Step 3: Plant diversified crops

Next, farmers plant their crops in the Deep Beds. Deep Bed Farming encourages farmers to move away from the monocropping that is practiced across much of Malawi. In monocropping, a single crop, in this case maize, is planted exclusively year after year on the same plots of land. Monocropping weakens the structure of the soil and depletes it of nutrients and leads to the growth of weeds and pests that are difficult to manage. To move away from monocropping, Deep Bed Farming diversifies crops through the application of intercropping and crop rotation.

Intercropping means that additional crops are planted alongside the staple crop of maize in the same season. These crops provide a natural ground cover that conserves soil moisture and also protects the land from the impact of large raindrops, which contributes to soil erosion. Crop rotation refers to changing the crops that are grown on a plot of land over the course of multiple seasons. In Deep Bed Farming, typical choices for intercropping include low-growing crops like pumpkins and ground nuts. For crop rotation, farmers will often rotate between legumes (e.g., beans) and cereals (e.g., maize).

Both intercropping and crop rotation regenerate the land, including undoing some of the damage caused by monocropping. Diversified crops restore depleted soil nutrients, increase soil fertility, improve soil structure and prevent erosion, and provide natural pest management. Together with the use of mulch and compost, this step enables farmers to transition away from the use of synthetic fertilisers.

Step 2: Create Deep Beds

Next is the creation of the Deep Beds. These beds are designed to minimise water runoff, to maximise water retention, and to prevent a new compacted layer of soil from developing. With the soil hardpan broken, Deep Beds and the crops grown on them regenerate the land to allow roots, water, and air to penetrate into the soil indefinitely.

To prepare for the creation of Deep Beds, farmers make careful measurements to plan and then form marker ridges in harmony with the natural terrain. Each ridge has a ditch running alongside it, created with soil excavated when the ridges were formed. Ditches become holding reservoirs for rainwater and allow the water to slowly enter into the soil, helping to improve local water tables through a process called groundwater recharge. If the farmland is on a slope, the ditch is constructed uphill of the ridge so that it can serve as a dam for water after heavy rains. The ridge is then stabilised by planting vetiver. This non-invasive grass establishes deep root networks that contribute to sturdy soil structures, which also helps to mitigate erosion.

Now the farmers begin building the Deep Beds between the marker ridges! Deep Beds are designed to be larger than ridges used in conventional farming in Malawi. Each bed measures one metre wide, enough for two rows of maize or three rows of smaller crops. This wider bed enables a more agricultural land to be used for growing by creating a higher bed-to-ratio. Once created, the Deep Beds are never trodden on again, preventing re-compaction and the formation of a new hardpan.

Step 1: Break the hardpan

Deep Bed Farming begins with the crucial step of using a pickaxe to break up the compacted soil or hardpan. Breaking the hardpan in and of itself delivers powerful benefits by allowing roots, water, and air to penetrate deeply into the soil. These benefits produce immediate effects towards curbing soil erosion, or even stopping it altogether, thereby allowing rich healthy soils to start developing. Crops with deeper roots tend to be stronger. They can also successfully deal with long periods of dry weather and drought, which have become increasingly common because of climate change. Now able to penetrate the soil further, the deeper roots can also store much larger quantities of water for longer periods of time. Greater water storage enables roots to nourish crops far into the dry season.

This first step provides prompt, tangible benefits that are key to establishing credibility and raising enthusiasm for Tiyeni’s methods among farmers. The credibility and enthusiasm also build the momentum to interest farmers in additional aspects of Deep Bed Farming.

 

From Insights to Innovation: R&D, Design and Prototyping

This building block captures the iterative research, prototyping, and testing process behind the design and performance optimization of Sparsa's compostable menstrual pads. The goal was to systematically address key challenges such as absorbency, retention, and hygiene using accessible, compostable materials and context-appropriate methods. 
 
During initial trials, the embossing of the word 'Sparsa' into the pad design caused production issues, as the added pressure led to small holes at the site of embossing. This aesthetic feature was removed in future die versions to preserve structural integrity. Material testing revealed that the non-woven cotton selected for the top layer was hydrophobic, preventing fluid from entering the absorbent core. Though soft and natural, it was unsuitable. It was replaced by viscose, a hydrophilic and compostable fiber. However, viscose caused another issue—it spread liquid too effectively toward the wings, where no absorbent material was present, leading to leakage. 
 
To address these problems, internal lab tests were developed and applied. The team created over twenty prototypes, varying in top layers, glue types, layer arrangements, and inclusion of guar gum. Some of these, like guar gum, improved total retention but introduced a gel-like texture that reduced comfort and slowed absorption. Tests showed that glue can either support or hinder fluid transfer depending on how and where it's applied—too much glue acted as a barrier and even left residues. Effective glue bonding improved layer connectivity but required careful quantity control. 
 
One critical hygiene failure revealed the presence of Staphylococcus aureus. Investigation found that gloves were not mandatory in the fiber factory, especially after cooking. Human skin was the primary contamination source. The team responded by revising hygiene protocols, making gloves mandatory post-cooking in both pad and fiber factories. This step eliminated the bacterial presence in follow-up tests. 
 
To better understand bacterial presence and reduction strategies, five process variations were developed—each changing the sequence of cooking, beating, and chlorine treatment. These were labeled Sample A to E and tested for bacterial load. The results provided insight into how specific steps and moisture conditions influence microbial contamination. 
 
Leakage from the wings was another key challenge, especially with viscose layers that spread liquid outward. Since wings lacked absorbent material, the team created different prototypes to control this spread. Solutions included modifying top layers, stretching or perforating materials, using starch or wood glue in targeted zones, and bonding absorbent materials more tightly. Some prototypes featured layered configurations with transfer paper. Tests confirmed that fluid distribution and retention improved only when materials were positioned effectively—paper layers under the core performed poorly, while those bonded near the surface aided absorption. 
 
Through every iteration, the team learned to question assumptions, test every new configuration, and document repeatable results. Design improvements were not driven by one-time outcomes but by data-backed testing, careful material selection, and practical lessons from production. 
 

  • Continuous prototyping and iterative testing to improve absorbency, retention, and leakage prevention. 
  • Close collaboration between the pad and fiber factories to maintain hygiene standards. 
  • Market analysis to understand competitor performance and identify areas for improvement. 
  • Access to both internal and external testing facilities for thorough evaluation. 
  • Proactive implementation of hygiene protocols, especially for bacteria control. 
  • Flexible material testing to find optimal combinations for performance and comfort. 
  • Strong teamwork and open communication across all involved teams for efficient problem-solving.  
  • Always validate the embossing design in real production settings before finalizing the die. Even small design elements like text can compromise pad performance under pressure. 
  • Before finalizing top-layer materials, conduct small-scale fluid tests to understand their hydrophilic or hydrophobic nature. Visual feel or assumptions can be misleading. 
  • Never order large quantities of fabric without first testing their absorption behavior. It’s more cost-effective to prototype first and confirm the fabric’s functionality in the full pad structure. 
  • Liquid spreading behavior should be evaluated with the full pad geometry. Materials that seem absorbent may cause unexpected leakage in edge areas like wings if no absorbent barrier is present there. 
  • Develop internal lab test protocols early. They help catch design flaws (e.g., leakage, low retention) before costly mass production begins. 
  • Make hygiene practices consistent across all production units. If one facility follows strict protocol and the other doesn’t, contamination will still occur. 
  • Don’t rely on verbal hygiene instructions. Make critical steps like glove use mandatory and tied to specific process stages, such as post-cooking in the fiber line. 
  • Document every change in the fiber treatment process. Small alterations like shifting the cooking or beating order can significantly influence bacterial count. 
  • When using glue, test different concentrations and application patterns. Too much glue may block fluid transfer, while too little may cause delamination. 
  • Use small-batch prototypes to test before full-scale trials. Some may boost retention but hurt comfort or speed of absorption. 
  • If a layer (like paper) is meant to aid fluid distribution, test its placement. Not all positions will support its intended function. 
  • Explore bonding techniques through trial — glue, pressure, stretching, or perforation. Each has pros and cons depending on material and location. 
  • Always question why something works. Prototypes should be backed by repeatable observations, not just one-time success. 
Gobernanza territorial

Este bloque se centra en el fortalecimiento de la gobernanza comunitaria en el Área de Vida Guajukaka, liderada por las comunidades guaraníes de Alto Isoso. A través de procesos participativos, los capitanes y sus equipos técnicos implementan una gestión territorial que vincula saberes tradicionales con herramientas modernas. Mediante talleres y actividades de mapeo, las comunidades profundizan su conocimiento del territorio, identificando áreas críticas para la biodiversidad y priorizando acciones de conservación. en este esfuerzo territorial se elabora el Plan de Inicio de Gestión (PIG) del Área de Vida Guajukaka, donde se identifican las acciones prioritarias para cinco años en el territorio. A nivel de la Autonomía Indogena Charagua Iyambae, se promulga su Ley de Áreas Protegidas.

El GAIOC está considerando asumir una parte del incentivo a los guardianes comunitarios. En la actualidad la Fundación Natura Bolivia, asume el presupuesto estimado para 10 guardianes mensual para remuneración, operatividad y logística de los guardianes del monte es de 18.300 bs, aproximadamente 2.500 USD al cambio actual de Bolivia.

  • Participación Comunitaria: El involucramiento activo de las comunidades guaraníes, lideradas por sus capitanes y equipos técnicos, asegura un compromiso genuino con la gestión territorial. La selección de los guardianes comunitarios es realizada por la entidad territorial organíca y sus bases (comunidades). Los guardaines son afines a la conservación de la biodiversidad y al conocimiento de su territorio. La Fundación Natura Bolivia, realiza capacitaciones en la tecnología que se utiliza.
  • Procesos Participativos: Talleres, mapeos y actividades que promueven el aprendizaje colectivo y la toma de decisiones inclusivas.
  • Capacitación Continua: Formación en gestión territorial y estrategias de conservación que empoderan a los actores locales.
  • Normativas territoriales: El Gobierno Autónomo Indígena de Charagua Iyambae, promulgó una Ley respecto a las áreas protegidas de su territorio.
  • Institucionalidad: Ha incorporado en su organigrama una Dirección de áreas protegidas, así como visualizó los responsables de las áreas protegidas y los guardianes comunitarios.
  • Plan de inicio de gestión del área protegida: Plan de manejo incluye como objeto de conservación a la especie: guanaco del Chaco (Lama guanicoe). También incorpora el rol de los guardianes comunitarios. El plan a sido aprobado en asamblea por las comunidades.
Empowering Grassroots Communities for Forest Patrol and Lemur Conservation

To strengthen the capacity of local patrollers in the Fierenana forest, a targeted training program was implemented to support grassroots communities with practical tools and knowledge for biodiversity monitoring. This initiative focused on lemur conservation and involved both theoretical and field-based instruction. Patrollers were trained in responsible forest navigation, emphasizing the importance of silence, attentiveness to visual and auditory cues, and appropriate behavior to minimize disturbance to wildlife.

A key component of the training was the introduction of four standardized data collection sheets. These tools guided patrollers in documenting transect routes, recording sightings of target species, identifying threats, and noting microhabitat conditions. The transect sheet helped define patrol routes, which followed existing forest trails and were marked every 25 meters with blue flags to aid in spatial referencing. Transects ranged from 1,000 to 4,500 meters and were selected to maximize forest coverage while avoiding deforested areas. To prevent overlap in observations, adjacent transects were spaced at least 250 meters apart.

During patrols, patrollers walked at a steady pace of 1 km/h, recording all visible lemurs along the transect. Observations included species identification, group size, age categories, and, when possible, sex. For each group, the patroller estimated distances to aid in future density calculations. Only visual sightings were counted to avoid duplication from vocalizations. In parallel, patrollers documented threats such as traps, logging, fires, and slash-and-burn agriculture, attempting to quantify their extent in terms of number, volume, or area. Any threats observed were flagged with red markers and dated to avoid repeated reporting in future surveys.

Patrollers also learned to use GPS devices to locate transect starting points and to ensure consistent data collection. Surveys were ideally conducted at the same time each day, starting no later than 7:30 AM, to maintain comparability. Observations of non-target species and off-transect sightings were also recorded to provide a broader ecological context. Each of the nine local community-based organizations (COBAs) was responsible for monitoring two to three transects per month, fostering local ownership and continuity in conservation efforts.

This building block demonstrates how structured training, simple tools, and community engagement can be effectively combined to support conservation goals. It offers a replicable model for other forest ecosystems and species monitoring programs.

In the commune of Fierenana, there already exists a strong foundation for community-based conservation. The local Community-Based Organizations (COBAs) have been actively engaged in protecting the CAZ Forest in Madagascar, which involves participation from both men and women from the local communities, who are committed to environmental stewardship.

Through a process known as “Management Transfer,” the Ministry of the Environment delegates the management of specific forest areas—particularly buffer zones of the CAZ—to these COBAs. These management contracts are reviewed and renewed every three to five years, depending on performance and compliance. Each COBA operates under a formal structure, including a governing board, internal regulations, and a general assembly, ensuring transparency and accountability.

Currently, at least nine COBAs operate within Fierenana, collectively overseeing a forest area of approximately 7,100 hectares. These groups include around 478 members, with a subset designated as patrollers—individuals physically capable of conducting regular biodiversity monitoring and threat assessments, particularly for lemur habitats. Each COBA is based in a fokontany, the smallest administrative unit in Madagascar, which helps ensure localized engagement and oversight.

To streamline coordination and strengthen collaboration with Conservation International (CI), these COBAs were unified under a single umbrella organization: the Vahitriniala Federation. This federation serves as the primary point of contact for CI throughout the BIOPAMA project and facilitated more efficient contracting and project implementation.

Local governance structures further reinforce these efforts. The commune is led by a mayor, supported by deputies, municipal staff, and council members. At the fokontany level, the Fokontany Chief played a key administrative role, while the Tangalamena—the traditional leader—provides cultural legitimacy and often endorses major decisions. This alignment between formal institutions and traditional authorities helped to create a favorable environment for conservation initiatives, ensuring both administrative support and community buy-in.

The rural commune of Fierenana has shown that environmental awareness is most effectively spread when integrated into all types of community gatherings. Embedding conservation messages into routine meetings—especially those led by local authorities—significantly enhances the reach and impact of awareness campaigns.

Effective communication also depends heavily on the credibility and conviction of the facilitator. When facilitators are genuinely committed and transparent in their approach, they are more likely to gain the trust and cooperation of community members.

However, challenges remain. In some cases, individuals have misused the name of a COBA to gain access to forest areas under the pretense of conservation, only to later convert the land for agricultural use. This highlights the importance of rigorous oversight. The Ministry of the Environment must ensure consistent monitoring of the management transfer process, while COBAs must strictly adhere to the terms outlined in their management agreements. These agreements, co-signed by the Ministry and the COBA president, are essential tools for accountability and must be respected in both letter and spirit.

Another key lesson relates to the confidentiality of patrol schedules. To prevent information leaks that could alert offenders, patrol dates should be communicated discreetly within the team. When offenders are aware of patrol timings, they may avoid detection, undermining conservation efforts. Maintaining operational secrecy is therefore critical to the effectiveness of forest monitoring activities.

Building Block 1: Empowering Grassroots Communities for Forest Patrol and Lemur Conservation

To strengthen the capacity of local patrollers in the Fierenana forest, a targeted training program was implemented to support grassroots communities with practical tools and knowledge for biodiversity monitoring. This initiative focused on lemur conservation and involved both theoretical and field-based instruction. Patrollers were trained in responsible forest navigation, emphasizing the importance of silence, attentiveness to visual and auditory cues, and appropriate behavior to minimize disturbance to wildlife.

A key component of the training was the introduction of four standardized data collection sheets. These tools guided patrollers in documenting transect routes, recording sightings of target species, identifying threats, and noting microhabitat conditions. The transect sheet helped define patrol routes, which followed existing forest trails and were marked every 25 meters with blue flags to aid in spatial referencing. Transects ranged from 1,000 to 4,500 meters and were selected to maximize forest coverage while avoiding deforested areas. To prevent overlap in observations, adjacent transects were spaced at least 250 meters apart.

During patrols, patrollers walked at a steady pace of 1 km/h, recording all visible lemurs along the transect. Observations included species identification, group size, age categories, and, when possible, sex. For each group, the patroller estimated distances to aid in future density calculations. Only visual sightings were counted to avoid duplication from vocalizations. In parallel, patrollers documented threats such as traps, logging, fires, and slash-and-burn agriculture, attempting to quantify their extent in terms of number, volume, or area. Any threats observed were flagged with red markers and dated to avoid repeated reporting in future surveys.

Patrollers also learned to use GPS devices to locate transect starting points and to ensure consistent data collection. Surveys were ideally conducted at the same time each day, starting no later than 7:30 AM, to maintain comparability. Observations of non-target species and off-transect sightings were also recorded to provide a broader ecological context. Each of the nine local community-based organizations (COBAs) was responsible for monitoring two to three transects per month, fostering local ownership and continuity in conservation efforts.

This building block demonstrates how structured training, simple tools, and community engagement can be effectively combined to support conservation goals. It offers a replicable model for other forest ecosystems and species monitoring programs.

In the commune of Fierenana, there already exists a strong foundation for community-based conservation. The local Community-Based Organizations (COBAs) have been actively engaged in protecting the CAZ Forest in Madagascar, which involves participation from both men and women from the local communities, who are committed to environmental stewardship.

Through a process known as “Management Transfer,” the Ministry of the Environment delegates the management of specific forest areas—particularly buffer zones of the CAZ—to these COBAs. These management contracts are reviewed and renewed every three to five years, depending on performance and compliance. Each COBA operates under a formal structure, including a governing board, internal regulations, and a general assembly, ensuring transparency and accountability.

Currently, at least nine COBAs operate within Fierenana, collectively overseeing a forest area of approximately 7,100 hectares. These groups include around 478 members, with a subset designated as patrollers—individuals physically capable of conducting regular biodiversity monitoring and threat assessments, particularly for lemur habitats. Each COBA is based in a fokontany, the smallest administrative unit in Madagascar, which helps ensure localized engagement and oversight.

To streamline coordination and strengthen collaboration with Conservation International (CI), these COBAs were unified under a single umbrella organization: the Vahitriniala Federation. This federation serves as the primary point of contact for CI throughout the BIOPAMA project and facilitated more efficient contracting and project implementation.

Local governance structures further reinforce these efforts. The commune is led by a mayor, supported by deputies, municipal staff, and council members. At the fokontany level, the Fokontany Chief played a key administrative role, while the Tangalamena—the traditional leader—provided cultural legitimacy and often endorses major decisions. This alignment between formal institutions and traditional authorities helped to create a favorable environment for conservation initiatives, ensuring both administrative support and community buy-in.

The rural commune of Fierenana has shown that environmental awareness is most effectively spread when integrated into all types of community gatherings. Embedding conservation messages into routine meetings—especially those led by local authorities—significantly enhances the reach and impact of awareness campaigns.

Effective communication also depends heavily on the credibility and conviction of the facilitator. When facilitators are genuinely committed and transparent in their approach, they are more likely to gain the trust and cooperation of community members.

However, challenges remain. In some cases, individuals have misused the name of a COBA to gain access to forest areas under the pretense of conservation, only to later convert the land for agricultural use. This highlights the importance of rigorous oversight. The Ministry of the Environment must ensure consistent monitoring of the management transfer process, while COBAs must strictly adhere to the terms outlined in their management agreements. These agreements, co-signed by the Ministry and the COBA president, are essential tools for accountability and must be respected in both letter and spirit.

Another key lesson relates to the confidentiality of patrol schedules. To prevent information leaks that could alert offenders, patrol dates should be communicated discreetly within the team. When offenders are aware of patrol timings, they may avoid detection, undermining conservation efforts. Maintaining operational secrecy is therefore critical to the effectiveness of forest monitoring activities.

Local and national awareness campaign on agroecology

Agroecology is a holistic approach, often described as a practice, a science and a social movement. Agroecology is the base for all interventions suggested in this solution.

As the initiated mindset change requires a fundamental, global behavioural change, an essential part of the efforts are directed to advocacy and awareness building activities such as information spreading through media houses, social media channels and conducting field visits with stakeholders from government, policy makers, educational entities, NGOs, donors and the private sector. 

Malawi has a population of around 22 million (worldometer 2025), of which almost 18 million are smallhoder farmers. If the initiated grassroot movement can be strengthened, Malawi could act as a leader in the global agroecological movement.

In times of climatic and economic crisis, smallholder farmers in Malawi are very vulnerable in terms of food security. 

Microcredits for smallholder farmers who venture into (agricultural) businesses are more likely to transition to agroecology, as long as their basic needs are covered.

It is fundamental to involve governmental agricultural extension officers, as they are long-term stakeholders who monitor and accompany the practical implementers in the field, the smallholder farmers. 

To accelerate this process, strong advocacy efforts are needed on national level that push for policy shifts and their implementation. 

Monitoring and Reporting on Restoration Progress

A structured monitoring and reporting framework was established to track the progress of each restoration method and assess outcomes. This framework involved regular data collection and reporting by trained community members, who were assigned specific tasks to ensure that the project’s ecological and social goals were being met. By monitoring the effectiveness of each intervention (e.g., soil erosion control, vegetation growth), the project could adapt techniques as needed and document best practices for future expansion.

  • Community Training and Capacity Building: Training local residents in monitoring techniques empowered the community to take responsibility for the project’s success.
  • Regular Data Collection and Reporting: Consistent data collection provided real-time insights, allowing for timely adjustments to improve restoration outcomes.
  • Collaborative Evaluation Processes: Involving the community in evaluation built transparency, ensuring that monitoring results were shared and understood by all stakeholders.

Building Knowledge and capacities is key for understanding and ownership!

Suivi de l’application et de l’impact de la Convention Locale

Les chargées du suivi définis dans le cadre de la CL suivent le respect des règles, les mesures techniques prévues et l’évolution de la ressource.  Les résultats de visites de terrain sont présentés au moment des assemblées réguliers des signataires et lors des rencontres de la structure de gestion de la CL. 

Les résultats servent en tant que « outil d’aide à la décision » pour les actions ou futures ou modifications à entreprendre.

Pour obtenir des données valables et actuelles, et afin de faciliter leur propre monitoring des mesures de restauration, il est important que les communes veillent à la tenue des assemblées.  Il est conseillé qu’ils accompagnent le suivi propre des chargées de suivi de la CL. 

Outils : réunions du comité de suivi, assemblées générales, (photos, tableaux de suivi), enquêtes usagers

  • Cadres de suivi clairs et implication communautaire
  • Dans les cas de continuité des acteurs initiateurs dans la zone il est conseillé qu’ils encouragent les communes et ST de suivre les CL et/ou de suivre eux-mêmes. 

La gestion adaptative est essentielle pour relever les défis émergents