receive formal university training, followed by periods of field-based formative research and results analyses. Participants learn how to change attitudes and behaviors, mobilize support for environmental protection, and reduce threats to natural resources. Rare’s local partners not only receive classroom training, but also implement an entire social marketing campaign in their communities, designed around a specific conservation goal. Participants in the program receive a toolkit for community outreach: Training 1 provides trainees with basic community engagement tools, so that they can start embedding themselves in the target audience and earn their trust. Training 2 takes place after a period of 1-2 months of field embedding, and teaches research techniques for qualitative and quantitative formative research. Training 3 takes place after 2-3 months of data collection and information gathering, to analyze data collected and design the Pride Campaign. Training 4 takes place upon campaign conclusion, to evaluate results and produce final report.
• Partner commitment to secure full-time dedication of participating fellows to the Pride program. • Continued full engagement and adequate progress of fellows during the entire duration of the program. • A minimum of high school degree for program participants/fellows. • A basic Pride curriculum, tailored to programmatic theme. • Basic infrastructure as well as training team.
A key element in the success of the Pride training program is to have specific deliverables and frequent evaluations of capacity. These deliverables and grades are recorded in an online tool that allows for multiple party follow-up. The same basic training assessment is delivered at the beginning of the cohort, and upon completion of every training phase. Having participants with different backgrounds and levels of academic training (high school or university degrees), presents both a challenge and an opportunity. The challenge is having to adapt lesson content and activities to accommodate for these differences. The opportunity is precisely to take advantage of these differences in skills and backgrounds to recruit participants to share past experiences and help fellow trainees in the learning process as mentors.
Revitalizing community engagement in park management
- Local community engagement in the park’s decision-making and management has been revitalized, based on experiences from Madagascar, which permit ongoing and active participation of community members in implementation, with involvement and buy-in to projects developed to support management activities. The regular dialogue between protected area and village representatives provides information on the activities of the protected area; allows for presentations of results from research; and raises issues and challenges that need a management response. In parallel, the park acts as an intermediary with donors to facilitate the financing of activities and amenities in the villages.
1. Trust and reciprocity: between protected area staff and community members 2. Top-down and bottom-up political will to engage and improve performance to meet challenges 3. Understanding that protection activities are in the interest of national and global donors, but should ultimately satisfy local development and regional and national priorities 4. ‘Early wins’ – target areas of governance and decision-making that will show the highest chances of early and immediate success, such as octopus fisheries and prevention of water source contamination.
The protected area began in 2001 with an open process for community participation. This was eroded and systems became marginal. By 2014, only a shadow of the former arrangements remained, while the challenges facing local communities and PA staff were greater. However, the chief lesson learned is that even where there is an echo of past success, it can be recovered by focusing on what worked. Secondly, momentum is important, but taking time is more so. Trust cannot be rebuilt in one day, by one project or group. Collaboration needs to be inclusive and work at the pace of the ‘slowest’ party. One lesson is to focus on some short-term ‘wins’ as well as a longer term goal, in tandem. In this case, convincing all parties that reef closures can work was best exemplified by the octopus fishery, which can recover rapidly. By demonstrating a benefit after a short period of engagement, more trust is invested into longer-term gains as well.
Capacity building of local stakeholders
EPIC activities are conducted in collaboration with stakeholders -from local to national level- to provide opportunities for capacity building in parallel to project implementation. Capacity building activities serve 2 purposes: 1) they allow the communities to be trained to use the local techniques again and 2) they help raise awareness and strengthen knowledge of partners and local governments on ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change more broadly. The creation of a capacity building plan for communities/stakeholders is key. It provides them with an effective, realistic and operational planning tool for trainings. The content of the training plan are evaluated and adjusted annually. The trainings undertaken so far include: 1) Training modules for villagers on (i) ANR, (ii) management of tree nurseries and (iii) salted land recovery techniques (in partnerships with scientists). After the trainings, practical sessions are organized to ensure that communities took ownership of these techniques. 2) Trainings for local governments (municipality and department levels) and stakeholders on ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change and disaster risk reduction
Early assessment of capacities and needs through regular discussions with communities and stakeholders, to ensure that the resources provided answer to their needs - Adapting the content of the training to the audience, inviting relevant speakers and using relevant examples for raising the attention of people - Planning for field visits to see the direct application of the techniques and to allow for a better understanding of the activities - Planning for follow up actions to ensure that the activities are implemented based on the agreement made during training
Capacity building of local communities and partners is key for allowing them to implement, advocate and preserve good practices on a longer term. - The use of traditional practices coupled with capacity building on agricultural techniques and knowledge sharing has proven effective for enabling communities to develop and implement adaptation strategies effectively. - The trainings on ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation gave to all the stakeholders a better understanding of the approach used throughout the project
Educating and outreach
Educating everyone from the local people neighbouring the reserve to the politicians was the most valuable component of the project. The concept of conservation and the protection of wildlife and our natural environment were completely foreign to them until they had the opportunity to experience it for themselves.
Engaging will ALL stakeholders, inviting them to visit the area and communicating with them in person.
Once people became aware of the value of this project and were cooperating at various levels we had overcome 90% of the challenges.
Documenting strategies and success evaluation
Any effective ecosystem-based strategies and implementation activities, need a strong documentation process and field monitoring activities in the field. Collating data from the field is key for 1) documenting the factors of success and failure of the techniques, and 2) for demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of ecosystem-based approaches. Such science-based evidences are necessary for making the case for nature based solutions to climate change adaptation. As part of EPIC, the following research activities have been undertaken so far: - Ecosystems and vegetation mapping and study of soil characteristics in the district of Djilor (in partnership with Cheikh Anta Diop University) - Development of training modules on ANR and other local adaptation techniques (in partnership with the National Forestry Research Centre and the Institute of Environmental Sciences) - Mapping of agricultural techniques for climate change adaptation and study of the impacts of disaster risk on local livelihood in the Foundiougne region (in partnership with a French school of engineers, ISTOM)
As far as possible, research institutes should be identified and involved from the start of the project, so as to understand the big picture of the project and its objectives - Defining research objectives and scope of the study is important to make sure that the research will respond to key questions relevant to the project.
- Creating partnership with schools and universities is a win-win situation: students can undertake their research and the project manager obtain scientific results and knowledge that are helpful for the implementation of the activities or for raising awareness on a specific topic. - Science based evidences and facts are key for reaching policy makers, as it allows them to get a clear picture of how the adaptation strategy works and what benefits it can provide. - Research partnerships don’t need to be necessarily designed in the short term, and can lead to longer term collaboration with universities and schools, where students (or PhDs) can be involved in future projects. - Results need to be accessible to all, for instance by summarizing them in a way that is easily understandable by external people
Sustainable agriculture in watersheds and vulnerable coasts
- Institutional support to producers in organizing themselves, to better engage with the local and regional markets and implement a more uniform plan and approach; reduce market competition and provide more inclusive access to production activities. - Promotion of more sustainable agricultural potential products, such as Ylang-Ylang used for perfume production, using more efficient, sustainable and resource-efficient technologies. For example, using copper stills and providing better distillation techniques that allow growers to also enter the production chain and command a better price for a better quality product. Agro-forestry techniques reduce the amount of primary fuelwood needed for the stills, and reduce impacts on the watersheds for the island. - Developing market-gardens and vegetable production to supply tourist facilities, such as hotels, restaurants, yachts within Comoros.
As above, the revitalization of collaborative planning and action, shared governance and better trust between actors is an essential step.The Comoros supplies 80% of the world’s ylang-ylang, so an existing market and practice is in place, but such a global market is fragile. Engaging the interest of leading sourcers of ylang-ylang, and convincing them to support sustainability in their sourcing is an important factor that enables more environmentally and socially responsible production. Proven transferable techniques and methods are available for ylang-ylang
The key lesson is that existing markets and resource opportunities should be the first to be developed, adapted and made more sustainable than looking at the very high transaction costs of introducing new alternatives. The link to sustainable production in watersheds and the quality of water, and reduced impact on coral reefs is not an obvious one, and can be forgotten once programmes are up and running. Maintaining a connection through awareness-raising, collaboration between sectors, and regular engagement is essential for long periods of time. An initial campaign may start the right track, but messages may soon be relegated if they are not maintained. Products such as ylang-ylang are part of a global market. As such, the commitment from sources and buyers, along the chain of production, is essential to avoid catastrophic market failures in the future. Using consumer groups and networks to encourage company buy-in to sustainability at source is an important contributing factor.
Creation of awareness raising and policy influencing tools
Multi-stakeholder Dialogue (MSD) platforms are created, comprised of government representatives, NGOs, civil society involved in the project. The platforms consist of management committees set up in each village and at provincial level, to monitor the project’s activities and inform its management. The committees provide support for the daily implementation of the activities as well as for strategic engagement with other institutions. Advocacy material for policy makers is also produced. The engagement at national, regional and global levels is crucial, to ensure that knowledge is transferred, and that policy makers become advocates/implementers of the key lessons learned from the project. Strategic engagements at national, regional and global levels included so far: - A national inception workshop of the project - A national forum with the Directorate of Civil protection on ecosystems-based risk management - Presentation of the project at regional forums and meetings (regional conservation forum, regional consultations for the WCDRR) - Showcasing the project in publications or case studies for global events (UNFCCC COP 21)
-Early involvement and awareness of governments: local governments should take part in the project from its start, and national government representatives should been invited to its inception workshop. - Establishment of MSD platforms at multiple levels of implementation allows monitoring of activities and provides guidance for strategic policy outreach - The international role and presence of an organization like IUCN, allows for opportunities to showcase activities and advocate for nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation at various levels.
- The creation of multi-stakeholders committees, in charge of monitoring and informing field activities, is key for actively involving partners and local governments in the implementation of the project. Their active engagement at every step of the project gives them ownership and encourages interactions between different sectors (research, civil society, environmental organizations, etc.) that usually don’t work together. - Working on policy influence at all levels (local to global) allows to effectively make the case for ecosystem-based solutions for climate change. -Showcasing local traditional knowledge for adaptation encourages government to implement similar actions at broader scales.
Management committee
The national authority begins the process to create a protected area management committee by inviting interested local stakeholders. Members are registered, and a council and a President are elected by the General Assembly. The management committee itself becomes a space for dialogue and allows issues to be discussed before tensions turn into conflicts. It also facilitates support from local stakeholders to the protected area management authority to carry out specific activities. The Fishermen’s Association and collectives are also members of the management committee and are active in the general assembly. A representative from the Fishermen’s Association was elected as President of the Management Committee, legitimizing the association as one of the most powerful and relevant actors in the protected area. This made communications between fishermen and government authorities more fluid and management decisions are made based on formal processes.
The management committee is a legally established by the National Law for Natural Protected Areas and its Regulations. The National Protected Area Authority promotes the creation of management committees for all protected areas as a way to create a space for dialogue and involve local stakeholders in management decisions.
The creation of the management committee gave the fishermen confidence that they would have a formal space to have their voices heard. It was also a space to resolve tensions and hear other perspectives. By assuming the Presidency of the Management Committee, the Fishermen’s Association was empowered, but at the same time they had to consider views and decisions that could be against their own. Therefore, more democratic decisions were reached.