Using organizational development methods on Local Committees

The analysis of the organizational capacities of biological corridors as multisectoral governance mechanisms allows for the identification of opportunities for improvement and strengthening needs to enhance the scaling-up of EbA. Existing competencies and capacities in technical and soft skills are assessed to facilitate multi-stakeholder dialogue, raise awareness, train and negotiate with decision-makers, conduct political advocacy, and establish alliances. Internally, organizational processes are analyzed to identify and prioritize gaps and bottlenecks in project management and financial sustainability.

An already existing governance structure needs to be in place, and its members should have an agreement on dedicating time to the upcoming process. Also, the process sould be facilitated by an expert in organisational development who selects adequate methods, prepares working sessions and guides the group.

The main capacity-building measures identified were in strategic communication, negotiation with key stakeholders, project management, and access to financial resources. These are highly efficient soft skills that are usually overlooked or underrated.

Shifting the role of local committees in biological corridors to a comprehensive approach

Biological corridors play a crucial role in promoting dialogue and participation among multiple stakeholders. Until now, their main focus has been on conservation activities. However, they have significant potential for scaling up Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA). They are integrated into the national strategy for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. This strategy is supported by a Local Committee, which serves as a forum for consultation and collaborative sustainability initiatives. This committee comprises civil society organizations (CSOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), government institutions, and municipalities.
To maximize the effectiveness of biological corridors in scaling up EbA measures, it is essential to establish a shared understanding and agreement among stakeholders regarding their role. This involves making explicit the role of biological corridors - and each stakeholder who participates - in sustainability and climate change adaptation strategies, but also also their specific contribution to social and economic local development. The road to this common understanding requires analyzing sectorial vulnerabilities, needs, and interests, but also oportunities, competencies and capacities with potencial to tackle common issues. In addition, clarifying basic concepts of climate change, adaptation, biodiversity conservation (EbA) with a people-centered approach, using sectorial specific language and active stakeholder participation, is key for reaching a common understanding.

Integration into National Policy Frameworks
Biological corridors are part of Costa Rica’s national conservation strategy, created through executive decree, mandating cross-sectoral cooperation in the public interest.

There is also alignment with the National Adaptation Plan of Costa Rics (Strategy #3), which promotes ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) through sustainable ecosystem management.
 

Multistakeholder Governance and Participation

An important enabling factor is the existence of a Local Committee as a formal consultative and collaborative platform comprising civil society, NGOs, government institutions, and municipalities. There is also active stakeholder participation across sectors which is central to dialogue and implementation.

Biological corridors should be understood as living organizations focused on citizen participation, with their own internal dynamics and operational and administrative processes. To channel efforts toward the efficient scaling of EbA measures, they need to create an identity, cohesion, and internal culture that allow them to address common challenges and opportunities. Applying the "climate lens" means going beyond management approaches focused strictly on conservation, instead focusing the analysis of potential impacts of sustainability actions on the quality of life of communities and individuals, especially vulnerable populations. 

Policy Alignment with PINPEP and PROBOSQUE for Smallholder Incentives

To promote sustainability and incentivize adoption of restoration practices, the project aligned its interventions with Guatemala’s national forestry incentive schemes—PINPEP (targeting smallholders) and PROBOSQUE (supporting forest management and agroforestry). This approach answered “what” (financial support available for conservation), “why” (incentives reduce the cost barrier for farmers), and “how” (linking project actions with formal application support). Farmers engaged in agroforestry, reforestation, or conservation activities were guided through the process of registering for these programs, ensuring long-term continuity and co-financing. This institutional alignment also ensured that restoration efforts complied with national environmental priorities.

A strong policy framework, INAB collaboration, farmer interest in incentives, and field staff supporting application processes enabled smooth integration. National recognition of smallholder needs and pre-existing program budgets were also essential.

While alignment with national programs strengthened sustainability, bureaucracy and paperwork were hurdles for farmers. Simplifying the application process and building farmers’ confidence in engaging with institutions proved essential. Having local facilitators familiar with both community dynamics and institutional procedures was key to success.

Ecosystem Service Modelling with InVEST for Landscape Planning

To understand how different land uses affect ecosystem functions, the project applied InVEST modelling tools to map and quantify carbon storage, sediment retention, and habitat quality in three micro-watersheds. This allowed the project team and local stakeholders to see the “what” (the ecological state of the landscape), “why” (which land uses provided more benefits), and “how” (where interventions were needed). For instance, forest and shrubland areas were found to store significantly more carbon and reduce erosion compared to basic grain croplands. This modelling helped prioritize areas for restoration and agroforestry. The visual outputs and metrics supported evidence-based discussions with communities and decision-makers, integrating ecological science into watershed-level planning.

Smallholder farmers, especially indigenous families in the Quiejel, Balanyá, and Pixcayá–Pampumay micro-watersheds; national partners—the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food of Guatemala (MAGA) and the National Institute of Forests (INAB); and the ecosystems that will benefit from improved land management

Making ecosystem functions visible through maps helped bridge knowledge gaps and build trust. However, technical complexity required training and translation into accessible formats. Some areas lacked detailed data, so local observations were essential for model validation. Combining modelling with participatory methods made the findings more relevant and actionable.

Using the SIREN App to Raise Awareness and Strengthen Community Connections

The SIREN app is a mobile tool developed by AMMCO to collect data on marine wildlife sightings, strandings, and bycatch, while simultaneously serving as an educational and engagement platform for coastal communities. Beyond data collection, SIREN helps raise awareness among fishers and youth by delivering marine conservation messages directly through mobile technology.

What makes this approach unique is the dual function: it informs and empowers users to act as citizen scientists, while also fostering a sense of community through shared environmental responsibility. Users, mainly small-scale fishers and local conservation volunteers are connected through common reporting goals and periodic in-person exchanges (e.g. during trainings or events like the Street Whale Symposium), enhancing trust and collaboration across regions.
The app is introduced through outreach sessions in coastal villages.
 

To implement SIREN, we apply the following steps:

  • Users receive basic training on species identification and reporting procedures.
  • Each report (sighting reported through the app) is reviewed by AMMCO staff, who provide feedback and clarification.
  • Educational content (Virtual Reality, posters, storybooks, videos) is developed based on the reports, and delivered through schools or fisher meetings.
  • Shared results and feedback loops build trust and stimulate user engagement and connections.
  • User-friendly mobile interface with offline capability
  • Existing trust between AMMCO and fishing communities
  • Regular communication and in-person follow-up
  • Integration of local languages and culturally adapted visuals
  • Low literacy and limited smartphone access require regular in-person engagement and the use of visual/voice features.
  • Incentives and recognition (e.g. being invited to events or featured in newsletters) help maintain motivation.
  • Community ownership improves when feedback is timely and reports lead to tangible conservation actions.
Innovative modes of delivery

The campaigns need to be specifically tailored for the respective target group to make the content more relevant and engaging. It is important to use multimedia and varied communication formats such as videos, comics, and radio shows, posters, comic books, wall murals, and competitions. These formats help presenting information in an easily understandable and appealing way.

Additionally, training in sustainable fisheries and aquaculture needs to include both practical skills and theoretical knowledge, with a strong emphasis on flexible teaching methods and hands-on learning. Practical training often takes place on demo farms or participants’ own farms, where group mentoring and on-site technical input from trainers and experts occur. This hands-on training covers essential topics such as site selection, pond excavation, stocking, feed and pond management, fish health monitoring, water quality management, and fish processing. By engaging in real-life situations, participants gain the skills needed to independently apply the training content in their own operations. This experiential learning enhances their ability to manage pond aquaculture and fishing throughout the season. While field demonstrations offer practical, hands-on learning, classroom-based training provides theoretical knowledge.

Depending on the context, it may be important to develop training that can be delivered without relying on technology or electricity -especially in remote and rural areas.

Influenced by the restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some countries adopted innovative methods to deliver training content and reach a broader audience. In Mauritania, for example, the training content was disseminated via a mobile application, allowing target groups to access the information conveniently. Meetings, visits to fish landing sites, and training workshops in the field were restricted. Some projects developed specifically designed interactive radio shows for remote listeners or special training videos to spread their training content and sensitise about fish consumption and sustainable practices. These videos furthermore have the benefit of being re-watched, therefore guiding fish and aquaculture farmers even after the training cycle or assisting other farmers who couldn’t participate.

Selection and Training of Trainers (ToT)

The Training of Trainers (ToT) method is a widely used approach in capacity-building programmes to ensure the effective dissemination and anchoring of knowledge and skills in communities. Trainers are selected based on criteria such as experience, communication skills, and community engagement. They undergo a structured qualification programme that includes classroom sessions and hands-on learning to prepare them to conduct sessions aligned with adult learning principles and discovery-based approaches.
A Master Trainer model, as used in the Aquaculture Business School in Malawi and the Community Resource Person model in India, plays a crucial role in ensuring consistent quality and calibration of training standards. Master Trainers not only lead the initial ToT programmes, but also support ongoing quality assurance by mentoring the trainers and monitoring the effectiveness of training delivery. The trainers act as intermediaries, translating technical concepts into practical solutions for farmers. 

Trainer manuals should be created precisely and in detail to provide future trainers with clear guidance on how to deliver specific training content effectively. The development of these manuals should follow a participatory approach, incorporating continuous feedback loops from participants. 

The establishment of a network of trainers within communities is essential to ensure the long-term availability of training and advisory services. By embedding this network locally, capacity-building efforts can better respond to the needs of the community.

Experience from India has shown that younger trainers, particularly those with up to five years of experience and graduate-level education, were rated highly by farmers. These trainers were found to be more relatable to the farmers’ learning levels, as they were not too distant in terms of educational understanding and could effectively bridge the knowledge gap.

Sustainability of the PR approach

To guarantee the sustainability of the PR system, it is essential to ensure its institutional recognition and integration into national agricultural policies. This requires the establishment of a national training reference framework and a certification system for PRs. These standards define the skills and learning modules required to train PRs, covering both technical aspects (agroecology, soil conservation) and pedagogical skills (leadership, knowledge transmission). Certification, currently under development, will enable PRs to gain access to funding and strengthen their credibility with agricultural institutions and partners. In parallel, funding mechanisms have been put in place to support PRs and guarantee their empowerment. These mechanisms include :

  • The Fonds Régional de Développement Agricole, which subsidizes the services provided by certified PRs.
  • Income-Generating Activities (IGAs), enabling PRs to develop agricultural services (seed sales, compost production) to ensure their economic viability.
  • Partnerships with farmers' organizations, to integrate PRs into local agricultural support structures.
  • The introduction of a certification process, tested in two pilot areas, guarantees official recognition of the PRs and their integration into agricultural systems.
  • The development of Income-Generating Activities (IGAs) enables PRs to offer services linked to local inputs, thereby strengthening their financial autonomy.
  • Access to funding mechanisms, notably via the regional agricultural development fund, supports certified PRs by subsidizing their services and initiatives.
  • A national reference system and a certification process reinforce the legitimacy and effectiveness of RPs. These tools offer official recognition and facilitate their inclusion in funding schemes and local partnerships.
  • Support for the creation of income-generating activities is crucial to ensure the long-term commitment of PRs. Opportunities such as input supply enable PRs to reconcile their responsibilities with direct financial benefits.
  • Collaboration with local actors is essential to maintain the sustainability of the model after the end of the programs. These partnerships ensure a smooth transition and continuity of services.
Integration of local contexts and languages

Incorporating the local context – like environmental and cultural conditions in the regions and local languages – is essential when designing training manuals. This ensures accessibility and relevance of training content and alignment with the realities of the target audience’s environment. To ensure the sustainability and widespread adoption of the training materials, they need to be closely aligned with the needs and priorities of local institutions. 

 

Enabling factors include involving local farmers and experts in developing materials, ensuring that training venues and tools are accessible, regularly collecting participant feedback to update content, and gaining support from community leaders to encourage attendance and trust.

In India, for instance, the modular training sessions were developed with a specific focus on the available time of farmers and their farming calendar. The developed approach allows the training to be broken down into short, 2-hour modules. This ensured that farmers, particularly women, can participate without disrupting their ongoing livelihood and household activities. The modular setup also enabled farmers to select sessions based on the season, such as pond preparation, stocking, or cultivation periods, maximising the relevance and timing of the information provided. Adding fitting illustrations, especially of local commodities and practices, to the training materials enhanced comprehension by grounding the content in familiar visuals.

Training farmers and seed multipliers in the SQD system

During the implementation of this approach, collaboration with the Ministry of Agriculture was undertaken to train farmers who were members of partner groups to approve their seed establishments. Under the new certification system, the approval of a seed establishment can be carried out in parallel with seed certification. The standards applied in this system differ from those used in conventional seed production. The training course aims to clarify these differences and highlight the advantages of the new production framework. It takes place over four consecutive days, with three days of classroom sessions and half a day devoted to practical work in the field. Training is provided exclusively by specialists and qualified technicians. The main objective is to train farmers in all aspects of seed production, control, certification and marketing. The practical training was carried out on the premises of a farmer benefiting from the program. Participants were shown a simulation of the principle of field controls.

  • The commitment of the SOC and local NGOs to organizing training courses adapted to the realities of growers.
  • A combination of theoretical and practical sessions, with demonstrations in the field.
  • The involvement of multiplier farmers and agricultural technicians to ensure a sustainable transfer of skills.
  • Joint training of technicians and multiplier farmers, gradually including relay farmers, has enabled better knowledge sharing and effective dissemination of technical skills.
  • Ongoing technical support, including appropriate plot selection, field cleaning, optimal harvest timing and rigorous management of post-harvest stages, contributes significantly to the final quality of certified seeds.
  • Regular capacity building in certified seed production (rice, maize, vegetables, dry grains) under the conventional and SQD certification systems is essential to the success of the process.