Partnership approach to monitoring

Monitoring programs provide ongoing information on the state of the marine resources that can be used for adaptive management, to assist in prioritizing monitoring and research activities, and to inform management decisions. Populations of key conservation species were monitored to assess the success of MPAs, e.g. coral reef fish larvae have been monitored to determine the connectivity among protected areas of the MAR. Also, the baseline for mangrove and sea grass cover was established in the four protected areas. The resulting datasets and subsequent analyses provide essential information to inform adaptive management strategies and assess the management effectiveness of the marine protected area. The monitoring programs also included capacity building activities for staff, rangers and community members to conduct research and monitoring as well as to improve support for conservation activities.

  • Technical assistance
  • Community interested in getting to learn from the natural resources
  • The energy and enthusiasm of a young group of people, even without any high studies, can generate very interesting information
Coordinated monitoring of protected areas

To ensure that the conservation values of the protected area are effectively protected, interested community members are trained in monitoring of trends in fish and invertebrate populations using standardized techniques. Selection of trainees and implementation of continuous monitoring are done in coordination with the community’s management committee.

  • Good partnership between LLCTC and the management committee
  • Support of the community and the management committee

It is important to encourage and support the management committee to play an active role in the management of the conservation areas. They often rely heavily on direction from the LLCTC, and even external partners such as The Nature Conservancy, rather than leading their own planning with targeted and needs-based LLCTC support. Management will never be self-sustaining until the communities no longer require external assistance. This understanding needs strengthening as this is the anticipated way forward for the sites under the Lauru PAN.

In-Water Monitoring
Consistent use of tangle-nets, visual surveys, and hand captures provide valuable insights to hawksbill turtle biology, life history, residency times, growth rates, and dietary requirements of hawksbill turtles, as well as connectivity between nesting and foraging areas.
• Ability to work with local partners to secure transportation for cruises. • Advanced geo-positioning technology and field scientific equipment has enabled more sophisticated research.
• Challenges associated with reconciling U.S. organizational policies regarding accounting procedures and insurance requirements with on-the-ground logistics and the provision of services to facilitate in-water monitoring.
Continuous monitoring

In order to ensure that the scenery values of the area are effectively protected, interested community members are trained in monitoring of scenery values using standardized techniques. Selection of trainees and implementation of continuous monitoring are done in coordination with the community.

  • Community support - Involvement of local communities
  • Conditions for adoption elsewhere.
  • Participatory process involving managers and experts.
  • It is important to encourage and support the community to play an active role in the management of the coastal scenery.
  • Management of coastal scenery will never be self-sustaining until the communities no longer require external assistance.
Breakwater monitoring and maintenance

A monitoring system is used to measure sediment accretion, and to monitor the condition of the T-fences. In addition, natural regeneration of mangroves is monitored. During the first year after construction, functionality of the T-fences should be ensured through monthly visual inspections and maintenance where necessary. After one year, visual inspections and maintenance should be carried out at least after the end of every storm season. In addition, seasonal GPS surveys of the shore line at low tide can be used to see whether the T-fences have impacts on the shape of the coastline nearby. The natural regeneration of mangroves is documented by recording species, size and density or through fixed-point photos. The latter can also be used as a simple alternative for GPS shore line surveys.

  • Know-how and manpower for regular surveys (data collection for monitoring) and routine visual construction inspections. 
  • Benchmark poles for recording vertical accretion at several transects. 
  • Fixed point photos are an easy to use tool to monitor mangrove regeneration and shoreline changes. 
  • Measurements of sediment consolidation (mud-density).
  • GPS survey equipment and know-how for long-term surveillance.

A standardized monitoring system for the condition of breakwaters, accretion of sediments and natural regeneration of mangroves is crucial for measuring the long-term success of T-fences. The need for maintenance and repair works may vary considerably between sites. Long-term surveillance based on GPS surveys must include neighbouring areas to discover possible negative side effects of T-fences (down drift erosion). It is important to realize that once floodplains are restored and an appropriate mangrove cover is in place, mangrove protection measures must be implemented to ensure sustainability of coastal protection. Once the mangrove forest is fully established, the breakwater construction is no longer needed. This process may take several years.

Pluralistic governance board

A pluralistic governance board is typically composed of representatives from local authorities, government departments and agencies, local communities and sometimes business organisations and is established during a negotiation process. The board is responsible for making joint decisions about issues raised regarding natural resource conservation. Its role is steering the implementation of the co-management agreement and review of the co-management results and impacts based on monitoring. The pluralistic governance board is an essential element to turn the idea of "sharing power" from theory into practice. This distinguishes it from centralized or private management where only one partner assumes the responsibility for making decisions.

  • The authorities should be committed to co-management partnerships.
  • Communities should have the capacity for making joint decisions. It could be done through practices of participatory action researches with different community groups.
  • The political system of the country should allow shared governance or allow grassroot discussions of issues related to natural resource management.

In order for the pluralistic governance board to effectively make joint decisions, it is important for all stakeholders involved to understand the need for a co-management partnership. For example, authorities should treat communities as equal and strategic partners and vice versa. Co-management will normally yield best results if the involvement of all in the partnership is voluntarily. However, in some situations where power also means money, political supports from higher levels or national policies promoting the practice of sharing power among different stakeholders can be helpful. Members of the board also need to understand and get used to the learning by doing practice. As a whole, they should aim for achieving better results but also learn to accept failures and how to constructively criticize mistakes.

Co-management agreement

The co-management agreement is a document consisting of everything agreed to during the negotiation process including management and governance elements. It can be seen as written evidence of the partnership among local actors. The management part specifies the six ‘W’: who can do what, where, when, how and how much. It provides general conditions; specifies natural resource management rules and regulations in each zone, rewards, penalties, the reporting schedule and implementation terms and monitoring. The governance part specifies key actors for decision making and their responsibilities.

Stakeholders need to understand the purposes of the co-management agreement. They should also see the need to adapt it to better reflect the changing situation of resource conservation. The co-management agreement should be developed through negotiation among organised partners. Therefore, community development to turn passive groups of individuals into a true community should be given attention throughout the establishment of co-management agreement and its subsequent adaptation.

The co-management agreement is subject to modification during the learning-by-doing process. Key actors involved in shared governance should understand the need to modify the agreement based on lessons learned during implementation. The co-management agreement provides the basic principles for the co-management partnership among key actors but does not limit their collaboration in making joint decisions to specific terms and problems mentioned in the agreement. Partners, such as authorities and communities, should continue to discuss and deal with any issue raised during their partnership. The co-management agreement is not the same as a fixed form of a benefit sharing mechanism even though it consists of sections specifying what resources can be collected by people and their responsibilities in forest protection. Instead, a co-management agreement is the result of negotiations and has a lot to do with adaptive management and governance issues.

Carbon inventories in mangrove ecosystems
Carbon inventories provide the basis for quantifying current stocks and mangrove areas needed to estimate historical emissions. They allow for characterization of the environment, description of the flora and horizontal and vertical structure of the stands, plus their condition. Carbon assessments can also kick-start local involvement and capacity building. When repeated over time under a robust monitoring system, they provide growth and carbon accumulation rates that are used to calculate higher quality emission numbers than those currently available.
The involvement of government and local authorities is key. Government officials (local and national) are made aware of the process so they can recognize the value of the inventories in providing detailed data on highly vulnerable ecosystems. Involvement of local actors is key so they are empowered and acquire ownership of the project. Also, their knowledge of the area supports project site selection and ensures safer working conditions.
The quality of the inventories depends upon the use of consistent protocols and the level of trained personnel. Work in mangrove forests is more challenging than in terrestrial ecosystems, and safety of the workers needs to be a strong priority. The logistics of using boats to access field sites, short windows of time between tides, plus the difficult terrain preclude swift completion of tasks which, in turn, increases costs and duration of field work. With local involvement, these costs may be controlled, as boat rental fees may be lowered or waived. Also, collecting and processing soil samples in the field is challenging because of their extreme high water content, implying that laboratory facilities need to be arranged in advance. Having local people involved with the inventories is highly recommended because of their first-hand knowledge of the area, tide behavior and land use dynamics. GIS tools facilitate inventory planning.
Long-term monitoring
Regular and long-term monitoring for at least 3-5 years tracks changes over time, which allows early modifications to correct problems and helps determine if the project’s objectives are achieved. Monitoring is scheduled at prescribed monthly intervals.
To be provided by solution provider.
The monitoring method used needs to fit the project requirements and the skills, time, and budget of the monitoring team. The restoration process depends on the natural cycle of seed production and recruitment while donors and sometimes communities want to see quick results. As a result, although overall costs may be lower, the method requires a longer funding and monitoring time-frame as usually granted.
Locally-based Park Management and Law Enforcement

Local institutions and communities, municipal and national govern¬ment representatives, NGOs, academia, and the private sector are all represented in a locally-based park management and law enforcement body. Law enforcement is ensured through partnerships with the Philippine Navy and Coast Guard and locally recruited park rangers who receive in-depth training and appropriate surveillance equipment. The environmental situation in the park is monitored regularly, while the effectiveness of governance is measured annually using participatory mechanisms.

  • Partnerships provide the support necessary for law enforcement operations. The Philippine Navy and Coast Guard play the biggest role by detailing personnel on rotation duty at the ranger station and supply of technical equipment
  • Locally-based management body, solely dedicated to implementing the park’s management plan and maintaining a presence in the park

Effective law enforcement requires appropriate enforcement capacities and equipment at the level of the MPA management agency. The management of a National Marine Park requires adequate resource use policies to being in place and being enforced including stringent penalties for non-compliance as a disincentive to illegal use. These laws, rules and regulations need to be supported and adhered to by the legitimate resource users and other relevant stakeholders.