Communication and public relations strategy

To ensure the successful marketing of biochar to farmers, promotion in the form of a clear and locally adopted public relations strategy is key. The Community Managed Resource Centre promotes its biochar product by engaging with Self Help Group leaders in advance of the upcoming sowing season. This involves the declaration of intent to supply biochar to farmers during a meeting with Self Help Group leaders. In addition, promotional activities include word of mouth and the placement of public notices in key locations such as agri-input markets, government offices, and the organisation's premises. Furthermore, outreach efforts could also include the use of mobile SMS, social media, exhibitions, marketing agencies, and participation in conferences to ensure all farmers are informed about the availability of biochar. The marketing strategy also includes the provision of offering product samples to potential buyers as well as frequently organised marketing and promotional activities such as demonstration plots and farmer field schools. 

  • Quality standards for biochar, as well as for other fertilisers in India, ensure a level playing field between producers and build consumer confidence.
  • A certification process helps to build confidence in the biochar product and to determine an appropriate price for farmers and consumers. 
  • Early engagement with farmer networks is crucial
  • Multi-channel promotion increases reach
  • Demonstration and hands-on experience drive adoption
  • Certification and quality standards build trust 
Efficient biochar marketing, distribution and payment system

The Community Managed Resource Centres oversee and organise the marketing and distribution of biochar to villages and farmers. To ensure timely availability, they require demand to be submitted at least 30 days before the farming season. The centres collaborate with farmers' Self-Help Groups to collect biochar orders. Self Help Groups are encouraged to combine orders from smaller farms, while the centres directly collect orders from individual farmers not participating in these groups. Pricing and delivery dates are communicated via public notice, and advance payments are collected from Self Help Groups and individual farmers and finalised one week before delivery. Upon production readiness, farmers are notified, and biochar is distributed from the centres’ warehouses. For members of Self-Help Groups, biochar is delivered to the group for further distribution. Non-members receive biochar directly from the centres. Each biochar bag is marked with an allotment number for accountability, facilitating efficient grievance handling. The marketing strategy includes collaborating with agricultural input dealers and Farmer Producer Organisations to expand its reach. 

  • The biochar strategy's success relies on key factors like a centralized oversight from an entity like the Community Managed Resource Centres, which ensure that processes and communication run smoothly, and sales are recorded for accountability. 
  • Collaboration between farmers’ groups is crucial for efficient order collection and delivery.  
  • A key challenge in entering the biochar market is obtaining quality standard certification from government-authorized agencies, which involves stringent third-party controls and adherence to regulations for organic fertilisers. To overcome this, it is crucial to appoint experienced personnel or provide special training to monitor all relevant steps of the production from raw material selection, production, packaging, and storage to processing and procurement with the guidance from the authorized agency. 
  • The biochar production business faces price risks due to fluctuations in the costs of raw material and storage. To mitigate this, setting sales prices that include sufficient margins to cover these costs is essential. 
  • Building strong partnerships with agricultural input dealers and Farmer Producer Organisations is vital. These partnerships facilitate the integration of biochar into regular agricultural channels, enhancing market reach and adoption among farmers. Engaging with industry experts in developing marketing strategies also helps in aligning the product with market demands.
  • Ensuring that biochar is produced, certified, and marketed within optimal timeframes helps maintain product quality and market value. Establishing clear production schedules and monitoring processes can prevent delays and reduce the risk of degradation. 
Biochar production

Biochar is carbonised organic material that is produced through pyrolysis, which is a thermal conversion under low or no oxygen. Biochar can be produced using various methods based on available resources and technologies. The production capacity of such a plant is around 200 kg of biochar per day with an output efficiency of 30 percent. Various feedstocks from residues are used to produce biochar, e.g. cotton residues, coconut shells and tree prunings. This is particularly beneficial as the cotton harvest residues are recycled and their open burning in the field is prevented. To source the feedstock sustainably, the project only uses local crop residues which would not have been used for a more valuable purpose. It is recommended to collect biomass around 15 to 20 Kilometres radius to make it more economical through avoiding large costs of transportations. 

  • Different feedstocks and production methods have unique strengths and weaknesses, emphasizing the need to match production methods with scale and sustainable resource availability for optimal outcomes. 
  • Proper drying of feedstock prior to production is essential to reduce energy consumption and production time. Wet feedstock increases operational demands, leading to inefficiencies and higher costs. 
  • The pilot reactor is ideal for large-scale biochar production due to its high efficiency and minimal environmental impact, while the kiln and pit methods are better suited for small-scale, low-cost production. With small scale production units, the control of emissions and temperature is more difficult. By burning the pyrolysis gases instead of releasing them, the Kon-Tiki kiln minimises the production of toxic emissions using an open flame curtain. 
  • The efficiency of biochar production varies depending on the type of feedstock, with cotton stalks yielding the highest efficiency at 35 percent, followed by agroforestry wood at 32 percent, and pigeon pea stalks at 30 percent. 
  • A limited availability of reliable biochar sources constrains feasible business solutions. 
Adoption of climate-smart pasture management practices

In the Boeny region, extensive cattle farming based on natural grazing is at risk of forage shortages due to negative effects of climate change and lack of effective space management. Improved and climate-smart pasture management practices of grazing lands are critical for increased forage production and increased soil C storage. Pasture management greatly contributes to soil protection as it promotes the restoration of ground cover and reduces the uncontrolled use of fires. The main stage of the adoption of climate-smart pasture management practices is to identify with the local population relevant and sustainable ways of managing community pastureland. As a first step, a survey was conducted via interviews and observations on several sites within each pasture to identify herder’s grass, fire practice, the landscape facet, fire and herding practices as well as other relevant data. In a second step, pastoral committees (kijana committees) were created by the project, and a method for supporting the management of community pastures applicable to all the intervention sites (here: 14) and users in the Boeny regions was developed. The committees were supported by a team consisting of project coaches, NGO coordinators and the project’s focal point at the Regional Directorate of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, to establish natural resource management rules that are relevant to users and acceptable to the authorities. Based on these findings, the integration of specific forage grasses, like Brachiaria sp , Stylosanthes sp, Panicum maximum and Pennisetum sp as well as the prevention of burning could substantially increase the balance of rangelands on the Boeny region of Madagascar. The implementation approach with ten steps was designed by the project and validated at the regional level. 

  • Policy, technical support and financial incentives proved to be essential in supporting the adoption of climate-smart pasture management practices by local farmers. 
  • Working with stakeholders at local level across the system is a precondition for comprehensively understanding the locally specific needs in climate-smart pasture management practices and for formulating a local support package. 
  • An assessment of the vulnerability and adaptive potential of farms is needed by studying farmers’ preferences, carbon (C) sources and C-stock positions, resource flows, and system management methods. 
  • The recognition and support for the pasture committee in the implementation of the plans and adherence to the local agreement is of crucial relevance.  
  • Climate change and the practice of bush clearing by fire are the major factors leading to the gradual degradation of native pastures and are major risks to increasingly negative C balances predicted by modeling analysis—equaling -3.15 t CO2 eq ha-1 yr-1 by 2030, -6.46 t CO2 eq ha-1 yr-1 by 2050, and -26.96 t CO2 eq ha-1 yr-1 by 2080, if no mitigating actions are implemented. 
  • Mainly Brachiaria and Stylosanthes sp., have a high C-fixing potential. Soils under traditional pasture have a significantly lower carbon mass than soils under improved pasture. The latter is associated with the system and thus acts as a GHG emission compensation phenomenon, making the carbon balance positive. In the given case, the grazing system composed of 96.2% native pasture with a moderately degraded pasture management regime and 3.8% improved forage species resulted in a positive C balance of 28.43 t CO2 eq yr-1 between 2022 and 2023. 
  • Improved forage species that are well adapted to climate and soil have a strong potential for preventing land degradation and even to support land recovery. If appropriately managed, the improved pasture management can lower the frequency of native pasture expansion through bush burning, increase soil biomass sequestration and enhance the density of local forage species.  
  • Further research is necessary to better understand how farmers’ income can profit from climate-smart grazing systems and related mechanisms of soil carbon sequestration, like the sedentarization of improved zebu breeds. 
  • Concrete examples of improved forage practices are important to provide decision-makers with evidence-based grazing system management procedures for policy formulation. 
Action definition and implementation for Sustainable Agro-Sylvo-Pastoral development

The definition of action involves establishing clear and measurable objectives for the identified priority areas. Technical options are selected and prioritized based on the specific soil types, landscape characteristics, and socio-economic conditions of each area. Various options, such as agroforestry, soil conservation techniques, and integrated livestock management are considered to address the unique challenges of each site. In Marohogo, the establishment of firebreaks and the reforestation of degraded areas was selected. Three types of firebreaks were established: bare firebreaks, green firebreaks with fire-resistant plants, and agricultural firebreaks. The Taungya method was used to involve local farmers in reforestation efforts while allowing them to cultivate the land temporarily. As such, degraded forest plots are made available to local farmers to enable them to grow food crops for two to three years. In exchange, they must plant trees and maintain the plot in order to restore the forest cover. 

  • Access to technical expertise and support in sustainable land management from local and international experts for farmers as well as access to appropriate plant species.  
  • Availability of appropriate technologies and resources to implement the selected interventions. 
  • Tailoring interventions to specific local conditions enhances their effectiveness and acceptance by the community. 
  • Combining agricultural and forestry practices can yield both environmental and economic benefits. 
  • Strengthening local community empowerment ensures an inclusive process.  
Action definition and implementation for Sustainable Agro-Sylvo-Pastoral development

The definition of action involves establishing clear and measurable objectives for the identified priority areas. Technical options are selected and prioritized based on the specific soil types, landscape characteristics, and socio-economic conditions of each area. Various options, such as agroforestry, soil conservation techniques, and integrated livestock management are considered to address the unique challenges of each site. In Marohogo, the establishment of firebreaks and the reforestation of degraded areas was selected. Three types of firebreaks were established: bare firebreaks, green firebreaks with fire-resistant plants, and agricultural firebreaks. The Taungya method was used to involve local farmers in reforestation efforts while allowing them to cultivate the land temporarily. As such, degraded forest plots are made available to local farmers to enable them to grow food crops for two to three years. In exchange, they must plant trees and maintain the plot in order to restore the forest cover. 

  • Access to technical expertise and support in sustainable land management from local and international experts for farmers as well as access to appropriate plant species.  
  • Availability of appropriate technologies and resources to implement the selected interventions. 
  • Tailoring interventions to specific local conditions enhances their effectiveness and acceptance by the community. 
  • Combining agricultural and forestry practices can yield both environmental and economic benefits. 
  • Strengthening local community empowerment ensures an inclusive process.  
Initial diagnosis for Sustainable Agro-Sylvo-Pastoral Management

The initial diagnostics involve conducting environmental and social analysis. Data from regional planning tools such as the SRAT (Regional Land Use Scheme), PRD (Regional Development Plan), and SAC (Municipal Land Use Scheme) are also collected and analysed." This data collection is critical for understanding the current landscape and planning effectively. The Marohogo Forest Station has always faced significant land tenure challenges resulting in illegal occupations and land conflicts with overlapping claims between the station and surrounding communes. The availability of the Local Occupation Plan for Land Security (Plan Local d'Occupation pour la sécurisation Foncièr, PLOF) data is necessary. A detailed mapping of land tenure statuses and stakeholder priorities was necessary to identify the key areas for intervention and the interests of various stakeholders. 

  • Availability of comprehensive and up-to-date data from various planning tools.
  • Strong cooperation and engagement with local authorities, relevant technical services (DIREDD), community leaders, and stakeholders in providing necessary information. 
  • The complexity of land tenure issues necessitates careful analysis and continuous monitoring. 
  • The importance of a detailed and accurate initial assessment cannot be overstated since it sets the foundation for all subsequent phases.
  • Effective stakeholder engagement from the beginning ensures that the interventions are relevant and supported by those involved. Right in the start, it is important to create a committee that represents all users to facilitate discussions with the community. 
Nature-Based Riverbank Stabilization for Wildlife and Community Safety

This building block focuses on using nature-based solutions to stabilize riverbanks and protect both wildlife habitat and community infrastructure. Riverbank erosion poses significant threats to riparian vegetation, drinking water sources, agricultural fields, and wildlife movement corridors. Instead of relying on concrete structures, this approach applies eco-friendly techniques such as bioengineering, bamboo and brush layering, use of coir logs, and planting native grasses, shrubs, and tree species to strengthen soil structure naturally.
Stabilizing riverbanks with vegetation reduces erosion, slows surface runoff, filters sediments, and restores natural river dynamics that support fish, amphibians, and terrestrial wildlife. These methods also improve habitat connectivity, helping animals move safely between feeding areas, mineral licks, and water sources.
Community participation is essential: local residents assist in planting, maintaining vegetation, monitoring erosion, and protecting newly restored areas from grazing and disturbance. This increases ownership and ensures long-term sustainability.
Nature-based riverbank stabilization also builds climate resilience by reducing flood impacts, preventing land loss, and lowering long-term maintenance costs. Integrated with watershed management, it becomes a key strategy for landscape-level conservation and community safety.

  • Access to native plant species for bioengineering and restoration.
  • Community labor participation during planting and maintenance.
  • Technical expertise in nature-based and bioengineering methods.
  • Supportive local administration for approvals and coordination.
  • Vegetation-based methods require consistent watering and protection until roots are well established.
  • Community involvement ensures long-term care, monitoring, and reduced disturbance.
  • Nature-based solutions work best when combined with broader watershed and catchment management.
  • High-flow or highly eroded sections may still require limited structural reinforcement.
Sustainable NWFP Marketing to Support Community Livelihoods

This building block focuses on strengthening 19 NWFP Community Groups through well-developed management plans and bylaws that ensure sustainable harvesting, monitoring, and equitable benefit-sharing. JWS is known for the sustainable collection of Rubia spp., Swertia chirayita, star anise, soft broom grass, mushrooms, and other high-value NWFPs.
Management activities include resource assessment, setting harvest quotas, training communities on proper harvesting techniques, enforcing bylaws, and supporting community-led monitoring. JWS also supports market linkages, pricing transparency, and annual reviews of the management plans.
Community participation is central: members help monitor resource conditions, report illegal extraction, follow sustainable harvest practices, and collectively manage income distribution.
In 2024, these groups collectively earned around Nu. 3.5 million from the sale of Rubia spp., Swertia chirayita, and star anise alone, excluding income from other NWFPs, demonstrating the livelihood potential of sustainably managed forest resources.

  1. Strong community institutions with approved bylaws
  2. Training on sustainable harvesting and monitoring
  3. Market access for high-value NWFPs
  4. Active patrolling support to reduce illegal extraction
  1. Clear rules and bylaws improve compliance and sustainability
  2. Community ownership increases protection and reduces overharvesting
  3. Regular resource assessments help adjust quotas and prevent depletion
  4. Strong market linkages boost community income
  5. Transparent benefit-sharing builds trust and long-term participation
Community-led Recreational Parks and Eco-tourism for Conservation Support

This building block establishes recreational spaces such as parks, nature trails, and picnic areas to provide safe and enjoyable outdoor spaces while promoting environmental awareness. Eco-tourism initiatives generate alternative income for community members through guiding, hospitality, cultural activities, and local product sales.
These facilities build public appreciation for nature, reduce pressure on sensitive wildlife habitats, and create incentives for conservation. Eco-tourism also enhances community well-being and strengthens long-term support for environmental protection.

Attractive natural features.
Community willingness to manage tourism services.
Basic infrastructure (trails, signage, resting areas).
Promotion through local networks or online platforms.

Facilities require regular maintenance for visitor satisfaction.
Low-impact design prevents habitat disturbance.
Training guides improves visitor experience and safety.
Revenue sharing must be transparent to maintain trust.