Incentive and sustainability

Our project is based on the premise that farmers want sustainability and are incentivised to achieve this. No farming operation will be viable in the long run unless it is done in an ecologically and economically responsible manner. Climate change has led to an increased frequency of drought, as well as an increased severity of drought in the western regions of South Africa. Stocking rates are effectively falling as a result of climate change, and this necessitates the need for farmers to diversify income in order to survive. Failure to change will have a devastating impact on biodiversity.

We are incentivising farmers to protect biodiversity through the adoption of more sustainable farming practices, e.g. grazing rest, correct stocking rates and habitat restoration activities. While these lead to fewer, but better quality animals, the farmer still experiences a loss of income. We help the farmer compensate for this through the adoption of non-farming activities such as ecotourism.

Through continual engagement with the farmer, we are able to address concerns as they are raised and ensure that the farmer perceives active engagement in the partnership as an incentive to improve his farming operation.

The region has an existing tourism industry which can be leveraged upon. Known as the ‘bulb capital of the world’, the area is well known and relatively close (a 3.5 hr drive) to an international airport. However, this season lasts approximately 2-months, and this project seeks to extend tourism operations throughout the year.

The farmer needs to be open to tourism as a means of generating tourism income. 

The project has immediate potential to generate additional revenue and can be custom designed to suit the infrastructure and abilities of the farmer.

  • Choose projects which are quick to implement and quick to show results.  This will booster partnerships and improve the chances of other promises being fulfilled.
  • Farmers are not keen on paperwork and administration and often require support in this area, especially as it relates to the new venture.
  • It is very important to demonstrate that the incentive is working as this underpins continued collaboration. Celebrate the small successes.
Partnerships

It goes without saying that change cannot take place unless based on sound partnerships that have clearly defined roles, responsibilities and deliverables. Changing farming practices is challenging as these ingrained practices have been passed down for generations. The EWT is able to assist the farmer to bridge the gap between traditional farming techniques and the skills required to transition toward nature-based tourism models.

We found it essential to select farmers who are open to change and then to build their trust through the provision of proven deliverables and mutual respect. Roles and responsibilities need to be clearly outlined and defined in order to speed up the operationalisation of projects and avoid misunderstandings. Our project set holistic goals that supported the farmer and his family, the farm workers, the conservation of biodiversity and provided a unique experience for the outdoor enthusiast.

Building lasting and open partnerships are one of the hallmarks of this project. It is part of the foundation for our success.

  • Trust
  • Open channels of communication
  • Clarity on what parties want
  • Willingness to collaborate
  • Realistic projects that are well thought out and can realistically provide the expected benefits.
  • Trust and partnerships are built on regular contact.
  • Communication must be open and honest.
  • By ensuring that a staff member was on site we could build trust more rapidly. Having an EWT staff member in the area to provide extension services was of critical importance.
  • Finding willing partners that are enthusiastic is critical to success.
  • Providing constant support and encouragement – if you promise to do something it has to be done.
  • Ensure that there is a reciprocal situation where the farmer also has responsibilities to perform at his own cost – this leads to a more vested relationships where it is in everybody’s interest to ensure the project is successful.
Covid19 Protocol

Elaborate a Protocol to minimize the damages caused by COVID19 and to be able to open the Protected Area for the enjoyment of tourists and the economic exploitation by the Tourist Service Providers, based on a traffic light by levels and capacities of load and by permitted activities.

Safeguard human life and the park's ecosystems.

establish carrying capacity levels for its use and occupation

dissemination of the Protocol's traffic light system

New reality of social behavior

establishment of social parameters to be followed

mediating between the economic needs of service providers and health care

preserving jobs through new work paradigms

preservation of ecosystem health

Strategic Plan for the PN Marine Zone of the Espiritu Santo Archipelago

Participatory strategy carried out with environmental, tourism, surveillance and tourism service providers, academics and researchers and civil organizations, which sets the actions and goals to be achieved for the conservation of the reproduction, births and breeding of the sea lion colony as the most precious conservation object of the protected area and the most important source of income for tourism service providers.

Synergy between all stakeholders

commitment within its scope of application

paradigm shift

Protection of sources of employment

long-term conservation

Service providers committed to training and new ways of carrying out tourism activities.

Flexible environmental authorities to commit to make changes in the norms and regulations that allow new governance schemes.

Tourism and surveillance authorities, proposing new norms and better sustainable practices.

All stakeholders at the table, seeking shared governance for the conservation and improvement of direct and indirect employment and PA conservation.

Construction of best practices and regulations for a better use of the PA.

Conservation of the sea lion colony through collective awareness.

Management for the identification of biodiversity and participatory and motivational management for the restoration of Protected Areas.

In addition to the formality and territorial planning related to the Local System of Protected Areas, the municipality, based on environmental management, developed the following components as a highly important strategy:

- Promotion of incentives for community and landowner participation to restore natural protective vegetation that improves ecological connectivity and functionality.

- Awareness-raising and education actions to promote knowledge of the biodiversity of municipal ecosystems and the importance of SILAPE as a strategy to conserve this functionality and strategic ecosystems.

- Identifying the biodiversity of the different groups as fundamental knowledge to take actions for their conservation and encourage participation in conservation and conservation decisions in land use planning.

- Actions to protect endangered fauna in sites of connectivity disruption and vulnerability of highly important fauna species. Includes implementation of aerial wildlife crossings (61 installed).

- The knowledge of local biodiversity based on technological tools that generated videos and clear images made it possible to see the important and abundant biodiversity of species, thus allowing unusual conservation decisions to be made in a territory that is part of a Metropolitan Area with high urban growth.

- The environmental management of the Secretariat of Environment in the different periods of governance has included the issue of Protected Areas as a component of high importance.

- Ecosystem conservation depends on local enthusiasm and identification of the importance of biodiversity and strategic ecosystems.

- Management plans and conservation proposals must be included in land use plans.

- Protected area management should be approached from a regional perspective so that each municipality takes the model and implements it in its own municipality with a logic of connectivity and ecosystem globality.

- The participation of research institutions in the biodiversity identification process and in the formulation of protected area projects is of great importance; it avoids doubts about the importance and certainty of the proposals.

- Community participation motivated by the evidence of biodiversity and the functionality of ecosystems is of great importance to keep alive the enthusiasm for its dissemination and knowledge.

Agreement 009 whereby the Local System of Protected Areas is adopted and implemented.

The Municipal Council of Envigado adopted Agreement 009 which aims to contribute to the identification, conservation, management and proper management of strategic ecosystems and protected areas in the jurisdiction of the municipality, articulating these actions to departmental, regional and national management scales that strengthen human sustainability through the effective achievement of conservation objectives.

Inclusion of the Local System of Protected Areas in the Land Management Plan in order to promote land uses that favor the protection and conservation of the associated fauna and flora.

Importance of knowledge of the biodiversity of species to value local ecosystems and make it known by different means to promote the interest and ownership of institutions and the community in conservation.

Local conservation is successful when it is based on internal initiatives that integrate institutions and the community and is supported by knowledge, participation and norms that motivate or encourage the protection of ecosystems.

Land use planning and ecosystem conservation strategies should be closely related in order to define congruent conservation projects and decisions that are supported by national norms.

Protected areas as environmental determinants in land use planning.

Protected areas in the urban context become an environmental determinant of land use planning and management, which, as higher-ranking norms, shield these spaces from changes that may be considered in relation to land uses other than the conservation and preservation of biodiversity and depend on political will for their management.

  • They provide guidance to municipal administrations on land use within protected areas, guaranteeing green spaces that help adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change and respond to the challenges of resilient, sustainable and biodiverse cities.
  • Reduce the occurrence of socio-environmental conflicts around strategic ecosystems in urban areas.
  • They favor the fulfillment of the Sustainable Development Goals and the IAHSI targets of the Strategic Plan of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

The fact that protected areas are environmental determinants of land use planning is the clearest possibility that exists to avoid the alteration, degradation, or disappearance of strategic ecosystems in the urban context, favoring the collective right to a healthy environment, as these cannot be ignored by municipal administrations or by the political will of the moment.

However, it is not enough to incorporate them into the planning tools to position the designation, regulation and administration in order to achieve specific conservation objectives in public policies and to ensure that there is an effective commitment to them. Interinstitutional coordination and articulation are necessary to achieve effective management of protected areas in a scenario particularly dense in conflicts and interests such as the urban landscape.

Strategic relationship for the management of protected areas in the urban context

The relationship between stakeholders (institutional, citizen, academic, and private sector) allows the creation of administration and co-management mechanisms that respond to the needs of the protected area and the effective management within the framework of the execution of the Management Plans contributes to the environmental governance of the protected areas.

  • The optimization of resources and institutional capacities in the implementation of protected area management plans for their effective management.
  • The definition of the roles and competencies of the different stakeholders with respect to the protected areas allows for greater clarity in terms of the instances of action and participation in their management, control and monitoring.
  • It strengthens citizen participation and governmental, community and private inter-institutional alliances.
  • Recognition of the actions, knowledge and initiatives of citizens regarding the conservation and protection of these strategic spaces for the maintenance of biodiversity and the preservation of ecosystem services.
  • Co-management promotes inter-institutional dialogue and the exchange of knowledge to develop a joint construction of the protected areas, which allows for the strengthening of trust among the stakeholders, reaching levels of good governance.
  • The contribution of private enterprise contributes to the sustainability of urban protected areas, while at the same time it is potentially functional to the private sector's environmental responsibility actions.
Playful, pedagogical and communicative strategies for the social appropriation of protected areas.

The guarantee of conservation of urban protected areas, beyond the technical and legal exercise of declaring them, is a robust process of social involvement. To this end, it has been essential to develop actions and strategies to promote recreation and environmental education around protected areas, expanding a collective awareness of the importance of their conservation, not only for biodiversity but also for the quality of life in the city.
The appropriation of socio-ecological concepts becomes a key factor in achieving the conservation objectives of protected areas. To the extent that stakeholders are committed to and recognize the values and ecosystem services that these types of spaces provide for the sustainable development of cities, the permanence of these spaces over time is guaranteed in desirable conditions for the conservation of biodiversity and amenity, enjoyment, well-being, and physical and mental health for all.

The continuity of social appropriation processes based on environmental education and public communication for biodiversity provide tools for the management and adequate co-management of protected areas, facilitating coordinated actions among all stakeholders: institutions, citizens, academics and the private sector.

  • The environmental education strategies and the dynamization through activities such as interpretive tours, yoga, weaving, bird watching, etc., allow for better learning, understanding and appropriation of the protected areas to the extent that another type of relationship is built between humans and nature and the search for a biocentric vision of life where interdependencies are recognized.
  • Other educational-environmental tools are strengthened and provided, as well as other conservation actions that were being developed by citizens and other stakeholders prior to the declaration.
  • The incorporation in the citizenship and the government of some concepts based on the dialogue of knowledge helps the conservation of ecosystems and biodiversity.
  • Participatory action as a fundamental axis for the successful management of protected areas.
  • Other actors and sectors are involved in the conservation strategy of protected areas, including universities and companies, which make contributions based on their specific interests and capacities.
Development of a Local Investment Instrument

The objective of the intervention was to develop strategic planning to guide local investments for ecosystem and landscape restoration in an effective and efficient manner. In order to achieve this objective, a methodological framework was developed that includes four steps: 1) Mapping of relevant local actors at the territorial level, 2) Participatory analysis of the dynamics of environmental degradation, 3) Definition of objectives, goals and restoration activity and 4) placement of resources.

The mapping of relevant local actors was carried out using the GIZ "Capacity Works" cooperation model; for the analysis of environmental degradation and the definition of objectives, the "Open Standards for Conservation Practice" methodology of Conservation Measures Partnerships - CMP was used.

PREP as a framework,

funding mechanism as an incentive/"promise" of an effective implementation of the PDLS (having in sight a real possibility of receiving funding for the implementation of the PDLS motivates the actors to participate actively).

Trust in FIAES, MARN and GIZ

Lessons from the construction process, piloting now being used in all areas prioritized by the PREP (?)