Planter Selection Criteria

This building block defines the criteria for selecting eligible tree planters and planting sites to ensure the success of the results-based incentive system. Participants include individual farmers and small community groups with land holdings ranging from 0.125 to 20 hectares.

Selection of planting sites is guided by established Land Use Plans (LUP), ensuring that the sites align with sustainable land management and restoration priorities. This approach helps optimize the ecological and socio-economic benefits of the plantations while reducing conflicts over land use.

The building block emphasizes proper identification of participants who meet the eligibility criteria and are committed to transforming their land into sustainable forests under the incentive system.

  • Clear Guidelines: Strict criteria requiring the inclusion of long-rotation and indigenous tree species alongside other tree species preferred by farmers.
  • Diverse Participants: Involvement of individuals and groups to ensure broad engagement.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Legalization of land ownership and documentation with GPS coordinates or shapefiles for transparency.
  • Community Trust: Transparent selection processes build trust and increase participation.
  • Documentation is Key: Using GPS or shapefiles for land boundaries enhances monitoring and transparency.
  • Varied Engagement: Including both individuals and organized groups fosters greater community involvement and ownership.
  • Secure Land Use Rights: Land use or resource use right certification is crucial to sustaining group plantings, ensuring long-term commitment and reducing potential conflicts.
Comprehensive life-cycle breeding program (Ex-Situ Conservation)

A comprehensive artificial breeding program was established over four years, producing 10,000 fish annually for conservation and reintroduction. Challenges included low genetic diversity and habitat-specific requirements.

  • A gene bank was established based on the concept of Noah’s Ark, aimed at increasing the population of the Formosan landlocked salmon through artificial breeding.
  • In 2000, the Formosan Landlocked Salmon Conservation Symposium was held, where a comprehensive conservation framework was developed. The goal was to gradually restore the five historical streams in the upper Dajia River, where the salmon originally thrived, within 30 years. A dual strategy of in-situ (on-site) and ex-situ (off-site) conservation was adopted.
  • Purely artificial breeding methods can reduce genetic diversity, so it is essential to establish a complete and sustainable breeding program.
  • There is limited experience in reintroducing endangered species, making it crucial to understand the life history and habitat requirements of the Formosan landlocked salmon. 
The Establishment of Shei-Pa National Park in 1992

Shei-Pa National Park has included the Qijiawan River catchment in its protected area, with conservation plans focusing on habitat preservation and breeding programs.

  • The Formosan landlocked salmon, discovered in 1917, is a unique species that is considered a "glacial relict." It is found exclusively in the high-altitude streams of central Taiwan, marking the southernmost and highest-altitude wild distribution of any salmon species in the world. This species is regarded as a natural monument and an iconic national treasure.
  • By 1984, the Formosan landlocked salmon was nearly extinct, with 90% of its historic range across five streams reduced, leaving only about 200 individuals.
  • In 1989, the Wildlife Conservation Act was enacted, listing the Formosan landlocked salmon as an endangered species (EN), signaling the urgent need for conservation.
  • During Taiwan's economic miracle in the 1960s to 1980s, human development spread to the mountains, leading to overfishing, water pollution, and habitat destruction. To conserve the Formosan landlocked salmon, the Wildlife Conservation Act was enacted, and Shei-Pa National Park was established to strengthen protection efforts.
Committee establishment, formalization and operationalization

Inclusive and participatory mapping of all stakeholders in the mangrove space in the five counties of Kwale, Mombasa, Kilifi, Tana River and Lamu. A series of meetings for sensitization on the National Mangrove Management Plan, and later facilitated formation of the national and five county committees. The committees were then facilitated in developing their workplans and executing some of the activities. This has since been picked up. 

Partnership and collaboration.

Inclusive processes

Willingness and trust amongst partners 

Participants and facilitator

Before the game can be played, the facilitator must be trained, and the participants selected.

The choice of a game facilitator should fall on someone knowledgeable about land use issues and who knows the social background, culture, language and customs of the local communities, as this expertise is crucial for leading the final debate. To prepare the facilitator, a good approach is to have them play the game once, along with other future facilitators. The goal of this first trial is not only to train them, but also to adjust the game rules to the local context. The game functions better when tailored to the local context. After the trial, a debriefing should be conducted to assess what worked well, what didn’t, and to determine what events or tokens could be created to best represent the region where the game will be played.

To select the participants, the organizers can work with the village chiefs, who will help identify and mobilize the various groups affected by the land use issue to participate in the game. They also can assist in selecting an appropriate location for the game to take place.

Participants should come from diverse groups, including young people, women, farmers, breeders, and others. During the game, it may be beneficial to sometimes keep these groups together and at other times mix them, in order to foster different dynamics and debates.

-knowledge of the facilitator in land use planning, social issues, ecological dynamics and ecosystem services

-interest of the participants to cooperate with other stakeholders

-mutual trust between participants and with the facilitator

-contact should be made with the village chief

-open atmosphere

-To reach the participants, a good way would be to get in contact with the village chief. 

- Having facilitators that belong to the same culture of participants and talk the same language is very helpful to create an open and safe environment.

- During training phase, don’t plan or add too many process, elements and rules to the game to reflect the local context, elements will arise more naturally while playing if the game remain enough flexible.

Stakeholder Collaboration Portal

The database fosters collaboration by providing accessible tools for policymakers, law enforcement, researchers, and NGOs. This collaborative model could be replicated to facilitate cross-sector cooperation in combating global challenges such as climate change or poverty.

Policy Evaluation Framework

The platform is designed to assess the effectiveness of laws and enforcement efforts, such as the Endangered Species Act and Lacey Act. This framework can be applied to evaluate policy impacts in other regulatory areas, like labor laws or international trade compliance.

 

use AI

To preserve natural resources, artificial intelligence must be introduced to preserve them, and automation must be used to preserve environmental diversity by linking to the use of the Internet today, which is everywhere, controlling it, and following up. It was made into a real reserve and controlled using connected surveillance cameras. Transporting animals to a safe environment protected by surveillance cameras to reduce poaching.

Signing of agreements with the communities of the villages of Bouna and Nassian for access to the PNC as part of the worship of sacred sites.

At the end of the workshop, all the points of the model agreement were validated by the stakeholders present. The next stage of this important activity was therefore the organization of meetings with the communities of the various villages concerned in the Bouna and Nassian sectors to discuss any difficulties they might have in implementing the convention for access to the PNC in connection with the worship of sacred sites, followed by the signing of the convention in the villages visited. A meeting tour with the communities of each village whose representatives were present at the December 2022 consultation workshop was carried out to discuss the implementation of the convention for access to the PNC in the context of the adoration of sacred sites, and to proceed with its signature. The tour was attended by the OIPR/DZNE (the North-East Zone Director, the Project Manager, the Riparian Measures Manager, the Chiefs of the sectors and rural animators concerned) and the Biodiversity and Forests Expert from GIZ/Pro2GRN. There was a massive response from the local population, with village and land chiefs and their notabilities warmly welcoming the delegation.

The visit to each village lasted a maximum of 2h30mn, and the main activities included a welcome, installation and presentation of courtesies, a reminder of the context, objectives and rationale of the agreement, a reading and explanation of the agreement's content, the adoption and signing of the agreement by both parties, with a copy being given to each village, and discussions on other aspects of relations between the OIPR and local communities. Some twenty agreements were signed during the tour.

Pre-validation of the agreement model with the representatives of the communities concerned at the consultation workshop and their presence during the tour facilitated exchanges and understanding of the content by all the communities, which led to their support and the signing of the agreements by their representatives. Sites in other sectors (Tehini, Dabakala, Kong) need to be inventoried in order to sign new agreements with these villages.

Validation of a model agreement for access to sacred sites in the CNP with communities, in the presence of local authorities.

The workshop to validate the agreement on access to the PNC as part of the worship of sacred sites was attended by a number of players, including the prefectural authorities, GIZ, the villages bordering the Bouna and Nassian sectors, and local radio stations. The DZNE and its partner GIZ/Pro2GRN coordinated the event perfectly.

This phase required a preparatory phase, which involved drawing up and validating the terms of reference and the draft agreement for access to the sites. The OIPR-DZNE team presented the draft agreement to all participants. Two (2) working groups were set up to scrutinize the agreement already drawn up for comments (Suggestions and recommendations).

Each group presented the results of its discussions. The suggestions and recommendations made during the plenary sessions on the draft convention were presented and discussed.

The workshop thus enabled the model convention for access to the CNP in the context of the worship of sacred sites to be reviewed in its entirety, the opinions of the stakeholders were collected and taken into account in accordance with the management rules of the National Parks and Nature Reserves of Côte d'Ivoire, and the model convention for access to the CNP in the context of the worship of sacred sites was validated.

The study carried out to identify sacred sites in the CNP identified riverside villages with existing sites in the protected area and a need to revive these practices. This facilitated the mobilization of these villages for the validation of the model agreements.