Will Burrard-Lucas
East and South Africa
Claudio
Sillero
Evidence and Awareness
Vaccination
Detection
Will Burrard-Lucas
East and South Africa
Claudio
Sillero
Evidence and Awareness
Vaccination
Detection
Monitoring + Evaluation

Given the lack of experience and the high need for learning and improving the solution, M+E is key. Starting in the nursery how the different seedlings develop, then after planting and in regular intervals. this allows improving the design, to determine the need for soil improvement, suitability of individual species on respective sites and many other aspects - including upscaling to other areas and countries with similar needs and circumstances.

- Capable institutions and link / partnerships to scientific organizations and individuals

- Local ownership and dedication, also beyond the project's lifetime

- a sound and realistic monitoring system from the outset

M+E needs to focus and should be carried out by knowledgeable and dedicated individuals and organizations. It should also involve the local landowners and their traditional knowledge

Technical knowledge on sites, species and nurseries

The sites are heterogeneous and have different degrees of degradation, resulting in different intervention needs and opportunities. It is crucial to understand which species appear in nature as groups and to design the planting design accordingly. Mother trees, flowering periods and storability of seeds need to be known and the planting has to be adapted according to suitable planting periods. In the nursery, the focus on good root systems of the seedlings is key, requiring appropriate nursing equipment, substrate and trained staff.

- knowledge, link to research and traditional knowledge

- capacities to collect seed material from the right tree for the right place and the right purpose

- sufficient funding and training capacities

Investment of time and funding in the above-named factors pays off in form of higher survival rates, better growth, and project success. Some aspects should not be compromised, for example the size of the seedling containers and the substrate.

Local ownership and co-management

The project follows a co-management approach from the outset - partner communities and local authorities have been consulted prior to planning and implementation. They have been actively involved in all steps of the project implementation, received training and were compensated for their efforts (planting). Examples include the integration of their local knowledge about the selected species and the benefits such as NTFPs.

Key is a good understanding of the local stakeholders and farmers to not only understand the purpose but also the benefits they will have if the project is implemented successfully. This goes beyond the planting and includes the management, to secure success beyond the project's lifetime. With a view to upscaling itis also crucial to align with local and national policy priorities and support the backing of decision-makers. Lastly, dissemination to receive braoder support.

It is difficult but can and has to be done - the ecosystem services are vital to the local population and the intensity of storms and droughts requires action and upscaling. Errors in this pilot work are necessary to improve the approach because there is little knowledge about the selected species, some of which are threatened by extinction (e.g. Shorea falcata). We have learned many lessons, e.g. on how to improve the seedling quality in the nursery and the planting approach, which are two crucial factors for the survival rates.