Protection of Meadows, Waterholes and Springs

The objective of this measure is to prevent water loss by retaining water, increasing its capture, and preventing and controlling erosion during periods when rainfall is more intense. To this end, we are working to protect meadows, water sources and springs with live fences planted with native species of queñuales (such as Polylepis incana or Polylepis racemosa), mainly, as well as colle(Budleja sp.), elder(Sambucus peruviana) and alder(Alnus spp), and stone piles. At the same time, the ecosystem's capacity to continue generating services for the communities and resist climate variations is maintained and increased, thanks to the fact that the organized population cares for, protects and conserves the springs, meadows, grasslands, grasslands and forests of the Jalca or upper part of the basin, and makes good use of the water.

The selection of forest species is based on traditional knowledge about the species that are best suited for the intended purpose. Thus, it is built by combining traditional knowledge with technical knowledge and participatory community work such as mingas, which integrate and increase social cohesion.

  • These practices have been identified and planned after a collective analysis by the villagers themselves, according to the socio-ecological reality of the area, and have been prioritized in the PMP.
  • Groups of several families that benefit from the water have been required to get together, after an inventory of these water sources carried out by the villagers themselves, so that they can organize themselves and provide the necessary labor.
  • It is a shared support, since the community members contribute and support each other in this work.
  • The constructive process of protecting the meadows, springs and springs has generated in the communities and, moreover, in their leaders and authorities a greater self-esteem, a strengthening of their capacities and a greater commitment to their family, community and future generations.
  • By protecting their water sources, in addition to maintaining and increasing the capacity of the ecosystem to continue providing water to local communities, it allows them to resist climate change variations, optimizes its use, ensures this vital element for times of scarcity or drought, and promotes the well-being of the communities.
  • As with the first BB, the demand for paid labor in the area reduces the availability of families to work in mingas, conditioning them to certain days and with restricted participation.
Water Harvesting in Microreservoirs and Sprinkler Irrigation

Within the concept of integrated management of the family plot, water harvesting was one of the most important points to make the process sustainable. In this sense, it was sought that the Jalca communities strengthen their water culture and use it efficiently and conserve the ecosystem that provides it, taking into account that it is likely that water scarcity will increase due to the effects of climate change. Thus, the farming family incorporated the efficient use of water and its conservation as a fundamental aspect of their development, making the most of water runoff during the rainy season through family micro-irrigation and sprinkler irrigation. The objective was to harvest, augment and use water. The land micro-irrigation systems were built by combining traditional and technical knowledge, within the framework of communal family work called "mingas", which strengthen social organization and the values of mutual support and social cohesion between families and the community. In addition, the PPA Project provided part of the food, some of the necessary tools and materials, as well as technical guidance and accompaniment in the process. The local government provided machinery and fuel for digging the wells.

  • The technologies were identified and planned after a collective analysis of the socioecological reality of the area, carried out by the villagers themselves, and were prioritized in the Participatory Management Plan.
  • Groups of 2 or 3 families that benefit from the water from the micro-supplies have been required to get together in order to have the necessary manpower, in addition to the support of the community. This is a shared support, since everyone contributes to the construction of the micro-reservoir for each family group.
  • The construction process of the micro-irrigation systems has generated in the communities and, moreover, in their leaders and authorities a greater self-esteem, a strengthening of their capacities and a greater commitment to their family, community and future generations.
  • The use of technified irrigation optimizes the use of water and thus ensures this vital element for times of scarcity or drought.
  • Family mingas are a communal activity; an ancestral custom, which is being recovered and revalued by the communities, as the great strength they have as a community to develop any activity, work and event that may arise.
  • The different infrastructure projects that were being developed in the area, such as the construction of the road and the installation of the electric energy network, which offer paid work and provide an opportunity for the peasant families to have an additional economic income, conditioned the minga work to certain days and with restricted participation.
Bioremediation

Bioremediation includes the use of organisms to eliminate contaminants from the soil or water. In the bioremediation system, water from the Chonta canal passes first through settling ponds and then through larger ponds where cattails and reeds - local plants - were installed to absorb rust from the water through their roots. Bacteria are also used to reduce the acidity of the water. Finally, the canal provides 120 L of purified water per second for the entire population and was implemented thanks to the collaboration of institutions based on community demand. It was designed under criteria of traditional and scientific knowledge: the appropriate places to build the sedimentation ponds, the wetland area, the selection of plants such as cattails and the technology for transplanting into the wetlands. CIAL members and the community clean the sedimentation ponds once a year between April and May. When the rains start, they let in a minimum flow, only for wetland maintenance and the use of some farmers.

The CIAL monitors water quality in the system twice a year; they mainly measure pH and electrical conductivity.

  • It started from a locally driven process to solve a local priority issue.
  • The measure is part of a larger strategy: the Community Development Plan (CDP).
  • Organization of local participation through the committee.
  • Prior relationship of trust between the community and the Mountain Institute, which supported implementation.
  • Continuous monitoring of the quality and proper functioning of the bioremediation system by the committee members.
  • It is necessary to plan the supply of inputs, either by confirming if there are sources to acquire them or if it will be necessary to produce them, such as sulpho-remediating bacteria in the wastewater treatment plants. While the plants do exist, there is not good management and not enough bacteria, so the laboratory needs to produce them especially for installation in wetland ponds.
  • The technology also requires rules for the proper use of treated water.
  • The operability of the water committee is a key factor and requires institutional strengthening and advice.
  • An important role of the committee is to follow up the system through monitoring and maintenance of the infrastructure.
  • Implementation needs to be accompanied by training, such as in infrastructure monitoring and maintenance (cleaning of sedimentation ponds and wetlands) and sediment management.
The Local Agricultural Research Committee

The Comité de Investigación Agropecuaria Local (CIAL) was established in 2000 and its members were chosen at a community assembly. The criteria established by the community members themselves to choose the local researchers were based on certain characteristics such as being observant, committed, responsible and punctual. The CIAL began with 16 members, both men and women. Its creation was based on the principles of Participatory Action Research (PAR). The CIAL and the IM initially carried out participatory research between 1999 and 2001 to recover pastures for cattle, starting with one hectare ceded by the community for this purpose and ending with 10 hectares thanks to the growing interest of the community members.

In 2010 the CIAL was reactivated with 24 members to carry out research under the name "Good Pasture, Good Water". In 2014 the CIAL was institutionalized in the community, being part of its organizational chart as one of its specialized committees and being included in the community's internal regulations. It is a very active committee, which is in permanent dialogue with its directors and with the entire assembly to report the progress of the research and its proposals, so that they can have the support for the necessary work through the communal tasks.

  • The commitment of its members (although some young people had to withdraw due to other obligations).
  • The support and backing of its community leaders.
  • The community's level of governance, which is reflected in: (i) its level of planning, the community prepared its Community Development Plan; (ii) the institutionalization of the CIAL in the community's organizational chart and internal regulations; and (iii) the management capacity of the community leaders, who obtained external support (e.g., heavy machinery) to implement the actions.
  • The process of institutionalizing the committee took much longer than anticipated, from its constitution in 2000 to its recognition in the statute as technical advisors to the community on pasture and water issues.

  • Empowerment and capacity building of committee members in the use of water quality monitoring equipment and data interpretation was key.

  • The initiative responded to a priority need of the community itself, namely water, responding to problems they have had since 1970. As mentioned by CIAL members, "we were always asking ourselves and other institutions why the color of the water and the smell and taste had changed and no one would give us an answer, until we were able to understand and improve the quality of our water" (Vicente Salvador).

  • It is necessary to prepare alternate representatives for the committee, since it demands a lot of time dedication, so some very empowered members left the committee due to their other obligations.

Participatory Management Plan for the Community Moorlands

The Andean Páramo Project (PPA), executed between 2006 and 2012 and financed by the Global Environment Facility (GEF), facilitated the construction of the Participatory Management Plan for the conservation and sustainable use of the Páramo. First, the community was approached and trust was established, then a participatory diagnosis was developed to obtain information not only about the páramo, but also about the local population's knowledge and perceptions about it. Also, spaces for discussion and reflection were generated, inviting community members who make direct and indirect use of the páramo. The interaction between the facilitation team and the villagers, through workshops, allowed knowledge sharing and mutual learning. Finally, the Community presented its Plan to the local and regional authorities, assuming the monitoring of the same, to follow up on the conservation status of its moors, the dynamics of land use, as well as some indicators related to their quality of life.

Required:

  • A highly participatory and reflective process.
  • Commitment of the community and the institutions in charge of the project.
  • Implementation of conservation and productive activities.
  • The development of the participatory management plan has been a long process, but with a lot of involvement and participation of the local population.
  • The commitment of all stakeholders involved, mainly the community and the provincial municipality of Ayabaca, to support the implementation of the management plan.
  • The permanence of the institutions in the area for a long period of time to accompany and support the implementation of the management plan and the management of other initiatives.
Compensation mechanism for ecosystem services: Quiroz-Chira Water Fund

The mechanism of retribution for ecosystem services Quiroz-Chira Water Fund (FAQCH) has been created with the purpose of channeling economic resources from the users of the lower basin of the Quiroz, Macará and Chira system to implement conservation and sustainable development actions in the upper basin, being the community of Samanga one of the beneficiaries of the Fund since 2014.

For this, the community must annually prioritize up to two activities and develop a proposal that is reviewed and approved by the FAQCH, for which an agreement is signed with the community for the implementation of the proposal.

The FAQCH brings together five public institutions (municipalities of Ayabaca and Pacaipampa), irrigation boards (San Lorenzo and Chira) and NGOs (Naturaleza y Cultura Internacional), who contribute on an ongoing basis, in cash or in value, to finance the proposals from the communities of the upper watershed. The good governance characteristics of the fund give it the confidence of its members (participatory, transparent and accountable). This process has matured with the support of public and private organizations and successive cooperation contributions, and is now in a scaling-up phase.

  • Conditions of trust and transparency between all stakeholders: upper and lower basin.
  • Clear rules from the beginning for beneficiaries.
  • Formal agreements for the implementation of activities and conservation.
  • Long-term commitments by all involved.
  • Continuous monitoring and evaluation of activities.
  • It is possible to obtain the commitment of the actors directly involved (in water use) to finance conservation and development actions.
  • It is necessary to include in the proposal support for sustainable economic activities that ensure improved livelihoods for the population implementing the measures.
  • It is preferable to channel the use of economic resources to implement concrete actions and not to establish agreements for direct 'payment' for conservation because in time these can become a vicious circle or even a reason for blackmail (e.g. "if they don't pay me I don't conserve").
  • The evidence and interaction between beneficiaries and contributors of ecosystem services are favorable for maintaining the best relationships and commitments among all those involved.
  • It is important to maintain the financing of the Quiroz water fund to sustain actions in the long term.
Outdoor Education Opportunities

One of the focus points for the development of the Treverton Wildlife Area was to create opportunities for Outdoor Education. More and more research is pointing to the requirements to create opportunities for children, youth and adults to experience the outdoors. Focusing on the benefits to the people improves the motivation for the participation. Understanding the psychological, social, education and physical benefits of outdoor education to individuals allows for greater involvement and increased utilization by educators and the educational institution. The outdoor education facility allowed for the outdoor activities to be conducted (camping, hiking, picnicking, action based projects, exercising, educational projects, solitaire, etc.).   These outdoor educational opportunities, activities and projects were and are not the only outcomes achieved.  The outdoor education projects are planned with the specific intension of either improving the biodiversity or at the least not impacting on the biodiversity.

Explanations, backed with research findings, of the significant benefits of outdoor events, projects and activities encourages participation which in-turn facilitates the biodiversity related projects. It is imperative that appropriate planning prior to an event or educational programme is conducted.  This must include a risk analysis and procedures.  Information on these should be fed to the participants.  The more a programme/project is conducted the more the project can be duplicated for the benefit of biodiversity.

It takes time for some people in the 'chain' to comprehend the concepts presented and to understand the advantages of Outdoor Education projects.  For example, understanding how the outdoor activities have significant benefit to individuals who can then have an impact on the biodiversity by conducting specific projects in the protected area.  

Once one leader in a community of practice 'buys' into the concept, others will follow.  Once a project has been conducted and the advantages 'advertised' to others then the knock-on benefit is seen when the next project is developed. Reducing the barriers to participation is important.  This might include time allocation to the projects, transport availability and extra adult supervision where required.  Conducting a comprehensive Activity Risk Assessment and development of Protocols with Control Measures for Outdoor Education projects assists with the planning process removing some of the barriers to having learners participate in activities outdoors.

Public - Private Partnerships

CIMMYT and more than 150 local and international partners from the public and private sectors participate in MasAgro’s research and development (R&D) activities and contribute to its implementation in the 12 hubs mentioned before. Each year, MasAgro’s research infrastructure and impact areas depend on the different type and number of participants, although SAGARPA provides core funding and CIMMYT leads most R&D activities. CIMMYT and Mexico’s agricultural research system (INIFAP) have bred and released 49 improved varieties of white maize and yellow maize that are adapted to small scale and rain-fed farming conditions in central, south and southeastern Mexico. CIMMYT has also offered specialized training to more than 50 Mexican seed companies that reproduce and commercialize the improved seed in MasAgro’s target areas. To help farmers adopt and achieve the yield potential of the improved maize varieties CIMMYT implements the sustainable intensification strategy described above.

Public - private partnerships require a flexible approach to intellectual property rights. CIMMYT has been able to broker these partnerships for the benefit of thousands of farmers because the product of its research is free of intelectual property rights and has the status of universal public good, whether that may be improved seed, agronomic expertise, smart machinery prototypes or maize and wheat genotypes. Partners of an agreement of this nature must be willing to exchange information and to collaborate with each other. 

It takes time to develop an effective network of partners. Some local seed companies did not send back information of field trials or markets. They wanted to have access to improved maize lines adapted to the markets where they sold seed but were reluctant or unable to send back information needed to further select or identify the best materials. It became necessary to offer specialized training on seed production and marketing to local seed companies. It was also necessary to build trust in the research and development network, and to help representatives of individual companies identify new markets for their products. CIMMYT identified different regions of Mexico that could increase maize production by substituting landraces with new high-yielding and resilient seed. These medium to high potential conversion zones offered new markets and incentives to local seed companies participating in MasAgro. These activities have been matched with ongoing efforts to train farmers on the adoption of the new high-yielding seed so that they may achieve their full yield potential. 

Sustainable Intensification

MasAgro is in its seventh year of implementation developing a sustainable intensification strategy of maize production systems based on conservation agriculture, and on the development and transfer of improved, high-yielding, climate ready maize seeds to farmers’ fields. MasAgro develops small farmers’ ability to adopt the product of CIMMYT’s research on maize conservation and improvement, agronomy, farming machinery, information and communication technologies (ICTs), and postharvest storage solutions. CIMMYT has developed innovation networks or hubs between maize farmers, researchers, service providers, extension agents, authorities, local seed producers and industry representatives in 12 regions of Mexico that have specific agronomic, ecological, weather, infrastructure and market conditions relevant to maize production. Each hub is formed by research platforms, demonstration modules, extension and impact areas where improved seeds, management systems, farming machinery and ICTs are developed, tested and adapted to farmers’ needs. MasAgro offers training to extension agents, technicians and farmers who maintain an ongoing exchange of information that has been key to achieve resource conservation and use efficiency, productivity gains and income increases.

Each year MasAgro’s research infrastructure and impact areas depend on the type and number of participants, although SAGARPA provides core funding and CIMMYT leads R&D activities. CIMMYT and Mexico’s agricultural research system have bred and released 49 improved varieties of maize adapted to farming conditions in Mexico. CIMMYT has also offered training to more than 50 Mexican seed companies that commercialize the improved seed in target areas. Sustainable intensification helps farmers achieve the yield potential of the improved seeds.

It is important to manage expectations of funding partners who are often eager to report outstanding results in terms of number of farmers reached or yield increases achieved. Agricultural research for sustainable development projects takes time to gain momentum, and to attract the attention of farmers who are often skeptical about new agricultural practices or disappointed by publicly funded programs that have failed in the past. Farmers are often reluctant to innovate because they have much at stake. If a crop cycle fails they loose their annual income so innovation must be gradual and participatory. MasAgro has succeded in overcoming risk aversion by promoting a gradual and incremental change on farmers' plots. Participant farmers first adopt sustainable intensification practices on a fraction of their land to compare its performance with the rest of the conventionally managed plot. In this way they also gain experience with sustainable farming and confidence to gradually extend the use of the new management system. Farmers must have access to expert advice to succeed. 

Resilience

A food forest is designed to be resilient towards environmental change in order to fulfill the goal of being sustainable. Resilience stresses the ability to 1) sustain the community when no external resource is accessible and 2) recover from disturbances such as climate change, destruction or vandalism.

 

The way resilience works is to a) maximize autonomy in water, nutrients, energy, and food and b) keep the environment and people healthy. The Beacon Food Forest is equipped with a rainwater collector and compost bins to store water and generate nutrients from onsite organic matters such as leaf litter, branches, and green manures. Although we do not have solar panels or wind turbines, our energy lies within the community who contributes their manpower. With the above, we can slowly accomplish food autonomy and sustain the local community.

 

Keeping the environment and people healthy is the key to allow for quick recovery. The Beacon Food Forest practices permaculture gardening to keep chemicals out of the land and the land productive at any time so that when faced with destructive events, plants may grow back within the shortest time frame.

1. Water autonomy using rainwater collector.

2. Nutrient autonomy using compost bins to compost onsite organic matter.

3. Make the plants collaborate and help each other through companion planting and tree guilds.

4. Maintain an active group of volunteers of all ages to ensure sufficient manpower.

Luckily, we have not experienced any destructive events that may test our resilience. Nevertheless, as the Beacon Food Forest is open to harvest by anyone who has the need, we were sometimes faced with similar situations, such as all ripe fruits of a tree gone in a single night. Although we have been educating ourselves that all harvest belongs to the public, most people still felt upset in such situations. Yet, people have also learned to mentally detach themselves from the harvest to minimize their sense of loss, knowing that the fruits would grow as long as the tree is alive. We happily see this as a realization of resilience.

 

It takes time for a food forest to mature and become fully resilient. As of 2018, we still rely partially on municipal water due to the insufficiency amount of rainwater collected. The full design map of the Beacon Food Forest is 7-acres large and we have only developed 2 acres. We hope that by developing the full 7-acres, we may raise our percentage of food autonomy to at least 5%, which would probably be more than that of any large city in the U.S.