WSR Nomination Process

Each year, Save The Waves accepts one new World Surfing Reserve from surf communities all around the world. The application process requires significant work from local communities and their inquiry is based on the following core criteria: 

 

1) Quality and consistency of the wave(s);

2) Important environmental characteristics;

3) Culture and surf history;

4) Governance capacity and local support;

5) Priority Conservation Area

 

Each application is reviewed by an indepedent Vision Council made up of professionals in the conservation, business, nonprofit, and surf fields. Once the World Surfing Reserve is selected based on the rigorous criteria, they undergo the Stewardship Planning Process and the other building blocks to formally dedicate the World Surfing Reserve.

  • Score highly in the WSR criteria (see above)
  • Excellent local support and capacity to carry out conservation projects
  • Excellent communication between Save The Waves and the applying World Surfing Reserve
  • Local support is absolutely essential in a successful application
  • A diverse set of stakeholder involvement is needed for the program
Stewardship Planning Process

A Local Stewardship Council (LSC) is the main representative of a World Surfing Reserve and is in charge of implementing the Local Stewardship Plan. The LSC works together with Save The Waves Coalition to Protect, Steward, and Defend their surf ecosystem.

 

LSC members work on the ground and with the local community to carry out activities that result in the long-term conservation of the reserve as well as celebrate and honor the tradition of surfing and ocean recreation.  The Stewardship Planning Process brings together the LSC and important community members to map out the the critical threats to the region and come up with long term goals and objectives for permanent protection.  

 

The Stewardship Planning Process generally follows the outline in "Measures of Success" that includes building a Conceptual Model, developing a management plan that identifies goals, objectives, actions and timelines based on the threats to address.

Enabling Factors include:

 

  • A well developed Local Stewardship Council
  • Support from the local government or municipality
  • Maps of the region and coastline
  • A well developed inventory of threats to the environment
  • A comfortable physical meeting space

Our lessons learned from this project include:

 

  • Relationship building between the stakeholders is key
An adapted technology co-designed with women seaweed producers

The tubular nets technology was co-designed with women producers themselves to ensure it was adapted to their needs and became theirs.

Several tests were necessary to determine the optimal length of the nets (15m instead of 30m), and how to harvest them (opening them to remove the seaweed instead of cutting the seaweed outgrowth). This ensured the nets were adapted to the women's needs. 

 

Participatory hands-on trials with the producers themselves enabled building handling capacity.

Responsibilisation of the women producers for monitoring the results of the different net configurations enabled appropriation of the innovation. 

Close relations of the Sea PoWer team with the producers enabled to build trust and hope in the new technology.

The vast knowledge of the Sea PoWer team about seaweed production and the Zanzibar marine environment enabled to quickly propose suitable alternative modifications.

Giving responsibilities and a stake in the trials to the end users was crucial to build ownership and confidence in the use of the tubular net innovation.

Accounting for factors indirectly related to the handling of the technology itself, for example, need to know the marine environment (tides, depths), and need to master additional equipment and practices (working from a boat) was also important.

Planning for the Future

In 2020, CORAL and the Polo’s Water Board commissioned a third-party consultant to assess the WWTP's performance and necessary improvements. Identifying improvement areas to achieve continued compliance with high water quality standards and a wastewater treatment capacity for the projected population growth of the greater West End area and its tourism industry until the year 2040.

 

The result is an investment gap of approximately USD 300,000.00. However, phased investment is considered in the fundraising strategy.

 

Projected Investments (currently in fundraising stage)

By 2022: Replacements in the aeration system, going from aerator pumps to a fine bubble diffuser system.  

By 2030: Addition of a new anoxic tank for denitrification.

By 2040: Addition of a new decanter and mechanical sludge dehydrator. 

The projection for 2040 is based on population growth/requirements as a tourist destination/compliance with national & international water quality regulations). The estimated average daily flow will be 612 m3/day. 

  • Polo's Water Board has established strong partnerships with organizations such as CORAL and MARFund, which have collaborated by funding previous repairs and improvements.
  • These multistakeholder alliances for sanitation and wastewater treatment can open the door for new partners and provide access to diverse funding opportunities. 
  • Non-profits and local organizations are gaining more experience in diversifying funding sources.
  • It is critical to conduct third-party assessments to identify the status of the infrastructure, improvement areas, and the need for future investments.
  • Communities and plant operators should not be discouraged by the scale of their wastewater treatment investment needs. These mark the way forward towards successful management and the continued improvement of the project.
  • Creating and maintaining strong alliances are pivotal to find solutions for technical and financial needs. 
Establishing strong partnership

Partnership in the recycling industry enhances success in the business. Arena's recycling industry duty is to collect plastic wastes as raw materials which is why they have been able to enter into a partnership with Coca-Cola because they have common goals and interests. Coca-Cola is producing a lot of plastic packaging items which are raw materials for Arena. Likewise, Arena is in the process of establishing collaboration with all the companies that produce plastic products. The aim is to enter into an agreement that all the garbage produced at any of their events must come to Arena.

Arena and Coca-cola both have the responsibility to care for the environment. Arena recycling industry has the capacity to consume plastics in large quantities because one brick consumes tons of plastics because it is made of 60%  plastic. Hence Coca-cola is assured that all the plastic materials they produce will be recycled.

The things we learned in partnership with Coca-cola is that we get the raw materials easily, and then when you make a partnership there is something called branding so we promote each other in the sense that we all are responsible for the environment and we get the branding of our company.

Space for reflexivity

A diagnostic and reflexive approach on values, knowledge and expectations at individual level is a useful baseline to prepare the group interactions and to balance representativeness and synergies in pluralistic settings

  • Meeting individuals “where they are” and encouraging them to reflect what they would bring (in terms of defended values and knowledge) to a group deliberative setting may enhance their long-term engagement and contribute to building collective capacity for mosaic landscape management;
  • Similarly, upfront asking participants who will be engaged in knowledge co-creation about their expectations from the process, i.e. expectation management, may increase participation.
  • In situations of values plurality and participatory decision-making it is more appropriate to adopt an adaptive and reflexive approach that recognises knowledge is intertwined with values and that they are mutually co-creating each other;
  • To navigate consensus, dissensus and inclusivity in multifunctional landscapes it is useful to plan for a collaborative process that alternates between consensus building and plurality recognition; in other words, reaching consensus should not be done at the expense of excluding certain viewpoints. This needs to be mentioned transparently, as agreement may not be favoured over the expression of value plurality;
  • An individual-based reflective inquiry of values and knowledge can be a relevant part of planning a multistage collaborative process towards sustainability outcomes.
  • More reflexive approaches to protected area management may enhance inclusive processes by allowing for different value and knowledge systems to co-exist.
Preferences, priorities, problem identification and tentative solutions – mapping system knowledge, target knowledge and transformative knowledge

Eliciting perspectives and systems understandings from a larger group of people in a systematic way to better understand the key issues that the process is framed around. Key issues are useful entry points to start entangling system dynamics - What are useful entry points in your case and to whom? This phase also asks the question of what is already known about the system by the stakeholders and what are uncertainties according to the stakeholders?

  • The iterative online survey offers a way to synthesize existing knowledge without actually meeting, online or in person.
  • The Delphi survey design helps bypass challenges in different actor preferences for how to collaborate, the perceived importance given to different issues and the practical circumstances of their involvement (e.g. professionally or privately). These differences may make it difficult (or impossible) to find a format, time, topic and language that suits everyone.
  • Complementary activities, like open ended interviews or discussions with a reference group not involved in the survey, can help clarify what information you have and what is missing.
  • Finding a unifying and specific vision for a complex landscape is hard. Identifying multiple points of common interest and a broad target like ‘liveable countryside’ can serve as a more realistic starting point for moving forward.
Harvesting fish responsibly - strategies in two regions of Mexico

A harvesting strategy is a set of formally or traditionally agreed upon tools used to ensure good utilization of the resource. In the fish fishery, it is a challenge to define these strategies and evaluate whether they work or not, since this activity usually involves a large number of species with different biological characteristics.

In order to identify the capture strategies used in the fish fishery, a fishery monitoring system was implemented through logbooks. These include information on catches, effort, fishing gear, and catch size and weight. The information collected in the logbooks is analyzed every six months to learn about the fishery and identify opportunities for improvement. Two examples of improvements made by fishing communities have been to modify the fishing gear in order to have a more selective fishery. They have also decided to establish minimum catch size agreements for fish species. This information recorded by the fishermen is shared with the government sector in order to have more information to know the state of the fisheries and define sustainable management strategies.

  1. Incorporate the empirical knowledge of fishermen and fisherwomen in the generation of the baseline on capture strategies.
  2. Generate and share knowledge on the biology of the species caught.
  3. Support the formalization of the capture strategies of the fishing community, when they are not recognized by the government sector.
  4. Achieve collaboration between scientific research and traditional knowledge to generate adequate capture strategies and contribute to their compliance.
  1. Implementing fishery monitoring allows us to identify opportunities for improvement in the fishery and to see if its implementation is working properly.
  2. Slight modifications in fishing gear, based on the traditional knowledge of the communities, can have a great impact, both positive and negative, on fish populations and the ecosystem.
  3. Given the lack of information on the life cycle of the exploited species, it is necessary to generate this knowledge in the area of exploitation in order to have more robust results. In the meantime, precautionary measures should be taken.
  4. The harvesting strategy can be adapted to external factors (environmental, social and economic).
  5. A successful harvest strategy established by a fishing organization, and documented as an internal agreement, serves as a baseline for the generation of an official harvest strategy.
Guías para decisores políticos y partes interesadas

La PEM aporta un enfoque de gobernanza oceánica integrado, novedoso a nivel de la Macaronesia. La decisión política y la participación pública son elementos fundamentales en esta política, que necesita del entendimiento de la PEM tanto a nivel de cada archipiélago como a escala transfronteriza.

 

Las guías de PEM de la Macaronesia europea pretenden informar y apoyar respectivamente a decisores políticos y partes interesadas en su importante papel en la PEM, incluyendo su participación activa en la preparación y desarrollo de los planes. Ambas guías hacen un repaso sintético de varios elementos importantes en esta materia:

  • La Macaronesia como región biogeográfica y sus componentes clave;
  • La PEM como política emergente;
  • El marco legal de la PEM en España y Portugal;
  • Los contenidos fundamentales de los planes de cada región;
  • Desafíos y oportunidades que presenta la Macaronesia.

 

Las guías también aportan información sobre los beneficios que conlleva participar en el proceso para los actores, así como los principios que orientan la toma de decisiones. Por último, se proporcionan recomendaciones de futuro para la participación y la toma de decisiones en Azores, Madeira y Canarias a partir de lo aprendido durante el proyecto.

  • Cooperación con el resto de los equipos del consorcio en la elaboración de las guías.
  • Revisión de contenidos por parte de las autoridades competentes de PEM de cada archipiélago, asegurando la veracidad de las informaciones.
  • Participación en talleres de PEM con las partes interesadas para presentar las guías y obtener aportaciones de los participantes. Esto creó la base para una buena parte de las recomendaciones incluidas en las guías.
  • Los proyectos sobre temáticas novedosas necesitan de documentos de carácter divulgativo. En éstos se requiere un esfuerzo sintético para poder alcanzar y ayudar a su público objetivo. Generalmente los decisores políticos y agentes socioeconómicos no disponen de tiempo o interés para leer informes extensos.
  • La ilustración y diseño de este tipo de guías son clave para hacerlas atractivas e invitar a su lectura.
  • Las guías deben ser traducidas a la lengua maternan de cada país, en este caso español y portugués, para alcanzar el mayor público posible.
  • Los proyectos piloto deben mostrar cierta flexibilidad a la hora de abordar sus entregables para poder adaptarlos a las necesidades reales y cambiantes a lo largo del tiempo.
Building local partnerships

People who live in the Denali region are connected by their shared appreciation for the landscape, resulting in tight-knit communities. For the project to succeed, it was important that the research team establish a mutual understanding and trust based on local partnerships. These relationships have helped to ground the project in a relevant and regional context, provide insight into what matters most to local residents, and guide various phases of the project:

 

  1. A local Executive Committee consisting of ten stakeholders who represent a diversity of perspectives from the region was formed to build local partnerships.
  2. The project hired a local resident to be a research technician and community advocate for the project to assist with data collection, entry, project design, information dissemination, and communicating research findings.
  3. A series of informal interviews and listening sessions were conducted to start the process of creating a shared understanding of change within the Denali region.

Demonstrated time and commitment from project representatives were critical for establishing partnership building as an active process. Additionally, team leaders already had conducted previous research in the area and formed several relationships that demonstrated their ties to the area, as well as long-term investments in facilitating discussions about landscape change. 

The importance of ongoing time, attention, and support that goes into building and maintaining partnerships cannot be overstated. The relationships that were initially built at the onset of the project require continual nurturing and cannot be viewed as a "checkmark" to move on from. Building partnerships also means being sensitive and responsive to locals’ ‘seasons’ in the year, for example, not asking to meet too often when it is a busy hunting or harvesting time of the year, even if this does not correspond to the busy times in the academic or management year. Additionally, efforts to build trust with different communities should likewise be approached with varying strategies. For example, something as simple as buying a cup of coffee at a locally owned business demonstrates reciprocity and investment into the well-being of the community.