Wetland Conservation: Prioritize protection and build a solid safety barrier for wetlands.
  1. Explore and promote a coordinated supervision mechanism for the reserve. Establish a quadruple linkage mechanism with local ecological environment and natural resources departments, and sign a cooperation framework agreement on the supervision and management of ecological environment in nature reserves. Taking ecological environment protection supervision, the “Green Shield” special operation, and satellite remote sensing verification as the main tools, regularly carry out joint inspection special operations on prominent environmental issues in the reserve to lay a foundation for effective management and protection of the reserve.
  2. Explore and establish a "one center, four systems" management and protection model. That is, with the "modernization of the governance system and governance capacity for ecological civilization construction" as the core, create a "three zones" comprehensive management and protection system, an "air-sea-land" all-round management and protection system, a "24-hour" round-the-clock management and protection system, and a community grid-based full coverage co-governance system. This forms a closed management of the core area, with local governments in the buffer and experimental zones being responsible for their territories, functional departments working together to manage and protect, and community residents widely participating in a "large-scale protection" pattern.
  3. Explore and implement minimal intervention ecological restoration technologies. Conduct habitat reconstruction, targeting degraded wetlands, by adopting a combination of measures such as "cattail and iris crushing + micro-terrain shaping + ecological water replenishment" to reshape shallow banks, water areas, and vegetation belts suitable for foraging and resting of red-crowned cranes, and restore the hydrological connectivity of wetlands. Implement food chain restoration by introducing benthic organisms (such as snails and shellfish) to rebuild the foundation of the food chain, attracting shorebirds like sandpipers and ducks, and forming a virtuous ecological cycle. The Spartina alterniflora control project has been implemented, using methods such as mowing, deep turning, and flooding, with more than 70,000 acres of Spartina alterniflora controlled. The treated areas have become new habitats for red-crowned cranes and other rare birds.
  1. The correct leadership of the higher-level governments and departments
  2. The broad basis for cooperation among governments at all levels.
  3. Nature-based Solutions
  1. The contradiction between protection and development still exists.
  2. The impacts of global climate change and human development on coastal wetlands are constantly changing, posing significant challenges.
  3. There is a lack of long-term and effective mechanisms for cross-regional coordinated protection.
“Tour Inside, Stay Outside” policy to control pollution within the protected area

Jiuzhaigou has strictly adhered to the "Regulations on Scenic Areas of Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture" for years. By implementing the "tour inside, stay outside" policy, it has effectively protected its natural resources, establishing China's most successful visitor diversion model. This strategy has successfully controlled pollution sources within the protected area, achieving zero sewage discharge and 100% harmless treatment of domestic waste in the protected area.

  • A clear regulation served as the basis of enforcement
  • A determined and effective governance authority
  • A thorough and considerate system of infrastructure in the protected area

A reasonable range of lodging and dining options available outside the protected area

Local and national awareness campaign on agroecology

Agroecology is a holistic approach, often described as a practice, a science and a social movement. Agroecology is the base for all interventions suggested in this solution.

As the initiated mindset change requires a fundamental, global behavioural change, an essential part of the efforts are directed to advocacy and awareness building activities such as information spreading through media houses, social media channels and conducting field visits with stakeholders from government, policy makers, educational entities, NGOs, donors and the private sector. 

Malawi has a population of around 22 million (worldometer 2025), of which almost 18 million are smallhoder farmers. If the initiated grassroot movement can be strengthened, Malawi could act as a leader in the global agroecological movement.

In times of climatic and economic crisis, smallholder farmers in Malawi are very vulnerable in terms of food security. 

Microcredits for smallholder farmers who venture into (agricultural) businesses are more likely to transition to agroecology, as long as their basic needs are covered.

It is fundamental to involve governmental agricultural extension officers, as they are long-term stakeholders who monitor and accompany the practical implementers in the field, the smallholder farmers. 

To accelerate this process, strong advocacy efforts are needed on national level that push for policy shifts and their implementation. 

Biofertilizer and biopesticde production for restoration of natural soil fertility

27 farmers benefitted directly from learning how to prepare their own biofertilizers and biopesticides with locally available ingredients. The goal is to gradually reduce mineral fertilizers and chemical pesticides until it they are completely quitted.

If participating smallholder farmers are supported with materials to prepare their own biological amendments and are guided in the production and application, they are more likely to prepare these themselves and more likely to quit chemical-synthetical prodcuts.

Local, regional and national advocacy meausres are required to build awareness among all stakeholders. 

Entrepreneurship and Value Chain strengthening in the Aquaculture Sector

To foster entrepreneurship in the aquaculture sector, an innovative Aqua Entrepreneurship Development Model was co-created in collaboration with established Aqua Entrepreneurs (AEs), businesses, and professionals across Assam and Odisha. The initiative aimed not only to nurture a new generation of rural entrepreneurs but also to document and systematize the process through a Entrepreneurship Promotion Guidebook (see download section below) enabling other implementers to replicate the model in different regions.

Monitoring and Reporting on Restoration Progress

A structured monitoring and reporting framework was established to track the progress of each restoration method and assess outcomes. This framework involved regular data collection and reporting by trained community members, who were assigned specific tasks to ensure that the project’s ecological and social goals were being met. By monitoring the effectiveness of each intervention (e.g., soil erosion control, vegetation growth), the project could adapt techniques as needed and document best practices for future expansion.

  • Community Training and Capacity Building: Training local residents in monitoring techniques empowered the community to take responsibility for the project’s success.
  • Regular Data Collection and Reporting: Consistent data collection provided real-time insights, allowing for timely adjustments to improve restoration outcomes.
  • Collaborative Evaluation Processes: Involving the community in evaluation built transparency, ensuring that monitoring results were shared and understood by all stakeholders.

Building Knowledge and capacities is key for understanding and ownership!

Raising Awareness on Restoration and Livelihood Opportunities for Maasai Women and Youth

The project incorporated awareness-raising campaigns to educate the Maasai community about sustainable land use practices and the importance of ecosystem restoration. Specific opportunities, such as grass seed banking, were introduced to provide economic benefits, particularly for women and youth. These campaigns aimed to shift perceptions of rangeland management from merely subsistence grazing to a multi-benefit approach, combining ecological health with economic empowerment for marginalized community members. The learning by doing by the community helped to foster restoration skills among the members, thus making the community restoration champions on their own land.

 

  • Culturally Sensitive Communication: Using respected community leaders and existing networks allowed the campaign to resonate with local values and traditions.
  • Direct Livelihood Benefits: Offering tangible economic incentives, such as grass seed banks, made the restoration efforts more appealing by showing immediate benefits.
  • Supportive Partnerships for Implementation: WWF, Big Life Foundation, Justdiggit and ALOCA’s presence in awareness-raising efforts lent credibility and technical expertise, facilitating widespread acceptance
  • Economic Incentives Encourage Participation: Providing livelihood opportunities (e.g., through grass seed banks) increases community engagement and shows that restoration has both ecological and economic value.
  • Awareness-Building is Essential for Behavioral Change: Restoration projects succeed when communities understand and value the benefits, highlighting the need for clear and consistent messaging.
  • Empowering Women and Youth Drives Wider Impact: Targeting marginalized groups like women and youth not only enhances inclusivity but also expands the project’s reach and sustainability through diverse engagement. 90% of the restoration work was undertaken by  women and youth.
Agreement on Designating and Demarcating Restoration Sites

To ensure effective restoration, project leaders worked with the community to designate and physically demarcate specific areas for intervention. This included mapping the landscape to identify priority areas for rangeland restoration, addressing concerns over land ownership, and ensuring community consensus on where boundaries would be drawn. The collaborative designation process allowed for clear agreements on how the land would be used, while physical markers helped prevent future conflicts over land use and maintain restoration areas.

  • Community-Driven site identification      and Planning: Engaging the community in mapping exercises fostered a shared understanding of the landscape and prioritized areas needing urgent intervention.
  • Clear Boundary Markings: Physically marking boundaries (e.g., with fencing or natural markers) and border patrols by community scouts provided clear, visible indicators of designated restoration areas, reducing misunderstandings over land use.
  • Consensus-Building Processes: Reaching community-wide agreements on site designation      increased local commitment to respecting and protecting these areas.
  • Clear Boundaries Prevent Conflict: Physically marked boundaries reduce potential disputes over land use, ensuring that restoration areas remain protected.
  • Local Input Enhances Relevance and Suitability: Community involvement in site selection increases relevance, as local knowledge helps identify areas that are both ecologically valuable and socially acceptable for restoration.
  • Ownership Through Shared Decision-Making: Engaging the community in boundary designation fosters a sense of ownership, increasing commitment to maintaining and protecting these restoration sites.
Organization of Community Meetings with Landowners (Local Barazas)

Community meetings, or barazas, served as the primary platform for engagement with landowners to discuss and align on proposed restoration interventions across 150 hectares of rangeland. These meetings were designed as participatory sessions where local Maasai landowners could voice their concerns, ask questions, and gain clarity on how the project would impact their land use. The barazas were instrumental in fostering transparent communication between project implementers and local stakeholders, allowing for an inclusive decision-making process that respected Maasai traditions and community dynamics.

  • Culturally Respectful Engagement Methods: Conducting barazas, a traditional community meeting format, allowed project leaders to approach discussions in a culturally appropriate manner.
  • Representation and Inclusion: Including landowners and community representatives ensured that diverse perspectives were heard and that decisions reflected the community's priorities.
  • Consistency and Follow-Up: Regular meetings provided a forum for ongoing dialogue and feedback, strengthening trust and adaptability to address any new concerns as the project progressed.
  • Transparency Builds Trust: Open and transparent discussions in barazas helped demystify the project’s goals, building trust and minimizing resistance among community members.
  • Community Ownership Leads to Better Alignment: When landowners are actively involved in the decision-making process, they are more likely to support and participate in the project, ensuring that interventions align with their land use priorities.
  • Iterative Feedback is Key: The regular nature of barazas provided continuous feedback, allowing the project to be responsive and adaptive to local needs and evolving challenges.