Biodiversity Conservation Activities with the Participation of Islanders

Through the efforts of the government, local government, and local residents, the Amami Islands were designated as a NP in 2017. 
Subsequently, the extermination of non-native species such as mongoose and wild cat etc. became a challenge in maintaining the island's biodiversity in preparation for the registration as a World Natural Heritage site, and preserving the unique natural environment that forms the basis of the island's environmental culture.  The mongoose, the biggest challenge of all, has been exterminated under the government's initiative and will be completely eliminated by 2024. Meanwhile, measures against wild cats and monitoring of non-native plants were carried out with the cooperation of Kagoshima University, the Ministry of the Environment, local governments, and local residents. In the case of wild cat countermeasures, precedents from overseas were introduced and considerations for owners in their daily lives were shared. In terms of invasive plant monitoring, continuous training sessions for local residents have been held to improve their capabilities and share the results.
 

  • Shared awareness of the crisis:
    Islanders and municipalities were able to share an awareness of the problem of familiar wild cats and invasive alien plants as a threat to the natural environment, which is the basis of World Natural Heritage and environmental culture.
     
  • Community ownership:
    It is important to share the challenge that invasive species are a local problem.
     
  • Sharing of results:
    For continued efforts, it is necessary to maintain motivation through the sharing of results.
     
Trials

On-station trials

In a series of experiments conducted at the National Aquaculture Center in Domasi, the project team tested the trap for intermittent harvest with different baits in ponds (200 m2) stocked with different species (Coptodon Rendalli vs. Oreochromis Shiranus) at different densities (1 vs. 2 vs. 3 fish per sqm.). In addition, further tests were carried out to determine the time and intervals it takes to catch a certain amount of fish. As a control and for comparison, additional ponds were stocked with O. Shiranus and C. Rendalli fed with maize bran or pellets for single batch harvest to represent customary forms of rural aquaculture in Malawi.

On-farm trials

At the time when the trap was technically functional, households that wanted to test the trap under every day, real-life conditions were identified. Over three months, six households tested the trap and documented the catch.

Funding and professional development training

For many conservationists, including our participants, the knowledge to effectively use conservation technology is not enough without the funding to access the tools. Recognizing this barrier, we provide each participant with $500 USD in seed funding to help them implement their conservation solutions. Additionally, we offer training in grant writing, pitching, and engaging with funders to enhance their ability to secure future funding.

  • Support from donors who fund seed grants 
  • Students are required to submit two updates and a financial report for their grant. Ensuring follow-up on these submissions requires dedicated effort and engagement from the core team  
  • Students have reported that being able to list the seed funding received through our program on their CVs has helped them secure additional funding opportunities in the future.
Hands-on engagement

For our technical training, we prioritize activities that allow students to directly interact with conservation technology tools. By setting up and deploying tools in safe, low-pressure environments, students have the opportunity to make mistakes and learn from those experiences. For example, letting students decide where to place a camera trap based on a lesson, and then evaluating the effectiveness of their decision by reviewing the data collected, is highly valuable. 

  • Access to technology tools at host institution for practical use 
  • Opportunities for students to trial and test tools themselves
  • Experience instructors to provide guidance and support 
  • When paired with supporting background information, we have found these hands-on experiences to be more impactful than traditional lectures or merely observing technology in use 
  • Providing opportunities to engage with the entire lifecycle of a technology (e.g., from set up and deployment to data collection and analysis) better prepares students for using these technologies in their own projects
Focus on early career potential

We select participants who are at the beginning stages of their careers, such as those who have completed their bachelor’s degrees and are entering the NGO or conservation workforce or embarking on higher education.The goal is to identify participants whose careers would benefit the most from the type and amount of training, funding, mentorship, and support we provide. 

  • Strong networks with local academic institutions and regional NGOs help us attract a large pool of qualified applicants (~200 applications per year)
  • Tailored educational materials that align with the needs of early-career participants
  • Community of same-stage participants form strong and enduring connections 
  • Initially, we included participants at various career stages, but we found that older, more experienced individuals have different needs and require a distinct program tailored to their experience level
  • Our entry-level training materials were less useful for women with more experience in the field
  • Over the past two years, we’ve recruited at least one participant without formal education but with extensive on-the-ground experience. These individuals have thrived in the program, highlighting an opportunity to further cater to this audience in future iterations.
Core training materials

To support our upskilling objectives across different contexts, we have developed a core portfolio of training materials. These materials focus on teaching fundamental competencies and are organized into themed modules (e.g., wildlife protection, human-wildlife conflict). Depending on the local context, we select the most relevant modules and training topics. Our locally recruited mentors and trainers are then encouraged to adapt these materials based on their specific expertise and background.

  • Multiple years of programming have allowed us to refine and improve our training materials
  • Annual participant feedback helps guide the development of new topics 
  • Host institutions and local partners provide valuable input on the most relevant training needs
  • Asking local trainers develop their own materials often exceeds their time and capacity 
  • Using standardized materials ensures consistency and reduces variability in the type and depth of content delivered
Mentors, trainers, and allies

Our goal is that our core portfolio of standardized training materials are delivered by female experts recruited from the local region, who we further engage in mentoring and leadership activities. By centering these role models throughout our programming, we provide our participants with a vision of their future careers. We strive to foster an inclusive environment for honest dialogue and encourage ongoing mentorship even after the program concludes. However, the very gender gap we aim to address often presents a challenge when it comes to recruiting female educators and role models for our programs. This situation has helped us to differentiate three leadership roles: “mentors” (female role models, who participate in training and mentorship), “allies” (male trainers and facilitators), and “trainers” (support from international organizing team). Participation of each to these types of individuals is critical to develop and support our participants.

  • Keen interest from female leaders to foster the next generation of conservationists, including willingness to engage honestly in vulnerable conversations and provide career advice 
  • Growing interest from allies to support development of women in their field and organizations 
  • Funding to support attendance and honorarium for high-quality mentors and allies 
  • We have established a code of conduct and set clear expectations up-front on how mentors and allies should engage with students during and after the program 
  • Mentors and allies with a background in training as well as expertise in conservation tech are preferred 
  • Wherever possible, we seek a combination of mid-career and established mentors, who can speak to participants about different stages of the conservation career journey 
  • Male allies need to be carefully selected to create a supportive, safe environment 
  • We maintain and cultivate female-only spaces at the workshop where male allies and trainers are not allowed 
Verify

Community rangeland monitors are selected by the village grazing committees to conduct monthly monitoring of the selected plots. Monitors receive training on best practices in data collection, as well as data input and interpretation protocols. Plots are located and confirmed via the Collector application for ArcGIS. Monitoring data is input into Survey123 and submitted to a cloud-based server hosted by Esri. Data collection focuses on understanding grazing quality via greenness and percentage of bare ground; grazing availability via grass height; and change in availability via percentage grazed. Monitors also record the frequency of invasive species and take a picture of the plot to report to the village grazing committee. 

The data for each plot is analyzed in real time via the ArcGIS Dashboard. The rangeland monitors and grazing and pastoralist committees have access to their dashboards so that they can view their pasture quality data and trends at any time. 

Monitoring and evaluation for evidence-based practice and sustainability

This building block emphasises community participation in monitoring, utilising citizen science and accessible data platforms to ensure local knowledge informs adaptive management and contributes to the long-term success of mangrove restoration.

Effective monitoring and evaluation is necessary for adaptive management and long-term success in mangrove restoration. In implementing CBEMR, Wetlands International developed a restoration plan with clearly defined goals and objectives aligned with measurable and relevant indicators.

To ensure accurate and consistent data collection, a variety of methods were employed, including surveys, field observations, remote sensing, and the use of the Mangrove Restoration Tracker Tool. This tool, integrated with the Global Mangrove Watch platform, provided a standardised framework for documenting and tracking restoration progress, facilitating learning and information exchange among practitioners. 

Strengthening the capacities of mangrove champions from Lamu and Tana counties through standardised CBEMR trainings and tools provided for the integration of citizen science initiatives in mangrove restoration monitoring.  

Creating platforms for community feedback and input such as the national and sub-national mangrove management committees ensures that local knowledge and perspectives are incorporated into adaptive management strategies. By using monitoring data to inform decision-making and adapt project strategies, restoration efforts such as those in Kitangani and Pate restoration sites have been continuously improved to maximise effectiveness and achieve long-term success.

In implementing the CBEMR approach in Kenya, we have learned the following: 

  • Adaptive management is key: Monitoring data has allowed for ongoing learning and adaptation of restoration strategies based on observed outcomes.
  • Community involvement is necessary: Engaging communities who interact with the ecosystem on a daily basis in monitoring restoration efforts strengthens ownership and ensures that local knowledge informs decision-making.
  • Data accessibility and transparency are essential: Sharing monitoring results with stakeholders promotes accountability and facilitates collaboration and cross-learning. 
  • Long-term monitoring is necessary: Tracking progress over time provides valuable insights into the long-term impacts of restoration efforts.
NoArk's Building Blocks

The building blocks of NoArk's solution are interconnected to create a comprehensive, efficient system for conservation and environmental management. Bio-acoustic and chemical sensors collect critical ecological data, while Edge AI processing ensures rapid, on-site analysis, enabling immediate detection and response. These components are supported by LoRaWAN connectivity, which facilitates reliable, long-range communication in remote areas. The processed data is centralized on the PAMS dashboard, where it is visualized and analyzed for actionable insights, fostering better decision-making.

This system is strengthened by hyperlocal climate data, which enhances precision in risk assessments and planning. Finally, community and stakeholder engagement ensures the data and tools are effectively utilized, promoting collaboration and adaptability. Together, these elements form an integrated solution that empowers conservation efforts, addresses ecological threats, and supports sustainable development.

The purpose of the building blocks in NoArk’s solution is to create an integrated and scalable system for addressing ecological, social, and economic challenges. Each building block plays a unique role and works in harmony with the others to deliver impactful outcomes.

How Each Building Block Works  

1. Bio-Acoustic and Chemical Sensors
  - Purpose: To monitor ecological and environmental health.  
  - How it Works: These sensors detect specific sounds (chainsaws, wildlife movement) and measure air and water quality, providing real-time data on biodiversity and pollution levels.  

2. Edge AI and IoT Integration
  - Purpose: To process data locally for faster decision-making.  
  - How it Works: Edge AI analyzes data directly on the devices, reducing reliance on cloud processing. IoT connectivity ensures data is transmitted securely and efficiently.  

3. LoraWAN Connectivity
  - Purpose: To enable cost-efficient, long-range communication.  
  - How it Works: LoraWAN ensures sensor data is transmitted over long distances with minimal power consumption, making it suitable for remote deployment.  

4. PAMS Dashboard
  - Purpose: To centralize and visualize data for actionable insights.  
  - How it Works: The dashboard aggregates data from all devices, providing tools for predictive analytics, real-time monitoring, and decision support.  

5. Hyperlocal Climate Data
  - Purpose: To support precise, localized interventions.  
  - How it Works: Sensors generate accurate, auditable data that informs risk assessments, conservation planning, and disaster management.  

6. Community and Stakeholder Engagement
  - Purpose: To ensure effective implementation and adoption of the system.  
  - How it Works: Partnerships with local communities, researchers, and decision-makers foster collaboration, capacity-building, and long-term sustainability.

Enabling Factors


- Technological Infrastructure: Reliable sensors, robust AI, and IoT technologies enable seamless data collection and processing.  
- Partnerships and Collaboration: Engagement with local communities, governments, and research organizations ensures the system is tailored to specific needs.  
- Scalability: LoraWAN and modular design allow deployment in diverse ecosystems and scaling to larger projects.  
- Sustainability: The system’s low power requirements and stakeholder involvement ensure long-term functionality and impact.  

These enabling factors ensure the building blocks work cohesively to deliver a holistic, impactful solution for conservation and environmental management.

Conditions Important for Success  

1. Reliable Technological Infrastructure  
  - High-quality sensors, robust Edge AI, and IoT systems are essential for accurate and timely data collection and processing.  

2. Strong Connectivity
  - LoraWAN or similar long-range, low-power communication systems are critical to ensure seamless data transmission in remote or challenging environments.  

3. Stakeholder Engagement  
  - Collaboration with local communities, governments, and researchers ensures the solution is contextually relevant, widely accepted, and effectively implemented.  

4. Scalability and Modularity
  - Designing systems that can scale and adapt to various ecosystems and environmental challenges is key to broader impact and replication.  

5. Sustainability Planning  
  - Developing low-power solutions, clear funding strategies, and community-driven maintenance plans ensures long-term functionality.  

6. Capacity Building
  - Training stakeholders, including local communities and enforcement agencies, to utilize and interpret the system’s data enhances the effectiveness of the solution.  

Lessons Learned

1. Adaptability is Critical
  - Each deployment requires customization to address local ecological, social, and economic conditions effectively.  

2. Community Involvement Drives Success
  - Engaging local stakeholders early fosters ownership, increases trust, and enhances adoption.  

3. Robust Data Systems Improve Decision-Making
  - Providing accurate, auditable, and traceable data builds credibility with decision-makers and supports informed interventions.  

4. Connectivity Challenges Must Be Addressed
  - Remote deployments need reliable communication systems like LoraWAN to ensure uninterrupted data flow.  

5. Integration of Multi-Sensor Inputs Enhances Impact
  - Combining bio-acoustic and chemical sensors with climate data creates a comprehensive understanding of ecological challenges, enabling holistic solutions.  

6. Continuous Feedback Loops Improve Performance  
  - Iterative updates based on field experience and stakeholder feedback optimize system performance and impact.  

By meeting these conditions and applying lessons learned, NoArk’s solution ensures effective implementation and significant positive outcomes for conservation and environmental management.