Prioritisation and planning

Prioritisation and Planning took place in three categories:

  1. Basic prioritisation: Combines results of the assessment to identify areas that are threatened and under-protected.
  2. Multi-criteria approach:  Uses criteria to identify important sites for biodiversity, drawing from the foundational datasets and results of the assessment.
  3. Systematic conservation planning: Identifies a portfolio of biodiversity priority areas based on biodiversity targets. Can include a range of additional data on ecological processes, ecosystem services, constraints and opportunities.
  1. Partnerships
  2. Stakeholder engagement
  3. Financial resources

Team work is important. Mapping and prioritisation of biodiversity can only effectively and efficiently happen when people, organisations work together.

  1.  
Assessment

Risk status and protection levels  of the ecosystems and species were assessed. 

  1. Collaboration
  2. Partnerships
  3. Financial resources
  1. Timely and meaningful engagement of relevant stakeholders is key in developing and implementing solutions
  2. Partnerships, collaborations and regional projects provide opportunities for cross-border conservation initiatives
Spatial Datasets

All the countries collected  spatial data sets that included:

  1. Baseline map of ecosystem types
  2. Map of current extent and condition
  3. Map of protected and conserved areas
  4. Maps of species occurrence

1..An agency that can play a coordination role (leadership). SANBI and UNEP-WCMC provided the crucial leadership roles

2. Establishing a strong community of practice that promotes peer learning and sharing.  The project brought together experts from across the implementing countries. 

3. Making clear links to government priorities and processes, to inform national policy. The project secured high level buy in from the government through rengagement with government entities in the implementing countries.

Perhaps the most valuable aspect of the approach presented in this guide lies in the intuitive understanding and wide range of information that can be conveyed in a few maps. Maps give geographic meaning to a biodiversity assessment, and provide focus areas that can be prioritised in the real world. They are able to communicate important messages about pressures on the natural environment and conservation imperatives to a range of relevant stakeholders

Recognition of the traditional knowledge and socio-cultural role of fishers in monitoring, surveillance, and waste management activities.

It is based on the explicit recognition of traditional knowledge and the socio-cultural role of fishers in the management and conservation of natural protected areas. The approach is organized around the three pillars of the conservation agreements: recognition of traditional knowledge, vigilance, and waste management, within the framework of a participatory and co-responsibility process. Their empirical experience on the high seas is valued to identify species, ecological interactions and environmental changes, strengthening their participation as ecosystem watchdogs. Citizen science is promoted to record biodiversity and encourage integrated waste management from departure to return to port. 

  • To rescue the traditional knowledge of the artisanal fisher in his knowledge of the environment, of the resources, understanding the level of risk of the activity. 
  • To know and share the experience of the activity and the offshore marine environment. 
  • Articulate the experience to the tasks and goals to be achieved in the management of the NPA. Citizen research or monitoring, surveillance actions and care of the marine ecosystem with the management of solid waste and recovery of abandoned fishing gear. 
  • Include in the training package, topics that are of genuine interest to local stakeholders, which help with the certifications required by PRODUCE or SANIPES, articulating these to the conservation goals. 
  • With the passage of time and technological progress, traditional knowledge is being lost. 
  • Conservation tasks such as waste management require a gradual adaptation and the involvement of other institutions to guarantee the effectiveness of the collection and final disposal system.
  • Failure to comply with agreements or to keep stakeholders informed of changes generates mistrust. 
Multi-Sector Partnerships

Strong collaboration between government agencies, research institutions, local farmers, and private sector partners mobilizes resources, enhances project sustainability, and empowers local communities. 

 

Community Engagement and Capacity Building

Women and youth are prioritized for training, ensuring equitable access to new agricultural technologies and leadership opportunities. 

Field Testing and Demonstration Plots

Testing these microbial formulations on coffee farms ensures their effectiveness and builds local capacity in sustainable agricultural practices. 

Science-Driven Sustainable Agriculture

The project uses genomic sequencing and metagenomic analyses to identify effective bioactive pest control agents. These lab-based solutions are translated into practical, farmer-friendly products through farmer field schools and demonstration plots. The project’s microbial formulations were developed with a plan to optimize and re-test the most effective formula for broader adoption. 

Participatory Planning and Indigenous Knowledge Integration

Recognizing that local communities hold deep environmental knowledge, the project conducted household surveys and community dialogues to map perceptions and practices around soil, water, and land use. This building block answered “what” (the lived experiences and practices of smallholders), “why” (planning must reflect cultural context), and “how” (engaging farmers in co-design). Farmers shared observations about decreasing water availability, shifting rainfall, and soil degradation. These insights complemented scientific models. In response, the project promoted culturally rooted practices like terracing, organic fertilization, and home gardening. Gender-sensitive approaches empowered women as leaders in ecological restoration and household resilience.

Deep-rooted cultural knowledge, community trust, and strong leadership enabled inclusive planning. Facilitators fluent in local languages and customs built bridges between science and tradition.

Respecting indigenous knowledge fostered ownership and sustainability. Creating space for women and youth increased innovation and resilience. The process strengthened community cohesion and built confidence in local solutions. Replication requires long-term engagement and respect for socio-cultural norms.

PAMS Dashboard + Community Co-Design

The Protected Area Management System (PAMS) by NOARKTECH is a centralized, intuitive dashboard aggregating data from edge devices. Co-designed with forest officials and community members, it delivers predictive analytics, real-time alerts, and supports evidence-based decision-making.

  • User-focused design through participatory field engagements
  • Integration of remote sensing data and satellite overlays for broader context
  • Offline functionality and multilingual interface increase usability across regions
  • Adaptive interfaces tailored to specific users (rangers, farmers, analysts) increase engagement
  • Alert fatigue can be reduced by dynamic thresholding and contextual relevance
  • Sustained use requires continued training and localized support channels