4. Stakeholder Engagement (ShE) Workshops

Management of surface and groundwater resources is a serious concern to local communities. Efforts at the individual or household level are not sufficient to plan and manage water. Hence it is essential that the diverse groups associated with a particular water resource come together to understand, plan and manage the resource judiciously, equitably and sustainably.

 

Watershed development, for example, through the Village Watershed/ Development Committee supported by the local governing body, brings all inhabitants of the entire village(s) together to regenerate their degraded watershed to enhance soil and water harvesting potential.

 

Two types of ShE events are:

1) Engaging the primary and secondary stakeholders at cluster level: these involve participation of direct water users and the neighbouring (upstream and downstream) communities to understand the scientific knowledge shared and active engagement in exercises.

2) Engaging representatives of the primary, secondary and tertiary stakeholders at block or district levels: These are mainly the government officials, experts in water, agriculture and allied sectors, practitioners, academics and research institutes. At this level of stakeholder engagement, participants discuss the larger perspectives of policy, advocacy and legal dynamics of water resources.

Stakeholder Engagement workshops include group exercises, games and discussions. Open and healthy discussions are encouraged around common concerns. The scientific information regarding socio-economic, local biophysical and hydro-geological findings is shared by WOTR’s researchers to enable participants to make informed decisions. During the process, VWMTs and Water caretakers prepare water budgets followed by the water harvesting and water-saving plans. In all our workshops we promote women participation as a criterion for successful implementation.

 

With more information and knowledge received through ShEs, the local stakeholders make informed decisions; immediate actions and development at the village level have taken place. Several water budgeting plans were made and followed through, which improved water sufficiency, provided drinking water security, and reduced crop losses. Introduction of villagers to water-saving and harvesting techniques improved water availability and water-use efficiency through the changed behavior of farmers. The rules and regulations made at the village level enhanced the power and reliability of local institutions in water management by increasing unity among the village community. However, adoption to new pathways and bringing about behavioral change is a very slow process. Villagers have insecurities of losing their ‘private’ share of water because of water budgeting. It is thus still anticipated to take a longer time to establish local water institution and informed communities to accept WSI completely.

Broad Socialization and Consultation Process

In order to avoid generating expectations or contradictions among the different stakeholders in the area of influence, prior to the consultation process with potential beneficiaries, a broad process of socialization of the project was carried out with local authorities, indigenous organizations, community representatives, describing the project, its scope and coverage.

A diagnosis of the situation of the Lenca communities was then carried out in order to strengthen knowledge of their culture and determine probable approaches for consultation.

Based on the diagnosis and socialization, we proceeded to shape the process of direct consultations with the communities about the project, its implications and the potential participation of the communities.

  1. Hiring of a consultant of Lenca origin, familiar with and experienced in the methodology and procedures of the executing organization (SNV).
  2. Networking and favorable contacts with different actors and community leaders of the co-executing organization (ASOMAINCUPACO).
  3. Broad consultation, without exclusion and open to adapting project activities to meet the suggestions of the consulted communities.
  4. Respect for indigenous organizations, but at the same time, giving space to unorganized communities or parts of them.
  1. It is necessary to give the necessary time for the communities to mature the information provided to them in the consultation process.
  2. Broad socialization creates an "environment of trust" and gives a transparent image of the project in terms of its scope.
  3. It was relevant for the communities that the project contemplated the rescue of their ancestral climate-resilient practices and respect for their internal governance.
Knowledge Management and Climate Change Adaptation

This block refers to the set of activities and processes that strengthen the exchange of information and experiences related to the design, implementation and monitoring of the solution. This allows building a shared knowledge base with the potential to facilitate the adaptation process and accelerate innovation and expected change/adjustments.

The main activities are:

  • Formation and training of commissions to recover local narratives that interweave actors, perceptions, experiences, knowledge and changes that are triggered throughout the adaptation process,
  • Systematization of the solution to identify lessons learned and confirm the results of the process.
  • Elaboration and dissemination of materials with great communicative power that show the territory, the actions carried out and the main protagonists of the adaptation process.
  1. Understanding that beneficiaries are the key actors in climate change adaptation processes.
  2. Identifying and listening to community narratives makes it possible to recognize the resilience of their livelihoods.
  3. Vulnerability to floods is differentiated for women and men, as well as the strategies and capacities they bring into play to face it.
  4. Communication materials should consider the needs and capacities of different groups and enhance their participation and empowerment.
  1. Adaptation to climate change is also a process of innovation, and as such is a path and not a destination. Its raison d'être is to make visible the conditions that increase the vulnerability of a system of interest and to offer solutions that generate a positive impact on the quality of life of people and the ecosystems that sustain them.
  2. For this reason, knowledge management plays an important role, as it allows generating a virtuous cycle of learning and improvement of adaptive management and disaster risk reduction processes; hence the importance of promoting a permanent reflection on reality and a more dynamic and lively flow of knowledge between beneficiaries, technical teams and the general project, which allows creating more robust solutions.
Citizen monitoring

The SbN citizen monitoring exercise is a useful tool in the analysis of better solution alternatives for local communities, but also to promote good governance and transparency, since it allows citizens to learn about the problems and challenges of ecosystem-based adaptation actions and to propose complementary alternatives for improving social organization, diversifying economic activities, new governance practices, among others:

  • to know the problems and challenges of ecosystem-based adaptation actions and the proposal of complementary alternatives for the improvement of social organization, diversification of economic activities, new governance practices, among others.
  • Raise realistic expectations about collective action and better understand their role as contributors to local well-being.
  • Recognize the relationship between adaptation to climate change and local development that responds to the needs, demands and realities of vulnerable groups.

-The Peasant Learning Communities are groups of farmers organized by agricultural sectors, whose leaders are responsible for coordinating the collection of information on the implementation of the measure and monitoring its results.

Citizen monitoring of the solution should be oriented towards recognizing :

  • Changes in the institutional framework of the adaptation process.
  • Changes in the vulnerability conditions of agricultural livelihoods (biophysical, social and economic).
  • Changes in the resilience conditions of livelihoods (recovery in less time, reduction of losses and damages, better knowledge of the factors that exacerbate the impacts of floods, systematization of experience, innovation and adaptive management).

To obtain favorable results, farmer leaders should be trained to:

  • obtain quality local information
  • Carefully select data according to each monitoring component.
  • thoroughly validate the information with the support of field technicians
  • structure the information based on the Datlas Platform
Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) with a sustainable livelihoods approach

The block shows the actions taken to establish the relationship between livelihoods and ecosystems, with emphasis on the benefits they provide: services and functions that are the most important part of the natural capital of our communities.

Capacity building on Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA)

  • The EbA approach oriented the analysis of livelihood vulnerability, the choice of measures of biodiversity use and ecosystem services, showing how they help people and their livelihoods to adapt to the adverse effects of climate change and indicators for monitoring the solution.

Actions in the territory

  • Establishment of 2 community nurseries with a production of 9,226 native plants with which 67.5 ha. of riparian zones were reforested.
  • Participation in the benefits derived from the restoration of riparian zones.
  • Community reforestation in riparian zones contributing to the health, livelihoods and well-being of local communities, taking into account the needs of women and the poor and vulnerable.

Reinforced learning that the vulnerability of livelihoods and the fragility and degradation of local ecosystems and the services and functions they provide are strongly correlated, facilitated understanding of the importance of halting the loss of biodiversity and significantly reducing its degradation and fragmentation and ensuring that these ecosystems continue to provide essential services to contribute to the well-being of the municipality's farming communities.

  • Keep in mind that we work with social-ecological systems, that is, with people and livelihoods linked to goods and services that are necessary to sustain life.
  • Valuing ecosystem services as a tool for adaptation helps to recognize the contribution ecosystems make to human well-being and to understand how they contribute to reducing the consequences of climate change impacts.
  • Although the EbA solution favors communities, it is necessary to establish it as part of a broader adaptation strategy that takes into account that there are social, economic and institutional conditions that exert pressure on municipal social-ecological systems and must therefore be modified to have a real impact on reducing vulnerability.
Capacity building for the mobilization and empowerment of vulnerable groups

The purpose of this block is to generate tools to understand and evaluate the impacts and opportunities that biodiversity and ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change offer in the face of climate change conditions. To this end, three types of training processes were developed:

Valuation of ecosystem services

  • Awareness-raising actions on the role of riparian ecosystem services in reducing the vulnerability of livelihoods to floods.

Increased climate resilience of livelihoods,

  • Workshops for the elaboration of impact chains (community analysis of the vulnerability of their livelihoods).
  • Workshops to define and prioritize actions for adaptation to climate change.
  • Working meetings for the analysis and development of the implementation strategy.

Actions in the territory

  • Training and formation of the AbE Squadron (group of women and men in charge of seed collection, location of sites to be reforested and planning of activities for this purpose).
  • The livelihoods approach made it possible to recognize social, economic and cultural aspects that affect vulnerability to climate change.
  • The community valuation of ecosystem services made it possible to identify their relevance in reducing the vulnerability of livelihoods, making the measure sustainable.
  • The participation of Municipal and Ejido Committees strengthened horizontal and vertical work and collaboration networks.

The recovery of local knowledge, practices and innovations oriented to the management of agricultural-riparian zones in the face of floods (obtained from surveys and analysis of community perceptions) is a fundamental basis for the design, implementation and monitoring of the proposed solution.

A nature-based solution does not neglect the main and most felt problems of the population and municipal livelihoods, with a participatory and gender approach.

The design and implementation process has also been highly participatory. Opportunities for participation have been created for men and women of the Ejido through a capacity building process that integrates community experience, technological know-how and new perspectives on the territory.

Institutional strengthening and governance of natural assets

The purpose of this block was to build an enabling environment for political advocacy in favor of the adaptation of municipal natural and social systems that are vulnerable to current and future climate impacts. To achieve this, two components were worked on:

Enabling conditions

  • Workshops to integrate biodiversity values into climate change adaptation strategies and municipal development planning processes and to reduce socioeconomic and environmental conditions that exacerbate climate impacts.
  • Establishment of agreements and synergies between ejido, municipal, state and federal authorities, as well as education and research centers to support the integration of ecosystem-based adaptation into municipal development planning and improve governance of natural assets.

Coordination mechanisms

Consolidation of horizontal and vertical networks through consultation and working groups that facilitated the development of the adaptation process:

  • The Expert Working Group.
  • The Municipal Adaptation Council
  • The Community Working Group
  • The Peasant Learning Communities

This component is fundamental because it provides legal, technical and programmatic support to the solution, which allows it to be incorporated into municipal planning, to address an area that has not been worked on in the Municipality of Armería: the development of climate action plans, which has allowed the municipal authorities to resume their responsibilities in the area of climate change.

Building an enabling environment for the implementation of climate change adaptation measures requires several components:

  • using scientific knowledge to conduct vulnerability analyses of agriculture to flooding, direct pressures on riparian ecosystems, and providing advice for the development of environmental, social and gender safeguards
  • targeting municipal development goals that may be affected by flooding, integrating adaptation objectives and criteria into municipal planning and budgeting to provide necessary inputs for implementation of the solution
  • Consider ejido and community leaders as key actors in the mediation between municipal authorities and farmers' collectives that contribute to the implementation of the solution.
  • Including the citizen monitoring component allows for the sustainability of the measure and the empathetic and proactive involvement of the communities involved.
Monitoring and Adaptive Management

Regular monitoring of the NEPL NP’s ecotourism program is essential to ensure the conservation objectives as well as continuous visitor satisfaction and therefore the overall project sustainability. The NEPL NP ecotourism program monitors the following information:

  • Wildlife monitoring is adapted to the ecotourism area and incorporates all or some of the following techniques: Camera trapping, GPS recorded all direct/indirect observations, Species recording of direct observations.
  • Financial data is entered in the system for every tour and is analysed on monthly and annual basis
  • Visitor Feedback data is collected from all visitors after every tour and allows to identify and improve tour services at the best delay as well as offers an opportunity to consider new ideas and further improvement needs.
  • Visitor Arrival and Profile is collected from all visitors on every tour and allows to identify the visitor trends and profile and therefore better understand and communicate to the market, as well as identify new opportunities.
  • Data collection forms
  • Wildlife Monitoring systems (direct observations, camera trapping, etc)
  • SMART (Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool)
  • The data collection systems must be simple to use and straight forward,
  • The collected ecotourism data can be useful for the National Park management, especially the wildlife data and law enforcement observations.
Law Enforcement

Two ranger stations are located in the two NEPL NP ecotourism sites. The law enforcement teams in the ecotourism area apprehend illegal activities, protect the tourism infrastructures and contribute data to the Ecotourism Benefit Fund calculation. In addition, the NEPL NP ecotours deliver benefits to the NEPL NP law enforcement program through the following activities: (1) regular presence in NEPL NP, (2) illegal activity identification (3) communication on the protected area's regulations to communities & visitors

  • Mobile ranger teams
  • Law enforcement strategy, financial and human resources
  • Prosecution
  • An active law enforcement presence is essential in wildlife tourism areas, whereas simply developing wildlife tourism does not automatically lead to a reduction of threats or improved levels of wildlife protection.
  • Due to limited financial and human resources, the law enforcement presence might lack to be equally distributed within all the ecotourism area. It may therefore be necessary to incorporate additional monitoring mechanisms that can be equally assessed, for example monitoring community efforts in regards of the land encroachment by comparing the land use plan and the satellite images.
Institutional coordination for scaling up technological processes in family livestock farming.

The Resilient Family Livestock project is the result of an inter-institutional articulation process that includes:

  • First degree family producer organizations (6 Rural Development Societies), second degree (National Commission for Rural Development - CNFR), and third degree of regional coverage (Confederation of Family Producer Organizations of MERCOSUR - COPROFAM).
  • The National Agricultural Research Institute (INIA), a public entity under private law.
  • The Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries (MGAP), a government agency that provided political backing for the development of the action.

This network interacted with other institutions such as the University of the Republic (UDELAR), the Ministry of the Environment (MA), the Uruguayan Agency for International Cooperation (AUCI), IICA and the Delegation of the European Union in Uruguay.

  • Previous CNFR projects with INIA and UDELAR (co-innovation in family production).
  • Existence of validated good livestock practices for family livestock production.
  • Alignment with NDCs (2017): GHG mitigation, adaptation and resilience of livestock systems to climate change.
  • CNFR membership in COPROFAM for scalability of co-innovation and inter-institutional articulation processes in the region.
  • Access to funding sources such as EUROCLIMA+.
  • The development of extension actions with family livestock requires an integral methodological approach such as Co-innovation.
  • The role of producers' organizations is key for the implementation of effective public policies in rural areas.
  • Good livestock practices require long terms to generate results and impacts on family systems.