LoRaWan Gateways

Previously these have been donated by Cisco Inc

Cisco 5-7 year support 

good robust tools with warrantee support is required to last 5-7 years

Actility LoRaWAN Things Park Network Server

The network server connects sensors, gateways and end-user applications and ensures reliable and secure data routing all along the LoRaWAN network. Along with the Operation Support System (or OSS), they are the brain that controls the complete LoRaWAN network

https://www.actility.com/lorawan-network-server/

It collects data from the LoRaWan Gateways and transports this data from field based sensors on to Node Red which sends data to Earth Ranger.

It can be self managed through training. It is easy replicable.

It can be deployed on-premise or on the cloud

It works extremely well. It is now implemented across 35 parks, with 1000 sensors capacity across sites.

 

Strengthening community engagement and expert knowledge

With our platform and tools, we not only provide opportunities to raise funds, simplify data collection for monitoring, and detect forest fires earlier to enable faster response, but also foster a sense of ownership for small grassroots projects tackling the globally critical issue of the climate crisis. Each project on our platform is encouraged to share its challenges and success stories with us and the broader community. This engagement happens through regular Community Talks or direct connections with other projects facing similar challenges, fostering meaningful discussions and facilitating valuable knowledge exchange at both local and regional levels.

Our project badges further enhance this sense of belonging, serving as both a symbol of community membership and an official seal of quality for potential supporters. Additionally, our free and confidential advisory service offers Restoration Organizations tailored guidance from our team of experts, empowering them to sustainably develop and improve their initiatives.

Active Community Engagement: Regular opportunities for interaction, such as Community Talks and peer connections, are essential for fostering collaboration, knowledge sharing, and mutual support among projects.

Training and Support: Providing training and ongoing technical support to project implementers ensures they can maximize the tools' capabilities and interpret the data effectively.

Recognition and Validation: Tools like project badges that serve as symbols of quality and credibility are important for both community morale and attracting potential supporters.

Tailored Advisory Support: Offering accessible, expert-driven, and confidential guidance ensures projects can address their unique challenges and make sustainable improvements.

Accessible Technology and Tools: User-friendly, reliable tools for fundraising, monitoring, and early detection of challenges like forest fires are vital for grassroots projects to operate effectively and achieve their goals.

Global yet Local Focus: Balancing global relevance with local impact ensures that both the broad climate crisis and specific regional needs are addressed comprehensively.

Key Lessons Learned

Community Engagement Builds Long-Term Value
Regular interactions through Community Talks and direct peer connections foster a strong sense of belonging and shared purpose. Projects benefit greatly from knowledge exchange, but these forums require consistent facilitation to ensure meaningful participation.

Recognition Drives Motivation and Credibility
Project badges act as an effective tool to recognize and validate project quality, boosting morale among implementers and instilling confidence in donors. However, the criteria for earning badges must be transparent and consistently applied to maintain trust.

Support Must Be Tailored and Accessible
Free advisory services have proven invaluable for projects facing diverse challenges, especially grassroots initiatives with limited resources. However, ensuring adequate capacity within the advisory team to meet growing demand remains critical.

Challenges and Aspects That Did Not Work

Inconsistent Participation in Community Engagement
Not all projects actively participate in discussions or share their experiences, limiting the potential for mutual learning. Encouraging broader involvement remains a challenge.

Balancing Standardization with Flexibility
While project badges and standards provide structure, some grassroots projects felt constrained by rigid criteria that didn’t fully account for local contexts. Introducing adaptability within guidelines has been key.

Advice for Replication

Foster Inclusive Communities
Actively encourage participation in knowledge-sharing initiatives by highlighting benefits and providing incentives for engagement, such as showcasing success stories.

Invest in Scalable Support Structures
Build a robust advisory team and implement scalable processes to accommodate the diverse needs of a growing project community.

Improved monitoring and reporting efforts for restoration

Environmental restoration initiatives must demonstrate the impact of their efforts to donors and other stakeholders. However, many projects struggle with collecting and presenting data effectively. This is where the digital tools TreeMapper and the DataExplorer dashboard provide invaluable support. TreeMapper enables restoration organizations to collect detailed on-site data about their restoration activities, beyond just tree planting. It can track interventions such as firebreaks, topsoil removal, or other ecosystem restoration measures. With an extensive database of over 60,000 species*, offline functionality, and the ability to re-measure monitoring plots, TreeMapper simplifies ecosystem monitoring and ensures comprehensive, reliable data collection.

Collected data is automatically uploaded to the platform, and publicly accessible within each project profile. For deeper analysis, restoration organizations can use the DataExplorer dashboard or export the data for further exploration in Python or Excel, gaining insights to improve their efforts.

Additionally, satellite data from NASA, ESA, and other providers enhances monitoring by verifying project claims and tracking changes in biomass, tree cover, carbon sequestration, and risks like fire or flooding. This combination of on-the-ground and remote sensing data provides a detailed, comprehensive view of project quality and development over time, empowering stakeholders with transparency and actionable insights.

*BGCI 2024. GlobalTree Portal. Botanic Gardens Conservation International. Richmond, U.K. Available at https://www.bgci.org/resources/bgci-databases/globaltree-portal/. Accessed on 11/12/2024.

Robust and User-Friendly Tools: Digital tools like TreeMapper and DataExplorer must be intuitive, reliable, and functional in diverse environments, including offline scenarios, to ensure widespread adoption and effective data collection.

Comprehensive Data Integration: Seamless integration of ground-collected data with remote sensing datasets (e.g., from NASA and ESA) ensures a holistic view of project performance and ecosystem development.

Extensive Species Database: A well-maintained and expansive database, such as TreeMapper’s 60,000+ species catalog, is essential for accurate and detailed ecological monitoring.

Accessibility and Scalability: Tools should be accessible to projects of varying sizes and resources, with scalability to handle diverse restoration activities and large datasets as projects grow.

Transparent Data Presentation: Making project data publicly available in a clear and engaging format fosters trust among donors and stakeholders while promoting accountability.

Key Lessons Learned

Ease of Use is Crucial: Tools like TreeMapper and DataExplorer must prioritize user-friendliness to ensure adoption. Complex interfaces or workflows hinder usage, especially in regions with limited technical capacity.

Offline Capabilities Are Essential: Many restoration projects are conducted in remote areas with unreliable internet. Offline functionality in tools like TreeMapper has been pivotal for data collection in such environments.

Integration of Ground and Satellite Data Enhances Impact: Combining on-the-ground data with satellite insights significantly improves monitoring accuracy and provides a holistic view of project progress, which is critical for both implementers and donors.

Transparency Builds Trust: Publicly accessible and visually processed data strengthens donor confidence and promotes accountability, showcasing the impact of funded initiatives clearly.

Aspects That Haven’t Worked

Inconsistent Data Collection Practices: Projects initially lacked standardized data collection protocols, which complicated integration and analysis.

Limited Early Training Support: Insufficient training materials and support initially hindered effective use of the tools. 

Advice for Replication

Focus on Core Needs First: Begin with essential functionalities that directly address user needs and gradually expand features based on user feedback and evolving requirements.

Standardize Data Collection: Implement clear, uniform guidelines for data collection and reporting standards to ensure consistency across projects. 

Offer Extensive Training and Support: Provide user-friendly training resources, tutorials, and ongoing technical support to help implementers fully utilize the tools.

Adapt Tools to Local Contexts: Consider regional variations in restoration practices and environments to ensure tools are versatile and relevant across diverse settings.

Prioritize Transparent Communication: Make project data accessible and understandable for all stakeholders, fostering trust and engagement.

Organization due diligence and project verification

Restoring forests is a complex and long-term endeavor that requires a holistic approach. To address this, Plant-for-the-Planet has developed its own minimum and top-tier ‘Standards’ for various restoration methods (reforestation, agroforestry, and assisted natural regeneration) that consider biological, social, and economic factors. Organizations and their projects undergo a rigorous verification process during onboarding and are evaluated against these ‘Standards’. Only those meeting the minimum ‘Standards’ are featured on the platform and allowed to actively collect donations.

In the second phase of due diligence, external experts visit the projects for on-site evaluations based on the established standards. These evaluation results are then reviewed, discussed, and ultimately assessed by an independent, voluntary panel of experts - the so-called Review Board.

This thorough process ensures that only high-quality, impactful projects are showcased and supported through our platform, fostering trust and delivering meaningful results. At the same time, Plant-for-the-Planet remains committed to continuously questioning, reviewing, and refining these standards, integrating the latest scientific research findings to ensure their effectiveness and relevance.

Clear and Comprehensive Standards: Establishing robust, well-defined criteria for different restoration approaches that incorporate ecological, social, and economic factors is essential for consistency and credibility.

Thorough Verification Process: A rigorous verification process during onboarding ensures that only projects meeting the standards are featured, building trust among donors and ensuring high-quality initiatives.

Expert Involvement and Independent Evaluation: External experts play a critical role in assessing projects on-site, and an independent panel ensures impartial, transparent evaluation, further strengthening the credibility of the platform.

Commitment to Continuous Improvement: Regularly reviewing and updating standards based on the latest scientific findings ensures the platform remains relevant, adaptive, and aligned with current best practices in forest restoration.

Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency: Clear communication with project owners, and experts, along with a transparent evaluation process, fosters trust and ensures ongoing support for high-quality projects.

Key Lessons Learned

Rigorous Standards Ensure Credibility: The importance of developing and maintaining clear, robust standards cannot be overstated. Well-defined criteria for different restoration approaches are crucial to ensure that only high-quality projects are featured. Without strong guidelines, it’s difficult to build trust among donors and other stakeholders.

Expert Involvement is Essential: Engaging external experts for on-site evaluations adds an important layer of credibility to the platform. Their independent assessments help ensure that projects meet the required standards and provide valuable insights into the feasibility and effectiveness of restoration efforts.

Continuous Improvement is Crucial: Regularly reviewing and updating the standards based on new scientific findings and real-world experiences ensures that the platform evolves and stays relevant. This commitment to continuous improvement fosters long-term success and adaptability in a rapidly changing field.

Aspects That Haven’t Worked

Overly Complex Verification Processes: Initially, the verification process was more cumbersome than expected, causing delays in project onboarding. This was a barrier to scaling, especially for smaller organizations with limited resources. Streamlining the verification process without compromising on quality could improve efficiency.

Inconsistent Stakeholder Engagement: At times, communication with some stakeholders — particularly local project implementers — was less frequent, which created gaps in feedback and adjustments. Ensuring more consistent engagement and collaboration throughout the verification and monitoring process would enhance the overall success.

Advice for Replication

Build Clear, Scalable Systems Early: Developing clear, scalable processes from the start can help avoid bottlenecks and inefficiencies down the line. Make sure your verification and evaluation systems can handle growth and adapt to new challenges.

Simplify the Verification Process: While rigor is important, consider building flexibility into the process so that it doesn’t become a barrier to entry. This can help support a broader range of projects while maintaining quality.

Ensure Strong Communication with All Stakeholders: Regular, transparent communication with all involved parties—including donors, project implementers, and experts—is essential. Establish clear lines of feedback and engagement to foster collaboration and ensure that everyone is aligned on the platform’s goals.

Invest in Continuous Learning: Make room for iterative improvements. Learn from both successes and challenges, and adapt the platform’s processes and standards as you gather new data and insights.

Forest ecosystem restoration and conservation platform

The Restoration Platform (alternatively ‘platform’) is an open-source, open-access digital solution designed to support and coordinate global restoration and conservation efforts. Built with the ambitious goal of restoring a trillion trees and conserving three trillion existing trees, the Platform connects donors, restoration organizations, and researchers in a collaborative network that enhances transparency, accessibility, and impact.

For donors, the platform offers an intuitive and seamless donation process, backed by rigorous due diligence and science-based quality checks, ensuring contributions support credible, high-impact initiatives. Real-time satellite imagery and progress reports enhance transparency, fostering trust and providing donors with a meaningful connection to the projects they fund.

For restoration organizations, the platform provides global visibility, sustainable funding opportunities, and advanced tools for monitoring and reporting on-the-ground impact. Integrated features like the DataExplorer dashboard and TreeMapper enable effective project management and data tracking. FireAlert offers real-time forest fire detection, ensuring swift action to protect restoration sites.

With over 75,000 active users and nearly 300 verified projects from 190 organizations across 64 countries, the platform has become a trusted hub for restoration and conservation. By bridging donors, implementing organizations, and science, it empowers stakeholders to restore ecosystems, combat forest loss, and drive measurable environmental impact.

Year-round participation: Application and onboarding enables us to cater wider user-base and their needs.

User-Friendly Design: Providing an intuitive and seamless data-driven experience for donors and project implementers, from making donations to tracking project progress seamless to all users and externals.

Global Accessibility: Offering multilingual support, open-source tools, and compatibility with diverse payment systems to cater to a worldwide audience and varying needs.

Continuous Innovation: Regularly updating features and integrating emerging proven technologies (e.g., AI, remote sensing, API) to improve transparency, monitoring, and user engagement.

Key Lessons Learned

Trust Requires Transparency: Rigorous due diligence and clear communication of project data are critical to building and maintaining trust among donors and project implementers. A lack of transparency can deter engagement and long-term support.

User-Centric Design is Essential: Early feedback from donors and restoration organizations highlighted the importance of an intuitive interface and seamless workflows. Complex or confusing processes can discourage platform adoption.

Scalability Requires Preparation: As the platform grew, managing increased demand for support, verification, and monitoring tools proved challenging. Building scalable infrastructure and processes from the outset is one important factor to scale.

Localized Support Boosts Engagement: Offering multilingual interfaces and region-specific features was key to attracting global users. Failing to address local needs initially hindered participation in some regions.

Aspects That Haven’t Worked

One-Size-Fits-All Approach: Assuming all users, globally, have the same needs and expertise to understand and appreciate the criticality of restoration approaches, led to disengagement. Tailoring experiences for individual donors and restoration organizations is critical.

Overcomplicating Features: Early versions included too many tools, overwhelming users. Simplifying and prioritizing essential functionalities improves adoption.

Advice for Replication

Invest in Early User Research: Understand the needs of all stakeholders (donors, implementers, scientists) before development begins to avoid costly redesigns later.

Prioritize Scalability and Flexibility: Design systems that can handle growth and adapt to diverse regional requirements from the start.

Focus on Community Building: Foster a sense of shared mission among users to drive engagement and collaboration.

Iterate Based on Feedback: Regularly gather feedback and use it to refine features, ensuring the platform evolves with user needs.

Multilingual Platform Development

ENCOSH was designed as a multilingual platform to facilitate knowledge sharing across diverse cultural and linguistic contexts. The platform was initially translated into Spanish and Portuguese, making it accessible to a broader audience in key regions impacted by human-wildlife conflicts.

The purpose of this building block was to remove language barriers, enabling the global conservation community to contribute to and benefit from the platform. By incorporating automatic translation and multilingual support, ENCOSH fosters inclusivity and maximizes its reach and impact.

  • Collaboration with linguistic experts and translators for accurate content adaptation.
  • Integration of robust translation technology into the platform’s backend.
  • Financial support from partners such as ODEADOM and the University of Salamanca to fund translation efforts.
  • Multilingual functionality greatly enhances accessibility but requires significant resources for implementation and updates.
  • Cultural nuances in translation need careful consideration to maintain the integrity of shared knowledge.
  • Challenges included keeping translations updated as the platform evolved and ensuring the accuracy of automated tools. Regular testing and collaboration with native speakers are recommended to address these issues.
How to make more fish available in the local market

What strategies need to be pursued to make more fish available to consumers in local markets? Because wild fish stocks are generally overfished, and the oceans’ ecosystems experience severe degradation the logical strategy is to increase fish supply through aquaculture. When increasing fish availability, especially for the food insecure population, the approach chosen must be environmentally sustainable, provide fish at an affordable price for this group (e.g., by avoiding additional costs such as for transportation) and should still offer the opportunity for producers to earn a living income.

The approach should therefore be centered around sustainable, decentralized aquaculture adapted to the limited financial and technical capacities of smallholders. Small-scale aquaculture in low-income countries plays already a crucial role in food and nutrition security as well as poverty reduction but still has significant potential to grow. On the one hand, vertically integrated aquaculture farms (companies that expand production to up- or downstream supply-chain activities) make important contributions to a country’s economic growth by increasing export earnings, but they usually have only little impact on the local fish supply and food security. On the other hand, small-scale aquaculture directly contributes to a higher fish consumption by the producers, depending on cultural preference for fish as a source of animal protein and to higher incomes that allow producers to purchase other foods.

When evaluating aquaculture as a source of income, it is important to consider that most small-scale farmers have little technical knowledge and financial capacities. These constraints prevent them from making larger investments for infrastructure and inputs, which are required when operating an intensive aquaculture production system. Formulated feeds, veterinarian products and machinery can significantly increase aquaculture production but are in most cases financially prohibitive for smallholders in remote rural areas. The required investments exceed their financial capacities by far and credits would put the household economies at risk. For this reason, technical and financial capacity development is so important. Optimizing the productivity of earthen ponds with low investments for fertilizer and supplementary feeds generating high profits per kg fish produced seems a workable way forward.

As an example, for a technique increasing production and being adapted to smallholders’ capacities, the GP Fish has introduced intermittent harvesting of Tilapia in Malawi. This practice is applied in mixed sex cultures of Tilapia, based on natural feed supplemented with agricultural by-products. Excess Tilapias, that hatched during the production cycle, are harvested by size-selective traps before reaching reproductive age. These frequently harvested fish are an easy-accessible protein source and nutrient-rich food component for a diversified diet and surplus production is generating additional income. Intermittent harvesting also reduces the economic risk of losing the entire production due to predators, theft, diseases, or natural disasters.

Support and Incentives

This block focuses on the support and incentive structure for participants. It includes providing seedlings, technical advice, and capacity-building. Payments are performance-based, tied to tree survival and the presence of indigenous and long-rotation species, encouraging long-term forest establishment.

  • Technical Support: Seedlings and expert advice on forest establishment.
  • Performance-Based Payments: Incentives based on tree survival, promoting ongoing care.
  • Capacity Building: Training to enhance tree-planting and maintenance skills.
  • Incentives Motivate Care: Linking payments to tree survival encourages better tree management.
  • Technical Support is Essential: Providing seedlings and expert guidance and regular supervision improves survival rates.
  • Capacity Building Empowers Farmers: Training in sustainable forestry practices leads to successful forest maintenance.

 

 

Planting and Monitoring Criteria

This building block outlines the criteria for planting and monitoring tree survival, focusing on long-rotation and indigenous species. It mandates a minimum of 1600 trees per hectare and ensures diverse and resilient forests. The block also emphasizes monitoring 15-18 months post-planting to verify survival and support continuous forest cover.

  • Species Composition: Minimum 25% long-rotation or indigenous species to enhance ecological diversity.
  • Monitoring: Ensures high survival rates and long-term success.
  • Sustainable Forest Cover: Maintained through enrichment planting and natural regeneration.
  • Monitoring Increases Success: Survival monitoring improves tree care and survival rates.
  • Species Diversity is Critical: A mix of species enhances forest resilience to environmental stressors.
  • Land Use Change Takes Time: Transitioning from farming to forest cover requires ongoing effort and monitoring.
  • Capacity Development is Essential: Training on species selection, planting density, and post-planting management should be integral to the process to ensure sustainable outcomes.