Securing private sector support for a joint vision for the conservation of protected forests

Engaging the private sector in support of the Collective Statement of Intent required a solid understanding of company risks (reputation, market, operational, legal) associated with sourcing coffee linked to deforestation. This required an understanding of existing private sector sustainability efforts and their challenges in order to identify innovative solutions. There is limited demand for traceable and certified coffee, and companies recognize that completing full ‘to source’ traceability assessments for individual supply chains is prohibitively expensive. Using a collective responsibility approach, as established by the 'Collective Statement of Intent', committed companies can work collaboratively and with other stakeholders to pool resources. This represents a cost-effective way for companies to reduce both their operational costs and reputational risk, while effectively and proactively tackling deforestation and supporting biodiversity conservation in BBSNP.

The significant momentum around sustainability and deforestation-free supply chains globally has been a key enabling factor. In addition, an initial campaign highlighted the links between coffee companies and deforestation. Many companies therefore have sustainability commitments and are aware of the need to address their sourcing risks. Securing the buy-in of companies at all supply chain stages has been critical to securing the buy in of others and to the notion of collective responsibility. 

Securing the buy-in of all companies sourcing from the landscape is a challenge. The initiative is supported by companies representing 60% of the region's robusta market and efforts to secure support from the wider market are ongoing, including through supplier engagement by committed companies. A solid understanding of supply chain risks and existing sustainability efforts has been essential to securing private sector support and to ensuring clear recommendations on next steps for joint solutions. One-on-one company engagement, both at headquarter and local level, as well as smaller group discussions, have been critical to understanding the priorities and perspectives of different stakeholders while multi-stakeholder engagement has been essential to progress and building trust.

Tri-sector partnership building

In order to define the Conservation Agreement, the partners adapted and applied the model of Tri-sector partnership building. The model helps build alliances between sectors with diverse interests aimed at promoting local sustainable development initiatives. In this case, we involed the community of Aripao, the company Givaudan, the buyer of the non-timber products from the forest and Phynatura, the organization of support and articulation.

For this block to be successful, an effective communication process was necessary, indicating the priorities and commitments of each sector and generating capacities in those members who needed tools in the negotiation processes. Given that sarrapia is the product on which the alliance is based, it was clear from the beginning that the preservation of the forest and traditional knowledge were elements for which all sectors had to work.

The tri-sector alliance depended on the construction of basic consensus among government authorities, civil society organizations and private companies, around priority issues or social issues for the three stakeholders. The success of strategies linked to sustainable development is facilitated when each sector knows its function making easier that communities that depend on natural resources to build sustainable livelihoods.

City Core Revitalization

The city applied a variety of capital improvement projects and urban operation schemes for city core revitalization. A centerpiece of the revitalization package is the development of Grand Plaza – a major social open space equipped with audio-visual amenities for various events and covered by a high-ceiling glass roof under all-weather conditions, in particular to deal with Toyama’s heavy snowfall climate. The city also established a 24-hour bicycle-sharing system by placing 17 bike stations with a private operator in the city core district. A central marketplace and local community facilities were constructed through the unique redevelopment schemes and incentive arrangement.

  • Development of a centric multifunctional facility to attract citizens and visitors (Grand Plaza)
  • Consideration to local climate and environment in the facility design

The key to the success of the city core revitalization is the wide variety of activity offerings suited for all generations, with due attention to the socially vulnerable, e.g. elderly, children, expecting mothers. The LRT supports this by providing direct and safe access from homes for this cohort of the population as well.

Promotion of New Township along the Public Transit Corridors

The city designated 436 hectares for an urban core district, 19 public transit corridors (including both light rail transit and bus lines), and 3,489 hectares for residential promotion areas along the corridors, for which special subsidies became available for qualified home builders, new housing owners, and multi-family apartment residents. Consequently, the number of new residential properties along the promoted transit lines increased 1.32 times for the period of 2004 to 2009.

  • Financial incentives for home owners along the public transit corridors
  • Commercial facilities, schools, hospitals etc. available within walking distance from public transit nodes and stations

Toyama's approach to attract development along the public transit corridors proved successful especially when this was backed by financial incentives. This in turn has led to indirectly disincentivising living in city fringe areas.

Reinvestment in Public Transit

The city introduced Japan’s first light rail transit (LRT), called PORTRAM, by utilizing the former JR Toyama-port line’s right of way accompanied by the extension of bullet train services to Toyama Station. The PORTRAM system with barrier-free stations and low-floor vehicles over the operation length of 7.6 km can smoothly carry elderly and disabled passengers to a variety of city destinations and bring wider environmental benefits, such as reduction in noise, air pollution, and CO2 emissions, to the whole city. Importantly, innovative project finance schemes were applied to split the roles of railway construction and system operation between public and private partners for the Toyama LRT. The public sector covers all the construction cost of the LRT system, including vehicles, railways, and depots, and the maintenance cost of these facilities, whereas the transit operator founded by several local governments and private companies recovers operation costs from fare revenues. The city filled the capital funding gap by arranging the national government’s road improvement programs and contributions from transit companies and by saving land acquisition costs with the former JR railway’s right of way.

  • Attention to universal accessibility for all
  • Innovative project finance schemes for public-private partnership
  • Sufficient funding support from the city

Caveat of applying this approach is that specifically for the Toyama case, the city had sufficient funds to cover construction cost of the LRT system, including vehicles, railways, and depots, and the maintenance cost of these facilities. Utilizing  right of ways of previous public transport systems can also be useful.

Availability of Data

Three types of data were particularly important in the design and promotion of the “Program for Earthquake-Resistant School Buildings”: school data, data on damages, and data on hazard risks. School data was collected by surveys and investigations conducted by FDMA and MEXT. A list of the surveys is indicated below.

  • School Basic Survey (annually since 1948) to collect basic data.
  • Public School Facilities Survey (annually since 1954) to collect building area and conditions of school facilities.
  • Status of Seismic Resistance of Public School Facilities (annually since 2002) to collect data on the seismic resistance of school structures as well as suspended ceilings of gymnasiums and other nonstructural elements of school buildings.

Earthquake Damage Investigation (after each mega-disaster such as the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake and the Great East Japan Earthquake) to collect damage to buildings, specifically the kind of damage suffered by various types of buildings, the location where the damage occurred and under what circumstances, and the kind of earthquake that caused the damage.

Building on experiences

One of the biggest instigators for developing and promoting school retrofitting is the past experiences of earthquakes. The 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake triggered the development of the program’s comprehensive guidelines, and the program gained momentum after the 2004 Chuetsu Earthquake and 2008 Sichuan Earthquake in China which caused the collapse of 6,898 school buildings and 19,065 deaths of schoolchildren. This prompted MEXT officials to pass the revised Act on Special Measures for Earthquake Disaster Countermeasures, which supported additional national subsidies toward the school retrofitting and reconstruction program. The 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake prompted the program to give higher priority to nonstructural elements and highlighted the need for tsunami countermeasures and functional improvements of schools as evacuation centers. Learning from each disaster event and applying the lessons learned to the improvement of the systems has contributed to ensuring the seismic safety of public schools.

  • Identification of the need to prioritize the subject through national policy.
  • The political will to make improvements to policies to achieve a goal.

Political will and interest to identify the retrofitting of schools as a priority initiative was essential for the national government to take measures to improve its systems and policies building on experiences. The constant effort to promote the retrofitting program was in part induced by politicians’ interest in both humanitarian and economic reasons. In a culture that prioritizes human life, a policy for making schools earthquake-resistant has the aim of saving the lives of schoolchildren. The policy also is considered an effective investment that contributes to local economies and produces tangible results that are well-received by the public.

Implementation of climate smart agriculture methods

The Maya Mountain North Forest Reserve Concession utilizes climate smart agriculture such as agro-forestry and Inga-alley cropping. Both of these methods combine agriculture with conservation of trees to create a sustainable land-use system, which increases carbon sequestration and crop yield. In addition, Inga-alley cropping uses species such as Inga edulis and Inga fueillei (leguminous, nitrogen-fixing trees) to improve soil health and reduce use of herbicides. With the preservation of permanent shade trees, and the planting of temporary shade trees and fruit trees, the cyclical production of the farm provides a sustainable yield that maximizes all products on the land. Planting Inga trees in rows supports a healthy yield of integrated fruit trees that are nurtured by the improved soil fertility provided from Inga species. This system reduces the amount of land needed for planting and provides valuable secondary uses like firewood, mulch and pest control.

The acquisition of the agro-forestry concession granted access to 936 acres for cacao-based agriculture within the Maya Mountain North Forest Reserve. Areas for planting were chosen using remote sensing to identify land that had already been used in the past. In addition a new set of roads/trails were built to provide access to the concession.

 

A clear idea of climate smart agricultural methods is needed before implementation. Training/workshops for farmers is vital to properly implement these methods.

Ya’axché has learned that the future success of the concession means that research into shade management and yields will need to be done to maintain good practices.

 

Community ownership of adaptation measures based on ecosystems and biodiversity

Communities took ownership of the following EbA measures once prioritized and implemented in a participatory manner in the basin:

  1. Restoration of riparian forests. Binational reforestation events are held involving local communities and schools. These efforts reduce erosion, mitigate the risk of floods, and reinforce cross-border cooperation and local empowerment, including youth. The sustainability of this action is integrated into a reforestation strategy for the middle basin.
  2. Integral farms / agroforestry systems. Practices are incorporated to manage ecosystem services and generate a high diversity of products (agricultural, forestry and energy). Soil conservation practices and a transition to agroforestry systems with crops and tree diversification, tropical orchards, sowing of basic grains and protein banks are promoted.
  3. Recovery and valuing of autochthonous seeds and varieties. Agrobiodiversity Fairs are organized to promote the conservation of genetic diversity (criollo seeds) and their traditional knowledge. The impact attributed to the Fair can be seen in the increases in: participation (exhibitors), diversity of species (> 220) and offer of value-added products.
  • The Agrobiodiversity Fair was born out of the need, identified by communities, to highlight the importance of genetic diversity for local livelihoods and adaptation.
  • Since its first organization in 2012, the Fair is becoming notorious, and consolidated, with the involvement of more and more institutions (indigenous associations; municipalities; government institutions such as ministries, institutes for rural development, learning or agricultural research; universities; and the CBCRS) as well as visitors.
  • Local wisdom relating to climate variability and extreme events, comes from traditional knowledge on resilience and adaptation, and is a key ingredient in building community responses to climate change.
  • Working with families was an effective model, as was the promotion of 9 demonstrative integral farms (replicated in 31 new farms). The integral farm produces a high diversity of products (agricultural, forestry and energy) and optimizes the management of natural resources. If it is framed at the landscape level, this production model consolidates the EbA approach and facilitates its scaling up.
  • The Agrobiodiversity Fair turned out to be a valuable space for producers; there they can create direct contacts for exchanging experiences, information and genetic material, and so there is a growing number of exhibitors that come from more and more communities.
  • The level of institutional commitment observed in the organizations involved, gives importance to the conservation and rescue of native seeds and their relationship with adaptation.
“Action learning” and monitoring to increase capacities and knowledge

In addition to training and supporting communities to implement EbA measures through their productive practices, the aim is to generate evidence on the benefits of these measures and create conditions for their sustainability and up scaling.

  • The socio-environmental vulnerability of 7 communities in the Sixaola River basin is examined in order to then identify and prioritize EbA measures.
  • Diagnoses are made (productive, socioeconomic and agro-ecological) to identify families with a commitment to transform their farms and select those with the greatest potential to become integral farms.
  • Technical support is provided to communities, complemented with traditional knowledge, to ensure that EbA measures contribute to food and water security.
  • Exchanges and training are organized for producers (men and women), indigenous authorities, youth and municipalities on climate change, food security, natural resource management, organic fertilizers and soil conservation.
  • Monitoring and evaluation is carried out to understand the benefits of EbA measures, and inform horizontal and vertical up-scaling.
  • Activities, such as the Agrobiodiversity Fair and binational reforestation events, are carried out collaboratively with local actors.
  • IUCN’s and ACBTC’s years of previous work with the local communities were a key enabling factor to ensure effective and inclusive participation processes, achieve a high level of ownership of EbA measures, and empower stakeholders (in this case, producers, community groups, municipalities and Ministries).
  • The binational agreement between Costa Rica and Panama (from 1979 and renewed in 1995) facilitates work at the binational level and inter-sectorial coordination, and endorses the Binational Commission for Sixaola that operates since 2011.
  • Self-diagnosis of vulnerabilities in the face of climate change (in this case, through the CRiSTAL methodology) is a powerful tool that allows communities to jointly prioritize what is most urgent and important and achieves greater collective benefits.
  • Applying the "action learning" approach at the community level allows for a better understanding of multiple concepts related to EbA and creates a community of practice that values and takes ownership of adaptation measures.
  • It is important to recognize the complementarity between scientific and traditional knowledge for the implementation of EbA measures.