Governance model

The results of the multi-sectorial dialogues are reflected in agreements regarding implementation plans. These agreements form the basis for establishing the model of governance, or in other words the set of formal and informal rules and their enforcement mechanisms. The agreements document the stakeholders’ understandings of the geographical delimitation of the area, its zoning, and the management category. They also establish the steps to be followed in the process for implementing the management areas, such as the consolidation of a governance model through a Local Council, which is a figure that gives legal support composed of diverse representatives.

  • Availability of the representatives of the public sector (SINAC) negotiating teams.
  • Technical and logistical support from the international cooperation.
  • Approach of collaborative facilitation and alternate resolution of conflicts.

Stakeholders are empowered by the process through participation in developing agreements. These agreements are a starting point and not a point of arrival, since they set the stage for future cooperation and implementation. The role of the facilitator and mediator must be neutral and independent, as it is a technical role in organizing social process. Maintaining a single platform of dialogue is important, but with opportunities for the facilitator to meet separately with each sectors. Other sectors not identified at the start in accordance with the development of the process should be included (e.g. semi-industrial fishing).

Multi-sectorial dialogue platform

To promote voluntary participation and to achieve consensus among the key sectors involved, stakeholders including local authorities, fishermen, local residents among others, are identified through a previous mapping of actors. The different sectors then propose their representatives who are formally committed to the process by signing a document. A multi-sectorial dialogue platform is established and the interests of the stakeholders are discussed using an approach of collaborative facilitation and alternative dispute resolution. This platform addresses the issues of geographical delimitation of the management area, and the governance model with roles and responsibilities by sector and areas of use.

  • The process is facilitated by a neutral and recognized mediator in the area.
  • Legitimacy of the process by means of the accreditation of institutional and community representatives.
  • Mapping of actors as preliminary input

The multi-sectorial dialogue platform promotes social cohesion among sectors. This space allows different groups to clarify about what they want and do not want to achieve in the protected area designation process. The team composed of the accredited stakeholders are the leaders of the process. The new communication dynamic created through the dialogues allows past disharmonies to disappear.

Vulnerability and climate risk assessment

The scientific study identifies coastal and marine areas of Costa Rica that are particularly vulnerable to climate change impacts. The vulnerability analysis combined three factors: exposure, potential impacts and the adaptive capacity of communities to respond to these impacts. Through these three factors the climatic threats of sea level rise, atmospheric temperature rise and changes in precipitation patterns were evaluated to identify vulnerability. The analysis supports the prioritization of climate change adaptation actions for protected areas and districts of local communities. These actions include the recovery of key habitats such as riparian forests, mangrove forests, beach terraces and the relocation of touristic trails close to the beach within the protected areas.

  • Available scientific information.
  • Technical and financial support to address the process

Vulnerability to climate change varies widely in the study area and is closely related to human and economic development. The study found that implementation of possible adaptation measures must begin with changes in development patterns and the reduction of existing pressures on the ecosystem, otherwise known as non-climatic threats. The study also found that poor resource extraction practices and the establishment of coastal settlements increase the sensitivity of ecosystems and the exposure of coastal communities.

National protected areas coverage analysis

Three scientific studies provide technical information to identify areas that should be included in the national system of protected areas. An evaluation of marine ecoregions in Mesoamerica was the first step to achieve a marine and coastal biodiversity conservation agenda at the regional level. To meet the targets established for the eco-regional level, gaps in representativeness and integrity for the marine and coastal biodiversity in Costa Rica were identified through a comparison of the national system of marine protected areas with the sites of conservation importance identified during the evaluation. National sites of conservation importance were prioritized in the gap analysis. Additional technical evaluations to elaborate on the state of conservation at a local site level were done. This scientific information helped to build up considerations for local level priorities, and the actual and potential uses along with the use conflicts.

  • Committed International and national NGOs have technical and financial assistance to develop these scientific studies.
  • Costa Rica is a signatory country to international biodiversity conventions and agreements, committing them to increasing conservation measures for sites of biological importance.

The gap analyses for biological conservation are a key element for the prioritization of sites of importance for conservation. The information provided in these studies constitutes a baseline to delve into more specific and local aspects. Scientific information enables informed decision making for increased conservation measures.

Common trust fund monitoring

Two compatible monitoring systems being built track financial resources and conservation impact across regional and national trust funds. Combined, these systems establish a robust M&E framework to measure for impact, organizational learning and donor reporting, using applicable regional indicators.

  • Development of region wide applicable reporting and indicators: Many sources of information and elements for these indicators are already available within and outside the region and would not need to be created in a vacuum.
  • Learn from experiences of similar institutions to establish the appropriate monitoring and evaluation system parameters
Strategic plan and fundraising strategy

Developed and implemented jointly with donors, countries and partners, the strong strategic plan includes:

  1. Consolidating the establishment of the fund's architecture
  2. Opening new thematic windows and attracting new countries to be part of the architecture
  3. Establishing a fundraising strategy
  4. Establishing a marketing and communications plan
  5. Establishing a monitoring and evaluation system
  • Consultations: A thorough consultation process will allow to develop a strong strategic plan for the CBF.
  • Measurable objectives and indicators: The Plan needs to include measurable objectives and indicators in order to assess its effectiveness.
  • It is crucial for the strategic plan to be an inclusive document with ample participation from all stakeholders
Successful trust fund operationalization

Skilled personnel, effective governance and functioning technical systems are essential for successful operation. Key elements to support this include training for National Conservation Trust Funds, staff and board members, establishment of clear accounting systems, operations manuals, learning from best practices, mentoring, and peer exchange.

In this regard, the CBF has established training on its accounting system for its staff. It has also become a member of the Latin American and Caribbean Network of Conservation Trust Funds (RedLAC) to learn from similar institutions.

  • Staffing: Hiring of a highly capable executive director. Additional support staff may also be needed.
  • Office: Set up initial logistical office operations.
  • Board: Establishment and training of the board of directors and executive director.
  • Committees: Establishment of board sub-committees and other advisory committees.
  • Development of an operations manual.
  • Finance and accounting.
  • Mentoring and overall organizational development.
  • Developing all necessary systems (accounting, other operations systems) often takes longer than expected. It is important to establish realistic timelines for establishing a CTFs operation. Tasks for the appropriate set-up of operations multiply quickly.
  • Support from donors and partners; not only in cash, but also in-kind, is key during the initial 1-2 years of operations.
  • Mistakes along the way will occur and it is important to recognize and address these quickly and continue to move forward.
  • It is key essential to have formal and informal advisor and other kinds of technical support. Many other CTF are currently under operation and can provide important insights in this process. RedLAC is a key resource for example.
Independent National Conservation Trust Funds (NCTFs)

CBF endowment proceeds will be channeled through the NCTFs, which in turn will lead the grant-making process for on the ground and water activities. They are governed by majority non-government member boards reflecting a broad range of sectors and interests, and provide grants to both government and civil society.

 

Drawing on internationally recognized standards, the characteristics of NCTFs to be supported by the CBF are:

  • Purpose: Purpose aligned with the purpose of the CBF.
  • Board composition: Broad composition and representation, with majority civil society board membership and no single majority interest group dominating the board.
  • Civil society board members: Board members representing civil society not solely selected by the government.
  • Asset control: Well-designed and independent asset control.
  • Audit requirements: Well-defined annual external audit requirements.
  • Grants: Grant making to government and civil society.
  • Multiple-stakeholder dialogue to guarantee participation of all relevant sectors in governance structures.
  • Clear legal instruments that reflect independent structures and guarantee the rights and responsibilities of the different stakeholders.
  • It is challenging to find the right balance between government and civil society representation in governance structures at the national level. Government actors may feel that majority non-governmental governance structure will exclude them from decision making and civil society may feel that majority government boards will result in inefficient institutions controlled by government.
  • Donors have a strong preference for NCTFs governance that is independent from government control, although government may participate in it.
  • Finding a balance in NCTFs constitutive instruments and other agreements to different points of views, needs and requirements, and reassure all stakeholders that the governance structure and decision making process will be transparent and inclusive is essential.
Government commitment

Governments are key in the success of the regional collaboration. Their political commitment to the Caribbean Challenge Initiative (CCI) Goals has been essential to attract donors to help achieve these goals, including building the finance architecture. Governments participate as observers and/or focal points in regional trust fund board meetings and are also part of the National Conservation Trust Funds (NCTF) boards.

  • Open, transparent and direct dialogue with governments.
  • Identifiable benefits for advancing national and regional conservation priorities.
  • Donor’s and partners’ commitments to provide funds and other technical assistance.
  • Building political commitment is a lengthy process that requires technical and policy inputs at multiple levels in government from technical staff, to middle/senior management positions and the highest levels ministers/heads of governments.
  • Donor’s commitment provides countries with additional security and confidence with regards to their political commitment and knowing that partners are ready to assist.
Marine Spatial Planning

A guided marine spatial planning exercise leads to the development of a multi-use zoning design for the area. This increases the capacity to protect, manage and sustainably use the marine resources. Potential mismatches between the area’s existing jurisdictional (legal-institutional) and geographical (social-ecological) scales requires consideration.

  • Pre-existing cross-scale partnerships (i.e. multi-stakeholder working group) and stakeholder engagement mechanisms for communication and information exchange
  • Academic-NGO partnership to address the mismatch between the existing jurisdictional (legal-institutional) scale and the geographical (social-ecological) scale
  • Collaborative data collection & validation processes supported trust and ownership in MSP information

GIS analyses were useful to determine the spatial allocation of the sea in a way that maximizes societal benefits and mitigates possible conflicts. Although the system was used to support transboundary MSP, inadequate sub-regional governance mechanisms constrain the implementa¬tion of the marine zoning plan by either country. Although framework legislation and national environmental management strategies are in place, formal institutional systems for national and transboundary marine management need to be clearly established. The realisation of effective transboundary cooperation and regional governance is needed to determine the appropriate and feasible institutional arrangements. Likewise, the fostering of environmental political will is essential for the development and implementation of new environmental management policies, plans and institutions.