CATS CARPHA UAS flying and mapping methods training course St. Lucia, November 2018
GIZ
CATS CARPHA UAS flying and mapping methods training course St. Lucia, November 2018
GIZ
CATS CARPHA UAS flying and mapping methods training course St. Lucia, November 2018
GIZ
CATS CARPHA UAS flying and mapping methods training course Grenada, December 2018
GIZ
Demonstrating UAS Site Results: Beausejour Wetlands
GIZ
Mushroom Cultivation Training: Inoculating substrate, St. Lucia, 2017
GIZ
Mushroom Cultivation Training: Trainee collects sample for pure culture, St. Lucia, 2017
GIZ
Soufriere Primary School Tree Planting and Farming initiative, St. Lucia.
Caribbean SEA/Waterways
Soufriere Primary School Tree planting by students with the assistance of Grounds Crewl
Caribbean SEA/Waterways
World Food Day Exhibition of Soufriere Primary School
Caribbean SEA/Waterways
The CATS Programme was based on the acknowledgement that good practices within the terrestrial zone augur well for the health of the coasts and marine spaces. Thus, it worked with practitioners (farmers, foresters, agroprocessors) within this space by teaching and reinforcing good practices that could be incorporated within their operations. A small group was also taught the specialised skills for mushroom cultivation as an alternative to traditional crop production. This niche area was anticipated to increase food production diversity as it aligned with the practices of good resource management, recycling of byproducts and resilience. For practitioners at the management level, the Programme supported the training of various persons in the practical application of Unmanned Aerial Systems for natural resource management and monitoring. Since CATS Programme’s introduction of this, several other organisations both private and public sector have embarked on similar trainings for their officers.
Resource management was an area of much focus by various actors within the stakeholder community. Thus, the challenge of obtaining buy-in and interest was minimal. Partners already had at least a basic understanding of the importance and relevance of effective resource management and the interconnection between the terrestrial and marine spaces. Further, given there were several other actors in the technical support and grant sectors with whom it was possible to collaborate to maximise results. Support from the ministries of agriculture in the various islands was also an enabling factor. Their technical expertise helped facilitate the implementation of the various initiatives. The ministries were the principal source of technical support for all terrestrial interventions under the programme. With regard to the management level, the actors, particularly in the forestry sector, saw the technology as a very relevant intervention as they were keenly aware of their monitoring limitations and saw the tool as an opportunity to improve the scope and efficiency of their monitoring.
The incorporation, within farming practice, of non-synthetic inputs for fertility and control of pests and weeds, though widely practiced many decades ago, is now alien to the majority of farmers. Modern farmers rely on their crop for their livelihoods and have clearly expressed that they are not willing to experiment on their sale crops by incorporating improved practices. They expressed concern about the risk of diminished crop quality, a situation which would reduce their revenue. They were unconvinced that they would be able to sustain their livelihoods if they were to change their farming practice to be more environmentally friendly. Thus, and future iterations of projects seeking to improve farm practices would have to incorporate significant investment and focus on demonstration plot establishment, research and development and start-ups. Despite having gone through a very rigorous process of participant selection for the mushroom cultivation training, it was recognised that the personal economic challenges and ambitions of the participants was an inhibiting factor; although all the trainees were keenly interested in pursuing the business start-up, they were challenged by the need to have secure revenue, and found it easier to continue their modus operandi prior to the training, as opposed to making the sacrifice needed to start the new businesses. All this was despite the project incorporating in its design access to raw materials needed for production during the initial months of production. The high-risk aversion of persons being encouraged to start up new businesses needs to be overcome by incorporating even more support mechanisms. The Programme failed to complete the second phase of the remote sensing training, thus pilots trained and their organisations failed to attain the full support needed to confidently incorporate remote sensing in their operations. Future such interventions should ensure completion of all necessary phases of support to ensure sustainability.
In addition to the direct actors at the operational level, institutional decision-makers, independent quality offices, certification bodies and research institutions are key actors to implement quality assurance of fish products on a national scale. The complexity of the value chain, which interferes with the traceability of the product, and the significant geographical distances between fish producers and consumers present a substantial challenge in maintaining the quality of fish. Therefore, it is difficult to trace back the product's source when spoiled or inferior fish reaches the consumers. Fish production and distribution are conducted both formally (e.g. through organized cooperatives) and informally by individuals. In most developing countries, the fish value chain predominantly follows an informal market system with limited quality management and traceability systems for fish. In the absence of traceability, there are concerns about trust and transparency in the marketing and consumption of fish in terms of the quality, food safety and price of products, which ultimately affects both consumers and fish sellers.
Partnerships with inspection authorities enable compliance with hygiene standards and strengthen traceability. A jointly developed hygiene and quality control plan ensures regular sampling and analysis along the entire chain, provided local staff have the required lab equipment. First sale certificates—preferably digital—help register origin, species, seller, and destination. Action plans with markets and auction halls, management commitment, codes of hygiene practices, and mobile apps all support implementation.
Implementation experiences should be regularly discussed with political decision-makers, associations, and value chain actors to ensure lessons are shared and challenges addressed. Long-term success depends on integrating the costs of sampling and analysis into the annual budgets of inspection authorities and securing stable financial contributions. Clearing out financial obstacles is more effective when the hygiene and quality control plan is aligned with local political strategies. Sustainability must therefore be at the core of implementation. Digital tools such as apps or online certificates have proven valuable for resource efficiency, communication, and transparency, as they help register products and disseminate training materials. At the same time, experience shows that incentives play a decisive role: the discard of spoiled fish from the market is immediately linked to a loss of income, creating strong motivation for compliance with hygiene and quality standards.
To ensure quality and safety in the fish value chain, from catch to consumer, it is vital to consider all steps of the value chain due to potential food safety risks. Implementing hygiene and quality trainings, introducing first sale certificates, and establishing control plans for state institutions are key interventions. A thorough value chain analysis is crucial for identifying improvement areas and requires visits to actors and a review of hygiene regulations. Based on this analysis, targeted interventions can be identified, ranging from policy to practical actions, involving research enhancement, regulatory support, and capacity development. The direct actors in the value chain are fishermen, retailers, traders, transporters, warehouse workers, and suppliers who play a role in the production, processing, delivery, or sale of products to consumers. They are the first point of contact for ensuring safe, high-quality products and therefore represent the primary target group for trainings on hygienic handling, storage, and transportation practices.
Hygiene and quality interventions require context-sensitive training supported by infrastructure such as ice production, cold chains, and equipment. Training-of-trainers strategies anchor knowledge in local institutions, while association leaders or market supervisors act as brokers to spread practices. Consumer and buyer sensitization is vital, as demand for fresh fish drives adoption. Communication and dissemination must reflect local media capacities—printed guidelines or mobile apps—to ensure accessibility and long-term impact.
Training must reflect the roles of varied actors in the fish value chain. While all need awareness of biochemical processes such as microbes, food-borne infections, personal hygiene, recognizing fresh and spoilt products, using ice to uphold the cold chain, and cleaning workplaces, fishermen focus on storage and cooling while processors stress hygienic equipment handling. Effective tools include on-the-job training, demonstrations, visuals, and tailored guidelines. Feasibility, feedback, coaching loops, and follow-up surveys are crucial for sustainable results.
National Mangrove Ecosystem Management Plan 2017-2027
NA
National Mangrove Ecosystem Management Plan 2017-2027 provides for establishment of National and County Mangrove Management Committees to serve as advisory organ to inform Kenya Forest Service on the technical issues regarding mangrove management. The committees at national and in the five counties of Kwale, Mombasa, Kilifi, Tana River and Lamu, have been established and operationalized. Their membership comprise of technical experts for mangrove ecosystem relevant disciplines, including; Forestry, Fisheries, Wildlife, Water, Land, and Climate, and representatives of communities and Civil Society/Non-governmental organizations.
The National Mangrove Ecosystem Management Plan was developed through a participatory process and adopted by Government.
Inclusive participation of Government, community, Civil Society/Non-governmental organizations
Government policy that provides for establishment of the committees to coordinate mangrove management