Sustainability as a tool for change

 

The central core point for this solution is the sustainability concept of intervention. Three main components of sustainability are addressed and exercised by the youth and all chain actors. By this organic honey production fits to the sustainability issues. From our business slogan “No tree, No bee, No honey, No money” one can understand, how it is really in line with sustainability. In our intervention we a have a vision to see happy beekeepers, healthy environment and quality honey. This approach also helps us to get a market for our product.  

  • Existence of the natural forest
  • Farmers livelihoods depending on the forest product
  • Sustainability  as big agenda everywhere
  • It is possible to develop sustainable business models including biodiversity conservation as main concern
  • Organic honey fits in best with sustainable agribusiness

 

Inclusive business approach

 

Our solution is exploring the potential opportunity for the rural unemployed youth in protecting their natural forest.  On one hand the youth are unemployed and on the other hand there is a huge potential in the forest. This needs systematic intervention to show the possibility to solve their unemployment problem in keeping the biodiversity. Business is our main tool for this intervention - It is making money from honey. Honey production fits best into conserving the forest in the area concerning solving the economic and social problems. The business approach is our building block since other many intervention such as NGO approach didn’t bring continuous change in the area. The growing demand for organic honey supports our system.

  • The market for organic honey
  • The suitability of the area for honey production
  • The simplicity of the production system 
  • The interest of the society to accept changes
  • It is possible to make money (profit) in contributing to rural development 
  • Everybody has the capacity to develop, if someone helps in how to do this practically.
  • The developing story behind a product is a powerful tool to get good market demand.
  • Spending more time in the project area helps the youth to develop confidence in the intervention
Upscaling of implementation of Dynamic Agroforestry Systems

 

The producer family with their garden is always linked with a broader sphere, such as the relationships between gender and generations, the social organisation, community, local and international markets, the cultures, and – something often overlooked as important – religion and/or spirituality. These aspects, however, should be considered within the concept of training.

The proposed methodology is based on a period of intensive theoretical and practical training of local trainers (facilitators) and lead farmers. In addition, the participants must "rebuild" their knowledge on their own plots of land. Individual practice must be supervised and accompanied by a senior trainer experienced in Dynamic Agroforestry.

Lead farmers present their practical know-how and document the processes experienced in the following installation period. In this way, a practical implementation of the concepts worked on can be achieved within a concrete context for the production level of a rural family. 

Upscaling is achieved as followed:

 

- 1 local trained facilitator trains 10 lead farmers

 

- 10 lead farmers accompany 5 to 10 farmers each in implementing DAF

 

- 10 trainers accompany 100 lead farmers

 

- 100 lead farmers  = 500 to 1000 followers

- A long term concept of developing programs for at least 5 years

- Participitory institutional framework

- Commited and open-minded staff 

- Budget for training, follow up, equipment, and monitoring

- Accurate selection of local trainers and lead farmers

- Practically skilled SAF senior trainers

- Access to market for cash crops

- Short term benefits for farmers (anual crops, less labour, no expenses for external inputs) 

The most important experience is the benefit of land preparation without fire. The advantage of SAF can be seen already after a couple of months, which helps to encourage farmers to extend learning plots step by step to the whole plantation. Short-term economic needs foster monocultures with expensive external inputs, creating more short-term economic needs. Also, agriculture is not a desirable future for many, and the young migrate to cities (generational conflict). National mega-projects such as dams threaten local initiatives. Other adverse conditions are unfulfilled basic needs, bad infrastructure and extreme climate conditions that impede dedication to long-term SAFS initiatives. However, we note an increasing awareness of the importance to preserve trees and biodiversity, and interest in SAF because of the need to restore soil fertility, and because families see that those who implement the mode are being less affected by climate change impacts, have better working conditions, healthier and more diverse food, and better markets (e.g. for organic cacao, coffee, coconut or coca). 

Building Sustainable Value Chains Based In Local Biodiversity

Runa works to build sustainable value chains for innovative products based in local biodiversity. Runa focuses on products that are emblematic of local culture and have a history of use and sustainable production among the indigenous communities we work with. Runa supports local producers to access a variety of market opportunities that balance value-added activities, stable market access, and the ability to sell any excess production locally. Runa works with communities to create spaces for smallholder farmers to turn traditional productive systems into sustainable livelihood opportunities.

Runa’s success in developing sustainable value chains can be attributed to collaboration with locals to utilize their vast knowledge of agricultural and non-timber forest products and production techniques and the existing demand in international markets for novel and exotic products. Though new value chains require investments of time and resources, Runa has been able to provide financial and capacity building support and assume risks that otherwise might incur to farmers and impede their participation or the success of the project.

In order to create sustainable value chains based in biodiversity, Runa recognizes the importance of working directly with producers to develop strategies and formalize best practices for small holder farmers. Our analysis shows that in the beginning years of market development for a new crop, it is unlikely that market forces alone will be able to incentivize ecological and socially sustainable production, especially as dictated by the Fair Trade and USDA organic standards.  Additional support is necessary to cover the costs required to achieve social and ecological impacts while economic sustainability develops. We have also learned that high demand and stable prices are necessary for farmers to invest in adopting new management practices to improve production. A farmer’s access to a stable market and confidence that they will be able to sell their crop makes them more likely to take the risk of experimenting with new techniques without the fear of economic loss from an income generating activity.

Strengthening Farmer Associations

Runa Foundation’s strategy for community development is to create strong community-based organizations and associations that can invest money and resources into their own development to improve livelihoods. Over the past 3 years, there has been a great deal of organizational advancement among the guayusa producer associations. Unlike other parts of Latin America, there is not a strong history of agricultural cooperatives in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Given this context, we prioritized Fair Trade Certification and strengthening farmer’s capacity for organization and resource management, in order to ensure that indigenous producers are able to connect with markets in a way that is just and equitable. One of the main components of success in establishing producer associations has been to mimic the functioning of current governance structures that are used locally to manage communities, land, or resources. Instead of imposing a structure that has worked successfully in other parts of Latin America, producers determine the structure and function of their associations, and we work with them to build a governance system that is efficient and legitimate in the eyes of producers.

The advancement of associations can in part be attributed to the participation and buy-in from local actors, which creates and defines a work structure for planning, coordination, and monitors the progress of the associations. A structure that is flexible and able to adapt to the needs of individual associations is essential.  This often requires investing more time and resources to have additional meetings or workshops to ensure that the associations are building capacity to advance in a sustainable way. 

It is sometimes difficult to motivate associations to participate in the many activities required for the certification of their product. For established crops such as coffee and cacao, the anticipated purchase volumes, higher prices, and established markets for certified products help to ensure that sales and the social premium contribution from their Fair Trade certification act as a sufficient incentive. However, as a novel product, the lack of market stability jeopardizes continued and quality participation of producers and associations. We have also learned the importance of creating mechanisms for collaboration among all stakeholders involved in the value chain and establishing clear guidelines to lead our work.  Over several years we have been collaborating directly with the associations as well as private- and public-sector actors and analyzing and revising the different activities involved in the guayusa value chain utilizing an adaptive management approach that has been highly successful for this collaborative work.  

Jony Girma
East and South Africa
Jony
Girma
Inclusive business approach
Sustainability as a tool for change
Jony Girma
East and South Africa
Jony
Girma
Inclusive business approach
Sustainability as a tool for change
Advocacy for EbA/Eco-DRR in marine protected areas

Designing Marine protected areas help protect ecosystems so that they can provide their multiple services such as coastal protection and food sources.

 

The project supported the case for the declaration of Port Salut as one of the MPAs, by making baseline data available on the diversity and status of coastal and marine ecosystems in the area and emphasizing the multiple benefits of protecting these ecosystems, in particular for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. The protected area of managed resources of Port Salut/Aquin now covers 87,422 hectares of the coastal zone of Port Salut Municipality.

Having field activities serve as an entry point to promote ecosystem-based activities within the framework of marine protected areas and coastal governance at the national level and raise national awareness of coastal and marine issues.

Before 2013, Haiti was the only Caribbean country without Marine Protected Areas (MPA). UNEP leveraged on initial governmental discussions that had taken place while the project was being conceptualised and supported the Government of Haiti to finalize the designation of marine protected areas in Haiti, and provided technical assistance to the Government to draft the MPA declaration. In 2013 the Government of Haiti declared the country’s first nine marine protected areas including the coastal zone of Port Salut - with the objective to “maintain biodiversity, while responding to the needs of the communities that depend on these natural systems”.