Livelihood focus

The community members developed their vision journeys to systematically track use of the benfits. This allowed members to use the proceeds for their desired purposes. For example building decent houses

Extnsion workers assisting community on visioning

 

 

Prior formaulation of Vision journeys ensure community achieve desired goals

Community monitoring of individual performance encourages members

Clan approach

 To prevent conflict the community divided itself into clans. Each clan manages its portion of the plantation. The heads of the clans comprise the executive committee.  The community uses unform work plan to emsure activities are done timely. The approach has led zero conflicts and smooth running of the plantation business. 

Social cohesion

existing relationships

Caln approach reduces conflicts among community memebrs on a common resource

Reliance on fellow relations leading to continuity of the activities

 

Empowerment of all actors involved is key

The success of forest management and restoration efforts has also hinged on the knowledge and skills acquired by the local forest organizations such as Village Natural Resources Management Committees. This has enabled the committee members to successfully implement ANR and fire prevention activities while adhering to good leadership skills to allow increased participation in restoration activities.

Community empowerment is a key enabling factor to consider within this building block because activities being implemented by the community members are as a result of the trainings/capacity building efforts by committed extension workers and other community leaders

  1. Training acts as an incentive for communities to participate in restoration efforts because  the knowledge gained is applied on their land.
Strong leadership and partnerships key to restoration

Forest landscape restoration efforts require a willing and enthusiastic social system led by Traditional Leaders who are traditionally custodians of customary land. The success of this solution has largely hinged on strong leadership and partnerships within. 

  1. Community Participation is a key enabling factor that is required for meaningful progress in the activities that are happening in the community. This is because without active participation they will not be any progress.
  2. The political environment also plays a part in enabling restoration. Political leadership that provides guidance to communities for sustainable management of forest resources is always preferred. 
  1. Community Expectations. It is very important to manage the community's expectations through most activities concerning natural resource management. Most communities expect immediate results when it comes to working on forestry restoration and this presents a problem where they can get discouraged like some community members not participating in the activities.
  2. Partnership is Key. For a smooth process of activities, the partnership is key between community members, government officials as well as Non-governmental organisations. It defines the roles to be played by all stakeholders
  3. Leadership. Leadership determines the type of natural resources governance. Strong community leadership has been found to contribute to the better management of forests.
  4. Youth participation is key. In order to have sustainable development, youth involvement is key since youth are the leaders of tomorrow. 
Accountability is key to governance and management

In an effort to promote improved governance and management, the DoF and MCHF supported the development of a tripartite forest co-management agreement between the DoF, the District Council, and the local communities (represented by the TAs). Roles and responsibilities--including specific roles and commitments from supporting actors (including Malawi Police Service, Ministry of Justice, etc.) help stakeholders to hold one another accountable.

The forest-co-management agreement has been informed by a forest management plan, developed with data from the NFI and from a series of community consultations. This also resulted ion the identification and prioritization of degradation/restoration hotspots.

Evidence of implementation is important to incentivize and motivate partners to continue investing in forest co-management

Capitalizing on strong local leadership and partnerships with government and others

The following building blocks have contributed to the success of the restoration realized to date.

  1. Strong local leadership:  Strong leadership by the Traditional Authorities and local committees facilitated participation, engagement, and buy-in.
  2. Partnership with government departments: The GoM delivers timely training and support
  3. Partnership with local and international NGOs.

The organization supported beneficiaries with resources including data, training/capacity building, and in some cases tools. 

The factors that enabled success to date included building on the recognition that local leaders are the most trusted agents of development. Without the buy-in and strong leadership of the Traditional Authority (and his Group Village Headmen), getting the buy-in of the communities would have been extremely difficult, if not impossible.

Lessons learned to date include:

  1. Information, awareness, and advocacy are critical to community-led problem identification and problem-solving, and are prerequisites to community participation in "solutions".
  2. Community participation in development work results in less costs in the implementation of activities.
  3. Partnerships and collaboration with District Council and the Area Development Committee, and with non-governmental organizations are key to sourcing required technical support e.g., ANR and firebreak construction.
- Enforcement and prosecution

This block is very crucial because it ensures that there is law and order in the communities. It involves setting up by-laws that guide in implementing the project initiative. It also involves putting penalties against particular illegal activities, e.g. cutting trees without permission. These laws are better enforced when the communities make them on their own while facilitated by the extension worker.

Enabling factors include: involvement of traditional leaders and also making the laws by the whole community at large.

We learned that stiff penalties for offenders were necessary to deter others from committing similar offenses. 

- education, training and other capacity development activities

The purpose of this block is to ensure that the communities have the appropriate knowledge and expertise about that particular project initiative so that it is sustained in the long run after the project phases out. It involves field training and setting up demonstration fields that are used as learning points for the communities. This way, it is easy for communities to engage in an initiative that has worked right in their community.

  1. Availability of funds to purchase training materials and refreshments for community meetings.
  2. Ability of communities to change mindset towards particular interventions.
  3. Well-trained facilitators.

We learnt that the government staff already available in the Extension Planning Areas were the appropriate facilitators for certain activities. Their involvement also facilitated continued monitoring of activities long after the project phases out

- Alliance and partnerships development

This is a very crucial parameter because it involves bringing together at least 2 institutions to work towards achieving one goal of the project. Each organization has different roles and activities but these different roles are aimed at achieving the same goals.

  1. Frequent stakeholder meetings
  2. Openness and willingness to share ideas
  3. Putting in place plans of operations

In implementing this block it was discovered that impact was huge because there was much focus on every activity being done. This was due to the fact that each institution has its roles clearly defined. The sharing of roles removed pressure from the other implementing partner. But we also learnt that lack of frequent meetings to share ideas resulted in poor service delivery.

Preparatory meeting, mobilization of the community and implementation

Prior community meetings were organized in the neighbouring village to raise awareness about the importance of mangrove restoration. During these meetings, the community was informed of the principles of the resoration method and the steps involved. Since mangrove restoration does not require any particular technical expertise (know-how), the entire community was targeted (women, men and youth) and mobilized for further actions. Furthermore, local authorities, state technical services, as well as administrative authorities were also involved, so that the method could easily be replicated elsewhere.

In-depth discussions with the local community and technical experts were crucial for a suitable design of the channel system in this area. The channel was dug according to the local topographic context, i.e. depth of the channel, angle of channel site, length, starting point, etc.

 

(1) 50 members of the local community were mobilized to dig the channel; (2) An area of 40 ha of degraded mangroves was identified (3) A channel system with a total length of 2200 m was dug to promote the natural recolonization in the degraded areas.

To motivate the different community groups (women, men and youth) for the restoration work, their interests must be considered. Furthermore, their future benefits (ecosystem goods and services) must be discussed in an understandable and participatory way. This, most importantly, includes food security and income generation.