Creation of a multidisciplinary team

The success of HeRe Lab lies in its multidisciplinary team, made up of professionals dealing with a wide variety of fields such as World Heritage, urban planning, architecture, art history, development, and economics.. The University of Florence acts as a catalyst for their involvement, through the participation of different faculties in the Lab and in the use of holistic approaches for the creation of sustainable solutions for challenges affecting the historic centre. The Lab has also played an important role in advocating for sustainable strategies in the development of the city, by taking into account urban green spaces, social inclusivity, tangible and intangible heritage protection, economic growth, sustainable tourism, as well as the requalification and enhancement of architectural elements.

The involvement of professionals with diverse backgrounds is the result of the participation of different faculties of the University of Florence, by means of the Council Deliberation n. 506/2015, which formalised the inter-institutional partnership between the University and the Municipality of Florence. Each faculty contributes through its own pool of professionals, researchers and resources.

The Departments involved are: Architecture; Economics and Management; and History, Archeology, Geography, Fine and Performing Arts.

The pool of professionals working for and in collaboration with the laboratory has allowed for a more comprehensive understanding of the significance of the site, its attributes and challenges. This has also  contributed to the establishment  of sustainable solutions aimed at addressing the issues affecting the site considering  the wider urban context through the application of methods and research from different disciplines.

Establishment of a shared model of governance between University and Municipality

The shared governance established in the HeRe Lab has ensured the creation of systemic synergies between municipal authorities and research institutions, in which the Head of the ‘Florence World Heritage and relations with UNESCO’ Office of the Municipality of Florence and the Dean of the Department of Architecture at the University of Florence act as scientific coordinators. This partnership has created an innovative model in which heritage research and practice are intertwined and the research produced responds to those practical challenges arising from the field.

The Lab was established through a Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of Architecture of the University of Florence and the Municipality of Florence, which was formalized by the Town Council Deliberation n. 506/2015.

The Management Plan of the World Heritage site, as well as its monitoring, amongst the lab’s main activities, are funded through Law 77/2006 “Special measures for the protection and the fruition of Italian cultural, landscape and natural sites, inscribed on the "World Heritage List", under the protection of UNESCO”.

The creation of HeRe_Lab - Heritage Research has resulted in the adoption of a multidisciplinary, holistic approach for the management of the World Heritage property of the ‘Historic Centre of Florence’.

The positive outcomes and results have brought together different stakeholders, authorities and institutions, who are supported in the development of heritage strategies and management practices. Therefore, the set of activities carried out by the Lab and its governance model are now attracting new actors, funds and projects and is expanding its scope of action.

Hortimare - an essential partner for Kelp Blue.

Hortimare, a Dutch-based company, is one of the few companies in the world specialising in the genetics, breeding and propagating of seaweed. Hortimare works with Kelp Blue to create starting material, increase yield and research on best growing techiniques of the Macrocystis pyrifera specie.

Holtimare has a state-of- the art lab in The Netherlands as well as a highly trained experienced team which specializes in seaweed breeding and propagating. Hortimare is an external technical consultant that is helping Kelp Blue set up and develop a hatchery in Namibia and to train a local workforce to run it. They also work together with Kelp Blue in sourcing, collecting and cultivation methods. They are also co-creating a giant kelp seedbank for future use.

The breeding of kelp seedlings is an essential first step in the cultivation of seaweed. There is no public Macrocystis seed bank so Kelp Blue has had to work with partners around the world to sustainably collect spores from wild kelp beds and transport them back to The Netherlands where Hortimare then optimizes Kelp Blue's hatchery system and seeding technique to get to predictable and consistent yield. They share all the information that is needed to make the farm successful. This as a win-win for both parties. Hortimare gets more and more reliable data and knowledge to be able to develop a certain standard and Kelp Blue can translate their findings to predictability of operation.

Sustainably sourcing material, a breeding programme and a property set up hatchery are the cornerstone of any seweed farmer's project.

Participatory management

Participatory management has been carried out since the establishment of the NPA at the request of the communities, with their benefit in mind, as well as that of future generations; however, over time this dynamism was focused on conservation with specific participation of the communities.

The life plans are a participatory process in which the opinion of the community members is obtained, reflecting on each dimension (cultural, environmental, social, political and economic), allowing for a diagnosis in order to coordinate actions aimed at sustainable behaviors that are also aligned with the objectives and vision of the ANP's master plan.

These visions contribute to more pertinent actions that help to articulate with other planning documents in the territory and the involvement of more stakeholders as part of a key strategy to achieve effective conservation.

The RCM leadership and the Maeni ECA develop technical and social capacities that promote the active participation of the communities in the elaboration and implementation of the life plans, oriented to the conservation of the NPA.

  • Greater participation of the communities in the conservation of the ANP.
  • The leadership of the RCM and the Maeni ECA tend to sustainable alternatives.
  • Communities are strengthened in governance allowing them to be more participatory in different spaces, making their indigenous development approach known.
  • The communities are aware of their main role as executors in the VDP implementation processes and promote the involvement of other actors in guiding roles such as public servants.
  • The involvement of communities is key, especially if they are strengthened and participate by making their vision and priorities known, promoting sustainable projects that avoid pressures within the PNA. For this reason, the RCM is currently inserted in the concerted development plans of the Municipalities of Megantoni and Echarati.
  • Experiences of life plans are replicated in other communities.
  • Participation spaces such as the PDV multisectoral roundtable, as a promoter of the elaboration and implementation of these plans, seeks a dynamic of opportunities and better interventions, optimizing resources, time and visualization of the ANP.
  • The visualization of the PDV experience brings opportunities for technical, economic, social and environmental support and cultural strengthening of public and private entities.
  • Communication with communities is improved due to the approach in the process of construction and implementation of life plans.
Biodiversity conservation

The Machiguenga Communal Reserve maintains an ecosystem conservation status of 98.8161 %, with a co-management model with the ECA Maeni that represents 14 native communities, 1 colonist settlement and 3 federations (COMARU, FECONAY and CECONAMA). In order for this model to work, it is necessary that the members of the communities themselves promote and encourage conservation for their own benefit in a win-win ideal, where the RCM conserves its natural and cultural values and the communities can be strengthened in their own organizational system and improve employment and income opportunities through sustainable economic activities.

The protected natural area and its buffer zone are territories where there is a great biodiversity of flora and fauna exploited by the communities, in order to ensure the conservation and sustainable use of resources with an associated landscape approach.The vision of the area is articulated with the vision of the communities, in terms of the management of their territories and resource management, which is why the life plans reflect their way of thinking and organizing themselves and reflect how they want to improve, seeking "good living" from their own form of governance.

  • The native communities know their territory and zones of natural and cultural resource use, and conserve their traditional knowledge of forest management.
  • The RCM promotes sustainable use of natural resources, avoiding pressures on the ANP and conserving existing biodiversity for the benefit of their communities.
  • ECA Maeni knows the priorities and vision of the communities and together with the RCM leadership they achieve more relevant actions.
  • It is necessary that the protected natural areas work jointly and integrally with the communities, taking into account the conservation of the territory, knowing the environmental strengths of the communities in order to promote actions that benefit both.
  • In order to conserve biodiversity in the NPA, it should be taken into account that the communities' territories are part of the fauna's movement areas; therefore, both areas are equally important.
  • The management of the NPA should be adapted to the knowledge, priorities and potential of the native communities.
Building scenarios for MSP and sustainable blue economy

This Building Block aimed to analyze potential future conditions of the Western Mediterranean in order to build three scenarios by 2030: trend scenario; conservationist scenario; and integrated scenario. The developed scenarios DO NOT represent official proposals for the area; instead, they are a starting point for a multi-sectoral and cross-border dialogue about the desired future. A technical report was developed and made publicly available.

  • Existing regional publications on maritime sectors trends

  • Existing regional policies about MSP or blue economy covering at least some of the beneficiary countries

  • Potential areas of development: Identify them based on literature to the extent possible, while using “real-life logic” when it does not exist.

  • Transparency: Justify the goals and assumptions of each scenario, as well as how they were developed. If they are not official proposals, make it clear whenever presenting the scenarios in order to avoid any issue, such as a governmental stakeholder upset because it was not involved in the process

  • How to use: Develop some guidelines with suggestions on how to use and adapt the scenarios during dialogue and negotiation with stakeholders at national and regional levels

Analyzing current conditions of the marine environment and maritime uses

This Building Block aimed to analyze the current conditions of the Western Mediterranean. Policies, data and information on the marine environmental and main maritime uses were analyzed to identify use-use and use-nature conflicts and compatibilities, resulting in the development of a technical report publicly available. Spatial data was compiled to develop the maps about the different uses. 

  • Access to public data sources, especially European and international ones

  • Data from previous projects developed in the region

  • At least one member of the team with expertise in spatial data available during the whole initiative in case additional analysis is necessary

  • Data providers: If the data is not publicly available, care should be appointed when choosing the right contact person (committed and with interest in the project) to request it  

  • Lack of data: Some institutions might not be willing to share data, so it is important to be transparent and acknowledge data gaps

Strengthening stakeholders’ capacities

This BB aimed to develop activities to improve stakeholders’ capacities on MSP and sustainable blue economy by helping them understand the big picture of the MSP process, as well as the role that they can play in such policy.

 

I) Training course for governmental representatives included both theoretical and practical sessions. The theoretical ones covered topics such as the concepts of MSP and sustainable blue economy, stakeholder participation and data and information. Moreover, the competent authorities had the opportunity to discuss national initiatives on MSP. Putting theory into practice, participants were divided into groups to play the MSP Challenge Game, representing planners and stakeholders. They defined the vision, objectives, indicators, actions and stakeholders of fictitious countries to simulate an MSP process. After, they developed sectoral plans and used the tokens available to negotiate space and develop an integrated plan coherent with the national objectives. They also had to link aspects of the plan with the achievement of the 17 SDGs.

 

II) Seminars for sectoral stakeholders

Thematic seminars were organized to highlight the need for MSP in the Western Mediterranean: international cooperation, multi-use of the ocean space, and spatial dimension of aquaculture and port infrastructures.

  • Training material and course in the language of the stakeholders (whenever possible)

  • Practical exercises to stimulate the learning process

  • Content: Beyond learning about concepts, participants are interested in real-life examples

  • Gender balance: It is important to request that the list of participants invited to the training courses is gender-balanced

  • Participation: Ensure that the National Focal Point responsible for co-organizing the activities is communicating with partner institutions to guarantee their involvement

Course Development

In collaboration with the University of the West Indies – Open Campus (UWI-OC), Barbados a 12 module/30 contact hour Continuing and Professional Education (CPE) course in Social Enterprise for Caribbean Transformation Course to enable the creation of socially responsible businesses, was developed. This Certificate Programme in social enterprise aims to institutionalize training for ecotourism for long-term sustainability and development. In cooperation with the University of the West Indies (UWI) - Open Campus, this 6-month programme is now available to students and interested stakeholders in 17 English speaking countries in which the UWI-OC operates. 

  • The track record, institutional maturity, project experience and goodwill of the implementing organization as well as the social partnership arrangements allowed for the continuity of the work to develop the course despite the challenges presented as a result of covid 19
  • Having a team of experts that have a community of practice - willing to share their knowledge, invest their time to create the course content; commitment to the process and saw the relevance of the approach and the potential impact

 

  • Having a degree of flexibility within projects and with partners was critical to achieving project objectives and to manoeuvre around unplanned events.
  • The track records and goodwill of the implementing agency allowed for continuity of the project despite varied delays.
  • The competency in terms of the capacity to negotiate, institutional maturity and project experience of the implementing organisation allowed for a solution driven / human centred approach to be applied during unexpected developments.
Incubator and Mentorship Program

One major incentive for participants in the social enterprise training was the possibility to transition on to the Barbados Youth Business Trust (BYBT) incubator and mentorship programme. This programme supported participants in the refining of business ideas, engage in business planning and development and included one on one coaching as well as presentation of business concept to garner financial support. Each person in the incubator was assigned a business mentor. The 1-year mentorship programme focused on lifting participants sketched projects or business concepts to the next level and support in the first phases of its implementation.

Inclusion of partners in the planning and implementation process

  • Ability to attract quality and committed partners allows for the provision of relevant support to beneficiaries.
  • Using an inclusive approach from planning to implementation allowed for ownership, greater buy in and commitment of partners as well as added value to the project