Setting up procedure for financial contributions for management activities

In order for the NCA CR to be able to pay financial contributions to landowners, it was necessary to clarify compliance with budgetary rules. In order to ensure compliance with the budgetary rules, NCA CR built the entire system from scratch. The first step was to distinguish between commonly assigned management activities in nature conservation and to determine the usual costs for their implementation. Today, the results are unified in a code list of activities in nature conservation linked to costs of common management measures.

The most challanging and the crucial factor is to agree on costs of common management activities (e.g. cost of mowing 1 ha of a meadow, creating 1 m2 of a water pond, etc.) with the Ministry of Environment and with practical land managers.

Once the list of activities and associated costs of common management measures is agreed upon, it is quite easy to make annual updates, the signing of individual contracts is relatively fast and easy and the costs are fully transparent.

Possibilities to pay for land management to the owner from state budget

In order to be able to pay fees for agreed management with landowners, the legislation had to be approved allowing such expenditures from the state budget.

Concluding agreements on land management for nature conservation, and agreements on management in protected areas, and paying a financial contribution for its implementation has been enshrined in the Nature Conservation and Landscape Protection Act since the beginning in 1992. However, the absence of general legislation on the concept of public contracts had long been an obstacle to its application in practice. This legislation was finally approved as the Administrative Procedure Code in 2006.

It has been crucial that such a paragraph in the state legislation exists allowing to use state budget to pay for services associated with the management of naturally valuable areas even on a private land.

Identifying and implementing alternative, income-generating elephant unpalatable crops as soft barriers to subsistence crops

A lot of is still unknown about elephants’ dietary preferences and deterrence crops. To expand our knowledge and create replicable methodologies, we studied elephants’ preferences towards 18 different types of crops, the majority of which are of high combined economic value (food, essential oil, medicinal and bee fodder value) and suitable for growing in Southern African climates. The cafeteria-style experiments allowed us to evaluate several plants that have never been tested in terms of their palatability to elephants. Our results showed that herbs such as borage and rosemary with medicinal and aromatic properties, respectively, were strongly avoided together with bird’s eye chilli (a well-known elephant deterrent crop). We found that lemon grass and sunflowers, presented as whole fresh plants to the elephants, were edible to the elephants. This is surprising, as both plant types have been described as unpalatable to both Asian and African elephants alike.

According to our overall scoring system, four food types proved best suited for the proposed corridor region (Bird’s Eye Chilli, Cape Gold, Cape Snowbush and Rosemary). Of these, only Bird’s Eye Chilli had been tested before. The other three plant types have been used in producing essential oil and hold great promise for income-generation.

  • Approval by relevant animal ethics committees
  • Access to (semi-)habituated, and human-friendly elephants
  • Access to fresh forms of plant crops to be tested
  • Experiments to be carried out by qualified researchers, according to scientifically correct framework & methodology, subject to peer-review before publication
  • Supporting staff and research network

The semi-habituated elephants are intelligent and could easily become bored with the experimental setup. It did help that the set out of the food type sequence was randomised every day. We also learnt that the time of experimentation did have a role to play, thus in the afternoon the elephants seemed more hungry and agreeable to approach and test every experimental food bucket. Filming the entire experiment help with the analyses as data recording on site could become complicated depending on the elephant’s behaviour and the ability to replay the sequence of event was helpful.

Mapping wildlife corridors linking Protected Areas using satellite tracking of elephants

Starting from the knowledge that over 50% of elephant movements are outside of Protected Areas (PAs) and over 75% of elephant populations are transboundary, we used a satellite tracking approach to identify which wildlife corridors are most used by elephants.

 

While our initial plan was to establish a corridor between Gonarezhou (high elephant density) in Zimbabwe with Banhine and/or Zinave National Parks (low elephant density) in Mozambique, insufficient tracking data and reports linking the PAs in these countries (Zimbabwe to Mozambique) to define a conclusive corridor has made us shift our geographical location to Namaacha Valley in southern Mozambique. Here several elephants that we had collared outside of PAs in the hope to find more corridor moving individuals between PAs across southern Mozambique, have defined a vital corridor covering the southern extreme of the KNP, south towards Tembe National Park in South Africa and east towards the Futi corridor and MSR on the coast of Mozambique.

 

The collaring of elephants and analysis of the tracking data have shown us that existing PAs are too small for elephants. Using elephants as the landscape planners for connectivity across national boundaries, enabled us to identify human-elephant conflict hotspots where efforts are most likely to have the largest impact.

  • Sufficient funds to purchase collars and pay for helicopter fees are critical to the success of this part of the strategic plan.
  • Helicopter & pilot availability can be challenging in remote areas.
  • Cooperation from the community on where and when elephants are in the corridor regions.
  • When working in a large Transfrontier Conservation Area, logistical support from partner organisations is key for successful longterm implementation.

We have learnt that corridor moving elephants are wily and are thus not often seen during the day when they can be collared. They have hideouts during the day to avoid conflict with people. We have managed to find suitable study animals by collaring one or more bulls within a group of bachelor bulls close to the border of protected areas or even within protected areas. This has helped us find additional animals when the groups split up over time. Also having a mobile Rapid Response Unit informing us of elephant movements, has helped us supply collars when needed to the Mozambique Wildlife Alliance who can deploy them quickly and efficiently on the ground. Writing ahead of time for funds via grants, has also enabled us to have funds. Expensive helicopter flying time and availability of pilots has remained a challenge.

Crear condiciones habilitantes para la intervención del Mecanismo TDC en las comunidades socias de la Reserva Comunal Yánesha (1)

La cogestión de la RCY en colaboración con la Asociación Nacional de ECA del Perú (ANECAP) apoyaron a las comunidades a lograr las condiciones que les habilitaron para acceder al Mecanismo TDC. Por ejemplo, se elaboraron siete planes de vida y se actualizaron documentos legales y administrativos.

  • Disponibilidad de la cogestión SERNANP-ECA AMARCY para configurar e implementar el modelo de articulación
  • Apoyo financiero y técnico de ANECAP y la ONG Desarrollo Rural Sustentable-DRIS para completar las condiciones normativas y metodológicas del mecanismo
  • La experiencia de la cogestión de la RCY en la gestión de proyectos que implementa como parte de los Lineamientos de sostenibilidad financiera de las Reservas Comunales del Perú, hizo posible que se canalicen fondos para la implementación de las condiciones para acceder al mecanismo TDC
  • Se fortaleció el modelo de cogestión entre el SERNANP-ECA AMARCY. Para el establecimiento de los compromisos del acuerdo tripartito se revisaron las funciones del ECA AMARCY para la gestión de la RCY y con el mecanismo de TDC se planteó implementar acciones de conservación y aprovechamiento sostenible en los territorios titulados de las comunidades, que se encuentran fuera de la RCY, en su Zona de Amortiguamiento y paisaje asociado.
  • Se incrementó el número de comunidades nativas miembros del ECA AMARCY, que se convirtieron en beneficiarias del Mecanismo TDC. Antes de la implementación del acuerdo tripartito, sólo dos comunidades habían aceptado el ingreso del mecanismo, y con la preparación y mediación de la cogestión, en total 9 comunidades nativas Yánesha llegaron a firmar el convenio con el PNCBMCC para acceder al mecanismo TDC.
Monitoring and management recommendations

Based on the results of the various protocols implemented in the Chriopt'îles project, management recommendations were formulated by the GCOI and presented to the TAAF, managers of the Eparses Islands.

Based on acoustic analyses and the hostile environment on Tromelin, the island does not appear to be home to any chiropteran species. No recommendations for management or further study are envisaged.

Despite the absence of chiropteran sounds in Europa's acoustic analyses, its history and local context suggest that chiropterans could still be present. It is planned to re-deploy the passive listening protocol over periods based on the dates of historical observations. Management recommendations will be made following this research.

2 species of chiropteran have been recorded on Grande Glorieuse, including the Taphien de Maurice and an undetermined species. The renewal of the passive acoustic protocol is envisaged in order to improve knowledge of the occupation of the territory by these species. Monthly visual monitoring of the coconut grove at the life base is also envisaged. The management of invasive exotic species on Filaos or Coconut trees must take into account the presence of these two species.

  • Obtain representative results from the various protocols implemented

  • Organization of a meeting during the project with the TAAF to discuss feasibility, technical, logistical and human constraints relating to the recommendations.

  • Organization of a feedback meeting with the Prefect of the TAAF, Mrs. Florence JEANBLANC-RISLER, to present the established recommendations.

  • TAAF welcomed and approved the management recommendations.

  • Willingness of both parties (GCOI and TAAF) to continue the partnership by considering a follow-up to the project.

  • Establishment of a working partnership between GCOI and TAAF

  • Development of management recommendations for each of the islands studied, based on the overall results of the project.

  • Willingness to pursue the acquisition of knowledge concerning the chiropteran assemblages present in the Eparses islands.

Field mission to Grande Glorieuse

During a 14-day field mission on the island of Grande Glorieuse, the GCOI's scientific coordinator deployed three different scientific protocols aimed at improving knowledge of the island's potential chiropteran species, and in particular of the Mauritian Taphien, whose presence has been confirmed.

The first phase involved active acoustic transects across the entire island, to identify areas frequented by the Mauritius Taphenid and any other bat species. Based on the results of this listening, visual surveys were carried out in frequented areas (notably coconut groves) to identify roosting areas and assess the numbers of the Mauritius Taphenid population. Capture sessions were then carried out in these roosting areas to collect genetic samples from the Mauritius taphid individuals captured. Subsequent genetic studies will be carried out on these samples, in partnership with PIMIT, to improve our knowledge of the species' biogeographical distribution and assess the potential role of Grande Glorieuse in this.

  • Have obtained authorization to access Grande Glorieuse via a scientific campaign

  • To have obtained a place for a round trip on the FAZSOI's means of transport

  • Have provided a complete and correct medical file from the operator to the TAAF

  • Have been able to adapt to the logistical constraints imposed by the FAZSOI to carry out rotations to and from the Eparses Islands

  • Adapted to the island's meteorological constraints and, despite this, met all the planned objectives.

  • Established a partnership with PIMIT

  • Census of the Taphien de Maurice only, by active listening

  • Identification of areas frequented by the Taphien de Maurice

  • Identification of an area used by the Taphien de Maurice (on the base, in a coconut grove with 209 coconut trees).

  • Estimated population size at 10 individuals, including a non-flying juvenile

  • Discovery that the Mauritius Taphenid population is breeding on the island.

  • Capture of 9 individuals, 7 different, 4 females and 3 males

  • Collection of 7 genetic, salivary and faecal samples for subsequent analysis

  • Biometric measurements taken on all captured individuals

  • Future genetic analyses to provide information on the global range of the Mauritius Taphenid.

Passive acoustic listening protocol

On each island concerned by the project, 2 SongMeter mini bat ultrasonic recorders were deployed during 2 listening sessions by 7 agents from the Terres australes et antarctiques françaises, previously trained by the GCOI in their use. The two listening sessions took place in winter (December-January) and austral summer (July-August), based on knowledge of the Taphien of Mauritius. Positioned for 5 nights, in 4 pre-selected habitat types, 20 listening nights per recorder and per session were recorded. In all, 240 listening nights were recorded on all the islands.

Sampling plans were based on data on the different types of environment present on the three islands, supplied by the Conservatoire Botanique National de Mascarin.

Once the recordings had been retrieved, the data were processed using a fixed-point protocol derived from the VigieChiro system managed by the Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle in Paris, enabling the chiropteran species recorded in the sound files to be determined. Once the sounds had been processed automatically, a manual acoustic analysis was carried out by GCOI employees to identify any species not detected by the software.

  • Training of TAAF agents by the GCOI in the use of recorders

  • Involvement and autonomy of TAAF agents in setting up the protocol

  • Cooperation with CBNM to provide data on the types of environment on each island studied.

  • Cooperation with MNHN to adapt the fixed-point protocol to a study area other than metropolitan France

  • Involvement of GCOI employees in sound processing and analysis, and in drawing up management recommendations adapted to the results of the study.

  • Presence of two chiropteran species on Grande Glorieuse

  • No chiropterans on Tromelin

  • Doubt as to the presence or absence of chiropterans on Europa

  • Good partnerships with TAAF, CBNM and MNHN

The Eparses Islands, a unique study area

Since 2005, the TAAF has managed the Éparses islands, comprising the Glorieuses archipelago, Juan de Nova, Tromelin, Europa and Bassas de India. Most of these islands are located in the Mozambique Channel, with the exception of Tromelin, north of Reunion Island.

Despite a small total land area (43 km²), the total waters under French jurisdiction linked to these islands represent 6% of French maritime territory.

These islands are part of the Madagascar and Indian Ocean Islands Biodiversity Hotspot, a regionally recognized natural heritage; they are included in 4 of the 320 Ecologically and Biologically Significant Marine Areas identified by the Convention on Biological Diversity; they are recognized as Key Biodiversity Areas by the IUCN; and some are recognized as Important Bird Areas by BirdLife International.

Despite the permanent presence of TAAF environmental officers on these islands, no studies had been carried out on chiropterans prior to the Chiropt'îles project. Only a few mentions of bats (genus Mops sp, Taphien de Maurice) have been recorded on the islands of Grande Glorieuse, Europa and Juan de Nova.

  • Establishment of a partnership between GCOI and TAAF
  • Definition of project objectives in consultation with TAAF and MNHN
  • Collection of previous records of bats in the Eparses Islands
  • Definition of protocols to be implemented, adaptable to each island studied and to logistical resources
  • Improving knowledge of biodiversity on the islands of Tromelin, Grande Glorieuse and Europa
  • First partnership between TAAF and GCOI
  • Opportunity to communicate the results of the study
Effective communication

Effective communication is an important aspect of the IMET assessment. Of course, effective communication between the project implementers and other stakeholders, including the funding institution(s), is needed during project development and implementation. However, in the IMET assessment, it is critical that the results of the assessment are effectively communicated to stakeholders. The stakeholders include those involved in the assessment and others who may not have participated. In our case, we organised an information sharing event at the national level to which different national stakeholders were invited. In addition to the presentations made at this event, information packs providing an analysis of the IMET results were shared with all participants. We also developed a summary results banner that was later deposited (and still is) at our project office. It is the first thing anyone sees when they walk into our office. We also developed simplified brochures in three local languages for community stakeholders.

A simple communication strategy was included in the project design. It detailed how results would be shared with stakeholders of different backgrounds.

To effectively communicate, we must acknowledge that we all perceive things differently. As a result, understanding others' social context must serve as a guide for our interactions with them, and we must use this understanding to choose the best means of communication. The methods you use to approach learned people or technocrats may not work for local communities. For instance, we found out that our local communities could not interpret the indices shown in our analysis report because, in their context, percentages did not mean anything. We therefore translated the indices into simplified explanations that they would make sense of.