Creating the necessary incentives to foster the success of green bonds

Following the development of the legislative and regulatory framework for issuing green bonds, it was also necessary to create incentives that enhance their attractiveness for both issuers and investors. With BIOFIN’s advocacy and in close collaboration with the Working Group, two key incentives were established.  

First, investors benefit from a 15% exemption in withholding tax on green bonds listed on a Zambian exchange with a maturity of at least three years. This measure encourages investment in projects with positive environmental outcomes and accelerates resource mobilization. It also motivates potential issuers, who can expect stronger investor demand and, consequently, higher returns on their bonds.  

Second, the SEC introduced a 50% reduction in green bond registration fees in Zambia. By lowering issuance costs, this measure further strengthens the attractiveness of the market for issuers.  

A key enabling factor is the support of government and regulators for developing a green bond market and their willingness to design and approve such incentives. 

Recently developed green bond markets might be perceived as too risky by investors who are more familiar with traditional bonds and other investments. Creating incentives for both issuers and local investors is crucial to navigate their risk tolerance and to stimulate the market in its early stages. 

Capacity building and technical support for market developers and green bonds issuers

Since 2018, UNDP BIOFIN has organized various capacity building workshops and provided support towards the development of the green bonds market in Zambia, engaging with key financial sector regulators. These activities have been instrumental in the formulation of the Green Bonds Guidelines and Listing Rules, and have also included targeted trainings for the SEC on the review and approval of green bond applications. 

As an example, a series of capacity-building sessions to scale up the market for green bond issuances in Zambia was delivered to members of the Working Group and other key stakeholders (e.g., investment brokers, transaction advisors, institutional investors, etc) in July 2025. The sessions covered topics such as the fundamentals of green bonds, the structuring process, and eligibility requirements.  

BIOFIN has also provided technical assistance to high-potential green bonds issuers in Zambia. In 2024, a global call was launched to offer tailored guidance for five companies or other prospective issuers. This support includes drafting green bond frameworks, identifying eligible project pipelines, liaising with investment banks, and engaging second-party opinion providers for certification. It also provides advisory services on aligning bonds with international standards, impact reporting, and market positioning.

Enabling factors include the availability of experts to deliver workshops and provide ongoing assistance, adequate funding to cover activities and logistics, the willingness of government and regulators to develop a green bond market, and the active participation of financial regulators. 

During the capacity building and technical support activities, it was observed that financial agents often misunderstood the principles of project finance, which differs from more typical corporate finance transactions in its composition of guarantees and risk scenarios. The benefits of green bonds, compared to conventional government bonds, were also not immediately clear to all participants. This highlights the importance of ensuring that capacity-building efforts (1) explain in detail the distinct characteristics of project finance, (2) are complemented by a broad awareness-raising campaign, and (3) also focus on transferring knowledge on environmental sustainability and associated standards to meet investors’ expectations.  

Bringing key stakeholders together under the Green Finance Mainstreaming Working Group

The development of a green bonds market in Zambia is anchored in the activities of the Green Finance Mainstream Working Group, which brings together financial regulators, standard-setting bodies, development partners, and other key institutions with the objective of mainstreaming green finance into Zambia’s financial landscape. Members include the Bank of Zambia, the SEC, and the Pensions and Insurance Authority (PIA). In addition, the Working Group includes strategic participation from the Ministry of Green Economy and Environment, the Ministry of Finance and National Planning, the Zambian Institute of Chartered Accountants, and the Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF) Zambia.  

The establishment of the Working Group provided a regular platform for collaboration among regulatory bodies, government agencies, and experts, fostering an enabling environment for the development and effective implementation of green finance solutions. Many of these solutions are multidisciplinary in nature, from legal requirements to technical expertise, and potentially could not have been developed without this collaborative effort. 

Enabling factors include stakeholders’ willingness to participate in and dedicate time to the Working Group, their recognition of the interconnectedness of green finance and the importance of the topic, and the availability of funding to support the Group’s ongoing activities.  

A key lesson learned is that establishing governance and collaborative structures is crucial for the development of green bond markets and other financial solutions. Regardless of the level of implementation, national or subnational, these solutions are typically multidisciplinary, and their implementation runs more smoothly not only when there is collaboration, but also when a dedicated platform with clear procedures for ongoing engagement is in place. 

In addition, it is crucial to consider broader advancements in the financial system that, while not mandatory for issuing green bonds, are likely to strengthen their creditworthiness. In Zambia, the Working Group is also pursuing complementary solutions that support the development of the green bond market, including measures to enhance economic stability, credit ratings, and market infrastructure. Examples include the development of Zambia’s National Green Finance Strategy and Implementation Plan, as well as a green finance taxonomy, tagging, and reporting system. 

Creating the legal and regulatory enabling environment for green bonds in Zambia

The development of legislation and regulations was the foundation for establishing a green bond market in Zambia. The 2019 Green Bonds Guidelines are the main outcome of this process and serve as the enabling regulatory framework for green bonds issuances in the country. They were officially gazetted and developed in line with the International Capital Market Association’s (ICMA) Green Bond Principles, a voluntary protocol for the issuance of green bonds.  

The Guidelines comprehensively cover the requirements for issuing green bonds, including the engagement of an independent external reviewer and the submission of a detailed, green bond framework to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This framework must explain the project selection criteria to be used, how funds will be utilized, the management of proceeds (the funds raised from selling the bonds), and how environmental objectives will be achieved. Together, these elements promote transparency, accountability, and investor confidence. 

To complement the Guideline, the Green Bonds Listing Rules were also developed, providing a detailed pathway for issuers to list green bonds on the Lusaka Securities Exchange (LuSE). They also establish procedures for evaluating the environmental credentials of green bonds and reporting impacts, contributing to an orderly market.   

The mobilization and coordinated efforts of all relevant stakeholders in capital markets and regulatory bodies, such as the SEC and the LuSE, are essential for the development and approval of the guideline and associated rules. 

Developing green bonds based on clear legislation and regulations, transparent and accountable mechanisms, and adherence to international standards is crucial to building investor confidence and, consequently, ensuring the bond’s success in mobilizing resources for climate and biodiversity projects. This is particularly important for countries where lower credit ratings could affect the bond’s perceived creditworthiness.  

In addition, developing a green bond market is a time-consuming process that requires engagement from multiple stakeholders and ongoing consultations. Therefore, it is essential to manage stakeholders’ expectations and allocate sufficient time to each stage. 

Finally, although the effective issuance of green bonds must include independent reviewers, it was identified that this expertise did not exist locally. At the same time, contracting foreign reviewers is costly and time-consuming. Hence, it is important that initiatives for the development of green bond markets also include professional development initiatives to train domestic independent reviewers.  

4. Capacity-building of CBOs on ecosystem governance and women’s leadership

Training on mangrove restoration process including development on mangrove nurseries in project sites, and on ecosystem governance equipped CBOs leaders with the skills and confidence to manage resources inclusively and effectively. This enhanced their decision-making, strengthened community participation, and contributed to the successful development of mangrove nurseries and implementation of conservation and governance solutions.

  1. Hands-on training in mangrove restoration, nursery development, and ecosystem governance equipped CBO leaders with applicable skills for effective and inclusive resource management.
  2. Continued support from local leaders, government officials, WIOMN team members, and technical experts ensured proper guidance, resource availability, and follow-up during implementation.
  3. Legal recognition and trust in CBOs strengthened their authority and confidence to lead conservation efforts and enforce local governance actions. 
  1. Local community training on mangrove conservation and management including restoration process is critical in ensuring best practices in mangrove restoration are implemented for successful mangrove restoration.
  2. Continuous monitoring and guidance of VNRCs, CoFMAs, and CBOs by mangrove experts are essential to ensuring best practices in mangrove conservation and management
  3. Placing mangrove conservation and management in the hands of local communities ensures ownership, thereby facilitating the achievement of conservation and management objectives.
3. Supporting the registration of Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) and the establishment of local governance structures

Formally registering CBOs and setting up structured local governance systems — a network of VNRCs or CoFMAs provided communities with legal recognition and a clear mandate. This process enabled collaboration between VNRCs or CoFMAs in archiving mangrove conservation and management objectives, enforce local by-laws, and manage natural resources sustainably. It also enhanced transparency, accountability, and access to government and donor support, empowering communities to take ownership of conservation efforts.

  1. Active involvement of community members through democratic elections, training, and awareness-raising fostered trust, legitimacy, and commitment to the governance structures. This local ownership was vital for sustainable resource management and compliance with by-laws.
  2. National forest policies, acts, and local government laws provided a legal foundation for recognizing CBOs and establishing community-based governance structures. Government agencies, departments and legal bodies, supported registration and enforcement processes.
  1. Community engagement through elections, training, and awareness-built trust and ownership, essential for effective governance and compliance with by-laws.
  2. Supportive institutional frameworks backed up by national policies, Acts and laws enabled the registration of CBOs and enforcement and community-based governance.
2. Development of mangrove management plans

The development of mangrove management plans for Villages and Shehias in the Bengo project sites was essential in translating national laws into effective local action for mangrove conservation and sustainable use in Tanzania. The plans provided a structured, site-specific framework that guided restoration, protection, and the wise use of mangrove ecosystems, aligning legal mandates with practical, context-specific interventions. The participatory and inclusive approach was a key toward archiving well-developed mangrove management plans actively involving local communities, including women and youth, in the development processes. The plans facilitated zoning for conservation, sustainable use, and restoration, based on both scientific and traditional knowledge. Furthermore, these plans enable systematic monitoring, enforcement, and adaptive management. Anchoring conservation efforts in locally tailored and community-supported plans, ensured that mangrove laws were not only written on paper but were meaningfully implemented on the ground, delivering long-term ecological, social, and economic benefits from mangroves

  1. Existence of national policies, Acts, strategies and guidelines including the Forest Policies and Acts for mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar provided a strong legal and institutional foundation for effective local planning and implementation
  2. The active participation of local communities, including elders, women, youth, and local leaders, created a sense of ownership, ensured plans were grounded in local realities, and fostered compliance and long-term stewardship.
  3. Support from government agencies (e.g., Tanzania Forest Services Agency, local authorities), development partners, and NGOs facilitated technical guidance, resource mobilization, and coordination among stakeholders.
  4. Training and sensitization programs for communities and local leaders improved understanding of mangrove values, legal provisions, and sustainable practices, empowering them to take action
  1. A supportive legal and institutional framework provided legitimacy and guidance for effective community-based resource management in both mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar.
  2. Inclusive participation of all community groups (elders, women, youth, and leaders), fosters ownership, ensuring locally relevant and sustainable plans.
  3. Collaboration with government, NGOs, and development partners strengthens community-based initiatives through technical support, resource mobilization, and improved stakeholder coordination.
  4. Training and awareness-raising strengthen community capacity and confidence, enabling informed decision-making and active participation in conservation efforts.
1. Legal establishment and empowerment of VNRC and CoFMAs

The national forest policy, forest acts, and guidelines, as well as the Local Government Act, provide avenue for community involvement in the management and conservation of forest resources, including mangroves, through the establishment of Village Natural Resource Committees (VNRCs) and Collaborative Forest Management Agreements (CoFMAs). In collaboration with village leaders, Shehia leaders, and forestry officers, supported by the State Attorney’s Office, efforts were made to establish VNRCs or CoFMAs in areas where initiatives were already present and to renew those that had become inactive. Democratic elections were conducted to select the leaders of the newly established or renewed VNRCs and CoFMAs. This transformation process enabled communities to elect leaders of their choice and legally empowered them with the mandate to protect mangroves.

  1. Active collaboration between the Tanzania Forest Services (TFS), the Department of Forestry for both mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar, local governments (Village and Shehia councils), District Commissioners for Kilwa and Mkoani districts, relevant ministries, State Attorneys, and NGOs ensured institutional, legal, and technical support.
  2. Inclusive community engagement through village meetings, democratic elections, and training fostered trust and a sense of ownership among community members.
  3. Supportive legal frameworks, including the National Forest Act 2002 (No 23 of 2002) and Zanzibar Forest Act 1996 (No. 10 of 1996) provided a basis for formally recognizing Community Forest Associations (CFAs) and promoting structured community participation in forest management.
  4. Well-defined governance structures and observable restoration results strengthened accountability and encouraged community commitment
  5. Capacity-building initiatives enhanced leadership effectiveness, governance structures, and the ability to mobilize resources.
  1. Consistent and early involvement of stakeholders fosters trust, builds credibility, and facilitates seamless project execution.
  2. Governance and accountability within local management institutions are strengthened through open elections and clearly defined responsibilities.
  3. Sustained and context-relevant capacity building is vital for nurturing strong and effective community leadership.
  4. Legal recognition and formal organizational structures equip local management institutions with the authority and means to access rights and resources.
  5. Demonstrable restoration successes enhance community enthusiasm and solidify long-term conservation commitments. 
Experiential, arts-based and reflexive learning methods to deepen nature connectedness

Different educational approaches were used by both the school and us to engage students in a transformative learning experience and strengthen their connection to nature: experiential methods (school garden lessons and interactive biodiversity lessons) to foster hands-on learning; arts-based methods (participatory theatre, photovoice, photo exhibition, sociodrama practices) to bring emotions to the surface; and reflexive methods (open group discussions using mood cards and games) to help process thoughts and feelings, and to encourage both acceptance and critical, creative thinking.

Experiential learning methods (school garden lessons, interactive biodiversity lessons), arts-based practices (participatory theatre, photovoice, photo exhibition, sociodrama practices), reflexive methods (open group discussions using mood cards and games), open school community and leadership, other partnerships (with the theatre company)

Intervention methods (experiential learning methods, arts-based approaches and reflexive learning) were applied to explore how the school garden and other nature–based learning methods influence attitudes, values and emotions. Through open discussion, creative expression, and self-reflection, these methods have the potential to deepen students’ connection to nature and cultivate a shared understanding of nature’s values. These methods can be applied separately, but our research has shown that they are more effective when used in combination, as together they can create a more transformative learning experience. However, it is equally important to have a supportive school community that is open to these innovative methods. Teachers should also be given greater flexibility to apply these methods in their practice – ideally, by integrating them more fully into the national curriculum.

Partnership with a “lighthouse teacher” and a supporting school community

A passionate teacher takes the initiative and dedicates a huge part of her time coordinating the project, collaborating with researchers, and engaging students along with her colleagues. The democratic school community and the teacher(s)’ intrinsic motivation lead to a certain creative freedom to pursue their own ideas and pedagogical innovations, while creating a trusting, open atmosphere for experiential learning in the school garden and through arts-based practices.

Supporting school leadership, available green space of the school, dedicated teacher, teamwork

It is essential to have at least one teacher at the school who is willing to dedicate time and energy to the project. Our research showed that the teacher’s background is less important than their strong intrinsic motivation – their deep belief in the value of connecting with nature and integrating green spaces into school life. Naturally, this commitment alone is not enough; it must be supported by a democratic school environment, such as an encouraging principal or school district, which enables the teacher to turn their vision into reality. The drawback of this building block, however, is that if the success of a project depends too heavily on one individual, it may not be sustainable in the long term.

Although school gardens are included in Hungary’s national curriculum as an optional specialisation, this currently applies only to grades 5 through 7. However, the teachers and experts we interviewed suggested that it would be more effective if education in this area began earlier and continued beyond these years. Therefore, a potential additional building block could be the presence of a supportive educational policy environment.