Political actors and technical personnel engagement

This helps to orient and introduce the project idea to the relevant officials working with the district/administrators directly or indirectly involved in the project. This was meant to avoid any future audit queries, conflicts arising from implementation of activities. These involved local councilors, local council or village chairmen, district political leaders, environmental police, internal security organizations, district administration officials, district technical staff from different departments(finance, procurement, natural resources, community development, engineering etc). This included other private stakeholders doing more or less similar projects, lodge owners etc. The engagement involved an organized project launch activity or ground breaking ceremony to educate them on the project anticipated activities, locations/areas, budget, beneficiaries, potential risks and the anticipated outcome, plus seeking their input and support for the success of the project. This also involved field visits to access the situation on ground before implementation.

  • Knowledge of the scope of the project, political boundaries and administration, scope of work of all the political and technical actors and their relevance in the implementation of the projects.
  • Mode of communication and ability to reach them - official written communication inviting the leaders and officials to the event.
  • Budgeted funds in the project to facilitate day allowance /transport refund/field visits.
  • Some of the local council leaders, are farmers and it was discovered that they are undertaking activities in the wetland and they were quick to embrace the prospected project activities and showed the will to offer personal advice.
  • This demonstrated the best practice for overall conceptualisation of the project idea by the stakeholders involved.
  • In this event, overall community members of anticipated beneficiaries were not invited. This was done on a different occasion, though it would have been time and resource saving to have them on this one too to help them prepare for the sensitization and education workshops ahead.
Identification of appropriate technology

Data collection is digitised using technological applications often selected to meet the needs of a particular project. In wildlife monitoring and protection, SMART for Conservation was identified as a suitable software for it provides a quick form to record incidents while tracking the distance covered by each team. Further, data collected in this manner needs to be used alongside other datasets for well informed decision making. To achieve this, an integration with Earthranger (an online visualization platform) was instituted to allow visual analysis of incidents and patrol coverage against other components such as tagged animals, live streaming images from security cameras, points of interest and environmental hazard reports.

  • Landscape-level collaboration - Learning from other players in the field to select technologies that have worked and can help in collaboration and sharing

  • Conservation Technology Laboratory - Existence of a technology development and trialing facility at the project site enhanced consultations with developers and other users. It was essential for conducting training, software configurations and system integration.

  • Knowledge of existing gaps - There was a clear understanding of gaps in data submission (time, geolocations and inconsistencies)

  • Team participation - Deliberate involvement of key staff members who have knowledge in the fieldwork designs, management needs and existing gaps is useful in pointing out technological needs.

  • Engagement of other organizations and people - It is important to learn from others who will indicate successful parts of the solution and associated shortfalls. These engagements would often help identify training needs, appropriate equipment and sustainability of the project

  • There is probably no fit-for-all solution - Application of identified technology/solution for data collection and/or analysis may need to be implemented together with other applications to enhance information management and sharing

  • Piloting before implementation - At the point of identification, it is useful to undertake a pilot rollout with a trial group if resources allow to gauge applicability and highlight potential pitfalls

Awareness and community outreach

The purpose of this building block is to ensure that the broader communities are involved in the conservation efforts through activities that they are passionate about i.e youth through sports, school children through reading programmes. This helps to improve the connectedness that the local people have with the rhinos and they value the rhino more. 

  • Organized youth groups and structures

  • Willing and welcoming community

  • Strong partner co-operation

Feedback meetings attended by conservancy leadership have proven to be an important communication tool to discuss objectives, challenges and ways to improve the monitoring programme. We have also implemented various projects to engage local communities through sports, reading programmes and youth clubs. Through awareness campaigns local people feel and realize the important role they play towards the conservation of rhinos.

Logistics and materials

Before responding to the call for projects, it is very important to draw up a list of the equipment available within the structure, and to check that it is in good working order. Then, a list of additional equipment needed to carry out the various activities must be discussed with the relevant people in the project. It is important to check whether the new equipment is available locally or externally, and in the latter case to take into account delivery times (sometimes several weeks or months) and additional costs. Next, it's very important to plan field activities according to weather conditions, and above all to adapt schedules very quickly.

  • Many items of equipment were already present and operational
  • New equipment had been purchased for other projects
  • Sufficient cash flow to be able to advance the cost of some equipment
  • logistical help from a number of local volunteers

As anticipated, it is not possible to carry out field work on the Saint-Pierre and Miquelon archipelago for several months (frozen ponds, for example). Consequently, it is essential to plan outdoor activities taking into account this major constraint, and to adapt the entire project accordingly. Once fieldwork is possible (6-7 months a year), you need to be ready and hyper-reactive to obtain the maximum amount of data.

An original, complementary and motivated consortium

From the outset, the aim was to set up a consortium that would bring together all the local stakeholders involved in nature management on the archipelago, as well as French metropolitan colleagues with expertise in a number of complementary fields: geography, fish biology. Given that only one technician is employed by the fishing federation (all other members are volunteers) and that the project's scientific leader does not live on site, it was crucial to recruit someone who would be responsible for running the project on site. This person was key throughout the project. In addition, we recruited a Master's student to support the CDD in the second year of the project.

  • Recruitment of a one-year fixed-term contract for the project, who worked locally.
  • Frequent exchanges between those involved locally and the scientific manager in mainland France.
  • Strong logistical support and involvement of FTP SPM throughout the project.
  • Student recruited for the project.
  • Excellent interaction between the local project leader and the scientific project leader in mainland France.
  • Rapid response from local stakeholders.

It is essential to form a complementary consortium from the outset, including people who are motivated by the project. Working on islands requires a high degree of adaptability and reactivity to carry out the various field operations, particularly on Saint-Pierre and Miquelon, where climatic conditions can change rapidly.

Effective communication

An excellent communication plan/network with different stakeholders was initiated across different levels. From the inception of the project, the community and other stakeholders were constantly capacitated on how the project is going. A relay of relevant vulture conservation and policy issues was achieved to the target stakeholders within the communities and KAZA TFCA.

Through strong relations established, the project implementers were flexible to engage with different stakeholders at different levels. This would include the arrangement of informal meetings and the use of local language to target different audiences. Social media, distribution of communication material and the power of face-to-face meetings enabled the implementer to reach grassroots levels.

Take advantage of social media platforms and share your story and journey with the whole world.

Face-to-face meetings are a powerful tool for effective communication and enable the project implementers to relay the relevant vulture conservation and policy issues to the target stakeholders within the KAZA TFCA.

Partnerships between key local actors and multi-sectorial, transboundary collaborations

The achieved results relied heavily on the collaboration and cooperation partnerships among various stakeholders, including government agencies, conservation organizations, scientists, and local communities. Collaboration with the Ministries/Government departments was key in sensitizing the communities on issues around human-wildlife conflict and suggested environmentally friendly ways to mitigate the conflict. The scientists were there to collect information related to wildlife poisoning and give feedback to the government ministries. The communities were the key stakeholder since they are the sole custodians of the environment.

The implementers connected with local communities was that we were already working with communities on some other projects, so this enabled our relations to be strengthened. By involving communities in decision-making, they were able to identify some stakeholders with whom we collaborated to share skills, knowledge, and experiences resulting in the project's success. The transboundary collaboration enabled the implementers to focus on tackling vulture poisoning across three countries separately but fighting for the same cause.

Partnering with other organizations trying to achieve the same goal makes the implementation of project results much easier and quicker without a scenario of duplicating the work on the ground. Ideas and possible solutions to a problem can be freely shared resulting in problems being addressed holistically.

Research and Science based decision making.

Our team has identified the importance of accurate data collection, regular monitoring and oversight of data is done by the science and research adviser and Chief Operations officer to ensure accurate data is uploaded to the database. Population management and scientific decisions concerning the rhino population in the country are guided by the data collected during monitoring conducted by our patrol teams. Data based inputs are used to define the carrying capacity for wild-life based tourism and to plan and manage conservation and development activities.

  • Availability of resources

  • Strong partnerships with like-minded conservation partners in the landscape

  • Supporting policies and frameworks

  •  Memorundum of understanding with the local government

  • Social and ecological monitoring enables a thorough understanding of the impacts of activities such as rhino trekking tourism on the rhino population.

  • Effectiveness of our efforts can only be assessed if long-term monitoring data is in place that provides temporal evidence of whether management goals and objectives are being fulfilled.

  • Science-based adaptive management is a very dynamic process which requires commitment from all stakeholders involved.

  • As monitoring is conducted by well trained conservancy rhino rangers (CRR) and Save the Rhino Trust (SRT) trackers, it increases their environmental awareness and provides a sense of ownership and motivation to protect the rhinos.

The procedures for structuring a seedling industry for ecological restoration have been established.

The key players in the nursery market were first identified and classified into four categories: growers, buyers, project leaders and technical partners. These actors, through their experience, represent the basis of the study to determine the challenges and limits of the project.

Through interviews, we were able to identify problems such as :

  • difficulty in obtaining seed at fruiting time,
  • lack of recognition of the sector in the tribe and in vocational training,
  • the difficulty of developing an economic activity in the tribe, adapted to the community rhythm,
  • the high level of technical skills required to produce seedlings in nurseries,
  • the lack of popularized tools adapted to the local context for understanding the nursery trade,
  • the lack of support for the industry (training, matching buyers and retailers, etc.).

The solutions proposed and discussed at the time were the development of a less technical seed-harvesting channel, better adapted to the local rhythm, the publication of a popularized nurseryman's guide and the introduction of vocational training courses in training organizations and directly on the tribe.

New Caledonia being a small territory, identification was relatively quick and easy. The players all responded positively to our requests and answered all the questions asked during the interviews. The idea of a project that would be beneficial to all (producers, buyers, project leaders and partners) helped to rally all players around the project.

The list of players cannot be exhaustive. To do the best we can, we need to focus on a small but representative number of players in each category. This number depends on the size of the territory.

For fast, effective interviews, you need to spend time upstream preparing the questions and methods of solicitation. You also need to be flexible and allow for new subjects to be mentioned. Also, as the interviews progress, it's a good idea to refer back to the problems encountered by other players and propose solutions in order to get fresh opinions.

Governance assessment of the protected area

Before the governance assessment, we undertook a scoping exercise that involved all relevant stakeholders. The assessment used a multistakeholder and multistage engagement process for the scoping exercise, information gathering and validation of results. The scoping workshop informed key governance aspects that enabled the selection of critical governance principles assessed. Various governance issues were identified and how they relate to the conservation of Bwindi. Stakeholders were able to identify best alternative priority actions and how they work. Stakeholders were able to identify the integration of Batwa cultural values as a key feasible solution that can link indigenous people to conservation and their livelihoods. In the implementation of the cultural values approach, various stakeholders are being involved to measure its effectiveness.

  1. The support and willingness by Uganda Wildlife Authority as a protected area management body has been instrumental in facilitating this solution. 

  2. Recognition of the governance complexities as major conservation challenges by all actors such as Uganda Wildlife Authority, Local Government of Kisoro, Rubanda and Kanungu, local communities (including indigenous Batwa) and other conservation organizations

  3. The funding from BIOPAMA was a strong evidence that using small resources effectively, we can achieve greater outputs and outcomes

  1. Identification of and addressing governance complexities has been appreciated by stakeholders as a pathway to sustainable conservation and livelihoods 

  2. Involvement of all relevant stakeholders is key in delivering tangible conservation and livelihood outcomes. It requires micro engagement of actors and how they agree to work together. 

  3. The current protected area management policies are rigid and require amendment to allow integration of governance aspects