Management and organisational structure of MSPs

The organisational structure of the MSP can vary according to the agreed governance framework, but a common set-up includes a governance body and several working groups. The governance body usually comprises a chair and co-chairs, and a limited amount of members which should represent the stakeholder groups engaged in the MSP. The positions can be appointed from within the membership of the MSP and should be rotated from time to time.

The task of the governance body is the general steering and successful operation of the MSP, and it accounts for its strategic evolution. It also oversees the working groups, reviews strategic plans, and ensures the engagement of stakeholders. Moreover, it is responsible for the continuous collaboration between the platform and the government, especially in terms of policy formulation. The governance body should meet regularly, e.g. twice per year.

Another important position closely linked to the governance body is the secretariat. Responsibilities and tasks of the secretariat can be supporting the governance body in its mandate, facilitating meetings and workshops of the MSP, the communication within the platform, and the development of a sustainability plan.

The working groups work on specific topics that are of importance for the MSP, which could be fingerling production, fish trade, or fisheries management and conservation. Membership in the groups is usually voluntary, but members should preferably have a certain expertise regarding the specific topics they work on. The respective groups report to the governance body, give recommendations, contribute to formulating policies, and assist with technical matters. They should also meet on a regular basis (depending on the urgency of the topic and desired results it could be between three to six times per year). 

Other organisational components in MSPs can be established, e.g. general assemblies, or a specific voting system for decision-making. The exact structures, roles, tasks, and processes are stated in the governance framework. In any case, the principals of participatory governance, inclusivity, and equity of the different stakeholders as well as transparency should always be incorporated to respect the integrative and transparent nature of MSPs. 

Clear and effective communication is another vital aspect for the successful functioning of the MSP. Internal communication among stakeholders – usually facilitated through the secretariat – ensures that everyone is well informed and engaged. External communication and outreach efforts help to convey objectives, outcomes, and benefits of the MSP to the broader community, potential partners and funders. 
 

This building block regards the management and organisational structure of MSPs after the establishment is concluded. The in the building blocks before mentioned steps are to be finished first.

A potential risk that should be avoided is the occurrence of conflicting interests due to the wide array of stakeholders engaged. This can slow down consensus building and the joint decision-making. Striking a balance between inclusivity and efficiency is a continual challenge.

Development of work plan & funding

Once roles and responsibilities are allocated, a work plan can be developed, defining concrete steps needed to achieve the MSP’s objectives. The work plan is typically developed collaboratively with input from all stakeholders to ensure that activities are aligned with the platform’s goals and objectives. Clear activities, timelines, and resources should be outlined in the plan. In this step the crucial aspect of funding is addressed as well. Necessary funds and ways to obtain them are elaborated to ensure the smooth implementation of the activities and the overall operation of the MSP. There are several ways how financial resources can be secured, such as through contributions of MSP members, grants and donations, or funding through the government. 
 

As explained in the buidling blocks before, stakeholder mapping for stakeholder identification, consenus-building, shared ownership and a common vision for the future as well as the establishment of a  governance framework are necessary steps before the work plan can be developed. Funding can potentially be discussed and regarded from the beginning of the MSP approach on.

Flexibility is  a critical factor MSPs should endeavour in order to adapt to evolving sectoral priorities as well as to stakeholder dynamics. Therefore, the platform should be capable and open to react to changes and new information and accordingly revise its strategy and work plan or include emerging stakeholders. This can be achieved through regular evaluations and adjustments – also regarding the general MSP performance – which contributes to the achievement of its mission.

Another important aspect for successful implementation of this approach is the promotion and coordination of research and data collection through the MSP with the goal of ensuring evidence-based decision-making and strategies, and to remain the MSP effective in its mission. One example is a feasibility study on authorizing catch and release during the fish ban, aimed at establishing a peak period for tourism. Catch and release is a key activity in tourism, and this study seeks to harmonize evidence-based legislation between tourism and fisheries.

Identifying sustainable funding sources or mechanisms is essential for the long-term viability of MSP, because without adequate financial support, the platform will struggle to maintain its activities. Considering this aspect already in the planning and formation phase of the MSP avoids problems later, especially when the platform is initiated with the financial support of donors that have only limited time and resources for the facilitation. 
 

Development of governance framework

Another crucial step in the formation is the development of a governance framework that builds the core of the MSP. It defines the rules of operation, roles, and responsibilities of participating stakeholders. This also includes the appointment of leadership positions within the MSP steering- and implementation structure. The stakeholders should work together to draft governance documents that outline these aspects, in order to ensure wide acceptance for these documents. The governance framework ensures that the MSP operates efficiently and that decision-making processes are clear and transparent with mechanisms for dispute resolution and conflict management in place. 
 

As explained in the buidling blocks before, stakeholder mapping for stakeholder identification, consenus-building, shared ownership as well as a common vision for the future are necessary steps before a governance framework can be established.

Establishing a system that maintains transparency and trust among stakeholders is a fundamental prerequisite and the basis of effective collaboration. Transparency can be achieved through open communication and honest sharing of information among the stakeholders. Open communication together with holding stakeholders accountable for their commitments as anchored in the governance framework helps to build trust.

For the successful establishment and management of MSPs, it is also important to consider potential internal risks that exist. One of them being the dominance of powerful stakeholders which marginalizes the voices of smaller or less influential groups. This highlights the importance to implement mechanisms that ensure power balance, especially when developing the governance framework. The rotation of leadership positions and equal say for all members regardless of their size or lobbying power are two possible ways of addressing this. 

Consensus-building

After the stakeholders have been mapped, they are brought together to find common grounds and build consensus. During engagement meetings, which can be facilitated by a moderator of a neutral third party, the stakeholders cooperatively identify and discuss joint challenges, define shared objectives, and formulate a common vision that should align with national and global agendas. These collective discussions ensure the inclusion of the different perspectives in the strategic and content-related orientation of the MSP. The creation of a shared vision and joint goals help to align efforts, create ownership, and maintain momentum amongst the members. 
 

The Stakeholder mapping is a vital first step before the consensus-buidling. It is a vital tool to identify relevant stakeholders for the MSPs objectives. In the fisheries and aquaculture sector, many stakeholders are directly and inidrectly connected to the fish value chain and some could be overseen quickly. But effective measures first require comprehensive representation and collaboration between all stakeholders.

As MSPs have the long-term purpose of sectoral improvement, members need to recognize that meaningful change may take time and requires sustained efforts. Developing and communicating a clear joint vision helps to keep stakeholders committed to the set goals over the long haul. In terms of communication, the development and sharing of a clear strategy to all new members helps to facilitate communication inside and outside the MSP. 

In addition, creating ownership through the allocation of responsibilities keeps stakeholders engaged and should be considered as an essential aspect in terms of sustainability. 

Stakeholder mapping

To ensure comprehensive representation, stakeholder groups and actors that are directly and indirectly connected to fisheries and aquaculture have to be mapped. This can be done through workshops where key stakeholders, in the case of aquaculture, e.g. the responsible ministry and fish farmer associations, jointly identify other relevant stakeholders. Due to different constellation in each country, stakeholder types can vary. In the case of fisheries and aquaculture, general key stakeholder groups and actors that are involved are:

  • Public sector: ministries and departments responsible for fisheries and aquaculture and, potentially, other governmental bodies that are connected to the sector, e.g. dealing with forestry, water, or agriculture;
  • Private sector: various actors including small scale fishers and fish farmers, large scale operators and companies, as well as actors along the value chain, operating in e.g. feed and gear production, fish processing, transportation, or marketing;
  • Agriculture farmers having impact on water quality and use;
  • Other user of water bodies related to aquaculture and fisheries;
  • Civil society organisations and the media;
  • Cooperating partners: international and national development agencies, international organisations (e.g. FAO, World Bank, WorldFish, WWF, etc.), and development banks;
  • Academia and research: universities and research institutions;
  • Traditional leaders, indigenous communities, and community members; and
  • Conservation groups: agencies working in environmental protection and conservation.
     

To address the issues and challenges descriped before and to foster sustainable management, a holistic and integrative approach regarding the different actors involved is needed. The participants of the MSPs should therefore not be one sided but integrate as many actors of the fish value chain and their different perspectives as possible. This guarantees a better understanding of underlying problems and helps to identify appropiate solutions and measures that are supported by all actors.

Establishing a system that maintains transparency and trust among stakeholders is a fundamental prerequisite and the basis of effective collaboration. Transparency can be achieved through open communication and honest sharing of information among the stakeholders. This should be regarded from the beginning of the MSP implementation process on. See also the upcoming steps to anchor open communication into the governance framework.

Due to the dominance of some powerful stakeholders, other stakeholders could be marginalized. Nevertheless, all stakeholders should be contacted and be given the opportunity to collaborate in the MSP. Later on, especially in the delevopment of the governance framework, mechanisms to ensure power balance need to be implemented to avoid the risk of the dominance of single stakeholders in the MSP.

Strengthen publicity and guidance, and develop green industries

 Enhance publicity and guidance to elevate public awareness of wildlife protection. The Dalaoling Reserve prioritizes ongoing public engagement, frequently organizing nature education activities centered on wildlife conservation, particularly during significant events such as National Ecology Day. Additionally, the short video footage of forest musk deer captured by infrared cameras has been featured multiple times on CCTV's "The Eye of the Secret Environment," achieving commendable results in science popularization and significantly enhancing public awareness of forest musk deer conservation.
Develop green industries and encourage surrounding villagers to join the protection army. With good mountains and good water as the medium, the green development model of "tea - fruit - bee - wine" is constructed for Qianjinyuan Village, and the rural green industry chain is created. To promote the development of the bird-watching industry around Dalaoling, attracting more than 400 bird watchers from outside to watch birds in the Dalaoling Reserve every year, creating an average economic income of more than 100,000 yuan for local farmers. Assisted in the establishment of the Dalaoling Forest Health Association, promoted the development of the surrounding farm music industry, and increased the average household income of nearly 20,000 yuan in 2024, so that villagers can change the tradition of relying on natural resources as the main economic source, serve the "green bowl" at the door, eat the "ecological meal", and join the wild resources "protection group".

1.Enhance publicity and guidance to elevate public awareness of wildlife protection;

2.Develop green industries and encourage surrounding villagers to join the protection army. 

1. Publicity should be carried out through multiple channels and methods;

2. The development of industries should be adapted to local conditions, and the enthusiasm the villagers should be stimulated.

Strengthen cooperation in scientific research and continue to carry out scientific research monitoring

Strengthen cooperation in scientific research and continue to carry out scientific research monitoring. The application of infrared cameras and other modern monitoring technology for research, in-depth understanding of forest musk deer habits and survival methods, in-depth cooperation with the Three Gorges University, the Chinese Academy of Forestry and other scientific research institutions, with the help of professional forces to improve the level of protection, jointly carried out forest musk deer protection research. More than 160 cameras have been continuously deployed in Dalaoling Reserve for more than 7 years, and the population dynamics and habitat distribution of forest musk deer have been obtained in real time, so as to strengthen the protection of forest musk deer activity sites and reduce the corresponding human interference.

1.Continue to carry out field monitoring;
2.Strengthen cooperation with universities.

1.Monitoring equipment should be updated in time; 
2. The professional level of monitoring personnel should be continuously improved.

Improve infrastructure,strengthen patrol and management.

   To enhance economic investment in forest fire prevention, the Dalaoling Protected Area has implemented comprehensive infrastructure improvements. Specifically, the protected area is equipped with three management stations, seven business management offices, one forest fire command center, two sets of forest fire monitoring and early warning systems, 32 surveillance cameras, nine patrol vehicles, two fire engines, nine drones, and 60 patrol terminals. These measures have enabled the reserve to achieve 54 consecutive years without major fires, thereby ensuring the safety of the forest musk deer habitat.

Strengthen patrol and improve the management level of forest resources. The forest musk deer habitat is included in the scope of public service forest protection, and strict protection is implemented. The forest chief system is the general starting point of Dalaoling Reserve, the responsibilities of forest chief are strengthened, the co-construction and co-management mechanism is established with 11 villages and 5 townships around it, and a new model of co-construction and co-management of double forest chiefs of protected areas and townships is explored, and 30 forest chiefs are set up at three levels: bureau, station and plot. Every year, we regularly hold forest ministers' coordination meetings on resource protection, forest fire prevention, and special actions to solve the problems of resource protection and people's livelihood development. Employ more than 20 full-time conservators, and regularly carry out various activities such as fire prevention publicity and education vehicle dispatch, household distribution of various publicity materials, hanging fire prevention publicity banners and colored flags, to protect the living environment of forest musk deer and other wild animals.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

  1. Funding support and technological investment; 
  2. equipment renewal and improvement;
  3. Establish a co-construction and co-management mechanism with the surrounding community;
  4. Strengthen joint law enforcement and severely crack down on illegal hunting and poaching.

1.1. Forest fire prevention is everyone's responsibility, and special groups should be properly managed; 

2. Increase the ways to increase villagers' income and reduce dependence on natural resources.

Presentation of results

Following from the six monitoring methods, six databases were also created to collect and analyse the data from these activities. The results have been written up into formal reports in English and Portuguese and shared with the national government. 

Each of the three fieldwork coordinators responsible for the data collection, processing and analysis of the data presented the results to other NGOs, the ministry of environment, Câmara Municipal Boa Vista (CMBV) (town council), Society of Tourism Development in Boa Vista and Maio (STDIBVM), Varandinha Association, Port Maritime Institute (IMP) and National Police including Maritime Police 

We are also hoping to submit the data collected during this project to be published in national scientific journals. 

Cooperation of the stakeholders.

Detailed and through databases produced by Dr Dario Cesarini with formulars for automatic calculation of indicators. 

Division of workload.

Sharing data allows for constructive feedback to be given to improve methods in the future. It also brings more meaning to the work and data colelction that was implemented over many months.

Nature reserve creation

This programme aims to go beyond traditional habitat restoration and will work to establish entirely new woodlands across eligible sites totalling at least 1,755 hectares. Aviva’s £38m donation is allowing local Wildlife Trusts to purchase, or long-term lease available land, and then establish rainforest and manage that land in perpetuity. Local Wildlife Trusts are leading on their own sites and projects, with direct support from the programme team operating from the central charity, the Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts, and input from their communities. New sites will be seen as a win for conservation and as important hubs for collaboration with local communities including educational opportunities. Local Wildlife Trusts will actively involve communities through planting days, volunteering opportunities, drop-in sessions, and guided walks.