improved knowledge on the opportunities and constraints for supporting forest-friendly sustainable land uses in the area around the ONP

SCERA’s technical staff and the Value Chain Analysis and Participatory Land Use Planning (PLUP) Feasibility study consultant, Dr Adam Manvell, implemented work on Agricultural value chain analysis around Okomu National Park. The team visited 8 support zone communities, 4 Local markets, 3 Agricultural Service providers and one Tree crop research Institute - Rubber Research Institute of Nigeria (RRIN). Based on findings from engagements with communities, communities are interested in forest friendly farming practices such as beekeeping and tree crop farming particularly Bitter kola (Garcinia kola), African cherry (Chrysophyllum albidum), bush mango (Irvingia gabonensis), pepper fruit (Dennettia tripetala), black pear (Dacryodes edulis), Avocado pear and importantly Timber species. There is high demand for timber in the area which has led to illegal logging issues in ONP. It has been observed that the environment is conducive for the farming of these crops and most of the trees are indigenous to the area. Local, regional and national markets are available for the sales of these products and the income generating potentials are encouraging. 

SCERA carried out a training on beehives construction from 24th-26th of October 2023, at the Okomu National Park Conference Hall, Okomu National Park Headquarters, Udo, Ovia South-West, Edo State. A total of 14 carpenters from communities were trained. The aim was to equip community carpenters with the skills for constructing beehives within their communities using locally sourced materials. These practices enhance the earning opportunities for carpenters, make beehives easily accessible and relatively cheaper for interested community farmers, and increase their interest in conservation initiatives. 

Okomu National Park staff have increased capacity for preventive law enforcement and are implementing a standardized law enforcement strategy throughout the project

As part of the process of developing a law enforcement strategy for Okomu National Park that is focused on crime prevention, and to build capacity of rangers of the park in data collection and analysis using Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool (SMART), SCERA organised a 5 days training workshop. The course aimed to build the capacity of ONP staff, national park service staff and SCERA staff in core SMART skills, and provide them with resources to support further training of protected area staff. The training/workshop was taught by a consultant TCHAKOUDEU KEHOU Stephane

More so, a 2-day training on Human Rights and Social Safeguards training took place. The same batch of rangers that were trained on SMART were the ones trained. After the training, a WhatsApp group was created for the consultant to continue to share information with the rangers

Training Module on Biofermenters

Alongside the technical solution and the financial model, GIC developed a training module, which assures that farmers who adopt the solution are prepared to produce and apply biological inputs such as Jeevamrut (liquid organic fertilizer), Ghanjeevamrut (solid organic fertilizer), and Neemastra (natural pest control).

Based on this module, all adopting farmers were trained on how to safely operate the system, how to maintain it, ensuring consistent fermentation quality and system longevity, and how to carry out basic troubleshooting to avoid the need for external technical support. Furthermore, they received training on the formulation of different organic inputs and their use in soil, foliar, and drip irrigation systems. Basic principles of nutrient management were also introduced, emphasizing balanced fertilisation and the role of these inputs in maintaining soil health.

By building these skills and understanding through the practical training sessions, the module supports farmers in adopting natural farming methods with greater confidence. Furthermore, it serves as a replicable model for scaling the use of biofermenters and natural inputs across other regions and contexts.

Country-specific transformation initiatives

During the two international learning events, which took place from February to October 2024, participants were tasked with developing country-specific transformation initiatives to work on collaboratively as a team. This activity constituted the core working stream for action in respective countries and was part of the Academy’s Growing phase. The country teams were responsible for developing and implementing at least one joint project aimed at advancing agroecological transition. The nature and topic of the transformation initiative were intentionally left open. Participants reported their progress through a video presentation and shared their results at the second international learning event held in Hawassa. 
Participants expressed a profound depth and intensity of learning throughout these initiatives, particularly in areas such as leadership, teamwork, and agroecology. Most of the initiatives were highly successful and will continue beyond the conclusion of the Academy. For example, in India, a roadmap for agroecological transition was developed for a specific district. In Burkina Faso, a tour for journalists was organised, which helped to raise awareness of agroecology within the country.

  • The initiative provided a general inspiration and framework for the transformation initiatives without being prescriptive regarding their content or processes. This approach allowed participants to learn and self-organise, leading to a greater sense of ownership. Participants noted that this motivated them to develop ideas they felt they could achieve together.
  • Each country team received support from a local country facilitator throughout this period. Often, these country facilitators acted as a unifying force for the team and their work on the transformation initiatives. Being from the respective countries, the facilitators understood the local context and were able to offer flexible support to participants. They conducted three to five full-day workshops for each country team as needed, helping the group stay focused on their transformation initiative, addressing specific learning needs, fostering both action and reflection, and providing individual support to participants.
  • While the country facilitators supported their teams, they were also guided in their professional development and facilitation skills by the international facilitation team. This team held seven online meetings for all country facilitators during the Academy. Additionally, the lead facilitators conducted approximately seven one-on-one sessions with each country facilitator.
  • Some of the transformation initiatives were overly ambitious at the outset and needed to be scaled back. It is recommended to schedule group coaching session at the beginning of the work on the transformation initiatives to help participants assess the feasibility of their projects.
  • Including the country facilitators in the international learning events is also recommended, allowing them to collaboratively initiate and conclude the country work alongside their teams during these events. Alternatively, a day-long online onboarding session with the facilitators could be arranged at the beginning of the process.
  • Communication from the organisations organising the Academy regarding options for sustaining and funding the continuation of the transformation initiatives should begin early in the process and remain consistent and proactive. It is advisable to explore ways to actively support networking opportunities for participants with potential funders of their transformation initiatives from the outset.
International Learning Events and Online Sessions

Two international four-day learning events framed the Academy, occurring at its beginning and end. The first event took place in February 2024 in Kisumu, Kenya, as part of the Sowing phase of the Academy. The objective of this event was to bring all participants together for the first time in a spirit of collaborative learning and support. It aimed to introduce the participants to the key concepts of leadership and agroecology while laying the foundation for successful work and group cooperation. During this event, participants began developing stakeholder systems maps to advance agroecology in their countries and collaborated to create a vision for change. Additionally, a field visit took participants to a local demonstration farm (BIOGI) and a farm practicing agroforestry, supported by the NGO Trees for the Future. 
After several months of learning in country groups and meeting the global cohort online four times, the second event was held in November 2024 in Hawassa, Ethiopia. This marked the final official activity of the Academy and served as the core event of its Harvesting phase, transitioning participants into the Transforming phase. The key objectives of this event were to support country groups and individuals in taking and scaling up action, to deepen the learning from previous months, to discuss the potential for upscaling the initiatives developed during the Academy, and  to celebrate and strengthen the networks that had formed.
During this event,  participants reflected on and shared learnings with other country teams, exploring key topics such as personal ecology, individual leadership, habit formation, and communication. A field visit included a tour to a local coffee co-operative processing facility and a diversified small-scale farm. Participants also planned their next steps as transformation makers for agroecological change.
The two international learning events were complemented by a total of four online session, each lasting 2,5 hours, which took place in March, May, July and September 2024. These sessions provided participants with additional insights on models and tools for leading transformation initiatives and advancing agroecology, including effective communication, overcoming obstacles, and influencing political narratives. Thus, these online sessions constituted an important component of the Academy’s Growing phase. 

  • Both events featured a highly interactive blend of training and workshops, guided by a pre-set agenda while allowing ample opportunity for participants to influence the programme.
  • The translation services provided during both live and online events were seamless. Thanks to the excellent interpreters, particularly at the two learning events, language barriers were effectively addressed.
  • Participants appreciated the field trips, which were made possible by hosting the international learning events in cities that offer access to rural areas, rather than in capital cities.
  • While the focus between the two in-presence International Learning Events was on country-specific transformation initiatives, the international online meetings provided an opportunity for the entire group to reconvene, maintain collective momentum, and to share insights with one another.
  • Regarding the field trips, it is preferred for future events to concentrate on a single field visit per learning event, dedicating more time, ideally an entire day – to the farm. Effective and timely coordination with country partners is essential to ensure that suitable locations, logistics, and adequate facilities are available on-site.
  • The bilingual nature of the events necessitated translation services for all sessions. While this was highly effective during in-person international learning events, the quality of interpretation and the technical setup for translation during online events fell short, creating additional work for facilitators, such as repeating sessions. Therefore, it is recommended to utilise software with easy-friendly translation features (such as Zoom, if permitted by the organising entity of the Academy) and to provide participants with more thorough briefings on overcoming technical challenges.
  • Thorough logistical preparation is crucial for international learning events. Participants from various countries need to converge at an appropriate location. Important processes, such as obtaining necessary visas and exploring travel options, should be initiated well in advance.
Building Bridges: The Academy’s Multidimensional, Multistakeholder Approach

The purpose of the Academy was to support participants in developing the skills and experience necessary for leadership in navigating complex systems and fostering agroecological transformation.
A suitable concept to fulfill this purpose was developed over a span of three months (July – September 2023): 

Consequently, the purpose was distilled into three key objectives: Learning, Acting, and Networking. These objectives were reflected in the design of each session and supported at three levels:  individuals, country teams, and the global cohort.
The methodology of the Agroecology Leadership Academy was based on 7 principles:

  • A close connection between the topic of Agroecology (the “What”) and Transformation and Leadership (the “How”)
  • A clear focus on transformation skills and mindset
  • Transformation initiatives as core learning projects
  • In-Country facilitators to support the country teams
  • Linking Learning, Acting and Networking
  • Systemic, experiential and relational learning
  • The strong role of communication

The general structure of the Academy was organised into four phases: Sowing, Growing, Harvesting and Transforming. Various learning formats were implemented throughout these phases, including an online kick-off event, two international in-presence learning events, four international online sessions, and individual workshops for the different country teams. These formats concentrated on the aforementioned levels. While the meetings within the country teams emphasised teamwork at the national level, the international sessions facilitated mutual learning among the global cohort. 

After the concept development phase, the participant selection process commenced. The goal was to assemble a heterogenous group representing diverse stakeholder groups, skills, ages and genders. 
A call for applications was sent out to a pre-defined group of potential participants from agroecology-networks in the respective countries. Following the evaluation of initial applications based on predefined selection criteria, individual selection conversations were conducted to finalise the group composition, with five participants chosen from each country. 
In selecting participants, not only individual criteria were considered, but also the need for complementary skills within the group composition.  Each participant was expected to contribute something from their personal background that would benefit the group as a whole.
This selection process ensured that different levels of the agricultural and food system were represented - participants included, among others, farmers, founders of agricultural enterprises, university professors, and representatives of ministries of agriculture - as well as ensuring a balanced gender ratio within the group.

  • Utilising a core model developed during the concept development phase, which was introduced at the beginning of the programme and referenced throughout The core model for Agroecology Leadership was designed in a circular format with multiple rings. The centre of the model, Agroecological Transformation, was to be achieved by interweaving elements of the inner circle – leadership elements at various levels – with the outer circle – agroecological principles.
  • Implementing a communication action plan to ensure that all participants understood the planned communication tools and materials, alongside establishing frequent communication to share information and include modules on effective communication.
  • Involving country focal persons in the development and implementation of the Academy to provide context specific support for both the facilitation team and participants. 
  • Adapting the Academy’s curriculum based on participants’ needs to ensure those needs were adequately met. Regular feedback from participants was solicited for this purpose. 
  • The overall structure and duration of the Academy appeared appropriate. The 11-month duration, combined with a mix of live and online events and transformation initiatives, was beneficial for learning.
  • The participant selection process was effective, as invitations sent through agroecology networks attracted two to three times as many applicants as available spots. The application process utilised simple and streamlined forms, and requesting application videos proved helpful in assessing participants.
  • Country teams, with diverse representation from various sectors (public sector, start-ups, academia) were highly active and successful. It is essential to emphasise the critical need for farmer representation and participation in forums like this.
  • The facilitation team demonstrated adaptability in creating a programme that addressed participants’ learning needs.  Rather than establishing a fixed curriculum at the outset, topics were developed based on participant feedback, which proved to be effective.
  • Initially intended to focus solely on creating materials such as videos and factsheets, communication activities became integral to all aspects—from the application process and session preparation to facilitation, documentation, and participant management. Therefore, it is recommended to incorporate the strong role of communication consistently into future Academies from the onset.
Protocolos para el monitoreo de peces pelágicos y para el monitoreo de mamíferos marinos

Se trata de una herramienta para el monitoreo de grandes peces pelágicos y/o depredadores (especies focales) en Áreas Marinas Protegidas (AMP) del Sistema Nacional de Áreas de Conservación (SINAC) de Costa Rica.  Este protocolo cuenta con una selección de indicadores que permitirán evaluar el estado de conservación en el que se encuentran las especies focales año tras año con el fin de identificar cambios a corto plazo y proporcionar alertas tempranas a los tomadores de decisiones. Se proponen técnicas de monitoreo estandarizadas, efectivas y accesibles que no dependan necesariamente de personal científico especializado en el campo. A largo plazo, esta información servirá para evaluar tendencias poblacionales, identificar amenazas y fortalecer la efectividad de las AMP hacia la conservación de un grupo de especies cuya presencia es vital para el funcionamiento y salud de los ecosistemas.

Creación en el 2016 del Programa Nacional de Monitoreo Ecológico (PRONAMEC), con el propósito de generar y difundir información científica sobre el estado de la conservación de la biodiversidad en todo Costa Rica. Esto, como una herramienta para la toma de decisiones a escala local y nacional. 

  • La participación activa y el empoderamiento de los guardaparques son fundamentales para lograr un compromiso efectivo con el monitoreo.
  • Es esencial dar continuidad al monitoreo, garantizando las capacidades operativas necesarias y el financiamiento de las iniciativas, como una forma de promover la consistencia de los datos y la información. 
  • La falta de embarcaciones dedicadas exclusivamente al monitoreo es un obstáculo que limita la efectividad del programa, ya que depende de recursos que se destinan a otras actividades. 
  • Es importante seguir un método científico riguroso, que incluye observación, formulación de preguntas, generación de hipótesis y análisis de problemas.
  • Es esencial compartir y publicar los datos obtenidos con la comunidad científica, para asegurar que la información se analice y utilice adecuadamente.
  • Se presentan dificultades para realizar foto-identificaciones efectivas de las especies debido a su desplazamiento, por lo que es necesario aplicar métodos alternativos de recolección de datos como la obtención de muestras genéticas.

Es necesario hacer recomendaciones de manejo basadas en los datos recopilados para mejorar la gestión de los recursos marinos.

Responsible code of conduct for whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) responsible tourism.

This protocol is contained in Resolution 0841 of 2024, issued by the Corporación Autónoma Regional para el Desarrollo Sostenible del Chocó (Codechocó), which seeks to define behavioral actions and establish measures for  responsible whale sharks tourism (including other species) to safeguard their welfare. It is aimed at fishermen, tourists and the community in general. 

Measures include the number of boats allowed with a shark or group of sharks at the same time, the maximum time and minimum distance, the mandatory use of life jacket and the carrying capacity of the area. It also prohibits feeding sharks, swimming near them,  free-diving, and throwing garbage in places not designated for it. 

In addition to drafting the protocol, which was subsequently approved and adopted by Codechocó, the initiative also developed an outreach strategy in which infographics (digital and printed) were designed that summarize the main guidelines of the protocol and the ecological characteristics of  whale sharks, highlighting the importance of protecting the species.  This material is used to support education and outreach activities (e.g. workshops, lectures) involving fishermen, local communities, tourists and tour operators. 

The main contribution of this tool has been changing the behavior of tour operators, visitors, fishermen, and the community at large to adhere to these minimum measures for the protection and conservation of whale sharks. This shows a considerable degree of effectiveness and receptiveness to this type of measure, as well as the creation of positive perceptions of a scientific, responsible, and conservation-oriented tourism model.

Livelihood Improved

Randilen Wildlife Management Area (WMA) generates tourism income that directly supports community development, fostering sustainable growth and improving local livelihoods. Revenue from tourism activities, such as park entry fees, guided tours, and eco-lodges, is reinvested in key sectors like education, healthcare, and infrastructure. Additionally, these funds empower local communities by creating jobs, enhancing conservation efforts, and supporting small businesses. The income also contributes to cultural preservation and environmental sustainability, ensuring long-term economic stability while promoting responsible tourism practices that benefit both people and wildlife.

Protection of wildlife and the environment

Trust Building

Trust-building is essential for an effective feedback mechanism, ensuring stakeholders feel safe raising concerns. Without trust, people may hesitate to report issues due to fear of retaliation or inaction, undermining the system’s purpose.

As stakeholders see their concerns addressed, trust deepens, leading to greater participation and stronger relationships between communities and conservation partners. Over time, this trust improves conflict resolution and increases local support for conservation efforts.

Accessibility and confidentiality are key. Secure lock boxes in each zone allow safe, confidential submissions, encouraging participation. Impartiality is also crucial. The multi-organization response team, which includes representation from Frankfurt Zoological Society, the Chitimbwa Iyendwe Conservation Project, and Zambia’s Department of National Parks and Wildlife FZS, reassures stakeholders that feedback and grievances will be handled fairly.

Consistent communication and follow-ups further strengthen trust. Keeping complainants informed about progress and resolutions demonstrates commitment. Transparency, including sharing general grievance outcomes in meetings, reinforces confidence.

Building trust in the feedback mechanism requires consistent engagement, transparency, and responsiveness. Early on, accessibility proved critical - placing lock boxes in multiple zones ensured community members could submit concerns easily and confidentially. However, initial lack of awareness limited participation, highlighting the need for repeated sensitization meetings to explain the process and reassure people of confidentiality.

Impartiality was another key lesson. By involving multiple organizations (FZS, DNPW and CICP) in the review team, the mechanism gained credibility, reducing fears of bias. Timely responses were also essential; delays in addressing grievances risked eroding confidence, emphasizing the importance of clear timelines and interim updates.

Additionally, managing expectations was necessary. Not all concerns could be resolved immediately, and some fell outside of the NTCP’s mandate. The set up of the mechanism stipulated that such issues were to be passed onto relevant bodies such as the Zambia police (no serious grievances requiring this action have been received to date). Communicating what the mechanism could and couldn’t address helped maintain trust. Ultimately, transparency, follow-through, and ongoing dialogue proved vital in ensuring the community viewed the process as fair and reliable.