Certification tools and instruments

Identifying the most appropriate means of assessing the different competences requires the development of a number of assessment ‘instruments’ to provide varied opportunities for competences to be demonstrated. The instruments should be appropriate both for the type of skill or understanding being assessed, and to the level at which the assessment is taking place. The instruments used by WIO-COMPAS are:

  • Application form for initial screening (all Levels)
  • Portfolio of evidence comprising documents produced in the workplace (all Levels)
  • Core Activity Document/Case study (all Levels)
  • Practical demonstration through scenarios (Level 1)
  • Written quiz, based on projected images of key species (Level 1); Written test (Level 2)
  • Face to face interview (Levels 1 and 2); Panel interview (Level 3)

To develop a system and associated ‘tools’ by which the assessed competences can be marked or ‘scored’. In WIO-COMPAS the most important competences carry a weighting of a possible score of 4 points, with the others weighted at 2 points. A score sheet is used for each instrument, and the scores are transferred to an Excel based ‘Candidate Scoring Package’.

  • Developed by team with strong ‘tacit’ understanding of the field at all levels
  • Inclusion of education and assessment specialist
  • Establishment of clear criteria for achievement of certification
  • Recognition of process as essentially a capacity development and enhancement process – for everyone, including those achieving certification

It is critical to recognize the differences in the roles and activities performed at the different levels, and the varying requirements for written and/or oral communication skills at these levels. The instruments must therefore be appropriate to the daily work functions at the various levels. Adequate opportunities must be provided for certification candidates to provide evidence of their competences. One instrument is not enough as this can favour some candidates over others. The key concept is that of ‘evidence’, which the instruments are designed to elicit from candidates. A scoring system is essential, as it provides a rigorous measure of the assessments and of the strength of evidence presented through the various instruments by the candidates. The range statements associated with each competence are vital to ensure consistency in assessment and in scoring of evidence between assessors.

Critical competence requirements

The purpose is to identify the critical competence requirements for effective functioning at all levels. The levels are closely linked having the same competence areas (see below) and with many of the competences within these demonstrating progression in skills and understandings through the levels. Some competences are specific to particular levels. The competences are then used to:

  • Establish benchmarks for operations at the three levels
  • Provide rigorous criteria for professional certification
  • Inform assessment of existing competence and identify competence gaps
  • Inform training and other capacity development intervention needs
  • Certify MPA personnel who meet the competence requirements as MPA–PROs.
  • Inform recruitment, performance review, and promotion processes
  • Establish a career path for MPA personnel
  • Shape the training provided for MPA personnel

The competences are grouped into 7 ‘Competence Areas’:

  1. Policy, Legislation and Compliance
  2. MPA Concept and Establishment
  3. Communication and Stakeholder Engagement
  4. Financial Management and Fundraising
  5. Management Operations
  6. Biophysical and Sociocultural Environment
  7. Leadership, Ethics and Innovation
  • Initial focus on one level
  • Competence lists developed collaboratively involving a range of perspectives: (M)PA management; science; education and assessment
  • Competences grouped into Competence Areas
  • Competences sufficiently generic to be widely applicable
  • Competences at a fairly broad level with each competence encompassing a range of specific skills
  • Competences limited to less than 80 (absolute maximum) to facilitate effective assessment
  • Competences supported by Range Statements indicating the level required and evidence relevant to their assessment

The main lesson is that the identification of the competences must be a collaborative and iterative process. They do not appear overnight, and require consistent focus over a considerable time. The different perspectives are essential, but will pull the process in different directions, with the ultimate outcome inevitably representing something of a compromise. The starting point should probably be the Competence Areas (see the WIO-COMPAS competence lists in the Handbook). The initial focus on one level was a strong feature of the process, avoiding the complication of trying to work at all levels at once. It cannot be stressed too hard that the process of identification of the competences is absolutely central to the whole process, and the competences are the foundation for everything that follows.

Sub-regional Alert Network of focal points
Visits to network members by the focal point of the country for data collection and awareness-raising.
Only available in French. To read this section in French, please download the document "Blue Solution Template in French: ‘AfricaSaw, Réseau d’alerte/sauvegarde du poisson-scie, Afrique de l’Ouest’” from the bottom of this page, under 'Resources'.
Only available in French. To read this section in French, please download the document "Blue Solution Template in French: ‘AfricaSaw, Réseau d’alerte/sauvegarde du poisson-scie, Afrique de l’Ouest’” from the bottom of this page, under 'Resources'.
Raising awareness and promoting effective approaches

Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing is increasingly discussed in international fora and receives increasing attention in the context of fisheries crime and maritime security. However, little is known about real cases of illegal fishing and how resource-poor countries can effectively take action against illegal operators that often work in highly flexible, well-financed networks. FISH-i Africa offers examples of concrete cases of IUU fishing, which can inform about current trends and can shed light on often vague discussions about illegal fishing. FISH-i has also nurtured political champions to elevate the issue in the global arena and to push for policy and regulations that serve the needs of Africa and the developed world. Creating an opportunity for Task Force members to speak for themselves in international meetings has built confidence amongst Task Force members who are now better able to promote actions against IUU fishing both domestically and internationally. In negotiation processes, such as the FAO Committee on Fisheries (COFI), for FISH-i member states to join together as part of an African Group results in increased influence on the agreements made, making them more relevant to the continent’s IUU issues.

Regional Champions are important to rally support for the Task Force both at home and abroad and to communicate the experiences and knowledge of the Task Force. Knowledge of, and access to, policy forums and international events. Evidence based awareness material developed from the experiences and cases of the Task Force.

Communication and raising awareness about illegal fishing cases and the actions that have been taken are important to strengthen the confidence of fisheries enforcement officials and to set disincentives for illegal fishing operators. FISH-i Africa has provided a forum that also allows those actively fighting against illegal fishing in resource-poor developing countries to feed their experiences and knowledge into international processes and to be heard.

 

Communication and policy work takes a lot of the resources that could be otherwise spent on the concrete work on cases of illegal fishing, on research on the patterns and strategies of illegal fishing and on building of methods and tools. Consolidating the African Voice would benefit from stronger regional dialogue (e.g. in regional fisheries bodies or economic communities) that links into the continental process. Synergies between regional and continental policy processes should be strengthened.

Technical support and research
The FISH-i Africa Task Force is facilitated and supported by a Technical Team of operational, legal and analytical experts and institutional partners, such as the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission and the Indian Ocean Commission, that provide the information, skills, networks, experiences and insights required to assist the national enforcement officers of the Task Force. Using advanced satellite technology, vessels are tracked and profiles of the vessels, their fishing activities, their owners and the operation network are analysed. In the case of suspected illegal fishing activities, evidence is gathered and intelligence reports shared with the Task Force. Information is fed into a vessel database that will become a valuable tool for risk assessment, control and enforcement. With limited MCS capacities it is important to focus inspection efforts on vessels identified as high risk. Research on patterns and players of illegal fishing operations, on legal questions, on tools and technology as well as on links to fisheries crime improve the systematic understanding of illegal fishing in the WIO and this information informs future strategies.
An accessible, available and trusted expert Technical Team – that engages through transparent processes and dialogue was essential to provide requested analysis and support. Technical solutions and expertise to build a comprehensive database on vessels operating in the WIO including all relevant information on vessel characteristics, history and ownership and to conduct research on illegal fishing.
The technical expert team provides case-specific direct assistance to Task Force members in the form of legal opinions, investigative support, operational advice, historic analysis of vessels and companies, as well as advice on options for taking action forward. This allows them to do their jobs better and gives them access to support from experts. Challenges: A high level of complexity in cases has been the norm, demanding that integrated intelligence and information, from a range of sources, is gathered and analysed, requiring considerable time and resources. Technical capacity and capability can be an issue, and the integrity of data is reliant on the integrity of the source and reliable inputting of data to systems. The illegal operators have grown wise to e.g. the use of AIS (automatic information system) data and so now turn off their AIS transponders.
Information sharing and regional cooperation

The FISH-i Africa Task Force has routine mechanisms to share information on their flagged and licensed fishing vessels and those active in their fishing zones and ports. They cooperate towards shared objectives, which are to take action against those identified as illegal fishing operators. FISH-i Africa uses an easy-to-use and secured web-based interactive communication platform through which relevant information can be shared in near real-time. This information includes satellite tracking data, vessel information on identity, flags, ownership, fishing activities, networks and trade routes, as well as systematic research on illegal fishing activities. Members can post requests and discuss operational, legal or strategic questions. Dedicated face-to-face meetings at least twice a year enable further discussions, analysis, strategy building and planning, whilst building relationships and trust. At country level further information-sharing and cooperation is needed to turn information and evidence into action. FISH-i Africa supports interagency cooperation between fisheries, port, customs, transport, police, health and other authorities to take effective enforcement action.

Political support from regional champions helped to successfully launch the initiative, maintaining momentum and demonstrating a strong will to bring illegal operators to justice.

 

Cooperation and active participation by all member countries that is based on trust developed over years in the Stop Illegal Fishing working group. An established technical solution for the information sharing platform/mechanism that is populated with information regularly.

Regular communication through the online FISH-i Africa communications platform facilitates rapid information sharing and transparency between Task Force members and regional partners. It also encourages more reticent members to ‘do the right thing’ or to ‘respond’. Most valuable features of FISH-i Africa were the provision of access to information about fishing vessels and licenses from other FISH-i countries; regional cooperation resulting in timely communications; advice provided to support decision making in respect to potential or realised cases and increased awareness about illegal fishing.


Lack of action within the Task Force: at times Task Force members were slow to engage or respond to queries from other Task Force members, due to lack of capacity or specific national concerns, at times slowing down overall progress on potential cases. Conflicts between countries emerged if vessels flagged to FISH-i Africa member countries were involved.

Awareness raising among challenged stakeholders

The challenge of sustainable governance of marine and coastal resources and territories has recently emerged in Mauritania. Definitely there is still a lack of understanding about what is at stake (environmental, social and economic levels). Therefore our programme invests in awareness raising among challenged stakeholders like the civil servants, fishermen, coastal communities, local NGOs… through: (i) production and up keeping of communication tools (flyers, film, posters, websites, social networks, newsletter), (ii) training courses, conferences…

  • Communication represents an important task which has to be taken into account regarding the financial and human resources of the programme
  • The facebook page is a real success
  • Images have more impacts than big reports!
  • It is sometimes difficult to find skilled professionals in communication available in the country
Scientific data for decision making

Implementing a marine spatial planning without knowing territories and resources is meaningless. Major breakthroughs in Mauritanian marine environment knowledge have been made recently that confirm scientific research is highly necessary to set a course towards clean and rich seas. Therefore several tools are necessary to adjust policies to the local context (sea uses regulations, norms and standards…). This is the reason why the programme BOG has supported national stakeholders to consolidate existing knowledge and design research programs to map vulnerable zones. As a result a Maritime Atlas of Vulnerable Sea Areas in Mauritania has been issued in French, Arabic and English. The program also initiated a set of ship-based surveys to assess seabirds and marine mammals off Mauritanian coasts: a key factor to understand and, thus, protect, marine biodiversity. In addition, a monitoring and early warning system for micro-contaminants has been designed and is now operating under the supervision of a coordination of 6 national institutions. Sediments, fish, bivalves, crabs, water are sampled and chemical as well as bioassays and biomarkers analyses were made in order to establish baseline levels of micro-contaminants.

  • Existing capacities among local scientific institutions was a real asset
  • International networking with scientific institutes (increase publication capacity, value local research…)
  • The objectives of the ministry of environment to set up national norms and standards also eased the process
  • English as the international scientific language is a real challenge in such country
  • Technical institutions won’t naturally take the lead for the monitoring and early warning system. The project needs to think of a more workable organization
  • New mission and mandate are not considered as such as soon as financial partners are identified…
  • As a consequence the main lesson learnt: appropriation unfortunately strongly depends on money
Community based approach

Community ‘buy-in’ for restoration activities is especially important in the case of dunes since there are many human threats to dune habitats. Encouraging a sense of ownership within not only the local community, but also the wider beach-going community, is the main strategy being used . This can be achieved through awareness-raising with the objective of socialising the vision for the coastal park, which in turn has the potential to reduce management issues. It is also useful to directly canvas the level of support for proposed interventions, ideally as part of the management planning exercise .

  1. Providing a range of activities to suit different demographics and interest groups. These include different versions of the dune restoration and maintenance activities themselves to suit different ages and abilities (examples include schools, corporate groups, volunteer organisations, and general working bees).
  2. Providing opportunities for groups outside the immediate community to become involved.
  3. Encouraging student and other research into aspects of the project including its effectiveness.

The availability and enthusiasm of volunteers within the community (both individuals and groups) has been important to the project’s success. Overall, the working hypothesis is that a diversity of ‘buy-in points’ will return the best outcomes in terms of a community-based approach. Effective strategies need to provide participation opportunities to suit different groups within the wider community and also address the sustainability of key volunteer inputs. Ensuring that the main organisers are sufficiently resourced, and taking steps to reduce the likelihood of burn-out are both important. Having a succession strategy is another useful idea, and in practice can be achieved by making room for enthusiastic ‘new blood’ whenever the opportunity arises. This has the added benefit of sharing the workload around, and can be useful if opportunities arise to expand the project, in either scope or scale .

Compliance with policy frameworks
National fisheries policy and legislation provide for the participation of fishers in fisheries management regimes, This is consistent with regional and global fisheries policy such as CCRP and SSSF, and promotes the involvement of fishers and their organisations in fisheries governance. Additionally the strategy directions and objectives of potential/realized partners promote effective relationships for capacity building, technical support, and facilitating a seat at the table.
• Existing policy/legal framework. • Organisations with converging interest. • National, regional and global fisheries governance initiatives.
• Focus, effort and teamwork required to benefit from enabling environment. • Awareness of existing realities and environment is importan.